David O. McKay Diaries – “Ezra Taft Benson”

Below you will find diary entries on the topic of “Ezra Taft Benson.” You can view other subjects here.

Search the diary entries below for specific dates, names, and keywords using the keyboard shortcut Command + F on a Mac or Control + F on Windows.

---

Fri., 7 Mar., 1947:

“Elder Ezra T. Benson of the Council of the Twelve called from Washington, D.C. and reported that there is a vacancy in the U.S. Court of Claims.  There are five judges in this Court, and only four are now serving–these are all Democrats.  Marvin Jones has been nominated by the President to serve as Chief Justice.

Brother Benson then stated that he has been urged by Senator Watkins, and others to see Marvin Jones in behalf of David Wilson’s nomination for this vacancy.  David Wilson is in Washington at the present time.  Brother Benson then stated that he has been urged by Senator Watkins, and others to see Marvin Jones in behalf of David Wilson’s nomination for this vacancy.  David Wilson is in Washington at the present time.  Brother Benson said that there are 30 senators who have pledged support, and they feel if jones would recommend Wilson to the President that the President would possibly nominate Wilson as the only Republican on the 5-man court.

Brother Benson stated that there is one other Republican bidding for the post–a fellow by the name of Clark from New Jersey.  He is known to be quite radical.  He made some freak decision while in New Jersey, and fought the prohibition amendment to the constitution.  It is not felt that he will get much support from the Senate.  The Republicans are holding up confirmatio of the Jones nomination pending the President’s nomination of a Republican to fill the vacancy made by Jones.  Wilson’s supporters feel that if Jones will suggest Wilson to the Preisdent that that is about all that it will take to get his nomination.

Brother Benson further stated that no representative west of the Mississippi River is in this Court, which the supporters feel gives them another claim to the position.

Brother Benson said that they want him to see Marvin Jones personally and tell him that we know Wilson, and that he is a man of good reputation, and that he would be an honor to the Court. Brother Benson said that he did not know Wilson well enough to do that.

I told Brother Benson that I know Dave Wilson well, that he was an instructor at Weber College, that he had been Bishop of the Ogden 12th Ward, and that he had also been chairman of the State Republican group, and, further, that I know him to be temperate in his habits, honest, and upright, and that I know of nothing that would cause Brother Benson to hesitate to speak personally to Mr. Jones recommending Wilson.

Brother Benson said that he wanted to find out whether it was all right with the Church for him to make this recommendation to Jones, and that if it would not embarrass the Church in any way, then he would make an appointment to see Jones. He said if there is any change of thought on this, he could be reached either at the Statler Hotel or at Brother Marriott’s home in Washington.”

Tues., 28 Sep., 1948:

“Just as I was leaving at 10 min. to 5 o’clock to meet Sister McKay, President [George Albert] Smith called me into the First Presidency room where Ezra T. Benson was awaiting to get the decision of the First Presidency as to whether or not he should accept a position with the Government in the Agricultural division. We told Bro. Benson to go ahead with the position, but that it should not interfere with the Thursday meeting.”

Fri., 1 Aug., 1952:

“[First Presidency meeting]  We also considered a letter from H. A. Lynn, President of the Sunkist Growers inviting Bro. Benson to accept the chairmanship of the American Institute of Cooperation. The Presidency discussed the question of cooperation.  A question was raised as to whether or not it is a socialistic tendency, Pres. Clark mentioning an experience he had in the raising of turkeys, the Poultry industry refusing to sell him feed and trying to prevent his selling his turkeys.  The brethren were agreed that they could not favor anything that interfered with individual liberty.  It was decided that Pres. McKay would talk with Brother Benson, suggesting that he must conserve two points, namely, that he is not pursuing a course that does not have the sympathy and support of his brethren, and secondly, that he does not devote so much of his time to other interests that the Twelve would be deprived of his help.”

Tues., 5 Aug., 1952:

“2 p.m.  Returned to the office where I met by appointment at his request Elder Ezra T. Benson.  I told him that the First Presidency had approved of his accepting the Chairmanship of the American Institute of Cooperation, but they wished me to state to him that they would oppose anything that would interfere with individual liberty.  Brother Benson said: ‘So should I.’  In accepting this Chairmanship, however, Brother Benson understands that his first duty is to the Council of Twelve.

The matter of Brother Benson’s accepting membership on the advisory Board of Consultants of the Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources was left for further consideration, Brother Benson having given additional information regarding that.”

Thur., 20 Nov., 1952:

“When I arrived home this evening I received a long distance telephone call from Senator Arthur V. Watkins who thanked me for the letter of congratulation that I had sent him, and then told me that Elder Ezra Taft Benson is being considered by General Eisenhower for the position of Secretary of Agriculture, and wondered if he would be permitted to accept the position should it be offered to him.  I said yes that I thought he would be permitted to accept.”

Mon., 24 Nov., 1952:

“Was very much pleased to read in this morning’s paper that President-elect Dwight D. Eisenhower had chosen Elder Ezra Taft Benson as Secretary of Agriculture.  At the invitation of the Salt Lake Tribune, I made the following statement to be published in their paper:

I am very much pleased to learn of Ezra Taft Benson’s having been chosen as a member of the Cabinet of the United States.

I his appointing Elder Benson as Secretary of Agriculture, Mr. Eisenhower has recognized true merit.  The appiontee’s high character, his unimpeachable integrity, his experience in dealing with Agricultural organizations and problems, make him eminently prepared to render efficient service to our country.”

Tues., 25 Nov., 1952:

“11:00 a.m.–Telephone Conversation With Ned Redding, Publisher of California Intermountain News, Los Angeles

Brother Redding stated that they had received the word regarding Brother Benson.  I told him I thought the appointment was gratifying to all in the Church and, as far as I could learn, to the people in Washington.  Brother Redding stated that they were going to press in a few minutes, and he desired to know if the report were true that Brother Benson would be given a leave of absence from his Church duties.  I told him this was correct.  He asked for verification of my comments which he had seen in the Los Angeles Times.  I referred him to an article in this morning’s Salt Lake tribune, which he did not have, so I made the comment that Elder Benson’s life, his high integrity, unimpeachable character, his experience as general secretary of the cooperatives, all eminently fit him to serve his country in the position to which President-elect Eisenhower has called him.

Brother Redding asked if Elder Benson did not have a call to Washington when he was called to the Twelve.  I answered no, that he had held that position in Washington when he was called to the Twelve.  He resigned from that position to serve in the Twelve. Brother Redding asked if that position had to do with farmer cooperatives.  I answered that that was right.  He commented that Elder Benson then was returning to Washington to fill a higher post.  I agreed.

I told Brother Redding that I felt that our President-elect was a good man, that it will take time to get things in shape, but that I look forward to a good administration.  Brother Redding stated that from his own experience he knows that Mr. Kefauver is giving President-elect Eisenhower his whole-hearted support, and if all Democratic leaders will do that we can look forward to a greater tomorrow.”

Tues., 25 Nov., 1952:

“3:30 p.m.–Telephone Conversation With Senator Arthur V. Watkins, Calling From Washington, D.C.

Brother Watkins offered congratulations on Elder Benson’s appointment as Secretary of Agriculture.  He said that he felt very happy abou tit, and a good deal of good would result.  All newspapers were commenting with the highest kind of praise–not one discordant word.  I replied that everyone here was delighted, the press, members and nonmembers, and a call from the coast this morning indicated that they felt the same way.

Brother Watkins informed me that Ivy Baker Priest of Bountiful had just been appointed Treasurer of the United States, that she would handle all the currency of the United States, and her name would be on it.

I stated that the outlook in Washington was very encouraging, from any viewpoint.  He said that he was grateful to God that a prophet of God was in the Cabinet, and with the exception of himself he felt that our representation in the Government was excellent.  He expressed deep humility.  I told him that being a high priest he was entitled to inspiration, that he had done a great deal of good, and I hoped the Lord would continue to bless him.  We exchanged best wishes to each other’s associates.”

Fri., 5 Dec., 1952:

“5 p.m.  Brother Fred Babbel called at the office to seek advice concerning the offer that has come to him from Elder Ezra Taft Benson to serve as an administrative assistant in his appointment by General Dwight D. Eisenhower as Secretary of Agriculture. Brother Babbel is now employed at Z.C.M.I. at a salary of $7500 a year, and he is questioning whether or not he should give up a permanent job to accept a political position, which undoubtedly will be temporary.  I said, ‘whether you accept Brother Benson’s offer or not is a matter entirely up to you.  If you would like to go back to Washington, D.C. in preference to continuing your present position at Z.C.M.I. you are at perfect liberty to do so. You must understand that that is more or less temporary–maybe a year, maybe three or four years or more.’

Brother Babbel replied ‘I understand that; but I feel that I should like to go back with Brother Benson.’  I then said:  ‘Brother Babbel, you kneel down and make it a matter of prayer and make your own decision.'”

Mon., 23 Mar., 1953:

Telephone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson—12:30 p.m.

“Called from Chicago where he is attending a Convention.  Said he called to see how everyone is and to extend greetings.  Said he is speaking over the radio this afternoon at 2:30 o’clock—it would be 1:30 p.m. our time—that it would probably come over KUTA, at any rate on the ABC network.

Elder Benson then asked how the Brethren are, and I told him that Brother Richards is at Lake Mead and seems to be a little better.  Elder Benson then asked about Brother Bowen, and I said that Brother Bowen is gradually getting worse—that his mentality keeps up, but his body is deteriorating, and that he does not seem to care any more.

Brother Benson then asked how I am feeling and I reported that I am feeling very well—Brother Benson admonished me to take care of myself.

I congratulated Elder Benson and told him that he seems to be winning out in his work in the Agricultural Department—I told him that he has our faith and prayers, and that it would make his heart warm to hear what is said at our meetings in the Temple on Thursdays—that he is with us in our prayers.

Elder Benson then said he would try to be here for Conference and hoped President McKay would save a seat for him—I said I would see what I could do about saving a seat for him, stating that he is still in full fellowship in the Church and everyone would be happy to see him.

Brother Benson asked me to convey his love to the Brethren and Sister McKay.

I asked Brother Benson to convey my esteem and high regard to President Eisenhower, and to his associates there in Washington, D.C., especially to Mr. McKay with whom I am acquainted.  Elder Benson said he went to the Virgin Islands with Mr. McKay and that they are on a Committee together on Island matters.

Brother Benson asked me to call Sister Benson which I did immediately after concluding my talk with Brother Benson.

I extended love and the Lord’s blessing to Elder Benson.”

Mon., 30 Mar., 1953:

“At 11 a.m. returned to the office at which time I placed a call to Elder Ezra Taft Benson.  He was attending a meeting in Maryland, from which place I talked to him.

I told Brother Benson that I called regarding his coming to Conference—that we wish to avoid any possible talk that he is coming here on government time and expense.  Asked him how he wished to travel—by air or train.  Brother Benson then explained that it is necessary for him to be in Denver of the 7^th of April at which time he is schedule to give a talk.  Inasmuch as this is government business, he will go by air to Denver and back at government expense, and then his trip to Salt Lake and back to Denver should be at Church expense—that he would make arrangements and then submit the bill to the Church at Conference time.

Brother Benson then said how happy he is to have his wife with him—that she just arrived yesterday, and was sitting by his side during the telephone conversation.  I extended by love and blessings to both of them.

Brother Benson asked that I have my secretary Clare call his home and have one of the girls ask Dr. Briner (who will be in Salt Lake tomorrow) to call at the house and give Beth a shot for her cold.  (This was attended to soon after the telephone conversation was ended).”

Thur., 9 Apr., 1953:

“Telephone Conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson re: Pres. Louis L. Madsen at Washington, D.C. Tele. 7-4142

Pres. McKay:  ‘You’re back on the job already.’

Elder Benson:  ‘Very much so.  I should like to have stayed longer—I enjoyed those three days of Conference so much—it was like going into another world.’

Pres. McKay:  ‘I am sorry I was not here to say goodbye when you called at the office.’

Bro. Benson:  ‘I wanted to shake your hand and tell you it was amazing to me the way you went through the Conference.  Your instructions were wonderful—you rose to the heights.’

Pres. McKay:  ‘Thank you.’

Pres. McKay:  “I should like to have just a word with you on the problem at the U.S.A.C.  Is there any chance whatever for the head (Dr. Madsen) to be utilized in the government?

Elder Benson:  ‘I talked with him when he was here, and I also talked with Bishop Isaacson when I was in Salt Lake.  I told Pres. Madsen if he wanted something and had made up his mind he was going to move, we would do everything we could for him.  I had already spoken to Dr. Sharen (?) Department of Research.  At that time he said he would be glad to have him back.  He was in the department at one time—that was right after you were here—two months ago.  I don’t know what the situation is now.  The President of the A.C.U. did not talk as though he was interested in the position—he did not give me any indication of what he will do.’

Pres. McKay:  ‘He cannot stick it out here; it would make it easier if he would resign from the presidency of the College—it would not reflect upon him here.’

Elder Benson:  “I think it is the wise thing for him to do and not be forced out.  He didn’t take to my suggestions very well.  He said he was being counseled to fight it out to the bitter end.  He did not volunteer who was advising him.  I will be glad to do a little checking.  I also indicated that there were one or two vacancies in important spots.  Dr. Sharen (?) said that there were two of three vacancies in spots that would be almost as important as being President of the smaller school.  Will try to get this information to the President.’

Pres. McKay:  ‘Thank you very much, and my blessings and best wishes to you in your important work.’

Elder Benson:  ‘Thank you, and love to you and to the brethren.’”

Wed., 28 Oct., 1953:

“Following the directors’ meeting, I dictated the following wire to Elder Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

‘Your Agriculture policy is sound.  Political demogogues seek to undermine your clear thinking.  Loyal citizens are with you.  Hold to your standards.  God bless and guide you!  Sincerely (signed David O. McKay)

October 28, 1953

Copy of letter received October 29, 1953 from Ezra Taft Benson, The Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, in answer to telegram sent by President McKay October 28, 1953:

Dear President McKay:

Your wire of last night is priceless!  Thank you so much for this further evidence of your confidence and your faith and prayers.

The days are difficult, but in many ways, satisfying.  We go from one emergency and one fight into another.  A nation-wide effort is now being made to discredit and defeat our plans for reorganization of the Department, particularly the Soil Conservation Service.  So far as we know, there is only one organization, the National Organization of Soil Conservation Districts, headed by one of our most vociferous foes, which is opposed to our plans.  We are moving forward and are very much encouraged.

As I dictate this letter, I assure you I have been thinking of you and all of my Brethren as you have joined together in the Temple this day.  I am grateful to you all for your constant support and interest.

May the rich favors of Heaven attend you and your good wife.  We often think of the delightful visit we had with you at conference time.

Faithfully your friend and brother,

(signed)

Ezra Taft Benson”

Thurs., 19 Aug., 1954:

“10 to 3 p.m. – Was convened in Council meeting — the first since the Temple was closed for the summer on July 1.  Fifty-five letters from Bishops and Stake Presidents were considered during our meeting.

At this meeting I expressed gratitude for the privilege we have of renewing our fellowship, our brotherhood; that each heart feels the strength that comes from this sacred gathering of the leaders of the Church.  It is real, and personally, for the Presidency, I expressed gratitude for the unity that prevails throughout this great Council.

I expressed gratitude to the Lord for the success that has attended our fellow-laborer, Brother Benson, in his great work in Washington.  I suppose it is not overstating the fact when I say that only the present responsibilities of the President himself exceed those which Brother Benson is carrying.  His has been a great task.  Out of it all there stands before the American people Brother Benson’s integrity and honesty of purpose.  Even those who have opposed him in his policy admit that nobody can question Brother Benson’s honesty, and on that rock he has stood, and in that declaration and radiant manifestation of character he has brought great credit to himself, the Council, and the Church.  Let us in our hearts again repeat to our Heavenly Father the gratitude expressed in our prayers today, and God bless you as you go out to continue your great work as Apostles of the Lord Jesus.

7 Sept., 1954:

“September 7, 1954

(continued)

Telephone Calls

1.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson telephoned from Estes Park, Colorado where he has been in conference with President Eisenhower.  He called to say that he is flying to Salt Lake enroute to Idaho and wondered if he could have an appointment when he arrives in Salt Lake tomorrow afternoon.  I told him that Sister McKay and I are leaving tomorrow morning at 8:40 o’clock for Chicago.  Brother Benson expressed keen disappointment, and I told him that it is my misfortune as I should surely like to see him, especially to congratulate him again on the outstanding victory that has come to him on his stand for flexible farm price supports.  Brother Benson said he is now holding meetings in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

I inquired about his stay with Mr. and Mrs. Fred Schluter at their summer cottage at Beach Haven, New Jersey.  He said they had four or five days there; that he had enjoyed his visit with them very much – that the Schluters are wonderful people.

Brother Benson then inquired about the health of the brethren, and I told him that we have three on the sick list – Elders Moyle, Stapley, and Bishop Joseph L. Wirthlin.  Brother Benson said that he had had a pleasant visit with President Stephen L. Richards in Washington, and that he thought he looked well.  Upon inquiry about President Clark, I told him that he is very well; that he has just returned from a three-week vacation at his farm in Grantsville.

Elder Benson then said:  ‘When does President McKay take a vacation?’  I told him that it looks impossible now that Conference is upon us, and that there are so many important matters that need attention before then.

I said again how happy we are over Brother Benson’s success – that practically the whole nation is happy.  Brother Benson said ‘The Lord has blessed us.  I surely appreciate your prayers and faith, President McKay.’  I told him that I had daily remembered him in my prayers, and that in the Council meetings our prayers were with him.

I sent my love and greetings to Sister Benson, and he reciprocated by sending his love and best wishes to Sister McKay and my family.  He said that his son Reed was with him, and that he will accompany him on this tour; that he is a great comfort to him.

Thurs., 4 Nov., 1954:

“At 3:30 p.m.  President Milan D. Smith, Pendleton, Oregon, President of the Union Stake, called at the office, and reported that he had been invited by Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson, to be a member of his staff, acting as his Executive Assistant, which is a very important position.

President Smith has accepted, but would like to retain his position as President of the Stake until February 19 and 20 when their Quarterly Conference will be held.  In other words, he would prefer not to be released at the next Quarterly Conference to be held November 20 and 21 as he has some definite plans in mind which he would like to consummate before he is released as Stake President.

I told him that we would recommend that he be not released at this next Quarterly Conference, and that his counselors could carry on for another three months during which time the Presidency and Council of the Twelve would determine when the reorganization of the Stake should take place.

I told him I thought that would be agreeable.  Will take this matter up at the meeting of the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve next Thursday.

8 Mar., 1955:

‘March 8, 1955

Ezra Taft Benson – called from San Antonio, Texas, is on his way back to Washington.  March 8, 1955.

Just returning from an official visit to ten countries in the Caribbean area.  Spent 2 and 1/2 weeks in Cuba, Porto Rico, Virgin Islands, Venezuela, Colombo, Panama, Costa Rico, Mexico, Guatemala.  Was on an official visit.

All along the way had opportunity to mention the church and his connection therewith to government officials with whom he came in contact.

At Venezuela Elder Benson met in his hotel rooms with some three or four families, J.E.Wilson, representing one of the companies there is highly recommended as one who could serve the Church.  His home is in Caracas.  Elder Benson thinks there is an opportunity to open a Mission, or at least extend the missionary work there.  Ambassador Warren told him that the Catholics are getting a hold on the people.  They have a group there running into thousands.  There is a Union Church there which is rather well attended by Protestants in that area, including Ambassador Warren.

In Panama he met with a group of 75 members at Major Yates’ home.

At Costa Rica – met with the missionaries and saints only briefly.  Was changing planes there.

At Nicaragua – met with a group of missionaries and members.  Four members of the Church on the Embassy staff.  The Ambassador at Nicaragua is well pleased with the work they are doing.

Had breakfast with a group Thursday morning in Guatemala.  Met Sister Romney – Brother Romney was in some of the districts.  Saw the Mission Home and chapel, and had a long visit with Ambassador Armour and his wife.  They know of our work, and are very cooperative.

Porto Rico.  Met with the servicemen and their wives.  No branch of the Church there.

One of the most important visits was in Mexico.  Elder Benson was there 2 and 1/2 days.  had a good visit yesterday with President Ruiz Cortinez of Mexico.  They were together a half an hour.  Ambassador White accompanied him on the visit.  Half of the time of the interview was spent in talking about the Church.  Pres. Cortinez knew of our work with the colonies – didn’t realize that the Church was so well represented in Mexico City.

The President of Mexico spoke very kindly of our people.  He is a farmer and rancher from Veracruz, and had come in contact with our people, but he didn’t realize we had branches in 62 areas in the Republic.  Was well pleased with the report about us.

Met with 500 in Mexico with President Bowman — had a wonderful meeting.

On the whole Brother Benson feels his trip was very fruitful and worthwhile.  In every country he was well received, and was able in every instance to speak about the Church, and his connection with it.

In Mexico stayed at the Embassy where President Clark stayed when he was Ambassador and had dinner with Ambassador White, and former Ambassador Mesersmit.  Both spoke very highly of President Clark and wished to be remembered to him.

Was with Fred Schluter in Cuba, Venezuela and Columbo.  Said that Brother Schluter was in good spirits and well.  That he wished to be remembered to President McKay.”

10 Mar., 1955:

“March 10, 1955

Report given by President David O. McKay

at Council Meeting,

Thursday, March 10, 1955.

Gave an account of Ezra Taft Benson’s activities in the Caribbean —

(See report on telephone conversation from Brother Ezra Taft Benson under March 8, 1955.)

President McKay said that he received a letter yesterday from Fred Schluter, who has been down in Central and South America, and went with Brother Benson on some of his appointments.  Brother Schluter in his letter praises Brother Benson very highly.  Said he was delighted with the way in which he met those audiences and gave the answers to their questions, and that there is no question in his mind, –he mentioned that he does not go overboard very easily, — that the intelligent people of the United States and of those countries that Brother Benson visited, will recognize Brother Benson as the strongest man in President Eisenhower’s Cabinet.

Sun., 1 Sept., 1957:

“I tried to get in personal contact with President Eisenhower through his secretary,  Mr. James C. Hagerty; but all offices were closed and the operator could not, or would not, give me either private number.

Inasmuch as the matter about which I wanted to see the President was very urgent, I concluded that I should secure passage on the plane the next morning.

(I noticed in the newspapers that President Eisenhower had scheduled a press conference on Tuesday morning and that on Wednesday morning he would leave for a long delayed vacation.  This necessitated my leaving on Monday before I could make a personal appointment with him.  It was rather a risky thing to do, to even hope to have a conference with the President on that busy day, Tuesday, but I felt imprssed to run the risk.)

Consequently, we made arrangements to leave for Washington, D.C. the next morning.”

Mon., 2 Sept., 1957:

“8:45 a.m. – Sister McKay and I boarded a United Airlines plane for Washington, D.C., via Chicago.  Our non-stop flight to Chicago was without incident, but very pleasant.

During the two-hour lay-over in Chicago we telephoned our daughter LouJean at Great Lakes.  She was very much disappointed that we had not sent her word that we were coming so that she could have met us.  However, we purposely refrained from doing so because we did not want her to drive the 75 miles to the airport and 75 miles back to her home for such a brief visit.

Enroute from Salt Lake to Washington we were treated with every courtesy by airline officials who met us at each port and rendered every assistance within their power.

7:30 p.m.  – Arrived in Washington, D.C.

By telegram we had reserved rooms at the Marriott Hotel.  We were met most cordially by Mr. and Mrs. J. Willard Marriott and Mr. and Mrs. Barlow (manager), who, with others, conducted us up to a suite of rooms on the 5th floor.

President Marriott deserves a great deal of credit for his success in the financial world and in his presidency of the Washington Stake.  This new hotel-motel enterprise is one indication of his success.  A thousand persons can find accommodations per night here in this four-million dollar modern hostelry.”

Tues., 3 Sept., 1957:

“At 8:15 a.m. I tried to get in contact with Mr. Hagerty, the White House Press Secretary, but was informed that he was in conference with President Eisenhower preparatory to his press interview.  With the assistance of several secretaries I finally got in touch with Mr. Stevens, the appointment secretary.  As soon as President Eisenhower learned that I desired a conference, he granted my request immediately and scheduled an appointment at 11:30 this morning.

The interview was entirely successful and satisfactory.  The President shows the marks of the weighty responsibility which he carries.  I was deeply impressed by the remark he made with reference to the responsibility of his office.  He said that he could not carry it without ‘aid from On High’.  I took occasion to tell him that we are thankful that we have a man in the Presidential chair who believes in and appeals to that Higher Power.

Following the conference with the President, we drove over to the office of the Secretary of Agriculture, Ezra Taft Benson, and as my visit to the President deeply concerned Brother Benson, I told the latter what we had in mind–that it must be clearly understood that Brother Benson’s first duty is to discharge faithfully his duties as Secretary of Agriculture and to do nothing that would weaken the President in carrying out Government policies.

However, if any change is contemplated in his office, we should like to be informed before the October conference.

At the First Presidency’s meeting on September 5, 1957, President McKay reported the following on his visit to President Eisenhower:

‘President McKay reported conferring with President Eisenhower at 11:30 a.m. Tuesday September 3, 1957 on which occasion the proposed reorganization of the Y.M.M.I.A. was explained to President Eisenhower, including the plan of the First Presidency to use Ezra Taft Benson, if he can be spared from the Government.  President Eisenhower stated that after the first four years Secretary Benson told the President that he could have his resignation at any time, and the President responded that he would be pleased to have him remain, but that he was free to follow his own wishes.  He paid tribute to Ezra Taft Benson saying, ‘There is no more honest man than Ezra.’  President Eisenhower said that there is one man who can take Ezra Taft Benson’s place, if he (The President ) can get him, and then said the matter of leaving the Cabinet is ‘for Ezra to decide.’  After the interview, President McKay talked with Brother Benson and informed him, repeating that the responsibility for making the decision is entirely his.  President McKay also informed Brother Benson, ‘We want you to be loyal to your position here, loyal to the government and to the President, but if he can spare you, we would like to use you, and if not, we will do something else.’

(see September 12, 1957 for a note regarding a telephone conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson regarding the above matter.)”

Thurs., 12 Sept., 1957:

“Note:

This evening Elder Ezra Taft Benson called me from Washington, D.C. and reported that President Eisenhower would like him to stay in the Cabinet for at least a year.  I advised him to stay and assured him that the First Presidency would arrange its affairs accordingly.  I also told Brother Benson that if President Eisenhower wants him to stay longer that he should give him the assurance that he will stay.  (see Sept. 3, 1957 for notes on my trip to Washington regarding this matter.)”

Tues., 1 Oct., 1957:

“Note:

Telephone conversation with Ezra Taft Benson from Washington, D.C. regarding world tour to include Hawaii, Japan, the Far East, and Near East, and finally Rome, Italy where about November 11 to 15, he will be the representative of the government of the United States at an international meeting.  He will be one of the scheduled speakers.

The American Ambassador has suggested to him that a meeting with the Pope be arranged.

Later, the Presidency decided that if he could avoid such a meeting without embarrassment,’ we would prefere that he do so.’

(see telephone conversation with Bro. Benson following)

Wednesday, October 2, 1957

Last evening, October 1, 1957, Elder Ezra Taft Benson called me by telephone at my home and asked whether or not he should accept a government appointment to go to Rome, Italy.  The American Ambassador to Italy there would like to arrange a conference for him with the Pope.  I told Brother Benson that I would talk with my counselors this morning and then let him know.

————–

Telephone conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson, Wednesday, October 2, 1957.  (Brother Benson was contacted in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.)

President McKay:  Can you hear me, Brother Benson?

Brother Benson:  Yes.  I am in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.

President McKay:  Regarding the matter we were discussing yesterday, we are all united in the feeling that if you can in honor, and without embarrassment, avoid that conference it would be well for you to do it.

Brother Benson:  All right.  I think I can.

President McKay:  Was it the Ambassador?

Brother Benson:  The American Ambassador to Italy.

President McKay:  Yes.  I see.

Brother Benson:  He is the one who has proposed it.  But I think I can avoid it, President McKay, because I am going to be in Rome for a very short time.  I have to make an important address for a World Agricultural Congress, and I think the shortness of my stay can probably be used as a reason for not doing so.

President McKay:  We have in mind particularly the effect upon our own people.

Brother Benson:  Yes.  That is the thing that concerned me too.

President McKay:  And the dignity that you would have to give to such a conference.

Brother Benson:  Yes, that is right.

President McKay:  And really they have everything to gain and nothing to lose, and we have everything to lose and nothing to gain.

Brother Benson:  I am in full harmony with that feeling.

President McKay:  Well that is good.  We are glad of that.  We all feel that it would be pretty embarrassing to you, and we are helping you out of what might prove to be a conference that will reflect upon our Church.

Brother Benson:  Well, I think it could be embarrassing both to me and to the Church.

President McKay:  All right.

Brother Benson:  I shall do my best, and I think I can work it out.

President McKay:  The brethren all send their love to you.

Brother Benson:  Thank you and my love to them, and thank you for calling.

President McKay:  Thank you, and good-bye.”

Friday, October 17, 1957

Telephone conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C., Thursday, October 17, 1957.

Brother Benson:  Good morning, President McKay, this is Brother Benson in Washington.

President McKay:  I am glad to hear your voice.

Brother Benson:  I have just received a copy of the latest volume written by your son, entitled, ‘Pathways to Happiness’.  I am going to take it with me on a trip around the world so that I can read every word of it.  I think the book came from the publisher.  I am glad to have it.  I am leaving on the 22nd, next Tuesday, for a trade trip that will take me around the world.  I am going first to Honolulu.

President McKay:  This is the same trip you had in mind?

Brother Benson:  Yes.  Then I go to Japan, China, India, Pakistan, Jordan, the Holy Land (that is Israel), Italy, Greece, Turkey, Spain, Portugal, and France.

President McKay:  That is good.

Brother Benson:  I wondered if there is anything I can do while I am there to help the Cause.  I will be in Japan on the first Sunday after I leave.  The Sunday following I shall probably be in Turkey.  I understand that we have a small group who meet there.  Then the third Sunday I will be in Spain.  I do not imagine that we shall have anyone there.  There may be a few servicemen.  I am taking the liberty of writing to the various mission presidents to indicate to them when we shall be in their missions.

President McKay:  If you will do that, they will arrange for you to meet as many of our members as possible.

Brother Benson:  I already have a letter from Japan from the mission president there asking if I shall be willing to meet with the Saints in the morning, and in the afternoon with the servicemen.

President McKay:  Are you going to the Philippines?

Brother Benson:  No, we shall miss the Philippines on this trip.  Some of my men were there recently, and I felt that it would not be necessary this time.

President McKay:  Keep in touch with us and send us your itinerary.

Brother Benson:  I shall send my itinerary to you.  It should be completed this afternoon.

President McKay:  Thank you for calling.  The Lord bless you on your trip.  Is Sister Benson going with you?

Brother Benson:  Yes, and possibly one of our daughters who will help out with the social obligations.  Five of my staff are accompanying me.  It is a trip on foreign trade and American trade.  I shall meet officials of government in some of the countries.  In some cases I have been asked to be a State guest.  We are going in a government plane.  The men on my staff who are accompanying me are specialists in the field of marketing, particularly.  In India I shall be staying at the palace where Nehru is housed, and I have been asked to visit him personally.

President McKay:  That is very good.

Brother Benson:  I hope I can do some good both for the Cause we represent and for agriculture.

President McKay:  President Clark and I are now in the Presidency’s meeting, and he said, ‘My love and blessings go with Elder Benson.’

Brother Benson:  We were delighted to have President Clark visit with us.

President McKay:  Brother Anderson and Brother Reiser join in sending best wishes.  Thank you for calling.

Brother Benson:  Give my love to the brethren.

President McKay:  We shall report to them in a few minutes in Council meeting.  I shall tell them about your call.  Thank you.  Good-bye.”

Tuesday, November 19, 1957

Telephone conversation between President McKay and Elder Ezra Taft Benson, who called from Fort Worth, Texas

Bro. Benson:  Hello, President McKay.

Pres. McKay:  Hello, Brother Benson.

Bro. Benson:  President McKay, how are you?

Pres. McKay:  Very well, thank you.

Bro. Benson:  That is good.  It is good to hear your voice.

Pres. McKay:  Thank you.  I bid you welcome back. 

Bro. Benson:  Thank you, it is good to be back.  We arrived Saturday at noon.

Pres. McKay:  That is fine.

Bro. Benson:  We had an opportunity to see many of our people on our tour.

Pres. McKay:  That is good.

Bro. Benson:  We spent our first Sunday in Japan where we had the pleasure of meeting with some three or four hundred Japanese Saints, and then in the evening some four or five hundred Mormon servicemen.

Pres. McKay:  Good.

Bro. Benson:  We had a nice visit with President Andrus and his wife and his associates.  They are all well, and I think they are doing good work, as near as I can tell.

Pres. McKay:  I think you are right.  They are doing very good work.

Bro. Benson:  Then later that week we were in Hong Kong and had a nice visit with President and Sister Heaton.  We were at the Mission Home, and also had a meeting with the missionaries.  Then we had quite a large group of the Saints who came down to the airport the morning we left, and I had a half-hour meeting with them.

Pres. McKay:  Good.  By the way, did you meet in their new apartments there in Hong Kong?

Bro. Benson:  Yes, I did.

Pres. McKay:  What do you think of them?

Bro. Benson:  Well, as near as I could tell, they seemed quite satisfactory.  It is a nice, rather commodious room where they hold meetings.  They must have had sixty, or so, missionaries in the meeting, and it seemed to be all right.  I did not inspect the apartments particularly.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  They are part of a cooperative housing arrangement there, and they told me something of their joint use of the elevator and other joint facilities they had.  But Hong Kong is very crowded at the present time.  There are a lot of refugees there from Red China, and of course, most of their missionary work is with the Chinese.  They are having pretty good success with them.  I met a number of them.  They seem to be fine people.  They have some of them doing local missionary work.  President Heaton feels very much alone way out there, and I tried to give him what encouragement I could.  He feels he would like to have a little more direction, and so I reviewed with him some of the work they are doing, and gave him what help I could in the short time we were there.  They were at the airport to meet us and then they were there again when we left.  We did not stay at the Mission Home because the Ambassador had insisted we stay at the Embassy.

Pres. McKay:  I see.  That is all right.

Bro. Benson:  I did go to the Mission Home, and had pictures taken there with the missionaries, and then met with them in their home.  There seems to be a good spirit, and I had a personal visit with President Heaton in which he opened his heart to me.  He has a fine spirit, but he sort of feels that the job is almost overwhelming for him.  So any encouragement we can give him, of course, will be all to the good.  They have printed a missionary plan which I have not had time yet to review.  It is bound, and I asked whether or not it has been approved by the Missionary Committee and apparently it has not; but I think a copy was submitted.  They feel they are making headway with their work.  Of course, they have a lot of refugee people in the city.  It is very congested and very crowded, and some of them are living under rather poor conditions, but they have a rather vigorous housing program on to try to meet the situation.  You know that Hong Kong is a free port.

Pres. McKay:  Yes.

Bro. Benson:  There are a lot of British there, and of course quite a number of Americans, also.

Pres. McKay:  I am glad that you called there and had a good visit with them.

Bro. Benson:  I enjoyed the visit very much.  President Heaton is a fine young man, he has a fine wife, and they have a lovely spirit.

The following Sunday we were in Amman, Jordan, the capital of the nation of Jordan, and we do not have Saints there except one man–a member of the Church–and his family.  But he was serving in the superintendency of the joint American Sunday School.  And so they invited me to take the time in the Sunday School and talk to them, which I was happy to do.

Pres. McKay:  Through an interpreter?

Bro. Benson:  Oh, no, these are all Americans of various faiths.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  Only one Latter-day Saint is there.  That is, only one Latter-day Saint who holds the Priesthood.  We had a very nice meeting, and the Ambassador is very friendly to the Church.

Pres. McKay:  Is it Amman?

Bro. Benson:  Amman, Jordan.  And in Amman I also had a half-hour visit with the King, who is a very young man, just turned twenty-three.

Pres. McKay:  Well!

Bro. Benson:  But a noble character, I believe.  He has a tough job.  I talked to him about the Church, and I promised to send him a copy of the Book of Mormon and other literature.

Pres. McKay:  That is good!

Bro. Benson:  That is pretty much a Moslem country, as you know, but he seems to be a fine character.  Then the next Sunday, we were in Spain.  That is a week ago last Sunday.

Pres. McKay:  You did not find anybody there?

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  We have quite a group of Saints there that are working.  We have a big military installation there–some very sizeable military airports; and a number of our people are out there working with the Government projects.  So we had, I should judge, about forty people to Sunday School.

Pres. McKay:  Well!

Bro. Benson:  I took the time in the Sunday School and talked to them, and then they had a Fireside in one of the homes in the evening where Sister Benson and I also participated with them.  Brother and Sister Jacobs from the BYU faculty had just arrived there. 

Pres. McKay:  What city was that?

Bro. Benson:  This was in Madrid.  And they are a very fine faithful group, apparently, doing good work, meeting together in a regular Sunday School, and then they have a Fireside in the evening in one of the homes.

Pres. McKay:  What mission are they under?

Bro. Benson:  Well, they think they are under the French Mission.  They have had some little direction from Paris, but not very much.  Apparently one of the brethren has been appointed as sort of a group leader, and he is taking the leadership.  He selected two counselors to work with him, and I do not know that they make any reports, however, I suggested to him that maybe the Mission President from Paris would get in touch with him and arrange for them to make reports, and give them some supervision.

Pres. McKay:  Yes, he should do that, because we are getting no reports from them here.

Bro. Benson:  No.  Well, we have their addresses, and if you would like, I can drop a note to Brother Christensen in Paris and give him the address.

Pres. McKay:  I will make inquiry tomorrow and see whether we have any report.

Bro. Benson:  Fine.

We were in Paris last Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, and had a nice visit.  They invited us to stay at the Mission Home, so we saw a great deal of President Lee and his wife, and President Christensen and his wife, who had just arrived about a week ago; and they seem to be making the transition nicely.  On Wednesday night, we met with the Saints.  It was a regular Mutual night.  They had the hall filled to overflowing.  We had a nice meeting with them.

Pres. McKay:  That is good.

Bro. Benson:  Things seem to be moving along in that mission.

Now in Ankara, Turkey, there were about 24 members of the Church who came up to the Embassy to spend an hour with us.   It was not on Sunday, as I recall.  It was on a Monday.  They are meeting in one of the homes–just started meeting.  Brother Mark Allen of BYU is there on a Fullbright Fellowship for a year teaching at the University.  Then there are some other men there working on various sites of Government projects.

Pres. McKay:  Is this at Constantinople?

Bro. Benson:  No, this is in Ankara, Turkey.  A very fine group of people–one or two in the military service–and some on various Government projects.

Pres. McKay:  And are they holding weekly meetings?

Bro. Benson:  They just started meeting in one of the homes.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  Two of the families had just arrived.  That swelled their numbers somewhat, so they started meeting in one of the homes.  Brother Mark Allen and I were schoolmates at BYU, so we had a very happy reunion.  The Ambassador is very friendly to all of them, and he is going to try and help to arrange a place for them to meet in a public hall if their numbers justify.

Pres. McKay:  That is fine.

Bro. Benson:  On the trip, I met with several of the leaders of nations including some of the heads of State in Israel where we spent a couple of days.  I had an hour-long visit with Mr. Ben Gurion, the President of Israel.

Pres. McKay:  He is a pretty fine man, is he not?

Bro. Benson:  He seems to be a noble soul, President McKay.  He was in the hospital.  You know that he met with an accident.  A fanatic threw a bomb into their Parliament and Ben Gurion had his left foot injured.  He was in the hospital, and I was the first nonmember of his family to visit him.  While I was there, he invited in the Press and photographers, and so our visit got a lot of publicity, because it is the first the outside world has heard about him since he went in.  But he seems to be a fine character.  I reviewed with him our interest in the Jewish people, the visit of Orson Hyde to Palestine, and the dedication of that land for the return of the Jews, and our faith in the prophecies of the Old Testament, and he was very much interested.  I am planning to send him a copy of the Book of Mormon.

Pres. McKay:  That will be a historic meeting.

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  I told him some day we would like to establish a mission there.  Later I had a luncheon at which the Minister of Finance was the Chairman, and the Minister of Agriculture was also there.  (There were four members of the Cabinet there.)  It was a luncheon given in my honor at the King David Hotel.  And later I talked with the Minister of Finance, and he has sent me material regarding Christians in Palestine.  I will send it on to you, President McKay.

Pres. McKay:  Thank you.

Bro. Benson:  I discussed with him the possibility of our some day having a mission there.  He said they did not look with too much favor on active proselyting among the Hebrew peoples, but he felt sure we would be welcome there as other Christian groups have been.  They are doing wonderful things in Palestine.  They are showing more progress there, I think, than any of the nations in the Near East or the Orient.  I flew over a good part of the country by plane and drove out into some of the rural areas, and they are making remarkable progress.  There is quite a contrast between Jordan and Israel, especially as you get up along the Sea of Galilee.  On one side is Jordan, and on the other side is Israel.

Pres. McKay:  Israel has the best part of the land.

Bro. Benson:  Well, they have the best part of the land to some extent, but they are also doing a better job with what they have.  There seems to be a dedication and devotion about their efforts that is really inspiring.  And they are digging deep wells and diverting the rivers.  They have drained their swamp lands and made fish ponds, until they are growing great quantities of fish as one of their principal sources of protein.  And the hills are now being covered again with citrus groves and olive groves.  It is a beautiful sight to fly over the country, and to see the old city of Nazareth, Joppa, and then to fly up over the Sea of Galilee.  It was a wonderful experience for us.  Also, the old city of Jerusalem, of course, is in Jordan.

Pres. McKay:  I know.

Bro. Benson:  And it is very drab and no evidence of progress whatever.  But a small part is in Israel, probably a fifth of the city.  And they are building some very nice buildings, including a new Parliament Building and a University.

Pres. McKay:  That is on the Israel side?

Bro. Benson:  That is on the Israel side.  And the city of Tel Aviv is now a thriving, bustling city of a third of a million people.  So they are making real headway.

Pres. McKay:  That is good.  How did you get along in Rome?

Bro. Benson:  Well, we were only there a day.  I had to speak at the FAO Conference, and then I gave a luncheon for all the Ministers of Agriculture from the 78 nations represented in the FAO.  I did go to Saint Peter’s so that my wife and daughters might see the Cathedral, and we looked around Rome just a little.  I did not have much time.  We were only there about a day and a half.  But we enjoyed our visit.

I had a long visit with Mr. Nehru, head of the Indian Government.  He invited my wife and daughter to accompany me, and then he invited his married daughter.  We had a nice visit together.  Of course, that is a strong Hindu nation, as you know.  And the refugee problem in India and in Pakistan is terrible–the worst poverty and distress I have ever seen anywhere in the world.  You see, all of the Moslems from India have gone into Pakistan as refugees, and the Hindus from Pakistan have gone into India as refugees, so both nations have refugee problems, and it is very, very serious.  Both countries are backward agriculturally and otherwise.  But there are a lot of wonderful people.  Cattle wander around everywhere unmolested, and are never slaughtered.

Pres. McKay:  They are sacred, you know.

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  And they just absolutely denude the country.  They eat everything and of course, bring in nothing.  That, coupled with low production, makes a real problem.

But all in all, the trip was very successful from the standpoint of our objectives as we set them forth when we left.  We visited twelve countries and Hong Kong in three and a half weeks, and met with the representatives of the trade and Government.

Pres. McKay:  Where is that?

Bro. Benson:  I say, we visited twelve countries and Hong Kong and met with representatives of the trade handling food products, with the leaders of nations, with farm leaders; and in practically every country, I got right out on the farms and went in some of the farm homes.

Pres. McKay:  Did it prove successful in helping you get rid of your surplus?

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  It has been very successful from that standpoint.  I had a chance to see our programs in operation in the various countries, and I think it will be the means of helping to expand our exports further.

Pres. McKay:  That is fine.

Bro. Benson:  At least, that is our hope.

Pres. McKay:  I received a letter today from Brother Smith.  I was surprised that he is going into his own business.

Bro. Benson:  Brother Milan Smith?

Pres. McKay:  Yes.

Bro. Benson:  Yes, he is leaving about December 1st, largely on account of illness in his family.  His brother has had to leave his post there in Utah, and they have had to take some of the men from up in Oregon down to operate that plant.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  I felt that I could not ask him to stay when his father advised him to come home.

Pres. McKay:  No.

Bro. Benson:  So I am appointing Brother Miller F. Shurtleff, one of our Bishops in the Washington Stake, as his successor.  It will be announced within the next few days.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  He has done good work for us, but Brother Shurtleff can pick up where he left off.

Pres. McKay:  Everything is going all right?

Bro. Benson:  Yes, pretty good, President McKay, in spite of what you read in the press.  There have been some rather bitter attacks made while I have been away, and much of it apparently is rumor which has been built up and fanned to quite a flame when I returned.  I talked with the President on the telephone.  I have talked to the people at the White House.  They are quite upset about the rumors that there has been an effort to get me to resign.  I have had no pressure whatever.  No one has suggested anything to me.  It is one of those things.  It is political, largely.  I know there is quite a group out in the Midwest, especially in Farmers Union territory, who have ben after my scalp ever since I came in.

Pres. McKay:  What is this report about the Vice President?

Bro. Benson:  Well, I do not know whether it is more than a rumor or not.  I have not talked to Mr. Nixon yet.  I will do so at the first opportunity.  But I an not sure.  I have never felt one hundred per cent secure with him, but I cannot quite believe this is more than a rumor.

Pres. McKay:  I see.

Bro. Benson:  It could be.  It is a rather crucial period in one sense, and I appreciate very much the faith and prayers of you and the Brethren.

Pres. McKay:  You have them.

Bro. Benson:  I know I do, and I am grateful for it.

Pres. McKay:  You stand by your original principles.

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  We are certainly going to do that.  And I think it will work out all right.  I am not too worried about it.

Pres. McKay:  I am very glad to hear you.

Bro. Benson:  I am concerned, but not worried.  There is one other thing I would like to get your judgment on, and I think I know what it will be.  About a month ago, Secretary Dulles and Cabot Lodge (Cabot Lodge is our Ambassador to United Nations, as you know) approached me and asked whether or not I would be interested in a long-time appointment as the United States Representative on the Economic and Social Council of United Nations.  I personally have no particular interest in it, President McKay, but I did not want to give them an answer until I had at least mentioned it to you.

Pres. McKay:  I think that you had better give them a negative answer.

Bro. Benson:  I think so, too.  When this job is over, I know where I would like to be.

Pres. McKay:  Yes.

Bro. Benson:  And I hope it is where you want me to be.

Pres. McKay:  I think you had better not accept that appointment.

Bro. Benson:  No.

Pres. McKay:  As Economic and (what)?

Bro. Benson:  As United States Representative on the Economic and Social Council of United Nations.

Pres. McKay:  I see–Economic and Social Council.

Bro. Benson:  There are various nations represented, and usually they are Ministers of Finance or Ministers of State who serve.

Pres. McKay:  I think you had better tell them ‘no.’

Bro. Benson:  I think so, too.  I am glad you feel that way.

Pres. McKay:  All right.

Bro. Benson:  How are all the Brethren?

Pres. Mckay:  They are all well–feeling fine.

Bro. Benson:  That is good.

Pres. McKay:  I will report to them tomorrow morning.

Bro. Benson:  Give them my love.

Pres. McKay:  Thank you.

Bro. Benson:  I appreciate very much this opportunity to visit with you.

Pres. McKay:  I enjoyed it very much.

Bro. Benson:  I am going on from here to Colorado Springs where I will be tomorrow at the National Grange Meeting, and then home tomorrow night.

Pres. McKay:  You mean, back in Washington?

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  I will be back in Washington tomorrow night.  I just stopped here between planes.

Pres. McKay:  Where are you?

Bro. Benson:  I am in Fort Worth, Texas.

Pres. McKay:  Oh, are you?

Bro. Benson:  Yes.  But I am going on to Colorado Springs where I have a meeting of the National Grange tomorrow, and I felt it would be so late that I did not want to call you from there and I have to leave to catch my plane right after my meeting tomorrow noon.

Pres. McKay:  I appreciate very much your calling.

Bro. Benson:  Well, I will write you about some of these matters in the missions as soon as I can get to it, President McKay.

Pres. McKay:  All right.

Bro. Benson:  Thank you very much.

Pres. McKay:  My brother, Thomas E., has been very sick for the last two weeks, but he is a little better.

Bro. Benson:  Oh, is he?

President McKay:  Yes.

Bro. Benson:  Well, give him my love, and tell him our faith and prayers are with him.

Pres. McKay:  Thank you very much, Brother Benson.

Bro. Benson:  All right, President McKay.

Pres. McKay:  Good Night.

Bro. Benson:  Good Night.”

Thurs., 12 Dec., 1957:

Letter from Elder Ezra Taft Benson Re:  letter to President Eisenhower

I reported at Council meeting this morning that I had received today from Elder Ezra Taft Benson a letter with which he enclosed a copy of a letter he had received from President Eisenhower.  The President of the United States had sent a letter of acknowledgment to ‘Dear Ezra’ in which he expressed appreciation of the quotations furnished by Brother Benson to the President of the United States from the Book of Mormon regarding this land, ‘choice above all other lands.’

I stated that we had not had time to read all of the quotations sent by Bro. Benson to the President of the United States, but the President of the United States expressed appreciation for those quotations which give assurance that this land will be protected if we keep the commandments of the Lord.

Pres. Clark commented that President Eisenhower had signed the note to Brother Benson as ‘D.E.’ which he felt was an indication of particular intimacy.”

Sun., 23 Feb., 1958:

This evening Elder Ezra Taft Benson called, and told me about the visit to him of Congressmen who intimated to him that he (Brother Benson) has become the scapegoat for the recent near-defeat of Republican senators.  A delegation of Republicans will wait on the President today (so they have declared) with the intention of having Brother Benson resign.

Brother Benson said he would get in touch with the President before they do, but this week will decide whether or not he (Brother Benson) will resign or continue on.  They are now in session on that important question, and Brother Benson asked to have his name put on the prayer roll at the Temple.

(Note:  later, Clare called the Temple and put Brother Benson’s name on the prayer roll)

On February 27, 1958, I made the following report to the brethren on Elder Benson’s situation:

‘President McKay reported that last Sunday Brother Benson called him on the telephone in the morning.  He and his family were fasting and he was feeling very down-hearted.  He did not feel just right about the visit of two congressmen, Messrs. Judd and Miller, and asked that we remember him in our prayers today; that he would like to have the Brethren ask the Lord to guide him in what he has to do.  He knew what the committee of politicians were going to try to do with the President, and said he did not know just how he would counter the attack.  He said that there had just appeared on the market a book written by the Farmers Union, members of which are principally communistic, and that it is one of the most bitter things that has been printed against him.  President McKay told him to continue to stand for his principles and that things would come out all right.  President McKay further told him that there was no question about President Eisenhower’s stand, and recalled to him his, (President McKay’s) visit with President Eisenhower, and that the President’s stand then was that Brother Benson was to stay to the bitter end.  Brother Benson said that it seems to be getting bitter, all right.

President McKay further mentioned that the newspapers indicated that Brother Benson was the first one to meet the President when he returned to Washington, and the newspapers also report the President’s decision on the matter.’

Sat., 19 July, 1958:

“9 a.m.  Met by appointment at his request Dr. and Mrs. O. Preston Robinson.  We held a discussion regarding the Middle East crisis, and the sending of armed forces by the United States and Great Britain to Lebanon.  Dr. Robinson repeated the story of his personal visit to President Gamal Abdel Nasser when he traveled to the Middle East a year or two ago, and of his (President Nasser’s) negative attitude toward Communism; that he was not in favor of the Communists.  Dr. Robinson thinks if the United States had helped Nasser wtih money for the dam, he would not have turned to the Communists.

I asked Dr. Robinson if he really felt that President Nasser was sincere – that a real Communist will lie, steal, or go to any length in order to carry out the fundamental idea of Marx which was this:  that negotiation with the Capitalists is of no use and the only way to deal with them is to exterminate them, and to be ruthless in achieving that end.  I said you do not know but what Nasser was deceiving you.  Dr. Robinson said, ‘No, I think not, because they have outlawed Communism in Egypt, and only recently have executed two men because they were communists.’

I said to Dr. Robinson, ‘Without saying anything to anybody, excepting to Elder Mark E. Petersen who is Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Deseret News, I think it would be worthwhile for you to go back and meet Ezra Taft Benson and tell him what you have told me.  Let nobody get the idea that you are presuming to ‘steady the ship of state’ but that you may have something which will reveal a side of Nasser which Dulles has not revealed to the President.  You go to Mark Peterson, without disclosing the fact that we have had a conversation, present to him your ideas, and if he, as Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Deseret News, thinks it is worthwhile, you may go at once, and I shall make arrangements for you to have a conference with Brother Benson, and it is up to him after that.

While they were still in my office, I got in touch with Brother Benson by telephone and told him what I had told the Robinsons.  I told him that I thought it was worth while for Dr. Robinson to have a conference with him, and Brother Benson expressed himself as feeling the same way.  Brother Benson said he would arrange for a meeting with President Eisenhower.

Later in the day Brother Robinson called me at home and reported that he had seen Brother Mark E. Petersen who agreed that it would be worthwhile for Brother Robinson to go back and meet Brother Benson Monday morning and get that side of the question at least to President Eisenhower through Brother Benson.  Evidently, following our telephone message to Brother Benson, he went to the White House and told President Eisenhower of our conference, and the following copy of a letter from President Eisenhower indicates that he is giving consideration to the matter.  (see also newspaper items about the crisis in Lebanon and a report from Dr. O. Preston Robinson, July 22, from Washington, D.C.)  (Also see telephone call from Ezra Taft Benson July 23)

July 19, 1958

      THE WHITE HOUSE

July 19, 1958.

Dear President McKay:

Ezra Benson has just telephoned to me your message.  I cannot tell you how grateful I am for your approval of the action I felt it necessary to take in Lebanon and for the inspiration of your prayers.  It is good to have such understanding and friendly support from one whom I respect and like so much.

With warm regard,

Sincerely,

/s/ Dwight D. Eisenhower

President David McKay

(Original letter is in the scrapbook.)

(The above message referred to is contained in consultation with Dr. O. Preston Robinson July 19, and telephone message from Ezra Taft Benson July 23)”

Tues., 22 July, 1958:

“Telephone conversation with Dr. O. Preston Robinson, Deseret News.

(Dr. Robinson called from Washington, D.C.)

Dr. Robinson:  I apologize for getting you out of meeting, President McKay.

President McKay:  That is all right.

Dr. Robinson:  I want to tell you that Sister Robinson and I had a forty-five minute talk with President Eisenhower today, and Brother Benson and Sister Benson were there too.  We had a most interesting discussion, and he concurred with many of our ideas and asked us to present to him a memo which he will follow up, and also asked Brother Benson to arrange for us to see Mr. Dulles afterwards so that is in process now, but I thought you would be interested in knowing.

President McKay:  Yes, I am very glad that you called.  Congratulations!

Dr. Robinson:  Well, if it had not of been for your influence, of course, we couldn’t have seen him, but we took the opportunity of expressing your love and best wishes to him, and he was very grateful and asked that we return them to you and express his.

President McKay:  Thank you.

Dr. Robinson:  We will give you a full report when we get back, but we think it has been very worthwhile.

President McKay:  All right.  I am very glad.  I felt well over the appointment–we have done what we should have.

Dr. Robinson:  Well, I am glad.  We are certainly glad we talked to you about it and it has worked out as it has.  He gave us forty-five minutes which Brother Benson says was one of the longest ones he has extended to anybody, so we felt that he was interested in what we had to say.

President McKay:  Yes.  All right.  Thank you and congratulations.

Dr. Robinson:  Thank you very much.

President McKay:  All right, good-bye.

(see July 23 for the call from Ezra Taft Benson on this matter.)  See also copy of letter from President Eisenhower July 19)”

Wed., 23 July, 1958:

3 p.m.  Received telephone call from Ezra Taft Benson regarding the visit of Dr. O. Preston Robinson to President Dwight D. Eisenhower on the Lebanon crisis.  (see following notes of conversation — see also July 22 and July 19 on this matter)

Wednesday, July 23, 1958.

Telephone conversation with honorable Ezra Taft Benson, Wednesday, July 23, 1958.

President McKay:  Brother Benson?

Brother Benson:  President McKay, how are you?

President McKay;  Very well, thank you.  Hope you are well?

Brother Benson:  I am just fine, thank you.  I wanted to report to you briefly regarding the visit to President Eisenhower.  You will get more details from Preston Robinson when he gets home.  I understand he left at 2 o’clock, our time, this afternoon.  I think his trip was worthwhile, President McKay.

President McKay:  Thanks.  I am glad to hear that.

Brother Benson:  I arranged for the appointment with the President.

President McKay:  Good.

Brother Benson:  Sister Benson and I accompanied Brother and Sister Robinson to the President’s office.  We spent about forty minutes with him, and we arranged it so that Brother Robinson did practically all the talking.  We had pretty well reviewed the situation before we went in, and the President was obviously very favorably impressed.  He has a remarkable grasp of the whole situation which, I am sure, impressed Brother Robinson as it did me.  President Eisenhower has a very sincere desire to get at the basis of a settlement and to work out a plan that will win the friendship of these Arab nations, and so I think Brother Robinson’s report of his experience helped to confirm some of the feelings which the President has had but for which he has not had full support among some of those consulting with him.

President McKay: I see.

Brother Benson:  I think our views tended to strengthen his hand; strengthen his convictions in the matter.

President McKay:  Good.

Brother Benson:  Now, President Eisenhower asked this:  If Preston would be willing to prepare for him a memorandum outlining the problem as he sees it, and also his recommendations as to what might be done to solve those problems.  Of course, we readily agreed to do that.  We saw the President, by the way, yesterday at a quarter to twelve until twelve-thirty, and then yesterday afternoon Brother Robinson worked on the report–the memorandum, and I went over it with him late yesterday afternoon.  We had it typed this morning here at my office, and I transmitted it to the President so it would reach him today about noon.

President McKay:  Well, that is good work.

Brother Benson:  The President suggested to me that I try and arrange for Dr. Robinson to see John Foster Dulles if I thought it would be advisable and it could be done.  So I arranged for him to see Mr. Dulles at 12 o’clock today.  I did not see Dr. Robinson after that because I had to go to a luncheon at the White House where the President was host to the President of the nation of the Republic of Ghana.  They gained their independence, you remember, about a year and a half ago.  I had a chance to visit with the President a little while I was there, and he had received the memorandum, and I had also sent to him before our conference, some material on the Middle East situation, including an editorial form the Deseret news which I had planned to send even before you called me about Brother Robinson which I think is the best editorial I have seen on the subject.  That editorial plus a by-line article from the Deseret News written by Preston plus that little booklet of Preston’s, ‘Must We Lose the Middle East’ or whatever the title is.  Now, I sent those ahead of our appointment with the President.

President McKay:  I see.

Brother Benson:  And when we got there we found that he had read them.  I marked them ‘Personal’ and ‘Confidential’, and at that time we had not received a confirmation of our appointment, but in my memo I said, ‘anticipating and hoping that we will see you tomorrow, I am sending you these materials.’  And later we got the appointment.  When we got there, we found he had read them which indicates his interest and his appreciation.

President McKay:  Well, that is fine.

Brother Benson:  President Eisenhower asked us to convey to you his love and greetings, and his appreciation, so I believe this effort has been worthwhile.  When I talked to the President today, it was quite apparent that he, too, felt the time was worthwhile from his standpoint.

President McKay:  Well, thank you very much, Brother Benson.  I felt impressed that it would not do any harm, and that it might do some good toward allaying the trouble that we have.

Brother Benson:  You had the right impression I am sure, and I hope it will bear fruit.  Now, the President indicated to us (and of course we cannot repeat this publicly) that he would be willing to see any of the leaders in the Middle East.  He would do anything that was right at all to try and improve the situation.  Since I placed this call to you, on the ticker which comes to my desk every hour or so, I notice that Mr. Khrushchev has agreed conditionally at least to attend the Summit meeting on the Mid-east situation of the United Nations Security Council, that meets here in New York.

President McKay:  Well, that is good.

Brother Benson:  It starts next Monday, so that is somewhat hopeful.

President McKay:  Oh, that shows that he doesn’t want to have any serious trouble.

Brother Benson:  That is right.

President McKay:  You are right.

Brother Benson:  So I think some good has been done, and I want to thank you, and I know that President Eisenhower would personally if he could.

President McKay:  Thank you very much Brother Benson.  That makes me very happy.

Brother Benson:  I was very pleased with Brother and Sister Robinson’s performance here, and Sister Benson and I enjoyed being with them.

President McKay:  I should like to report to you that this morning while I was in conference here one of the reporters came over from the news.

Brother Benson:  Yes.

President McKay:  He had heard something about Brother Benson’s going back.

Brother Benson:  Yes.

President McKay:  And he was going to give it publicity, and I told him not to do it.

Brother Benson:  Well, I think that is probably wise, although we did clear with the President that it would be all right to announce that he had had the Conference with the President.  You see the President releases his appointment list unless it is something highly confidential.

President McKay:  Well, that is all right–it should come from that source.

Brother Benson:  That is right.  It would be all right for Brother Robinson to indicate he had had the appointment.

President McKay:  That is all right.

Brother Benson:  But he could not discuss the subject of the conversation.

President McKay:  No, that is all right then.

Brother Benson:  And I also saw Brother Pierce Brady.

President McKay:  Good.

Brother Benson:  I spent some time with him on this question of the location of the Federal Building and helped to arrange for some appointments.  He saw all of the Utah delegation.  He feels the thing is well in hand, and I think he left last night.  He said he would be in touch with me when he thought I could do anything further to be helpful.

President McKay:  That is good.  Thank you very much, and congratulations on your success.

Brother Benson:  Thank you and the Lord bless you.

President McKay:  Thank you.  Good-bye.

Brother Benson:  Good-bye.”

Wed., 30 July, 1958:

“11 to 11:25 a.m.  Dr. O. Preston Robinson came in to give a report on his visit with President Eisenhower and also to John Foster Dulles, U.S. Secretary of State regarding the Lebanon uprising, and Nasser’s attitude toward Communism (see notes following)

Wednesday, July 30, 1958

(Dr. O. Preston Robinson’s report on visit to President Eisenhower).

On July 30, 1958, I made a brief report to President McKay on the visit Sister Robinson and I, in company with Secretary and Sister Benson, had with President Eisenhower in Washington on the morning of July 21st between 11:45 and 12:30 noon.  I told President McKay of the cordial way in which President Eisenhower received us and reported his expression of best wishes which he asked us to convey to President McKay.

At the outset of our interview, President Eisenhower said he was most interested in receiving our views on the critical Middle East situation and indicated that often religious people were able to get information which others could not obtain.

I told President Eisenhower briefly about our meetings with Middle East leaders, particularly President Gamel Abdel Nasser, in 1954 and again in October, 1957.  The President was most interested in our impressions of Mr. Nasser and in our opinions as to his objectives.  I emphasized my convictions that Arab nationalism is a powerful force to which we should be sympathetic and that the Moslem people, including President Nasser, fear and resist Communism.  They have accepted help from the Soviets only after attempting and failing to obtain help from Western nations.  Due to recent and present political domination by Western nations in the area and because of the West’s extensive economic interests, the Arabs are suspicious of Western intentions and fear the Americans are attempting to replace the British and the French in control of the area.  This rear, plus the creation and existence of Israel, are the chief reasons why anti-Western feeling runs so deep in the Middle East.  For an Arab to be pro-West in that area now is almost treasonable.

Despite this anti-West sentiment, there is a deep reservoir of respect and admiration for Western and particularly for American ways of life and for the American form of government.  This reservoir needs to be tapped in order to reverse the present drift which is leading this area ever closer to Communist domination.

I reported to President Eisenhower that President Nasser had told us that his country and other Arab countries would resist to the bitter end outside domination from any source.  However, he told us, if they must be dominated, they would rather be dominated by the United States than by Russia.  I also emphasized the fact that President Nasser had expressed a sincere desire to talk face to face with President Eisenhower, provided such a conference would not be humiliating to his country nor would in any way threaten his country’s sovereignty.

President Eisenhower responded most favorably to this comment and stated that he would like to talk with Mr. Nasser provided, of course, that he could do so without embarrassing our allies – the British, the French, and Israel.

President Eisenhower was keenly interested in what we had to say.  He was courteous, gracious and extended the interview fifteen minutes beyond the prescribed time.  At the close of our conversation, he re-emphasized his opening observation that he was most interested in getting the opinions and impressions of an honest man who had no ulterior motives other than the welfare of the United States.

President Eisenhower asked me to submit my observations and recommendations in a brief report.  He said that when he gets things in writing, he can make sure that they are adequately followed up.  He also suggested that I have a talk with Secretary Dulles.    This interview was arranged and I talked briefly with Mr. Dulles the following day, Wednesday, July 22nd.

O. Preston Robinson

General Manager

Deseret News Pub. Co.

Tues., 23 Sept., 1958:

Telephone Calls

2.  Milton Weileman, Chairman of the Democratic Committee, called and asked for an appointment for David King and for him to discuss the political talk that had been given by Ezra Taft Benson last Monday evening in Salt Lake City.  (see Sept. 24 for visit to Elder Benson in LDS Hospital)”

Wed., 24 Sept., 1958:

“7:30 a.m.  Visited Elder Ezra Taft Benson in the LDS Hospital where he has been confined for the past few days for a check-up.  He suffered a gall bladder attack last Monday evening while delivering an address in Salt Lake City.

Brother Benson seemed to be feeling very well.  He said that the doctors are calling at 10 o’clock this morning to release him.  He said that they had found that there was nothing wrong with his heart; that he had suffered a gall bladder attack; that the stone had passed through and that he is now all right.

I mentioned to Brother Benson that he had ‘stirred up’ the democrats in giving his talk the other evening.  He asked me if I had any objections, and I told him that he could do nothing else since he is US Secretary of Agriculture.  Brother Benson said that he had forty appointments ahead of him, and that three fourths of them are non-political.

I told him to go ahead, and congratulated him on the success that he is having with the farmers.

Sun., 12 Oct., 1958:

“8:30 a.m.  Greeted and shook hands with Elder Robert Wright who just returned from the Swiss-Austrian Mission, and also with his twin brother, Elder Richards Wright, who returned from the British Mission a few months ago.  These young men are a credit to the Church and their family.

9:30 a.m.  Went over to the Tabernacle to listen to the regular broadcast of the Tabernacle Choir.

Before attended the Choir Broadcast, I met at the office Elder Ezra Taft Benson where for twenty minutes he consulted with me about his work in Washington.  He brought to my attention a copy of the Washington Farm Reporter (Report No. 839) of October 4, 1958 in which some statements regarding ‘Mr. Benson’s remarkable political come-back’ – that in New York there is ‘considerable interest in Benson as a potential Republican presidential candidate for 1960.’

In our conversation I said to Brother Benson ‘Do not seek the candidacy; let them come to you and if they do, we shall consider it.’

Brother Benson then said that President Eisenhower has invited the Choir members to sing at the White House during their Concert tour of the East and Canada, but there will not be room for the whole of those to sing before the President in the White House.”

Wed., 19 Nov., 1958:

“Telephone Calls – Tabernacle Choir

1.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson called from Washington regarding the Choir and the possibility of their going to the Russian Fair as a part of the prospective trade and cultural exhibition program of the United States and Russia.  (see following conversation)

I feel that there is no objection to the Choir taking such a trip.  However, I made no mention of taking the Choir to the Scandinavian countries and Czechoslovakia, although that was mentioned by Brother Benson.

I feel that the Lord is opening up the way for a favorable introduction of the Church into Russia.

Wednesday, November 19, 1958.

Telephone conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson.

Brother Benson:  How are you, President McKay?

President McKay:  Very well, thank you.

Brother Benson:  How is that good eye coming?

President McKay:  In another week I think I shall have my glasses.

Brother Benson:  I hope you will be careful.  I do not know whether that kind of advice takes with you.

President McKay:  I think I am careful, but my wife and my counsellors think I am very careless.

Brother Benson:  I wanted to call you regarding the Choir and the Russian Fair.  I do not know whether you are familiar with the fact that our Government is negotiating now with the Government of Russia regarding a prospective trade and cultural exhibition.

President McKay:  I have heard something about it.

Brother Benson:  It is tentatively set for next summer in Moscow.  After the President had heard the Choir sing in the White House, I made the comment to him that in our planning with Russia it would be a lovely thing to have this Choir included.  He seemed enthused about it.  Now in the meantime we have had some contact with some of the people in the State Department.  They are just now trying to work out plans as to what groups they would send over if they are successful in working out their general arrangements with the Russians.  I have talked to Bob Mullen who, as you know, is doing some publicity work for the Church here in Washington.  It is my feeling, President, before we go any further on this, we should get an expression from you as to whether you would look with favor upon it.  We had thought that if it could be worked out, it may be that the Choir could take in the countries of Norway, Sweden, Finland on the way and Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Austria on the way back.  That is very tentative and very general.  I think that before we take the matter up more formally with the State Department it would be well to determine whether or not you feel it would be favorable from the standpoint of the Church.

President McKay:  What about the expense?

Brother Benson:  That is one of the questions which the State Department has raised with us.  They would not have any labor union problems with the Choir as they are voluntary workers.  They have indicated more recently that probably it would not be a serious problem.  They would have some funds for their work.  That is one of the problems that will have to be discussed.

President McKay:  If the expenses can be worked out certainly I look upon it with favor.

Brother Benson:  Would you care to consider it and maybe discuss it with some of your associates.

President McKay:  You let us know about how the expenses will be taken care of, and we shall let you know.  If that can be arranged, I think we can let them go.  I think it would be a good thing.

Brother Benson:  Can we say the Church would look upon it favorably if the expense can be worked out?

President McKay:  I think it would be wonderful if they could go.

Brother Benson:  It appears now that they will be framing up plans within the next month.

President McKay:  All right, you tell them we look with favor on it.

Brother Benson:  That will be fine.

President McKay:  Let us know how many?  We should like to have about the same number that went back East.

Brother Benson:  That is the full choir.  And would you think that you would look with favor on them going to these other countries?  When they went before did the countries pay part of the expense?

President McKay:  No, we paid all of it.  The Choir consented to help pay the expenses.  They paid all their expenses on this trip.

Brother Benson:  In Europe did they charge for the concerts?

President McKay:  Oh, yes.

Brother Benson:  I see.  That was the means of helping to finance the trip.  Maybe a similar arrangement could be made.  I think the appearance at the fair in Russia would be without charge.  We will discuss it further with the people in the State Department.

President McKay:  How will they finance other groups?

Brother Benson:  I think they pay the expenses in part.  They haven’t framed up any groups finally yet.  I do not think they have contacted any organizations formally until they work out the details with the Russians.

President McKay:  We shall look upon it with favor provided we can arrange the transportation.

Brother Benson:  Give my love to the Brethren when you meet tomorrow.

President McKay:  Thank you.  Is Sister Benson well?

Brother Benson:  We are all quite well.

President McKay:  Give my kind regards to them and to the President.

Brother Benson:  Thank you.  We have cabinet meeting at 8:30 in the morning.  I will convey your greetings to the President.”

Friday, March 6, 1959

Telephone conversation between President McKay and Honorable Ezra Taft Benson, United States Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Brother Benson:  Good morning.  How are you?  This is Brother Benson in Washington.

President McKay:  Yes.

Brother Benson:  I just wanted to tell you of two developments in Israel that may be of some interest.  I would also like to get your counsel.

We are opening an office for the Department of Agriculture in Israel.  We are sending a young man to serve as our agricultural representative.  He will be closely associated with our Ambassador, and he is just leaving this week.

Secondly, Mr. Eban, who has been the Israeli Ambassador here in Washington from Israel, is just retiring and returning to his country — we understand to stand for election for parliament over there and possibly to become a cnadidate to succeed the present prime minister Mr. Ben Gurion.  Mr. Eban has been very friendly to me personally here.  when Brother Lee came through here, I arranged for Mr. Eban to arrange his travels.  He has invited me to luncheon with him the first of next week.  If there is anything I can do to be helpful to the Church, I shall do so.  He will probably raise the question regarding the Church, and I wanted to check with you.  I shall, of course, tell him of our plans, which he is familiar with, to open an office in israel.  He has encouraged us.  He may ask whether or not the Church is considering opening a mission in that country.

President McKay:  No.  If I were you, I should give no encouragement for the time being.  The Arabs are opposed to the State of Israel.

Brother Benson:  The situation has improved considerably.

President McKay:  I would not give him any encouragement on our establishing a mission there.

Brother Benson:  I shall not mention it then.  I shall stick to the agricultural work.  Of course, I do plan to keep in touch with him.  He has aksed that I do so.  If the time comes that he can be helpful to us, I think we have a friend in him.

President McKay:  How is Mr. Dulles?

Brother Benson:  I just came from Cabinet and the President made a report this morning that things are very encouraging.

Presidetn McKay:  That is good.

Brother Benson:  The President was pleased.  The treatments — gold treatment and X-ray treatment — have given good results.  The President was quite optimistic.

Secretary Dulles was very pleased to have your greeting and blessing extended to him.  I told him that you Brethren would be praying for him in the Temple.  It pleased him.  He could hardly hold his emotions.  I am sure it has helped a great deal.

I hope you are well.  Sister Benson joins in sending greetings to you and Sister McKay and all the Brethren.

President McKay:  Success to you and also to the man who will be representing the Agricultural Department in Israel.”

Tuesday, May 19, 1959.

Telephone conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson who called from Washington, D.C. as soon as he received word of the death of President Stephen L. Richards.

Brother Benson:  Hello, President McKay, this is Brother Benson.  I just got the flash over the wire here about Brother Richards.

President McKay:  Well, we are all broken up about it — it is sudden and a shock.

Brother Benson:  I just cannot believe it; he seemed so well when he was here a few days ago.

President McKay:  I know.  He was feeling fine.  We got word just before meeting time this morning that they had taken him to the hospital, but that there was no need to worry.  However, just about the time we usually meet at 8:30 in the morning, we received word from the doctor that he had passed away on his way to the operating room.  He had reached the hospital but before he got to the fifth floor his heart stopped.

Brother Benson:  They were taking him to surgery?

President McKay:  They were taking him up to give him a test.

Brother Benson:  I see.

President McKay:  The word that we had received was that ‘there was no need to worry, it is not serious.’  While we were sitting in the office word came that he had passed away – it was that sudden.

Brother Benson:  It is an awful shock, and I know what a shock it is to you!

President McKay:  He has been as close to me as a brother could be, a friend of the truest kind.  He has been wonderful, and of great value to me.  It is a great loss to the Church.  He was a great intellect, a great soul.  He was a loyal to me as his grandfather was to the Prophet and just as close.

Brother Benson:  I don’t suppose any plans have been made?

President McKay:  We are going to see Sister Richards in a few minutes.  They stayed last night at their summer home.  We didn’t know.  President Clark and I were going out an hour ago to see her as she did not know of his passing.  Her son and his doctor, a nephew, and members of the family went out and told her about it.  They will be in the apartment in about thirty minutes, and then we shall go over to see her.  Thank you for calling.

Brother Benson:  May the Lord bless you, and please convey my love and sympathy to Sister Richards.  I think so much of her also.  If Sister Middlemiss or someone could let me know about the arrangements for the funeral, I would like to come if at all possible.  Thank you so much President McKay, and the Lord bless you.

President McKay:  Thank you.  Good-bye.

(see Friday, May 22, 1959, for Funeral Services)”

Thurs., 3 Sept. 1959:

“Thursday, September 3, 1959

Telephone Conversation between President McKay and Elder Ezra Taft Benson, United States Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.

Brother Benson:  Hello, President McKay, this is Brother Benson in Washington.  How are you?

President McKay:  Very well, thank you, and I am glad to hear you.

Brother Benson:  Well, thank you.  How is Sister McKay?

President McKay:  Not so well, but now we know what is the matter, and from now on we look for improvement.  She hasn’t been able to gain her strength.

Brother Benson:  Yes.  I talked to Brother Moyle when I was there Monday, and he said you had taken her to the hospital again, and you were not able to get a real diagnosis of her case.

President McKay:  I think we have had it now.  We feel encouraged.

Brother Benson:  I am glad to hear that.

The young people, the student body leaders from BYU, have invited me to attend their leadership meeting in Sun Valley.  They had heard I was going to be out to Denver on the15th for the President’s meeting on Youth Fitness, and they are urging me to come on up to Sun Valley.  I had a letter from Brother Rex E. Lee, the President, and today I talked wtih Jim Marshall at BYU, and learned that they are hopeful you are going to be able to go; so I am just calling to see what you would like me to do, or if there is anything I should do.

President McKay:  Thank you.  I am not going.

Bro. Benson:  You are not able to go?

President McKay:  No.  I cannot do it.

Brother Benson:  Would it be helpful if I accepted?

President McKay:  If you accept it, we shall be glad.  It would please us very much if you will.

Brother Benson:  Well, I can arrange it, President McKay.  It would have to be on the 17th instead of the 16th, however.  They told me today that that would be all right.  I was coming out the 16th, but I have just been requested by the State Department to accompany Nikita S. Krushchev,”

(text ends here)

Mon., 8 Feb. 1960:

“Telephone Calls

1.  Walter Stevenson of Ogden, Utah called regarding whether or not he should accept the suggestion of Ezra Taft Benson and H. Aldous Dixon to run for Congress — see notes following.

Monday, February 8, 1960

Conversation between Mr. Walter Stevenson of Ogden, Utah, and President David O. McKay regarding Ezra Taft Benson and H. Aldous Dixon’s suggestion that Mr. Stevenson run for Congress on the Republican ticket.

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘I wanted to talk to you about my running for Congress.  We have some problems at home with sickness.’

President McKay:  ‘What do you mean by ‘sickness at home’?’

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘Effie is not well.  She has been sick for some time.  We’ve had trouble with one daughter.  She is a spastic and is under the care of a psychiatrist.  I told Brother Benson and Brother Dixon that.’

President McKay:  ‘The sickness is there anyway.  It is no excuse.  You would have to take care of that just the same.  I should like to see you run and make it.  I would not hesitate a minute.’

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘Do you think, then, with those problems it would not be too much of a handicap?  We had a son in the French Mission.  He has come home ill.  It is an emotional upset.  If you think I should run, I shall do it.  I am not too anxious, but they seem to think it is my duty.’

President McKay:  ‘We want a good man back there.  If we have you, we shall have a good man.  However, you know more about your home conditions than I do.  I had not heard about your son.’

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘Yes, he got a pain in his stomach and was in a hospital in Paris for a month.  He had an operation and they could not find anything wrong.  They think it is just emotional trouble.’

President McKay:  ‘Did they operate on his stomach?’

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘Yes, the French doctors thought something was wrong with it, but there was not.  It is just a matter of nerves.  We hope he will soon recover.  Thank you, President McKay.’

President McKay:  ‘You had better look into the matter of whether or not you should run for Congress and make your own preparations.’

Mr. Stevenson:  ‘That will be fine.  Thank you.'”

Tuesday, February 23, 1960

Telephone conversation with Honorable Ezra Taft Benson

Elder Benson:  President McKay, I feel in need of your judgment and counsel on a matter that is very important to me and to my work.  I wonder if it would be convenient for you to see me any time Saturday or Sunday, March 5th or 6th?

President McKay:  I’ll make it convenient.

Elder Benson:  I don’t want to interrupt your plans but I would like to come out.  I may have my older son, Reed, with me.  It is a matter regarding my work here and also my work in the Church.

President McKay:  May I look up my appointmnents and call you back?

Elder Benson:  I can call you back, or can I hold the line for a minute?

President McKay:  I think you had better come on Saturday, March 5.  What time would it be?  Say 8:30?

Elder Benson:  Well, the plane service isn’t too dependable.  I will be in New York—

President McKay:  Make it 9 o’clock.

Elder Benson:  Fine, we will make it nine o’clock.  If I can’t make it I will let you know.

President McKay:  Alright, we will be in town.

Elder Benson:  Good, we will look forward to seeing you.

President McKay:  Goodbye.

Elder Benson:  Goodbye.”

Sat., 5 Mar. 1960:

“2:30 p.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson and his son Reed called at the office by appointment previously arranged by telephone call from Brother Benson at Washington, D.C.

They entered into a two-and-a-half-hour discussion with me on national political affairs, especially on questions pertaining to candidates for the presidency of the United States.

I made no commitments, but advised that they watch the political trend between now and April Conference.  Reed then asked the question (having in mind the suggestion that has been made that his father run as a candidate for presidency) if there is anything that he could do or say that there might be other candidates considered besides the Vice President on the Republican ticket.  I answered, ‘You must never mention this – let the political leaders get together and make the suggestion, but do not let it come from you; you may acquiesce, but let them do the suggesting.’* (See over)

Following this consultation, I left for the hospital.”

Sat., 5 Mar. 1960:

“On March 8, 1960 received a letter from Brother Benson, a copy of which follows:

Washington, D.C.

‘Dear President McKay:

It was a real honor and pleasure for Reed and me to enjoy our association with you on Saturday.  Thank you so much for the generous amount of time you gave us and the counsel and instruction which you offered.  We will be happy to watch developments carefully, as you suggested, in the hope that we may have, as you indicated, the answer in a week or so, and in any event, by the time of April Conference.

We do hope that Sister McKay is continuing her improvement.  We all join in sending our prayers in her behalf.  May the rich favors of Heaven continue with you and yours.

Faithfully and sincerely your friend and brother,

/s/ Ezra Taft Benson

(see Wed., April 6, 1960)”

Wed., 6 Apr. 1960:

“3 p.m.

Met in my private office by appointment at his request Elder Ezra Taft Benson who discussed with me again the matter of his running for the presidency of the United States.  I told him that there is no change in my advice as given to him on March 5, 1960 when he called; viz., that the pressure for this candidacy must come from outside groups, and not from him nor from his son Reed.”

Mon., 6 June 1960:

“11 a.m.

Received a courtesy call from United States Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona.  He was accompanied by Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson.  He impressed me as a good man, and one who is favorable to the Mormons.  Senator Goldwater thought it would be a wise thing to have Brother Benson come home as he fears he is going to be embarrassed by both the Republicans and the Democrats.  I told the Senator that some time ago the Church had a good place for Brother Benson if he felt to come home at that time.  This information was conveyed to President Eisenhower so that he might have an excuse to release Brother Benson if he deisred to do so, but President Eisenhower felt that he needed Brother Benson’s services, and did not feel to release him at that time.’

Monday, June 6, 1960

Letter received from Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson:  (For original correspondence, see Scrapbook  – Visits with important people.)

      June 8, 1960

President David O. McKay

Building Re:  Senator Barry

      U.S. Senator – Arizona

Dear President McKay:

I know it has been your privilege to meet many wonderful people from the highest to the least, the rich and the poor, presidents, rulers, and probably many of the most prominent individuals.

Monday, when you were kind enough to meet Senator Goldwater, of Arizona, he was very greatly impressed.  After we left your office, he stated he had looked forward to meeting you for many years, and he could not remember ever having met a man with whom he was more deeply and reverently impressed and of whom he thought more.  He was very humble and grateful, and truly appreciative, for the few moments he spent with you.

He like many others all over the world have been very friendly and very favorable toward the Church because of you.  Your willingness to meet men from different parts of the land has done much for the Church, more than we will ever realize, and at the same time, it has been a great blessing to these folks.

Monday when you met Adeshir Zahedi, Ambassador from Iran, he came to my office because he was very thoughtful of me in Iran when I was sick.  He recently sent me a very personal letter and an invitation and sent me a beautiful Persian rug.  While he was at the college, I took a keen interest in him because he was a brilliant young man and a very humble and clean young man.  He neither smokes or drinks, and he, too, was so greatly impressed in meeting you.

We are all so thankful to you for all you that do for us.

Senator Goldwater, in my opinion, is a very capable Senator.  We have developed a very fine friendship.  He has invited me to Washington many times.  We keep a constant correspondence, and I am sure he is a highly regarded Senator among his colleagues.

Personally, I shall feel indebted to you as long as I live, and all my efforts, my work, and my accomplishments, be they small, are largely due to the encouragement, the loyalty, and the friendship and love I have received from you.  I haven’t the words to express to you how that has made me feel and what it has done for me.

Truly, the example you set for us is a stimulation and an inspiration, and may our Heavenly Father preserve you and bless you for many, many years to come, because under your great leadership, the Church is experiencing a truly golden era.

With kindest personal regards and love to you now and always.

Affectionately your brother,

/s/ Thorpe B. Isaacson

Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson

TBI/mb”

Fri., 22 July 1960:

“Telephone conversation between Elder Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture, and President David O. McKay.  Brother Benson called from Washington, D.C. regarding the presidential nomination.

Pres. McKay:   Hello.

Bro. Benson:   Hello, President McKay, this is Brother Benson.

Pres. McKay:  Glad to hear you.

Bro. Benson: It is good to hear your voice, how are you?

Pres. McKay: Very well, thank you.

Bro. Benson: That is good.  You are standing the heat out there all right are you?

Pres. McKay: All right, but we are getting out of it when we can.  It is terrific!

Bro. Benson: We are having the best summer we have had since we have been back here.

Pres. McKay: It frequently happens that way.

Bro. Benson: Yes it does.  How is Sister McKay?

Pres. McKay: She is getting better, thank you.

Bro. Benson: Oh I’m glad, give her our love will you?

Pres. McKay: Thank you.

Bro. Benson: I wonder if you have any counsel for me as we approach this convention in Chicago.  I am going out on Monday morning.  They have been busy writing the platform this week, as you know.

Pres. McKay: Yes, I was in touch with one man yesterday who is there.

Bro. Benson: Brother Wilkinson is there from Utah.  I don’t know if we have any other Latter-day Saints there or not.  I have three members of my staff there offering technical help.  I am going out, I think, on Monday to stay through the convention.  I am quite hopeful that they are going to come out with a rather sound plan on Agriculture — although I think it will be rather general, the details to be filled in maybe during the campaign.  There is still considerable interest in the Governor of New York, Nelson A. Rockefeller.

Pres. McKay: So I notice, and I am happy about it.  He has made a slip or two recently.  I was sorry to see that.

Bro. Benson: I think he has been a little bit liberal in one or two things he has said, and I have told him so.  I am under considerable pressure to indicate who I think would stand the best chance of defeating Senator Kennedy of the Republicans.  I have been seriously considering making a brief statement that I feel that the Governor of New York would stand the best chance.

Pres. McKay: I think you are right, and I am with you!

Bro. Benson: I am glad to hear you say that.  I don’t know that he has much of a chance, but I think there is a long-shot chance he may possibly win the nomination yet.  But most people think that Nixon has it pretty well sewed up.

Pres. McKay: Yes, that is the general idea.

Bro. Benson: But there is apparently a growing sentiment in a draft for Rockefeller.  It is too bad he withdrew last December.

Pres. McKay: Yes, it was the mistake of his life.  I believe if he had not done that he could get the nomination.

Bro. Benson: Yes, I think there is no question about that, President McKay.  But, he did withdraw.  Now it is a question of whether or not there will be enough sentiment developed to draft him.  They are after me to try to help persuade him.  I think they think I have more influence with him that I do.  They want me to help persuade him to run on the ticket as second man.

Pres. McKay:  Oh no, I think that would be a mistake.

Bro. Benson: I think the best thing to do is try to get him in first place.

Pres. McKay: Try to get him in first place.  If he cannot do that, then it will be up to him.

Bro. Benson: May I read to you the brief statement I had in mind of making?

Pres. McKay: All right.

Bro. Benson: This is the statement:  ‘Having traveled possibly more miles in the United States than any other Republican in the past seven and one-half years, I am convinced that Governor Rockerfeller would stand the best chance of defeating Senator Kennedy.  The Governor would pull heavily from Republicans, Independents, and Democrats, and I strongly believe he would win.  Although in some areas I feel Governor Rockefeller may be somewhat too liberal, he is devoted to our basic American concepts, and would make a great president.’

Pres. McKay: That is very good.

Bro. Benson: If there is any question about any of it I would like to know.  I hadn’t, at first, thought to say anything about my own travels.  I was going to start out this way:  ‘Of the prospective Republican presidential candidates, Governor Rockerfeller would stand the best chance of defeating Senator Kennedy.’

Pres. McKay: No, I hardly think I should do that.  I think your statement is right just as you have it.  You are just stating that you have had a chance to get the sentiment of the people.  So the first statement you read is better than the last one.

Bro. Benson: I am particularly concerned that there be no unfavorable reaction on the Church.

Pres. McKay: No, I don’t think it will.

Bro. Benson: This doesn’t speak out in opposition to the Vice-President.  It just indicates what I think about his chances if he were nominated.

Pres. McKay:  I think that is all right Brother Benson.

Bro. Benson: I don’t know just when I shall release it, President McKay.  I may release it this afternoon for the morning papers, or, I may wait until Saturday for the Sunday morning papers.

Pres. McKay: I think Sunday morning would be a better time.

Bro. Benson: It might have an influence on a greater number of delegates if it came out earlier.  Of course, I think maybe Sunday morning will be the best as there are no afternoon papers on Sunday.

Pres. McKay: I think so.

Bro. Benson: I appreciate your judgment on this President McKay.

Pres. McKay: Thank you for calling.

Bro. Benson: I hope you get a little relaxation this weekend.  Get away from the heat if you can.

Pres. McKay: I am just leaving now.

Bro. Benson: Peace be with you!

Pres. McKay: Thank you.  We join in sending love to you.

Brother Benson: Thank you, goodbye.”

Tues., 13 Sept. 1960:

Senator Kennedy Party

I reported to the brethren that Senator Kennedy, Senator Moss, Congressman King, and their party will be in Salt Lake City Friday, September 23rd between 5:45 p.m. and 6 p.m., and that a request had come to me that they would like to meet members of the First Presidency.  I stated that I had said that I should be glad to meet the party, and invited my counselors to be present if they wished so to do.

Political Meeting in Tabernacle

I said that protests are coming to permitting the use of the Tabernacle for political meetings.  We considered the part to be taken by the brethren of the General Authorities in the political meetings.

It was decided that individual members of the General Authorities may attend these meetings as they please, but that they be advised to take no part.

I stated that I had advised Elder Hugh B. Brown not to participate by offering prayer or by introducing the speaker.  It was suggested that Elder Ezra Taft Benson refrain from participating in the campaign.”

Wed., 21 Sept. 1960:

Telephone Calls

1.  While at my apartment at the Hotel, talked to Ezra Taft Benson in Washington, D.C.  Told him that we do not want him to enter the political campaigns this Fall.”

Friday, January 6, 1961

Telephone conversation between President David O. McKay and Elder Ezra Taft Benson, who called from Washington, D.C., Friday, January 6, 1961.

Brother Benson: President McKay, how are you?

President McKay: I am well.  I read your letter last night.

Brother Benson: Bless your heart.  I am happy to hear your voice, and I read in the Deseret News last night that you have just celebrated your 60th wedding anniversary.

President McKay: It was one of the most glorious experiences of my life!

Brother Benson: That is wonderful.

President McKay: All our little grandchildren paid tribute to Mama Ray.  We were all crying, we were so happy.  I have never been so thrilled and proud in my life!

Brother Benson: The Lord bless you.  What a rich experience!

President McKay: Yes, it was.  Thank you.

Brother Benson: We are all proud of you and grateful for you.

President McKay: Thank you.

Brother Benson: Our hearts go out to you.  I wanted to talk to you just a minute about my plans for the future as I see them now, President McKay.  These last couple or three weeks are proving to be about as busy as I have ever had.  There is a lot of work to complete at the end.

President McKay: I congratulate you on the tribute from President Eisenhower.

Brother Benson: Thank you very much.

President McKay: He has been a wonderful friend to you right from the beginning.

Brother Benson: Yes, he has.

President McKay: And you have to him.

Brother Benson: We have developed a very close friendship, and he has great admiration for you.

President McKay: You know that I reciprocate that.

Brother Benson: I know you do, and I have expressed that to him, as you have.

President McKay: Thank you.

Brother Benson: Now, President Eisenhower is, of course, preparing a State of the Union message, a budget message, and an economic report — all of which have in them something to do with Agriculture, so that has been taking a lot of time; and then we have just had a flood of callers here to the office from all over the nation, just to come in and express appreciation and to say ‘good-by’, which has been very pleasant but very time consuming.  I think I did not say to you that I have been trying to prepare a manuscript, which may be published, of the eight years of service here in the Department.  I did discuss it with, I think, Brother Lee and Brother Mark Petersen, and I am arranging to send a copy of the draft, when I get it in shape, to Brother Petersen for review.  I thought it would be a nice thing to have a member of the Twelve go over it, and he has agreed to do that –because I do not want anything in it which would in any way be inimical to the best interests of the thing we all love the most.

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: Now, there is one other thing that I wanted to mention.  I have, I guess, thousands of cards on people that have come here to the office with whom I have had dealings.  Most of them are, I would say, pretty good friends.  They are all friendly, but most of them are what you would call good friends; and I thought when I got out that probably I would have those cards segregated by missions and have referral cards go to each one of them.  I have not felt free to say all I would like to have said to them during the time that I have served as an official of the government, but I believe that after I get out I could do it discreetly and wisely; and I think probably the overwhelming majority of them would appreciate it.  You understand what I mean — that would be for missionaries to call on them.

President McKay: I know.

Brother Benson: We do not have to make the decision now.

President McKay: I think that requires careful thought.

Brother Benson: Yes, I think it does.

President McKay: Going out through your office to the Mission Presidents — I think we had better be careful about that.

Brother Benson: I would not do it here.  I would do it after I got back to Salt Lake.

President McKay: I see.

Brother Benson: I am entitled to take all the cards with me on each man, which gives his address and his connection — in some cases his telephone number — and how many times he has called at the office.  I would bring those with me.  Then we could make the decision later.

President McKay: Well, we shall have to keep it for consideration.

Brother Benson: Yes, that is right.  I will not make any move until I check further with you.

President McKay: You will take those cards with you at any rate?

Brother Benson: Yes.  I want to have them.  They are my property, and I want to refer to them occasionally, so I will bring them along with me.

President McKay: Should they be left as reference to the future Secretary of Agricultural?

Brother Benson: No, there will be another set here if he needs them.

President McKay: That is a personal matter?

Brother Benson: It is the usual procedure for me to take them.

President McKay: Well, all right.  You have made a good record.  Do not do anything that will let any enemy find fault.

Brother Benson: We will try our best not to.  I have had a good briefing session with my successor, and while he does not know agriculture, he is an energetic and vigorous leader, and we are trying to be as helpful as we can.  We left him two big books of transition papers, which I wish I could have had eight years ago, which he has appreciated very deeply.  I have a good letter from him this morning.

President McKay: That is good.

Brother Benson: As to the question of moving back, President McKay — officially we are through here on the 20th.  There will be a little cleaning-up work to do, which you can understand.  We have not sold our home.  It looks like we are going to have to take a loss on it, unfortunately.  We took a loss on our home in Salt Lake when we left.  The market was soft, and we had to move quickly, and we turned the money on our home here and had to borrow some, too, but the colored element in Washington — and our home is in that district — has had a very bad effect on real estate value.

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: Now, we do not know how long it is going to take us to move it.  We are pushing it hard.  We have several companies working on it.  We hope we will have it sold by the 20th.  We have set the date for our departure on the 31st of January.  The home will sell better if it can be shown while we are in it, so we are hopeful that the way will be opened up so we can sell it between now and then, and then we can go ahead with our plans.  If it does not sell, then we will have to make the decision whether we stay on a few days longer until we do sell it, or whether we move out and leave it with the real estate firms to sell.

President McKay: You have perfect liberty to take what time you need.  That will be all right.

Brother Benson: I appreciate that very much.

We have, of course, the cost of moving out, and I have been hopeful that we could have a similar arrangement to that which we had when we moved here.

President McKay: It seems to me that the government should help you one way.

Brother Benson: The government will not do it unless you are going to another government assignment, President McKay.

President McKay: Is that so?

Brother Benson: If I were going to a government assignment abroad or some other place, they would; but there is just no chance of it.

President McKay: Why did they not help you when you went back?

Brother Benson: Well, you see, I was just moving into government service.  It is only when you transfer from one government post to another that they help you.  They do not help you on the first move — they do not help you when you terminate; but if they ship you after you have come into the service, then they will.  So there is not anything we could do there.  I wish there were, but there is not.

It has been a rather costly operation for us back here.  We have kept our social activities to the very minimum, but even then the costs — we have been living with people and associating with people who have been pretty free spenders because they have had the money.  We have tried to hold everything down — trying to keep our children in school at the Brigham Young University part of the time — it has been quite a financial load.  It is going to cost us money by the time we get back.

I have had to buy a home in Salt Lake.  I bought an old home and we are fixing it up a bit.  I have had to go to the bank and borrow the money, assume the mortgage on it, and borrow money from the bank to cover the difference.  So it is kind of a tight squeeze now until we sell our home.  If we sell our home, we will be able to, we hope, lift the mortgage and also pay the bank off.  The bank has been very good here.  They have loaned me $16,000.00 on an open note.  We hope that things are going to work out so that we can dispose of our home and so we can pay for our old home in Salt Lake.

President McKay: I am here alone now.  I will take it up with my counselor tomorrow morning when he comes back.

Brother Benson: That is fine.  I did mention it to Brother Moyle one time when I was out there and I was unable to contact you because you were so busy.  His immediate comment was, ‘I think the Church ought to move you back as they moved you out.’  But, of course, I will abide by your decision.  It would be helpful to us, and I appreciate your approval for me to stay here until we sell our home.  We do not want to stay here until we sell our home.  We do not want to stay any longer than we have to.  We have made definite plans to leave on the 31st.  I had a meeting in Michigan.  They are having a meeting up there in which they have urged the attendance of all the former Secretaries of Agriculture — that means five, including myself — on February 1st.  I was going to attend that, and then drive out from there.  Sister Benson and one or two of the girls would go ahead so they would be at the home when the furniture arrives in Salt Lake.

President McKay: You take the time that is necessary.  That will be all right.

Brother Benson: We will do that, and we appreciate it.  In the meantime, the brethren are giving me some assignments and I have been to Atlanta, Georgia.  I am going to Texas to the San Antonio Stake this weekend, and to New Jersey next weekend.  I am trying to cut the time down as much as I can so as not to be away any more than I actually have to.

President McKay: That will be all right.

Brother Benson: I am enjoying the appointments.

President McKay: All right.  We congratulate you on your eight years’ service.  They will be memorable to you and to the nation.

Brother Benson: President McKay, I can not express adequately my appreciation for the wonderful support I have had from you personally, and from the Brethren, also.  It has been a wonderful source of strength and help.

President McKay: The Lord continue to bless you and guide you.

Brother Benson: Thank you, and the Lord bless you and bless Sister McKay.  I hope that all is well with her.

President McKay: She is getting along very well, thank you.  Kind regards to Sister Benson.

Brother Benson: Thank you.  We look forward to the time when we can be home again.

President McKay: And also kind regards to President Eisenhower.

Brother Benson: Yes.  I expect to see him probably before next Friday, but our last Cabinet meeting will probably be next Friday, President McKay — a week from today.

President McKay: You tell him I have him in mind and I love him as ever.

Brother Benson: Fine.  I appreciate that.  Did you get my last letter about your possible trip to Palmyra?

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: Oh, that is the one you are referring to.

President McKay: Can you come over to it?  Are you going to be there?

Brother Benson: Well, I would like to be there, and I had half planned to be there; but then I got an assignment from the Twelve to go to the New Jersey Stake on that same day. 

President McKay: I see.

Brother Benson: So I had better take my assignment, I guess.

President McKay: Yes, you will have to take your assignment.

Brother Benson: Yes, that is right.

President McKay: I have a meeting now with the men regarding how best to go there.  I do not know just how to go — whether by plane or railroad.

Brother Benson: If there is anything we can do to help out, we will be glad to.  We had planned, had we gone up, to drive from here, but it is about a full day’s drive.

President McKay: What kind of flying weather do they have back there?

Brother Benson: It is very good now, President McKay.  The snow is nearly all gone, and it has been very mild and nice.  Today it is a lovely day.

President McKay: Well, I want to fly if it is all right, but flying in the winter time is rather risky.

Brother Benson: Yes, but I think maybe you could fly into Rochester or Buffalo and then have them pick you up and drive you from there on.  Would you like to have us check at all?

President McKay: No, we shall do it from here, just as well.

Brother Benson: I did mention in the letter the hope that you might stop in Washington one way or the other.  I know it will be a tiring trip.

President McKay: Well, I shall have to do it in a hurry, becasue I am here alone with Ray and I do not like to leave her at nights.

Brother Benson: Yes, of course.

President McKay: She worries about my being in the air at winter time; she does not like that.

Brother Benson: I hope you will have someone come with you.

President McKay: Oh, yes.  I will not travel alone.

Brother Benson: That is good.  If there is anything we can do on this end, let us know.

President McKay: Thank you very much.

Brother Benson: Thank you, and the Lord bless you.

President McKay: Good-by.

Brother Benson: Good-by.”

Thurs., 18 May 1961:

“Today at Council meeting, Elder Ezra Taft Benson, who had attended, at the request of General Dwight D. Eisenhower former President of the United States, a meeting of President Eisenhower’s former Cabinet members (Elder Benson having been Secretary of Agriculture), held at Gettysburg, on May 11, 1961, gave us a rather disturbing report of that meeting.

Brother Benson, referring to the meeting which was held at the College in Gettsburg, said that 15 were present.  Stated that General Eisenhower was in excellent spirits and robust health, and that he sent his warmest best wishes to me.  *(see note below by cm)

At the meeting they discussed the current situation (General Eisenhower leading the discussion), and also the speech which the General proposes to give June 1, this being the first speech he will have given since his retirement from office, and which is to be given at a meeting in Washington, D.C.  The General wanted to know how he could best help the country and the present administration in that talk.  The Cuban problem is giving deep concern to both President Kennedy and General Eisenhower.

The General feels that the situation has been badly fumbled, and thinks part of it has been due to the fact that there has not been sufficient counseling together, and General Eisenhower felt, too, that the military tactics were bad.  President Kennedy is sick at heart over the situation and General Eisenhower is very much concerned over the situation.  There was a long disucssion at the meeting over the way the Monroe Doctrine has been flouted, and the blunt violation of the Declaration of the Assocation of American States.  It is quite apparent that Cuba is being used as a base for infiltrating Latin America with Communistic philosophy.  The Laos situation is also giving great concern to the leaders, and it would seem that probably the Communists are going to make the next attack in Berlin.

Elder Benson said the situation in the Executive Branch generally, he felt, is not good at the present time; that President Kennedy is certainly feeling the strain of his terrible responsibility according to the reports that he received.  He said that there is a unanimous feeling that the Country faces some very serious problems, and that we ought to do what we can to be of assistance.  General Eisenhower feels that the country needs to unite behind the President, particularly on international matters.

*Note by cm

When sending his best wishes to President McKay, General Eisenhower said in Elder Benson’s presence, that he considered President McKay ‘the greatest spiritual leader in the world today.’

Fri., 26 May 1961:

“Telephone Conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson

Re:  Serving on a Committee to look into the question of exchange of humans for tractors in Cuba.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson telephoned to me at 3 o’clock this afternoon and said that Dr. Milton Eisenhower had been appointed by President John F. Kennedy one of a three-person committee to look into the question of exchange of humans for tractors in Cuba.  One thousand two hundred and fifteen freedom fighters that are imprisoned in Cuba may face death — we do not know.  Castro has made the proposition that he would exchange them for 500 American tractors.  It may be black mail.  President Kennedy has appointed Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Walter Reuther, and now he has asked Dr. Milton Eisenhower, and has authorized him to add two or three members to his committee to deal with the agriculture aspects of the deal.  Brother Benson said Dr. Eisenhower called him to see if he would lend his name to the committee.

I answered: ‘You cannot lend your name on that Committee.’  Brother Benson said:  ‘I do not feel that I should; Dr. Eisenhower apparently feels that I cannot refuse the President.  He said that our duty will be largely to raise the funds for the tractors.  They propose to get the names of the prisoners, and send one-fifth of the tractors as Castro cannot be trusted.’  I said Castro cannot be trusted any more than Khruschev — their word does not mean a thing!’  Brother Benson said the sentiment in South America is very strong against Castro, and some of the people are raising funds to help purchase the tractors so that the prisoners can be freed.  I said, ‘Well, it is a terrible thing, but you must not associate yourself or your name with this committee — with Mrs. Roosevelt, and Walter Reuther.'”

Thurs., 29 June 1961:

“8:15 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and asked about the disposition he should make of his many government records and also his personal records.  I told him that we would leave to him and President Joseph Fielding Smith, Church Historian, the matter of going over the papers and recommending what papers, if any, should go into our records here in the Historian’s Library, and which, if any, should be placed in the Congressional Library.  They are to report back.

I stated that Brother Benson gave a grim report of conditions in Washington from which place Brother Benson has just returned.  Brother Benson has received an invitation from the senators and congressmen to go back to Washington as an adviser.  I feel that if this matter comes up again that Brother Benson should remain here; that we need him at home.

Thurs., 17 Aug. 1961:

“10 a.m. to 3 p.m.

The regular meeting of the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve convened in the Salt Lake Temple at 10 a.m.  This was the first meeting since we adjourned on Thursday, June 22, 1961.

Following some regular business regarding Stakes and Wards, we discussed the following:

1) Position of the Church with reference to Communism.

Some of the Brethren called attention to the extensive activity of some of our stakes presidents in the Los Angeles area, largely directed by President Hugh C. Smith.  Brother Cleon Skousen is taking an active part in this campaign, and that regularly organized meetings are held in the Los Angeles area, and that this campaigning is being carried into our Sacrament meetings.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson mentioned that Brother Skousen is field director of the American Security Council, which is a national organization set up by businessmen and business corporations primarily, and financed by voluntary contributions; that some very distinguished Americans serve on the Advisory Committee and the Board, and they have headquarters in Chicago.  Their objective is to try to inform the American people on the issues involved in Communism and Socialism.  He said that personally he thought the Communism threat is very real and very dangerous, and that there is need for some organized effort to meet this great threat.

Elder Benson and others of the Brethren indicated that they thought that perhaps Brother Hugh C. Smith has been a little extreme in his efforts to combat this menace.  The Brethren were agreed that we should fight Communism as citizens, but they questioned the wisdom of doing so as the Church, and particularly in our Sacrament meetings.

It was suggested that the First Presidency prepare a carefully worded memorandum on this subject to be handed to the Brethren of the General authorities for their use when visiting quarterly conferences, setting forth the precise feeling of the First Presidency about this matter.  It was suggested that emphasis should be placed on the spiritual nature of our Sacrament meetings.

It became the sentiment of the Brethren that this be done, but I said that in this connection, however, we must be careful about condemning any efforts that are anti-Communistic because Communism is a real danger in our country.  It is a termite movement, the purpose of which is to make the state dominant over the individual.  Our Sacrament meetings should be reserved for spiritual enrichment and spiritual instruction.  (See Diary of August 31, 1961 for further discussion on this matter.)

Saturday, September 30, 1961

Fourth Session

BENSON CITES RED PERIL IN LDS TALK

Communism and collectivized socialism are incompatible with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Ezra Taft Benson, member of the Council of Twelve Apostles, told the Saturday afternoon session of the 131st semi-annual General Conference of the Church in the Salt Lake Tabernacle.

Elder Benson, former secretary of agriculture, said it was the duty of every holder of the priesthood to fight worldwide conspiracy of communism on every front.

‘Some timid, vacillating political leaders,’ he declared, ‘proclaim that communism is something we will have to learn to live with, whether it is Khrushchev or some other leader.

‘The present Communist system, they declare, will continue because there is no alternative system to replace it.

‘Such a negative attitude writes off the hundreds of millions behind the Iron Curtain as a lost cause.  Surely no courageous, liberty-loving citizen will treat the Communist secret combination as something we will have to learn to live with.

‘There is a more courageous and sounder point of view.  President David O. McKay expressed it in these words (in a discussion with President Kennedy when he was a senator):

‘Men will be free.  I have hoped for 20 years that the Russian system would break up.  There is no freedom under it, and sooner or later the people will rise up against it.  They cannot oppose those fundamentals of civilization and God.  They can’t crush their people always.  Men will be free.’

Elder Benson characterized socialistic communism as ‘the earthly image of the plan which Satan presented in the pre-existence – a program which is essentially a war against God and the plan of salvation.’

He asserted that communism is fundamentally socialism and that collectivized socialism is part of the communist strategy.

‘We will never win our fight against communism,’ he continued, ‘by making concessions to socialism…

‘When socialism is understood, we will realize that many of the programs advocated and some of those already adopted in the U.S. fall clearly within the category of socialism… which is simply governmental ownership and management of the essential means of production and distribution of goods.

‘The socialistic communistic conspiracy to weaken the U.S. involves attacks on many fronts.  To weaken the American free-enterprise economy…is a high priority target.

‘Theri press and propaganda media are therefore constantly selling the principles of centralized or federal control of farms, railroads, electric power, schools, steel, maritime shipping and many other aspects of the economy, but always in the name of public welfare…

‘No true Latter-day Saint and no true American can be a Socialist or a Communist or support programs leading in that direction.  These evil philosophies are incompatible with Mormonism, the true Gospel of Jesus Christ.

To meet the challenge of the adversary, the speaker urged members of the priesthood to become informed about communism and Americanism; to accept the command of the Lord and treat socialistic communism as the tool of Satan and resist its influence whereever found; to help those who have been deceived; to use influence to resist erosion taking place in political and economic life.

‘We should not make the mistake,’ he continued,’ of calling people Communists just because they happen to be helping the Communist cause.

‘Thousands of patriotic Americans, including a few Latter-day Saints, have helped communists without realizing it.  Others have knowingly helped without joining the party.

‘The remedy is to avoid name-calling but point out persuasively how they are helping the Communists.

Speakers at the afternoon session, in addition to Elder Benson, were William J. Critchlow Jr., assistant to the Council of Twelve Apostles; Marion G. Romney and LeGrand Richards, members of the Council of Twelve Apostles; Thorpe B. Isaacson, newly appointed assistant to the Council of Twelve Apostles, and Sterling W. Sill, assistant to the Council of Twelve Apostles.

Elder Sill, who President McKay invited to deliver his one-minute speech because of lack of time, spoke less than a minute on the text – ‘Come Follow Me.’

The opening prayer was by H. Loren Allen, president of the Mesa Stake, and the benediction by Milton R. Ream, president of the San Leandro Stake.

The Salt Lake Tribune – Sunday Morning, October 1, 1961

Fri., 3 Nov. 1961:

“7:45 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and discussed with me the fluoridation issue which is to come before the vote of the people next Tuesday.  He prepared a statement which he thought might well be included in an editorial in the Deseret News.  I took the statement into the meeting of the First Presidency, and we approved of its being used.  The statement is as follows:

‘In the fluoridation controversy all parents should decide for themselves how much responsibility for their children’s teeth they wish to retain and how much of their responsibility they wish to transfer to the government.  Our citizens should carefully weigh the issue of the loss of part of their freedom in exchange for the proffered benefits.’

After the meeting, I called Dr. O. Preston Robins, General Manager of the Deseret News, and told him to use the statement in an editorial in the Deseret News before Tuesday.  (see copy of conversation following.)

(see also copy of editorial following.  NOTE: The statement as given to Dr. Robins was evidently not used.)

Friday, November 3, 1961

Conversation between President David O. McKay and O. Preston Robins of the Deseret News, November 3, 1961, at 11:20 a.m.

President McKay: Hello.

Brother Robins: Good morning, President McKay.

President McKay: Good morning, Brother Robins.  What is your feeling and attitude on this matter of Fluoridation?

Brother Robins: We have taken the point of view that we could remain kind of neutral, because my board told me to.

President McKay: What do you mean, ‘kind of neutral’, how is that?  Why not be entirely neutral, there is no ‘kind’ about it.  As per your editorial in last evening’s paper, people are saying that you are favoring Fluoridation.

Brother Robins: It depends upon which side you look at it.  We try to balance it on the editorials.  If you will look at Wednesday’s paper, we had a pro and con view on it.  We are trying to keep it equal.

President McKay: Here is something I think we ought to do:

‘In the fluoridation controversy, all parents should decide for themselves how much responsibility for their children’s teeth they wish to retain and how much of their responsibility they wish to transfer to the government.  Our citizens should carefully weigh the issue of the loss of part of their freedom in exchange for the proffered benefits.’

Brother Robins: I think we can say that with full confidence.

President McKay: All right, we are sending it right over.

Brother Robins: We will run it.

President McKay: Thank you, nice talking to you.

Brother Robins: Thank you.”

Fri., 1 Dec. 1961:

All American Society

The Presiding Bishopric called attention to the request of the all American Society for the use of the Assembly Hall on Monday, December 11, 1961 to present Dr. Fred Schwartz, President of the Christian Anti-Communist Crusade.  It was explained that Brother Reed Benson, son of Elder Ezra Taft Benson, and Cleon Skousen are taking a very active part in this ‘crusade.’

Bishop Simpson reported having attended one of the meetings in Los Angeles.  He said that Cleon Skousen was extremely ‘right-wing’ to the point that he was recommending that the entire State Department be dismissed and new men put in that Department.

I asked Bishop Simpson if he knew anything about Dr. Fred Schwartz who is to speak in the meeting in the Assembly Hall, and Brother Simpson said that he is an Australian, that he is a gifted speaker.  In this connection the literature regarding the proposed meeting indicates that President David E. Heywood of the Phoenix Stake, President Alonzo F. Hopkins of the Woodruff Stake, President Glenn E. Nielson of the Big Horn Stake, and other prominent people are listed as sponsors of the program, in addition to Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Twelve.

I said that we cannot refuse the Assembly Hall for the holding of the meeting proposed.  I asked Bishop Vandenberg to watch the service and to make sure that no one makes an attack on the State Department or the Government.

Bishop Vandenberg said he would call Elder Benson and talk with him and tell him that this meeting must be strictly non-political.

Tues., 5 Dec. 1961:

Just before leaving home, telephoned to Elder Ezra Taft Benson regarding a telegram which I had received concerning his accepting a speaking engagement in Southern California.  I told Elder Benson that his accepting this invitation is entirely up to him.

I also told Brother Benson that permission had been granted for the All American Society to hold their meeting in the Assembly Hall next Monday evening.

Tuesday, December 5, 1961

The following telegram was received, and read at 12:30 p.m. to Elder Ezra Taft Benson:

NO PD LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 4

President David O. McKay

47 East South Temple

Salt Lake City, Utah

Urgently request Elder Ezra Taft Benson as Keynote Speaker evening of December 11 for Project Alert School of Anti-Communism, week of December 11-15, presented by Navy and Marine Leagues.  His address will be at the Shrine Auditorium before an audience of 6500 and will be televised throughout Southern California with releases by film and video tape in other cities throughout the United States at a later date.  We cannot think of any who symbolizes the integrity, forthrightness and courage of America as does Elder Benson.  Granting him permission to speak will mean a great deal to all of us in Southern California.

Dr. William Brahsears

Chairman of the Board Project Alert

11 11-15 65– 2404

Elder Benson was advised that this matter was being left entirely in his hands, and to do what he deems best.

President McKay said to Brother Benson:  ‘I will leave it entirely with you, it is a personal matter.'”

Wed., 13 Dec. 1961:

“Immediately following the departure of the Swiss Ambassador, I received in my private office, Dr. Fred C. Schwarz, President of the Christian Anti-communism Crusade, physician from Australia, and former minister in the Baptist Church, who is now devoting his full time as an anti-Communist crusader.  He was born in Brisbane, Australia, January 15, 1913.  He studied at the University of Queensland where he graduated in science in 1933, majoring in philosophy and political economy.  Concurrently with his teaching duties, he studied at the University of Queensland Medical School, and in 1944, received his degree in medicine and surgery.

Dr. Schwarz first met the Communists at the University of Queensland.  He engaged in a debate with Max Julius, a leading Australian Communist in the year 1940.  His interest increased, and he has made a profound study of basic Communist texts.  He has continued to debate Communists and recently debated the chairman of the Communist Party of Massachusetts, Otis Archer Hood, at Harvard University.  He has repeatedly challenged Communist leaders on open debate on any aspect of their philosophy and program.

In 1950 he left his native Australia, and toured the United States and Europe lecturing on Communism.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson and his son, Reed, were present during the interview.

I welcomed Dr. Schwarz and told him of my admiration for anyone who advocates the truth and fights against evil, and I added, ‘You are one of these friends fighting the greatest evil in the world — Communism.’

Dr. Schwarz impressed me as a man who is very well informed on the subject of communism.  I was very interested in what he had to say.  (see notes of interview written by Brother Henry Smith of the Deseret News who was present during the interview.)

Wednesday, December 13, 1961

One of the prominent visitors to the office of President David O. McKay this week was an Australian physician and former minister who is now devoting his full time as an anti-Communism crusader.

He is Dr. Fred C. Schwarz, president of the Christian Anti-Communism Crusade, who gave two addresses in Salt Lake City last Monday, one at a luncheon in the Hotel Utah, and the second in the Assembly Hall on Temple Square.

President McKay and Dr. Schwarz spent a pleasant half hour in the President’s office Wednesday, discussing the dangers of Communism, which they mutually agreed was ‘the most evil thing in the world today.’

President McKay welcomed Dr. Schwarz to his office and told of his affection for the ‘advocates of truth and those who fight evil.  You are one of these friends fighting the greatest evil in the world.’  With Dr. Schwarz were Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Council of the Twelve, and his son, Reed Benson, director of the All-American Society.

Dr. Schwarz spent a considerable part of the interview warning President McKay of the eminent dangers of Communism, and explaining that his dual emphasis during his ‘crusade’ in the United States was, first of all, the need for knowledge — understanding of the techniques of Communism — and secondly, a strong motivating force as vital as their’s is with which to oppose them.

The visitor told President McKay that Lenin’s book, ‘The State and the Revolution’ is now the most translated book in the world, having surpassed the Bible in that regard, ‘but,’ he added, ‘nobody bothers to read it.’

At the conclusion of the visit President McKay wished his visitor ‘success in your efforts.’

In his Salt Lake addresses, Dr. Schwarz declared that people tend to hide from unpleasant truths.

He explained that since the formation of Communism in 1903, some one billion people have fallen under its denomination, and Communists have an ‘option’ on another billion in the uncommitted areas of the world.

‘At the present rate of progress, Communism will have conquered us in ten years,’ he said.  He urged people to become ‘dedicated individuals’ and to put the defeat of Communism first, above all other things.

By – Henry Smith

Deseret News Reporter”

Fri., 5 Dec. 1961:

11 a.m.

Henry Smith, reporter of the Church Section, came in and asked regarding publishing Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s speech made in Los Angeles a few days ago.  I gave permission for this speech to be published.”

Tues., 9 Jan., 1962:

1:10-1:25 p.m.

Called President Ernest L. Wilkinson at Washington, D.C. in accordance with his request regarding Columnist Drew Pearson and Senator Barry Goldwater; also regarding letter from Professor Richard D. Poll of B.Y.U. with reference to W. Cleon Skousen and his book.

(For complete details, see copy of conversation following.)

“Telephone call to President David 0. McKay from President Ernest L. Wilkinson-President of the Brigham Young University–in Washington, D. C., January 9, 1962, at 12:30 p.m.

Wilkinson: President McKay?

McKay: Yes.

Wilkinson: I made bold to call you today, despite knowing how busy you are, because I knew from Preston Robinson that you were meeting him in the morning — Wednesday morning. You afforded me the privilege of going to an Educational Convention in the East, and I have spent one day here in Washington, and I have some new information on this matter that you will be talking to him about, and I thought that it was my duty to get to you.

First, I find in Washington here that Jack Anderson, who is the assistant to this Drew Pearson–Anderson being a member of our Church–is a very, very close friend and goes around all the time with young David King.

Second, I find also, I learned from two sources when I got here on Sunday, that young David King has been telling prominent Church people here that this attack he made on Benson for Benson’s Los Angeles talk was done after he received information from the General Authorities as to a Thursday Conference they had in the Temple, in which they disapproved of Benson’s talk.

Third, Senator Bennett has been so concerned if the news continued with Pearson that Pearson may do as he has done in five or six other instances just before election — come out with some attack or smear on Bennett at the last moment, which is too late to be mentioned or to repute it. Pearson, of course, has had a reputation for doing that. He has done it five or six different times, and everyone who does not agree with his philosophy — he, of course, is an extreme left-winger — is afraid of him, and so Bennett went to Robinson when he was out in Utah this last year — this last fall, and asked Robinson if there was any attack of that kind on the part of Pearson, if he (Bennett) would have time to answer it in the News, and all that Robinson said was that he would have to wait and see at the time — he couldn’t promise him in advance that he could answer it, they would have to judge it as things come up.

Now, I mention those three things that I have learned since I have been in Washington. I placed my opposition to Pearson, of course, on the grounds which I think were solid — that he was just too undependable to be worthy of the traditional Deseret News published by the Church. But if we should continue, of course, to publish his articles and he should make some type of an attack on Bennett at the last moment, and even if the News did not carry it, other papers who have Pearson’s column would carry it, and then if we did not carry it, of course, the News would then be subject to a lot of criticism upon the grounds that they refused to run Pearson’s article, which he was actually against Bennett.  In other words in addition to Pearson being entirely undependable and unreliable, there is now introduced into the problem the political danger in this situation, which to me is very, very unhealthy from the standpoint of the Church and the News. Now, that is the first subject I wanted to cover with you, and they all have to do with Pearson.

The second subject I wanted to cover with you is that of Goldwater. On the way back here, and I had to take the train because the planes were down for a couple of days, I had a chance to read the news releases of Goldwater for a period of three or four months, and I would like just to have the opportunity to sit down the minute I get back for one day and make a careful memorandum for you on them — not the summary of all of them.

McKay: Well now, of course, their objection there is that he is a presidential candidate. That is the only objection they had.

Wilkinson: That is the only objection. Now Preston Robinson agreed with me again on Friday, or Saturday, that all that Goldwater says is more nearly the Mormon viewpoints than any other writer. He admits that. Well now, why simply because he may be a presidential candidate, should we deny ourselves the writing of someone who writes more constant with our ideals than anyone else. I should say that Preston told me and, of course, he told me about his conference with you. He told us all about it, so I know about it through him. He told me that if, when he had his further conference with you you then directed him to take Pearson out, that he already had a conservative writer that he would put in in his place. And I asked him who the conservative writer was. He gave me his name. I do not now recall the name, but certainly he is a man completely unknown. Now with Goldwater being known as well as he is. . .

McKay: Wasn’t it Littman?

Wilkinson: No, he has got another man now.

McKay: Oh, I haven’t heard.

Wilkinson: Well, he will tell you about it. He has got another man now.

Of course, Littman is a liberal writer and he is not Conservative. But my

point is if as Preston says, Goldwater echoes our traditional Mormon beliefs

more closely than any man in public life, why should our readers be denied

the rights to read him merely because he might be a presidential candidate?

We are printing every day in the week statements of Kennedy. Certainly

Kennedy is going to be another presidential candidate. Why shouldn’t we put

down side by side — if they want Littman, Littman is liberal, print him side against Goldwater. I am in favor of both sides being expressed, but I do not think we should deprive ourselves of the leading political apostle right now of the views that we believe in. Now that’s on Goldwater. In other words, my own deep feeling is that you should not settle for some third or fourth-rate man whom the public do not know at all, and who very few people would ever read. They would read Goldwater, even if they did not believe in him, because he is well known in public life. My final suggestion on that point is that it seems to me that this whole question of whom these feature writers are should be reviewed all at one time, and unless you want to decide it yourself, it would seem to me that either you or the First Presidency should sit down with the Board of Directors of the News and decide all at one time on the writers who they should be. Some of them may be liberal. I would not object to some of them, a man like Littman being liberal, provided at the same time we were able to put in a man like Goldwater, who admitedly represents our views more than anyone else. Now that is all, President McKay, that I need to bother you with. This thing admittedly has troubled me a lot, but I wanted to get that over to you.

McKay: I thank you very much for it.

Wilkinson: Now, finally, just one comment on another matter. A Richard Poll, a professor of Political Science at the BYU, asked permission of me to send you a letter with respect to Skousen. I did not think that I ought to deny him the privilege if he wanted to. I saw the letter. To me it is rather academic. It has been sent to you, you maybe haven’t opened it yet.

McKay: No, I have not seen it yet.

Wilkinson: May I just tell you on that. Brother Poll, and President Brown have been talking about this somewhat. I do not know whether President Brown suggested that he send it to you, but I have seen correspondence between the two, and it may be that there was some such suggestion, but when I get back, I could talk to you about the entire thing too, if I may, and there is no need for you to answer it immediately. It is an attack on Skousen. I think it is trivial. I do not agree with all that Skousen has done. I think Skousen has been a little careless in some of his statements, but certainly his motives and his purposes are good.

McKay: Yes, and he is nearer right than he is wrong.

Wilkinson: He is much nearer right than he is wrong.

McKay: Right.

Wilkinson: And these mathematitions are just altogether too trivial in their harping and their criticisms. They cannot see the forest for the trees.

McKay: That is what I think.

Wilkinson: Well, now, I apologize again for intruding, but I wanted to bring you up to date as far as I knew.

McKay: Thank you very much, I appreciate it.

Wilkinson: Well, thank you, President McKay.

McKay: All right, Good bye.

Wilkinson: I am grateful for the privilege of telling you.

McKay: Thank you.

Wilkinson: Thank you, good bye.

McKay: Good bye.”

Thurs., 15 Feb., 1962:

“8:05 – 8:50 a. m. 

Office consultation With Elder Ezra Taft Benson which was interrupted by an office call of Brother S. Lawrence Moss, with whom I made an appointment for him and his son for Saturday morning.

8:55 – 9:50 a. m. |

I attended the meeting: of the First Presidency, and there I told my counselors of the meeting with Elder Benson regarding Anti-Communistic Activities. Brother Benson is very much concerned regarding certain information that has been given out in Seattle. A member of the high council up there has written to him regarding instructions that one of the members of the First Presidency has given the president of that stake by telephone in answer to a letter of inquiry he had written to the First Presidency. He said that a member of the First Presidency had told him that they shouldn’t permit any discussions of communism in their Church meetings, especially in any Sunday School or young people’s firesides. He said that he could not speak for the other members of the First Presidency who were out of town. A few days later a member of the stake presidency announced in the stake preparation meeting that there should be no discussions of Communism, that the people were not well enough informed to discuss it.

President Moyle recalled this conversation and explained the circumstances. He had said to the stake president in substance, that it was his judgment, and he was speaking for no one but himself, it was not proper for us in firesides and in our Church meetings to get into controversial matters, and that there was a controversy over Skousen’s talks, and these things should not take place in our formal religious gatherings. He told the stake president he was not prepared to give any official statement, that when there was an official statement to be given it would be given in writing over the signature of the First Presidency, and that so far as he knew there had been no formal approval of either “The Naked Communist” by Cleon Skousen, or the “American Heritage of Freedom. “

I commented that I have given public approval of Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist” in General Conference, and that the “American Heritage of Freedom” is a pamphlet containing Brother Benson’s October Conference address that I knew nothing wrong with Elder Benson’s talk, and thought it to be very good.

President Brown said that his only objection is that Elder Benson’s talk puts Socialism and Communism in the same category, that all the people in Scandinavia and other European countries are under Socialistic governments and certainly are not Communists. Brother Benson’s talk ties them together and makes them equally abominable.  If this is true, our people in Europe who are living under a Socialist government are living out of harmony with the Church.

It was decided to invite Elder Benson to meet with the First Presidency Monday morning, February 19th.”

Mon., 19 Feb., 1962:

8:00 – 10:00 a.m.

Attended the meeting of the First Presidency.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson, by appointment, came into the meeting. We discussed the matter Of communism and Elder Benson’s participation on the Advisory Council of the All American Society, an Anti-Communist Organization. Reference was made to a letter from a high councilman in the Seattle Stake, requesting explanation as to the Church’s stand on the matter of speakers referring and discussing communism in Church meetings.

After much consideration, it was decided that Elder Benson should call the president of the Seattle Stake to have this matter cleared, and to remove all questions as to Elder Benson’s responsibility and participation in Anti-Communistic activities.

After the departure of Elder Benson, the First Presidency agreed that now was not the time for the Church to make a statement as to its stand against Communism, but that such a statement could be made at a later date.”

Tues., 20 Feb., 1962:

“Telephone conversation between President David O. McKay and Elder Ezra Taft Benson, calling from New York City, February 20, 1962 at 8:00 a.m.

McKay: Hello

Benson: Good morning, President McKay.

McKay: Good morning.

Benson: I am here in New York City for a Board Meeting of the Corn Products Company, and on my flight out here to New York, I gave serious thoughts to the things which were said yesterday in our meeting regarding the Anti-Communist Lines. This is the thing I was thinking about, President McKay: J. Edgar Hoover, who is probably the greatest authority in the nation on this question has on one or two occasions expressed a desire to come to Salt Lake sometime. In fact, some months ago the All-American Society considered inviting him, but the invitation was never extended. It just occured to me that it might be a fine thing to have him come out at the time of one of our conferences — maybe the April conference. Maybe he could say a few words that might be helpful.

McKay: It would be a fine thing to have him

Benson: It would be a lovely thing to have him

McKay: I think it would.

Benson: He is getting along toward retirement now. He has such a love for our people. I presume he has hired more returned Mormon missionaries than any agency of Government.

McKay: Well, it would be an event to have him present,

Benson: It would be a nice event, and especially to have you introduce him, and maybe he could consent to take fifteen minutes. Now, I think the invitation, of course, ought to come right from the President of the Church, I think I should be in the background. However, I know this good man, and have seen him several times in Washington, and if there is anything I could do in the background, I would be happy to do it.

McKay: I think you had better approach him

Benson: You think I ought to approach him?

McKay: I think it would be better for you to approach him than for me.

Benson: Well, then I thought if we were not having a Thursday meeting – – that’s Washington’s Birthday – I might return by way of Washington.

McKay: All right, you do that. Call on him and see.

Benson: I could call on him and then I could tell him that a letter would follow from you.

McKay: No, you just tell him that we will get in touch with him, and then I will read my conversation with you to him.

Benson: All right, fine. In other words, I will extend the invitation on your behalf to attend the conference. Any one of the three days ?

McKay: Let’s see, we start on Friday.

Benson: Yes, Friday, Saturday, and Sunday. It would be nice if his message could go out on Sunday. I don’t know what his feelings would be, or what your feelings would be .

McKay: We have only one hour on Sunday that covers the entire Western part of the United States.

Benson: Well, of course, he has had a national audience before, but, whatever you think. Maybe we ought to leave it flexible with him.

McKay: Yes, let him choose the date.

Benson: All right, but any one of the three days. And I will tell him that I am extending the invitation on your behalf and that you will be in touch with him by telephone if he is willing to consider it.

McKay: All right.

Benson: Thank you, President McKay.

McKay: Thank you.

Benson: You bet, good-bye.

McKay: Good-bye.”

Wed., 7 Mar., 1962:

“MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT McKAY

ON MARCH 7, 1962, FROM 7:45 A. M. TO 8:45 A. M.

I met with President McKay at his office at the above time. The following decisions were made:

14. Ezra Benson’s Devotional Address. I informed President McKay of Ezra Taft Benson’s address to the Brigham Young University studentbody on public and private debt and urged that it be printed in the News with deletion of certain political references. He agreed and authorized me to have Henry Smith print it.

I informed him that on both the Goldwater and Benson speeches, as well as his own reply to Congressman Harding, I would have Henry Smith check with him.

Thur., 8 Mar., 1962:

“3:00 – 4:30 p.m.

Listened to a tape recording of an address on Cornmunism by Reed Benson, son of Ezra Taft Benson. As an anti-Communist speech, it was very good. Confidentially, I approved of Elder Benson’s ascertaining from my counselors the source of information given them that Reed had made remarks to the affect: ‘that he, Reed, represented his father, and his father was one of the twelve Apostles, and that he has the approval of the Prophet of the Lord.'”

Fri., 20 Apr. 1962:

“11:30 a.m.

Returned to my private office.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in regarding: 1) a request that has come from Mr. H. Glenn Olson of Olson Brothers, Inc., North Hollywood, California for him to become a member of their Board of Directors.  I told Brother Benson that he could accept this position with the understanding that it did not in any way conflict with his Church duties; that they must come first, that otherwise I could see no objection to his accepting.  2) Brother Benson asked about my meeting this afternoon with Dr. Leonard E. Read, President of the Foundation for Economic Education, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, who is in Salt Lake City, but I told him that it would be impossible because of previous appointments.  3) Brother Benson reported that he had received dozens of letters from persons both in and out of the Church who had commented favorably on his address at the April Conference, Sunday morning, April 8, 1962.

Fri., 4 May 1962:

“10:00 a.m.

I met Brother Reed Benson by appointment at his request.  He assured me that he does not bring politics into his speaking appointments in Church meetings.  However, he said that the Republican Party desires him to enter politics, and we talked briefly about his desire to do this.  I said to him that that is an individual matter – ‘you are an American citizen; you act accordingly.'”

Fri., 18 May 1962:

“While I was dictating letters, I had a telephone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson, who was in Portland, Oregon attending a National Boy Scout meeting, and is appointed to the Seattle Stake Conference.

He asked regarding his accepting the invitation of the National Boy Scout Organization to be chairman of Region Twelve, and his attendance at the Seattle Stake Conference.  He said that he felt that there has been some reflection cast on him in this stake with the President and the High Council, and inasmuch as he always meets with the Stake Presidency, High Council and Bishoprics, he asked that I make a telephone call to the Stake President regarding this matter.  (see notes following for details of conversation)

I then called President F. Arthur Kay of the Seattle Stake, and told him that Elder Ezra Taft Benson will attend the quarterly conference of his stake, and that I wanted him to know that Elder Benson comes up there under no cloud whatsoever, and that I also approve of Brother Cleon Skousen’s book ‘The Naked Communist.’

Friday, May 18, 1962

Telephone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Council of the Twelve 

Portland, Oregon, to President David O. McKay, May 18, 1962, at 8:10 a.m.

President McKay: Hello.

Brother Benson: Hello, President McKay?

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: This is Brother Benson.  How are you this morning?

President McKay: Very well, thank you!

Brother Benson: I am at Portland, Oregon, attending the Annual Meeting of the Boy Scouts and we finish up tonight, then I will go on to Seattle where tomorrow morning will be Boy Scout Day at the World’s Fair.  Then I attend Stake Conferences of the Seattle and North Seattle Stakes there.

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: I have two questions, President McKay.  You recall my coming to you with letters from the officials of Region Twelve of the Boy Scouts?

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: And you felt probably that we should have the Chairmanship of that Region for at least next year, and suggested that probably I had better take it.  Now, I am to give them an answer today.  I am going into a meeting with Region Twelve this morning, but this has occurred to me since I talked with you — I am not trying to shirk the responsibility — but I find that the person who becomes Chairman of a region — there are twelve regions in the United States — also becomes a member of the National Executive Board of the Boy Scouts, and that is where I am serving now.  Now, it occured to me if we could get them to accept someone else with good grace, it would give us two members on the board instead of one.  Now, I don’t know what their attitude would be, and I didn’t have anyone special in mind to suggest, but I do know they want an answer today, and I promised to give them one before the convention ends here — I promised to give them a final answer.

President McKay: They have no objection to your serving in both places?

Brother Benson: They want me to serve in both places, President McKay, but I thought there might be some little advantage to the Church to have someone else as chairman so he would be also a member of the National Executive Board, and I talked to Brother Lou Roberts and Joseph Bentley — they are here — and also Brother Curtis, who was formerly Superintendent of the Young Men, and they seem to think that there would be some advantage.  Just how great that advantage will be, we cannot tell, of course.  But I thought that probably I might broach that subject to them and see what their reaction would be, but before I did so I wanted to check with you to see if you had any suggestions or whether you thought this would be advisable.

President McKay: I think it is all right for you to accept both positions for the present.

Brother Benson: Do you?

President McKay: Yes!

Brother Benson: Well, I will be happy to if that is your feeling, President McKay.

President McKay: They have asked you to do it — I think it would be best for you to do it.

Brother Benson: Then I won’t raise the other question.  It is going to take quite a little time.  We will have several meetings, but I thought that maybe we might be able to serve for one year — that will get us by our celebration.  Next year will be our Fiftieth Anniversary of Scouting in the Church, as you know — that is a pretty important year for us, and to have the chairmanship I think might be helpful to us.  So I will go ahead then, but not make any commitment as to time.  How will that be?

President McKay: That will be all right.

Brother Benson: All right, thank you very much.  Now, the other thing.  You will recall the little difficulty we had with President Kay of the Seattle Stake?

President McKay: Yes.

Brother Benson: Now, I am going into his stake.

President McKay: I am glad you are!

Brother Benson: I have some anxiety, because I fear that there has been some reflection cast on me in this stake with the President and High Council, and I always have a meeting with the Presidency and High Council and Bishoprics, and I don’t know of anything that will clear it up fully unless there could be a communication go from you — a telephone call — because I don’t want to be in a position of trying to question anything that has been given them by a member of the Presidency.

President McKay: I think I had better call Brother Kay.  He is president, isn’t he?

Brother Benson: Yes he is.

President McKay: I shall call him and tell him that Brother Benson is absolutely clear and that if there is any feeling in the stake that there is any fault against Brother Benson’s [Skousen’s] book or against your remarks at General Conference, it should be allayed, because both are supported by the President of the Church.

Brother Benson: I would be very grateful for that, President McKay, if it can be done.

President McKay: Then you go along and conduct the Stake Conference just as usual — as if nothing had happened.

Brother Benson: All right, I will be happy to do so.

President McKay: Then I will call President Kay, in answer to his letter of February some — I don’t remember.

Brother Benson: Yes, it was sometime in February.  Yes, you answer it by telephone then.

President McKay: Yes!

Brother Benson: That will be fine, because I will be with him tomorrow afternoon.  I am going to have him meet me.  There is a special train going up with the Boy-Scout workers to the Fair, and I was planning to have him meet me and join me at the Fair.

President McKay: You go right on just as though nothing had been said by the counselors in The First Presidency on it.

Brother Benson: I will be happy to do it, and now if you will have your secretary get on the telephone, I have his resident’s phone and his office phone.  It might save her a little time.

President McKay: Clare.

Clare Middlemiss: Yes, I am on the phone.

Brother Benson: I didn’t ask President McKay about his good wife.  How is Sister McKay?

President McKay: She is not well.  She had a very bad night last night.

Brother Benson: Oh, that’s too bad.  Well, our faith and prayers will be with her.

Brother Benson to Clare: President McKay is going to call President Kay and simply clear up this whole thing, that there is no question about the books or the Conference talk.  Now I didn’t mention ‘The Naked Communist.’  He may want to mention that also.

Clare Middlemiss: Skousen’s book, yes.

Brother Benson: Yes, because that was more or less condemned.  President Kay’s residence telephone is Pacific 5-2974, and the office phone is AL 5-2944.

Clare Middlemiss: All right, thank you, Brother Benson.

Brother Benson: God bless you all.  Good-bye.

Clare: Good-bye.

Friday, May 18, 1962

Telephone call from President David O. McKay to President F. Arthur Kay of the Seattle Stake at his home PA 5-2974, May 18, 1962, at 8:15 a.m.

(Regarding Elder Ezra Taft Benson)

President McKay: Hello.

President Kay: Hello, President McKay.

President McKay: President Kay, some time ago I received a letter from you regarding Brother Benson’s Conference talk, and ‘The Naked Communist’ by Brother Skousen.

President Kay: Yes.

President McKay: Now, I didn’t answer it, but I have taken it up with the Brethren.  All I wish to say this morning is that I personally approve of ‘The Naked Communist’ and Brother Skousen and his relationship with us right here, but in any organization outside I don’t know whether he receives a salary or not.

President Kay: I have not received any information on that.

President McKay: I haven’t either.

President Kay: I haven’t received anything since the last call with Brother Benson.

President McKay: All I wish to say to you is that Brother Benson is not under any cloud whatever regarding his attitude towards communism.

President Kay: I am very pleased to hear this, President McKay.

President McKay: And neither is Brother Skousen’s book — ‘The Naked Communist.’  There are some men who opposed it — their criticisms are very faulty and very weak.  Brother Skousen is in good standing in the Church, and his attitude towards communism is approved.

President Kay: Well, I greatly appreciate this call.

President McKay: I thought I would let you know, because I understand that Brother Benson is up there to attend a Conference and you are going to meet him.

President Kay: Yes, I will be meeting him tomorrow.

President McKay: Let political parties and anti-communist groups do their own work outside of the Church.  We will attend to our Church duties, and condemn Communism in all its forms, but we shall not make a public issue of it during Conference times.

President Kay: Yes.

President McKay: I thought I would give you that assurance.

President Kay: I appreciate that a great deal.

President McKay: All right, and I appreciate your letter.

President Kay: Well, I hated to be in a position that I was caught in, President McKay, one especially — may I just point this thing out — that would bring any disharmony, and I hope that it has unified rather than anything else.

President McKay: All I know about Brother Benson’s political affairs is that his son, Reed, is out for some political position.  He has been told that that is his individual responsibility and he alone is responsible for it.  The church is not sustaining him any more that we are any other man, but is a political matter to which any citizen is permitted to aspire.

President Kay: Certainly.

President McKay: Otherwise, Brother Benson stands approved fully.

President Kay: I love to hear this, because I have never heard him give a message that I disapproved of in any way.

President McKay: No, sir!  All right.

President Kay: Thank you a great, great deal, President McKay, and this has been a real personal pleasure.

President McKay: Kind wishes to all assembled at your Conference.  Give them my greetings, please.

President Kay: I certainly will, President McKay.

President McKay: All right.

President Kay: Thank you!

President McKay: Thank you!  Good-bye.”

Tues., 19 June 1962:

“12:30 – 1:05 p.m.

Following the Expenditures Committee meeting, I met with Mr. Drew Pearson, national columnist.  Earlier this morning I received the following telegram from Mr. Pearson:

‘Washington, D.C. June 18, 1962

David O. McKay, President

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Salt Lake City, Utah

Will be in Salt Lake few hours, June 19, beginning around noon.  Recalling the most inspiring interview with you some years ago, I would consider it a great favor if I could call on you again.

Drew Pearson’

Upon Mr. Pearson’s arrival at the airport he telephoned me and said he would like to come right up to see me.  Within about fifteen minutes after our telephone conversation, he was at the office.

I read to him one of his columns in which he attacked Elder Ezra Taft Benson.  Mr. Pearson smiled and said that he did not write it — that our own man, Mr. Jack Anderson, wrote the article.

I had a very interesting interview with Mr. Pearson.

I invited him to have lunch with me, but he declined, saying that he had to catch his plane at 2:00 p.m.  However, as I passed through the lobby at 1:15 p.m. going home, Mr. Pearson was there and had stopped to ask questions about the building and its use.  He walked with me to the hotel, and I again invited him to come up to the apartment and have lunch with us.  He was pleased to accept, so I surprised Sister McKay with an unexpected dinner guest.  As we entered the apartment, I said, ‘What do you have for lunch?’  Sister McKay answered, ‘For the first time in a long time we do not have meat for dinner; we are having a cheese soufle’.’  We enjoyed our lunch and had a very good time together.  Sister McKay was embarrassed that there was no tablecloth, that the table had been set with place mats.  Mr. Pearson stayed until he had only fifteen minutes to catch his plane.  He seemed to enjoy his repast with us.

Later, to my surprise, Mr. Pearson ran a story on his visit with me in his column.  He mentioned in detail our conversation and the luncheon he had with Sister McKay and me.

Tuesday, June 19, 1962

The Washington Merry-Go-Round

The Washington Post

Wednesday, May 30, 1962

BENSON POLITICKING BRINGS REBUFF

By Drew Pearson

Former Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Bensons’ habit of preaching politics from the pulpit is getting him into trouble with his fellow Mormons.

The latest protest came from Nevada Sen. Howard Cannon, devout Mormon, who didn’t like a recent Benson sermon suggesting that President Kennedy associated with people with ‘barnyard morals.’

Cannon complained directly to David O. McKay, the venerable Mormon prophet, against Benson’s ‘innuendo aimed at the President of the United States.’

In a private letter to the head of the Mormon Church, Cannon wrote:

‘I firmly believe that such a reference was improper, uncalled for, totally out of place, and did great harm to our church.  Such comment is certainly beneath the dignity which should be and is attached to the pulpit in Temple Square.

‘It has always been my impression,’ added the Nevada Senator, ‘that the pulpit should not be used as a place from which to voice partisan, political views.  Although there might be very limited occasion when such action could be justified, it seems to me that it is neither proper nor desirable to advocate a political viewpoint from a church rostrum nor to expound a religious philosophy from some political public forum.

‘The remarks of Elder Benson seemed all the more regrettable, since they followed the excellent and sound admonition … that we as church members should sustain and support those who had been elected to high positions of public responsibility and that we should avoid joining or paying lip service to radical organizations and individuals on either extreme of our spectrum.’

NOTE: Shortly before the Mormon Church took this public stand against extremist organizations, Benson’s son, Reed, hastily deserted a rightwing group he had helped to form called the All-America Society.

A VIRGINIA LIBERAL

Rep. Burr Harrison, Democratic Congressman who represents Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley and its prosperous apple orchards, is not running for reelection.  Five Democratic candidates are battling to take his place.

The other day, Secretary of Commerce Luther Hodges was in Winchester to crown Arthur Godfrey’s daughter as Apple Blossom Queen.  His duties as crowner-of-the-queen were not too exacting and he had time to check into the political situation in this stronghold of Sen. Harry F. Byrd, biggest apple grower in the world.

‘What are the issues between the five candidates?’ Hodges asked.

‘No differences of opinion between the candidates at all?’ pressed the Secretary of Commerce.

‘Well, possibly one is more liberal than the others,’ was the reply.  ‘He lunched the other day with Sen. Mike Mansfield.’

ANTI-CASTOR OIL

White-maned Sen. Ken Keating, able New York Republican, has discovered that Uncle Sam has taken too big a dose of castor oil.

The Senator found 224 million pounds of castor oil in the Government stockpile, enough for several billion distasteful swallows.

But, apparently, Uncle Sam uses the stuff not down the gullets of protesting children but to lubricate airplane engines.  Even for this purpose, Keating believes it is at least 156 million pounds too much.

He got started on his castor oil quest after hearing from a Batavia, N.Y. ‘seventh-grade student who complained despairingly: ‘with all the brilliant doctors and scientist working for the Government, Senator, wouldn’t you think they could dream up something easier for kids to take than castor oil?’

Keating replied that the Government, far from solving the problem, may dump the 156 million pounds of surplus castor oil on the market.

‘But I promise you,’ he wrote, ‘I’ll oppose loading that on the unsuspecting kids.’

PERSONAL FILE

Here are more questions and answers from the Merry-go-round mailbag:

Question – Is it true that President and Mrs. Kennedy have broken tradition and banned white-tie-and-tails in the White House? – Mrs. J.R., Los Angeles.

Answer – The President, who dislikes starched-collar formality, favors black-tie receptions over white-tie-and-tails.  He asked members of Congress how they felt, and they agreed.  This has been a boon for most guests, but is a blow to Washington tailors.

Question – I suggest you investigate jet joy riding at the Patuxent Naval Air station.  You’ll find that Navy fliers have been taking their wives on flights at the taxpayers’ expense. – Mrs. D.D.S., Falls Church, Va.

Answer – Some wives have signed up in the Civil Air Patrol to get around the Navy ban on unofficial passengers.  They simply put on their patrol uniforms and go jet joy riding with their husbands.

Question – I hear Generalisimo Franco is on his way out as dictator of Spain.  Any truth to the rumor? – I.G., Philadelphia.

Answer – The Catholic Church has suggested informally to Franco that it’s time for him to step down.  It was similar Catholic pressure that led Dictator Peron to leave Argentina.

Tues., 26 June 1962:

“8:00 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came into my private office and discussed with me statements to be made in the forthcoming book ‘Crossfire, the Eight Years with Eisenhower,’ which covers Elder Benson’s eight years as U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.  These statements pertaining to my remarks to Elder Benson regarding his appointment as Secretary of Agriculture, a meeting with President Eisenhower regarding release of Brother Benson as Secretary of Agriculture, etc., were approved by me with the exception of three or four paragraphs which I thought would be unwise to publish.

Tuesday, June 26, 1962

June 25, 1962

MEMORANDUM

TO: Clare Middlemiss

FROM: Elder Ezra Taft Benson

RE: CROSSFIRE, THE EIGHT YEARS WITH EISENHOWER

Some 2 1/2 years ago I mentioned to President McKay as I have one or two times since that I entered into a contract with Doubleday to prepare a manuscript for a book covering my eight years as Secretary of Agriculture.

Knowing how busy the President is I have hesitated to trouble him further regarding the matter, however, the manuscript is now in corrected galley form in the hands of the publisher and I would just like to set down the more important references to President McKay in the hope that he might find time to glance over them to see if there is anything glaringly out of order.  I have tried to make these accurate and present them in a way that would be helpful rather than harmful to the President and the Church.

I will list them giving the setting and then quoting the appropriate part from the manuscript.

1.  Regarding the telephone call from Senator Watkins to President McKay when my name was first mentioned, the following:

‘The next morning, after leaving my car on the parking lot at the Church Office Building in Salt Lake City, I met President David O. McKay who also was parking his car.  We had a habit of going down to the office rather early in the morning.  ‘I received a very important telephone call last night,’ he said.  ‘Brother Benson my mind is clear in the matter.  If the opportunity comes and the proper spirit I think you should accept.’

2.  The time in 1957 when President McKay went to Washington to confer with President Eisenhower regarding the possibility of my release from the Cabinet.  President McKay later visited with me at the office and recounted his conversation with the President.

‘In relating all this later President McKay said, ‘Mr. Eisenhower indicated to me that you and he had been very close.  In fact, the President told me ‘Ezra and I have been just like this,’ and he interlocked the fingers of his hands.

‘Then he said, ‘I just don’t know where I would turn to get someone to succeed him.’

‘Now Brother Benson,’ President McKay went on ‘I left no doubt but that the government and President Eisenhower have first call on your services.  We in the Church can make adjustments easier at this time than the government can.  We want to support President Eisenhower.  He is a noble character, a fine man.  In this case our country comes first.  But of course, we also want you to do what you prefer.’

‘Next day I phoned President McKay.  ‘Please tell President Eisenhower,’ he said, ‘that we want to help him in every way possible.  And ask the President to forgive me if I seem to be intruding; that was the thing furtherest from my mind.  When I relayed this to Newport, Eisenhower laughed, ‘Far from intruding, his visit was most gracious.’

3.  In 1958 reference is made to a visit in President McKay’s office as follows:

‘On Columbus Day, I sat in the office of President David O. McKay in Salt Lake City.  With his hazel eyes, ruddy cheeks and snow white hair he seemed the embodiment of buoyant youth, combined with venerable wisdom.

‘I have been hearing your name mentioned recently, Brother Benson,’ he said, ‘as a possible candidate for the Vice Presidency and even for the Presidency.’

‘This is what I told President McKay as we sat in his office on that Sunday morning, October 12, 1958, ‘I have said over and over again that I have no political aspirations.  All I want to do is serve President Eisenhower as best I can as long as he thinks he needs me.  Then I want to come home.’

‘President McKay smiled gently.  ‘No answer could be better than that, Brother Benson.  Just keep on as you are and we will wait for the Lord to tell us what the future holds.’

4.  On March 5, 1960, Reed and I had a visit with President McKay during which we reviewed the political situation, the increasing evidence of support for me to give further service in the government and to reaffirm the fact that I have no political ambition.  The reference in the book is as follows:

‘The venerable gray haired 88 year old Prophet listened intently then speaking in his quiet forceful manner he appraised some of the political developments and current national leaders.  The country needed more patriots and real statesmen, he said.  Finally he suggested that we watch this developing groundswell closely for the next few weeks and that if we did, we should have the answer by the time of our Church Conference in April.

‘If it should come to pass,’ he said, ‘Governor Rockefeller and Brother Benson would be a great team.  We are all proud of the way you have stood for principle — but then you had to do this to be true to your own father and grandfather.’

‘Saying it was highly desirable that more than one man should be considered for the presidential nomination in each political party, he went on and indicated he was sorry to see Rockefeller step out of the picture and hoped he could be encouraged to reconsider.  President McKay thought it would be appropriate for me to make a statement indicating that the nomination should to go by default to the Vice President.

‘In any event,’ he concluded, ‘I belief we shall have the answer to our question by the April Conference and possibly even within the next few days or the week.’

‘A month later at the April Conference of the Church in Salt Lake City, President McKay and I talked again.  He was most kind in his remarks regarding my work in Washington saying that it would stand for all time as a credit to the Church and the nation,’ as well as to my family and me.

‘I sincerely hope Brother Benson,’ he said, ‘That Governor Rockefeller will still be able to get into the race.  And I have considered it all carefully and if the opportunity should come unsolicited for you to serve in a higher political post you will have the whole-hearted support of all of us.

‘Thanking him for his confidence, I said I was quite sure that the opportunity would not present itself.  I will be back with you in January.’

5.  During the 1960 campaign I received word from Republican leaders that Senator Kennedy was to speak in the Tabernacle and be introduced by a member of the Council of the Twelve.  My informant asked whether I would be willing to introduce the Vice President when he spoke in the Tabernacle.  This then follows in the manuscript:

‘It bothered me, however, that a church official might be actively participating in this manner in this political meeting.  So I telephoned President McKay.  He assured me that no member of the Twelve would introduce Kennedy; as a government official, however, I was in a different position.  In reply, I said there was no compelling desire on my part to introduce the Vice President; moreover, I felt strongly that we must be careful in using Church Officials to tip the political scale.

‘That coincides precisely with my own sentiments,’ President McKay replied.  ‘Now, mind you, I fully recognize your unique position and you may do as you think best, but I have been wondering if it might not be best for you to hold your own campaign activity to a minimum.’

Clare, the above are the significant references to the President.  There are other incidental references but I think no particular question is raised by them.  If the President could scan the above just to be sure that everything is in order it would be reassuring to me; while it would be difficult to make any major changes, word or phrase changes could still be made at this late hour.  I need to let them know in New York by telephone by the end of their business day if there are to be any changes.

Tuesday, June 26, 1962

MEMORANDUM

TO: Clare Middlemiss DATE: June 26, 1962

FROM: Elder Ezra Taft Benson

RE: CROSSFIRE Memo of June 25, 1962

In conference with President McKay this morning regarding the June 25, memo, he approved everything in it with the exception of the following:

1.  On Page 2, paragraph 3, blue eyes changed to hazel eyes.

2.  The two paragraphs at the bottom of Page 2 are deleted.

3.  The third paragraph at the top of Page 3 is also deleted.

4.  In order to give the proper continuity I personally changed the fourth paragraph at the top of page 3 to read as follows.

‘Thanking him for his confidence, I said I will be back with you in January.’

The President indicated his pleasure that the story of my eight years as Secretary of Agriculture had been completed and was ready to turn over to the Publishers.”

Fri., 26 Oct., 1962:

“While at Huntsville this morning, I received a telephone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson who said that he is leaving this afternoon for his tour of the South Sea Island Missions. He wondered if I had any special instructions for him, and I said that I should be grateful if he would take my greetings and blessings to all the people; that he had my prayers for his health and protection during his travels.

Elder Benson then said that there are two things he would like to ask me about; namely, (1) That the counselors in the Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Association feel that they are at a stand still so far as their work is concerned since Brother G. Carlos Smith, Jr.. the newly-appointed General Superintendent, is away from the city conducting the affairs of the Central States Mission.

I instructed Brother Benson to take this matter up at the Council meeting today, and told him that he should tell the Brethren that Superintendent Smith should be instructed to come home for a day or two to get things organized here, and then he can return to the Mission and wind up his affairs there.

(2) Elder Benson then said that his son, Reed, has been seeking an appointment with me to explain that after spending a year in studying the aims and purposes of the John Birch Society, he feels that he should accept an invitation from this Society to be the Coordinator for the State of Utah, which position will take him into other parts of the country to speak in public meetings where people are interested.

I answered, “I have heard about the John Birch Society, and everything so far has been negative, so it is up to you and Reed as to whether or not this position is accepted.”

Brother Benson said that he had read their Blue Book and other literature; and has met their leader, Mr. John Welch, who is a fine Christian gentleman. Said he felt that they are the most effective organization we have in the country in fighting Communism and Socialism. He said that his son, Reed, knows that he will be criticized severly for having anything to do with the Society, and that he may be jeopardizing his political career; however, he is convinced that he can best serve his country by working with this organization. Said they have visited the headquarters of the Society in Massachusetts, and have been favorably impressed with the spirit and fine Christian ideals of the Society.

Elder Benson said that he personally knows that there are Senators, and some of the finest patriots of the Countrv, and some of our own Stake Presidents who are members of this Society. They do not publish a list of their members, although there is nothing secret about the organization. They have a mazagine called “American Opinion”.

I said, “I have nothing whatever to do with it.” Brother Benson said that Reed would not go into this if I told him not to, and I said that this is a matter that I shall leave entirely with him and Reed.

I then wished Brother Benson a successful tour of the Missions; that my blessings go with him. I said that he knew, of course, that on a long journey like this he is free to take his wife with him.

Later he phoned and told my secretary that he failed to mention to me that Sister Benson is not well enough to travel with him; that she has some back trouble and arthritis which gives her a great deal of pain if she sits too long in meetings.”

Fri., 4 Jan. 1963:

“Elder Ezra Taft Benson and Statement on the John Birch Society

In answer to a telephone request from Elder Ezra Taft Benson to see me, I instructed him to call my counselors and tell them to hold a meeting with him this morning in the office of the First Presidency.  A discussion was held regarding the First Presidency’s statement regarding the John Birch Society and Reed Benson’s association therewith.  (see January 3, 1963 Diary for statement appearing in the newspaper, and see Ezra Taft Benson’s file for minutes of meeting held.)”

Sun., 6 Jan. 1963:

“Sunday, January 6, 1963

January 6, 1963

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

President David O. McKay

Building

Dear President McKay:

You asked that I dictate a memorandum or minute of the meeting you and I held together at your home in Huntsville today, January 6.

The first subject under discussion was the recent declaration made by the First Presidency and published in the newspapers regarding the John Birch Society and its officers, stating that the Church does not endorse them.  You asked that I read a number of opinions from various sources, including the editor of the Los Angeles Times, The New York Times, the Attorney General of the State of California, the Ministerial Association of California, and others.  After reading and discussing these, we agreed that we had done the right thing in letting the members of the Church and the world know that the Church does not in any way endorse or subscribe to the John Birch Society.

You mentioned that we might have erred in that we did not call the Bensons in before making the announcement.  I called your attention to the fact that we had called Brother Benson in and discussed Reed’s activities during the campaign in disregarding our former statement regarding the use of our chapels and meeting places for political purposes.  At that same meeting we discussed the John Birch Society, and Brother Benson denied having any association with them.  I mentioned this to President Moyle upon my return to Salt Lake, and he said he will get minutes of that meeting and present them to you at your next meeting.

. . .

Hugh B. Brown

Tues., 22 Jan. 1963:

“7:30 a.m.

Dr. O. Preston Robinson, Manager of the Deseret News, came in regarding re-organization of Board which will take place at the annual meeting to be held February 6, 1963 at 7:30 a.m.  I said that I shall attend the meeting.

Later, I telephoned to Brother Robinson and told him not to publish Drew Pearson’s column concerning Elder Ezra Taft Benson, which is very unfavorable to Elder Benson.”

Wed., 23 Jan. 1963:

“7:30 a.m.

John Birch Society — Communism

Met by appointment at his request Elder Ezra Taft Benson, and had a lengthy conference with him regarding the newspaper statement made by the First Presidency dated January 2, 1963, pertaining to political questions in general and the John Birch Society in particular.  Elder Benson said the statement seemed to be leveled against him and his son, Reed, and also Brother Skousen.

I told Brother Benson that it was intended to apply to them.  I said that the statement made by him (Elder Benson) in favor of the John Birch Society was made by him, one of the Twelve, who is an international character and received international publicity, and that that is one reason the Presidency had to make the announcement in the newspapers.  

Elder Benson asked if this means that they must never mention Communism, and I said that, of course, they could mention Communism by saying that it is un-Christian in America and an evil thing.  I said it did not hurt my feelings for the accusation to be made that the John Birch Society is a secret society (which Elder Benson says it is not) because when there is a prairie fire sweeping over the country, men who fight the fire, often start fires themselves.  I told Brother Benson, however, that he must not say that the Church favors such ‘a fire.’  I said further that if members of the Church want to join the John Birch Society, they may pay the $12.00 dues if they wish; that that is up to them.

Thurs., 24 Jan. 1963:

“8:30 a.m.

Meeting of the First Presidency was held.  President Brown still absent in South America.

Telephone call from Senator Wallace F. Bennett, regarding John Birch Society.  While in the meeting, I received a long-distance call from Senator Wallace F. Bennett, who reported for my information that the Democrats in the Senate were contemplating presenting an attack on Brother Ezra Taft Benson because of his interest in the John Birch Society.  He said this was based on a Drew Pearson article concerning the First Presidency’s statement on the John Birch Society, and they have asked the Republicans to join with them, but the Republicans have refused to do so.”

Wed., 6 Mar. 1963:

10:00 – 10:30 a.m.

Was engaged in the meeting of the First Presidency.  Among matters taken up were:

John Birch Society -President Hugh B. Brown’s comments concerning

I read a clipping from the Los Angeles Times under headline ‘Benson Not Speaking For Mormons On Birch’.  The article quoted President Brown.  President Brown explained that when he arrived in Los Angeles President Anderson of the California Mission had five reporters in his office for a press interview.  The reporters had a copy of the statement of the First Presidency about the Birch Society.  The first question asked was if the First Presidency had issued a statement that Brother Benson is for the Birchites.  President Brown said he answered that Brother Benson is entitled to his own opinion as an individual, but the First Presidency have spoken for the Church and any statement contrary to that is not the policy of the Church.  When President Brown found out what he was up against he asked the secretary of the mission to get a tape recorded and to make a record of everything that was taken down.  President Brown has a complete tape of everything that was said.  He said he made it very clear that any statement Brother Benson made was on his own responsibility and that he was not speaking for the Church, that the statement which they had was the authoritative position of the Church with respect to the Birch Society.

I read the following statement from a copy of a letter sent from my office and signed by my secretary, Clare Middlemiss, answering inquiries about the Church and its position on the John Birch Society: ‘I have been directed to say that members of the Church are free to join anti-communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposed to the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the Church for the purpose of increasing membership in private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.’

President Brown said what he said was entirely in harmony with that statement.  (see Diary, March 13, 1963, for statement by Elder Benson on JBS)

I said that following the publication of the statement, I was asked to apologize for what was said against Brother Benson and his son Reed because ‘if we had called them’ we would have done anything that you suggested.’  I said ‘yes and nobody in the Church or in the world would have known that you were doing that, but everybody knew that you are a national character and everybody knew that you favor the Birch Society and that you approve your son representing it in Utah, and when the First Presidency gave that statement it received the same publicity which your statement received, and we offer no apology.’  I referred to a telephone call, the message of which came directly to me from President Milan D. Smith, who asked ‘please do not let your father have his picture taken with that man (Mr. Welch) because Sister Benson is telling people that President McKay is in favor of Mr. Welch.’  I said I sent a telegram to Mr. Welch stating that I was sorry that I had to go to the coast.  On that day Mr. Welch telephoned to Reed Benson saying ‘That’s too bad.  I should have come a week earlier or a week later’ — showing that his whole purpose was to see me.  (see newspaper clipping following.)

Wednesday, March 6, 1963

‘LDS OPPOSE’ BIRCH GROUP

Los Angeles, March 4

A leader of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints said Monday that former secretary of agriculture Ezra Taft Benson does not speak for the church when he endorses the John Birch Society.

‘We are opposed to them and their methods,’ said Hugh B. Brown, a member of the three-man LDS First Presidency.  The First Presidency is the top governing board of the church.

Brown, 79, said Benson is ‘entitled to his opinion,’ but that he is not ‘entitled to say the church favors the John Birch Society.’

Brown, who was here to appear on a television program, said he feels ‘we should not mix politics and religion.'”

Wed., 13 Mar., 1963:

11:00 a.m.

Received a telephone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson from Los Angeles, California.  He explained that he has been contacted by the McLatchy Newspapers to attend two forums which they are conducting.  He has been invited to go from Los Angeles to Sacramento for a meeting there tonight.

Brother Benson stated that reporters have pressed him somewhat on questions concerning the John Birch Society, and asked that he be permitted to quote from the letter that has been sent from my office in answer to many letters that have come to me from members of the Church.  I gave permission for Elder Benson to do this.  (see following transcript of telephone conversation, and also copy of letter referred to.)

Wednesday, March 13, 1963

Telephone conversation between President David O. McKay and Elder Ezra Taft Benson, calling from Los Angeles, California, March 13, 1963, at 11:15 a.m.

President McKay: Hello.

Elder Benson: Hello, President McKay.  This is Brother Benson.  How are you?

President McKay: Fine, thank you.  How are you?

Elder Benson: Just fine, thank you.  President McKay, I have been contacted by a chain of newspapers — the McLatchy Newspapers, and they are a rather liberal group of papers.  For some months I have been encouraged to come into this area and attend these two forums, and I made the commitment long before I went to the Islands.  Everything went well yesterday, and I go from here to Sacramento for a meeting tonight.

President McKay: Under the same auspices?

Elder Benson: Under the same auspices.  Their director of public relations is driving me up the valley, leaving in about an hour.  Obviously there have been quite a number of questions raised regarding the Church’s position on certain matters.  I have fended off these questions pretty well.  I have had them screened by a responsible person in the meetings, so that no crack-pot questions would be presented.

President McKay: Good.

Elder Benson: But this question regarding the Birch Organization has been one they have pressed somewhat on.  I had delegations of our own members come up on the platform afterwards and some came to the Hotel and some of them were going to release the letter which had come from your office signed by Clare, and I suggested to them that they hold it up, that there may be a better way to handle it.  Now, when I get to Sacramento this afternoon, I will have to meet the press, radio, and Television, and I thought probably in view of the fact that the situation is quite confused and this item that has appeared in the paper more recently attributed to President Brown seems to have added to the confusion.  I thought a very simple statement which I could hand out so there would be no chance of misquoting me would be the best way to meet this, and I have drafted a very simple one which is largely a quote from your own letter, which I thought I might use and probably would be the most helpful.  May I read it to you?

President McKay: Yes.

Elder Benson: This would be a statement which I would hand to the press, then I would refuse to answer any further questions on it, and it reads as follows:

‘I have stated, as my personal opinion only, that the John Birch Society is ‘the most effective non-Church organization in our fight against creeping Socialism and Godless Communism’.  Obviously, only one man, President David O. McKay, speaks for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on matters of policy.  In response to many inquiries, the office of President McKay has stated ‘that members of the Church (and this is taken from Clare’s letter) are free to join anti-communist organizations, if they desire, and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the Church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.’  If further information is desired, it would be appropriate to direct a letter to President McKay.’

That is the end of the statement.

President McKay: I would not put that last statement in, because we are getting so many letters now we are just swamped.

Elder Benson: Well, then we could just end it with the quote from the letter, and not say anything about further information.

President McKay: Yes, that is enough.

Elder Benson: If that is your wish, we shall put it that way.  And I believe this will help to quiet this thing down President McKay.  Our members are quite confused about it, and I think it would be better for me to release this in this form in a press conference than to have individual members making releases of letters.

President McKay: I think so.

Elder Benson: And I believe it will help to quiet this matter down, and this might be a good place to do it, because this is a rather liberal area, where there has been more controversy than is usual in California or other parts of the country.  I have had a very good reception here by the newspaper people and by the public, but this is known as a rather liberal area.

President McKay: Do you think you will stir up the whole nation again by repeating your statement that you made before?

Elder Benson: I do not think so, because it has been misquoted as though I was speaking for the Church, etc., and I state here ‘I have stated as my personal opinion only’ and then I simply repeat a part of what I said before.  I think this tends to clarify it, and I think that is needed.

President McKay: Yes.

Elder Benson: Now, I have talked to some of our people here today and they think this will be very helpful.  I have not talked to the representatives of the McLatchy Newspapers, and I have no particular obligation to get their judgment on it.

President McKay: No.

Elder Benson: I will just put it out as quietly as possible, and not make a big thing of it.  I will just place it in the hands of responsible newspaper people.  And I believe it will help.  Otherwise, they are going to question me on this point and that point, whereas I shall just hand them this statement and say I have nothing more to say on it.

President McKay: Well, I will leave it to your judgment.  I think we had better get it quietly settled once and for all.

Elder Benson: Certainly we should.  Well, if you think it is better to leave this last sentence off.

President McKay: Yes, it is not necessary.  If they desire further information, they will write anyway.

Elder Benson: All right then, I will cut that off.  Now, I am planning to take a private plane from Sacramento after the meeting to San Francisco so I can catch that 10:30 plane home, so I can be at the meeting tomorrow.

President McKay: That will be fine.

Elder Benson: All right, President, thank you so much.

President McKay: All right, thank you for calling.

Elder Benson: You bet, good-bye.

President McKay: Good-bye.

Wednesday, March 13, 1963

Deseret News

Salt Lake Telegram

Salt Lake City, Utah B Section

Thursday, March 14, 1963

Birch Society Stand Told By Elder Benson

Special To The News 

Sacramento

Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Council of the Twelve of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, here to address a Community Forum Wednesday night issued a statement concerning the Church and the John Birch Society.

The statement, given after telephone communication with Church President David O. McKay in Salt Lake City, is as follows:

‘I have stated, as my personal opinion only, that the John Birch Society is, ‘the most effective non-church organization in our fight against creeping socialism and godless communism.’

‘Obviously, only one man, President David O. McKay, speaks for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) on matters of policy.  In response to many inquiries, the office of President McKay has stated, ‘that members of the Church are free to join anti-Communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the Church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.’

Elder Benson spoke Tuesday night in Fresno and Wednesday night in Sacramento at Community Forums sponsored by the McLatchy Newspapers.  His theme was ‘Threats to Our Freedom.’  The above statement was issued at a press conference Wednesday.

Wednesday, March 13, 1963

Elder Benson Makes Statement

Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Council of the Twelve issued the following statement this week in Sacramento after consultation with President David O. McKay:

‘I have stated, as my personal opinion only, that the John Birch Society is ‘the most effective non-Church organization in our fight against creeping socialism and godless communism.’

‘Obviously only one man, President David O. McKay, speaks for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on matters of policy.  In response to many inquiries, the office of President McKay has stated ‘that members of the Church are free to join anti-communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies’.’

Elder Benson spoke Tuesday night in Fresno and Wednesday night in Sacramento on Community Forums sponsored by the McLatchy Newspapers on the theme ‘Threats to Our Freedom.’

Deseret News – Church Section, Saturday, March 16, 1963″

Thurs., 13 June 1963:

Telephone Calls

At 8:00 o’clock this morning Elder Ezra Taft Benson called and said that he had been invited to speak to some social groups in Arizona on Communism.

I told Brother Benson that I had just read this morning a letter complaining about the talks he has been making around the Country, which have associated the Church with the John Birch Society.  I said that what he says is taken advantage of by his enemies; that they misinterpret what he says and that it hurts both him and the Church.  I told him not to accept this appointment; that it would be wise for him to confine his talks to Church assignments.

Fri., 14 June 1963:

“9:15 a.m.

Left for home.  Sister McKay was ready and waiting to accompany me to the MIA Conference.

9:30 a.m.

Arrived at the Tabernacle which was filled with thousands of MIA workers.  It was quite a surprise to them as Sister McKay and I walked in and took our seats on the rostrum.  The congregation arose in tribute.  I declined an invitation to speak, saying that I would ‘see them Sunday’.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson was the main speaker.  Remarks were also made by Bishop Robert L. Simpson of the Presiding Bishopric, an advisor to the MIA, and greetings were given by all six MIA executives.

It was a very choice meeting, and Sister McKay and I enjoyed it very much.

At the close of the meeting, Elder Benson introduced us to Mr. John H. Rousselot, former California Congressman, and now district governor of the John Birch Society for six western states, who attended the meeting.  He is in the city to attend and speak at a meeting of the society to be held in the Newhouse Hotel.”

Tues., 18 June 1963:

12:45 to 1:00 p.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and said that complaints had come to him about the ZCMI Fashion show and the displaying of gowns used by acress Elizabeth Taylor in the movie ‘Cleopatra’.  I asked Brother Benson to contact Harold Bennett, Manager of ZCMI and make inquiry into this matter.

Later, Harold Bennett telephoned and said that the Fashion Show at ZCMI is arranged; that they have engaged the Hotel Utah and the women have paid for their tickets, and that there is no way that they can stop this show as Elder Benson had told him he would have to do.  Brother Bennett said that the gowns that have been sent are beautiful and that there is nothing indecent about them.  They will be careful that the film ‘Cleopatra’ will not be ‘played up’ too much.  I told him under those circumstances he could go ahead with their plans.”

Thurs., 8 Aug. 1963:

“John Birch Society – Statement of First Presidency

Senator Wallace F. Bennett sent a ‘tear sheet from the Congressional Record, which contains the attitude of the Church regarding the John Birch Society.’  Senator Frank Moss had previously placed the statement of the First Presidency about the John Birch Society in the Congressional Record, but did not include the letter sent from my office to members of the Church who inquired if their membership in the Church would be in jeopardy if they joined the John Birch Society.  (see copies of letters, ‘tear sheet’ and newspaper clipping following.)

Thursday, August 8, 1963

August 30, 1963

The Honorable Wallace F. Bennett

United States Senate

Washington, D.C.

Dear Senator Bennett:

Thank you for your note of August 8, 1963, with which you enclosed a ‘tear sheet’ from the Congressional Record, which contains the material you put in that Record concerning the John Birch Society.  President McKay is pleased to have this material to complete his files.

The President returned last Tuesday from Great Britain where he dedicated the Church edifice at Merthyr-Tydfil, South Wales, near the birthplace of his mother.  It was amazing to all of us how well he looked following that extremely strenuous trip.  He said it was one of the best trips he has ever taken.  He was thrilled with the faithfulness of the people of Merthyr-Tydfil and with what they had accomplished in erecting such a beautiful chapel.  Of course, it was a very emotional experience, too, for the President, inasmuch as his mother was honored on this occasion.  Gus Backman was a speaker and represented the businessmen of Utah in presenting the organ for the Chapel in memory of President McKay’s mother, Jennette Evans McKay.  It is reported that many tears were shed at that meeting.

President McKay read your letter, and, therefore, received your personal regards.  He has directed me to send this letter, and to send you his cordial best wishes.

With kind regards, and again thanking you,

Sincerely yours,

/s/Clare Middlemiss

Secretary to:

President David O. McKay

Thursday, August 8, 1963

August 8, 1963

Miss Clare Middlemiss

47 East South Temple

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear Clare:

I am enclosing a tear sheet from the Congressional Record which contains the material that I put in last Tuesday at the request of  Mr. Robert W. Lee, including your letter to him.

I hope this will satisfy him, and I appreciate your help in working it out.

Kindest personal regards – which I hope you will pass on to President McKay.

Sincerely,

Wallace F. Bennett

WFB.kh

Enclosure

Thursday, August 8, 1963

ATTITUDE OF CHURCH OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS TOWARD JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY

Mr. Bennett:  Mr. President, on May 28 of this year there appears on page 9158 of the RECORD an insertion made by my colleague (Mr. Moss) in which he discusses briefly the attitude of the Latter-day Saints (Mormon) Church toward the John Birch Society, and in which was printed a statement from the Salt Lake Tribune on March 21, 1963, under the heading, ‘L-DS Presidency Issues Stand on Birch Society.’

Then follows a brief three-sentence statement regarding the position of former Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson.  It is headed by a line in parentheses.  ‘From the Salt Lake Tribune, March 21, 1963.’  This carries with it the implication that all three sentences are quotations from that paper on that date.  In fact, the first two sentences are paraphrases, and only the third is a direct quotation from the article.  This handling of Mr. Benson’s position has disturbed many of his friends in Utah, and at the request of one of them, Mr. Robert W. Lee, I ask unanimous consent to have printed in the RECORD, the texts of the three statements in their complete form.

First, in order to set the record in focus, I should like to reinsert the first statement from the Salt Lake Tribune on March 21, 1963, under the heading, ‘L-DS Presidency Issues Stand on Birch Society.’

Second, immediately following it I would like to insert the entire text of the other article printed in the Salt Lake Tribune on the same day, March 21, 1963, whose headline reads, ‘Benson Clarifies Views on Birch Society Stand.’  It will be noticed that the sixth paragraph in that article is the one quoted on page 9158 of the RECORD.

Third, at the request of Mr. Lee, I offer for the RECORD a letter addressed to him on August 1, 1963, and signed by Clare Middlemiss, secretary to David O. McKay, president of the L-DS Church.  The letter to Mr. Lee not only contains my authority to insert the letter in the RECORD, but also quotes an earlier letter addressed to Mr. Lee and also signed by Clare Middlemiss, secretary to President McKay, which stated the church position in slightly different language.

There being no objection, the three statements were ordered to be printed in the RECORD, as follows:

LDS PRESIDENCY ISSUES STAND ON BIRCH SOCIETY

The first presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Thursday issued a formal statement to ‘correct the false statements and unwarranted assumptions regarding the position allegedly taken by leaders of the church on political questions in general and the John Birch Society in particular.’

The statement follows:

‘The church recognizes and protects the rights of its members to express their personal political beliefs, but it reserves to itself the right to formulate and proclaim its own doctrine.

‘We believe in a two-party system, and all our members are perfectly free to support the party of their choice.

‘We deplore the presumption of some politicians, especially officers, coordinators, and members of the John Birch Society, who undertake to aline the church and its leadership with their partisan views.

‘We encourage our members to exercise the right of citizenship, to vote according to their own convictions, but no one should seek or pretend to have our approval of their adherence to any extreme ideologies.

‘We denounce communism as being anti-Christian, anti-American, and the enemy of freedom, but we think they who pretend to fight it by casting aspersions in our elected officers or other fellow citizens do the anti-Communist cause a great disservice.

‘We again urge our bishops, stake presidents, and other officers of the church to refuse all applications for the use of our chapels, cultural halls, or other places for political meetings, money-raising propaganda, or to promote any person’s political ambitions.’

The statement was signed by President David O. McKay, Henry D. Moyle, and Hugh B. Brown, counselors in the first presidency of the church.

[From the Salt Lake Tribune, Mar. 21, 1963]

BENSON CLARIFIES VIEWS ON BIRCH SOCIETY STAND

At least 1,000 persons have written headquarters of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints seeking the church’s views on the John Birch Society, Ezra Taft Benson, member of the Council of Twelve Apostles, disclosed Wednesday.

Returning to Salt Lake City from a ?-day business trip to New York, the former U.N. Secretary of Agriculture said he is amazed at the number of persons making such inquiries.

‘At least a thousand persons, either members of the society or just well informed on it have written President David O. McKay to learn the church’s stand,’ Elder Benson said.

Mr. Benson said that although he is not a member of the society, he ‘strongly’ believes in its principles.  He added that by the same token, while he is not a member of the Farm Bureau, he believes in its efforts, too.

Mr. Benson said he is too busy with his church work to join many organizations he would like to support.

‘I have stated, as my personal opinion only, that the John Birch Society’ is the most effective nonchurch organization in our fight against creeping socialism and godless communism.’

‘Obviously only one man, President David O. McKay, speaks for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormon) on matters of policy.

‘In response to many inquiries, the office of President McKay has stated

‘that members of the church are free to join anti-Communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the church is not jeopardized by so doing.

‘The church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.’

Elder Benson, whose son, Reed, is Utah coordinator for the John Birch Society, said he is completely impressed by the people who are pushing the work of the society and praised the ‘honesty and integrity’ of Robert Welch, the founder.

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS

Salt Lake City, Utah, August 1, 1963.

Mr. Robert W. Les

Salt Lake City, Utah.

Dear Brother Les:  In your letter of July 27, 1963, you state that Senator Wallace F. Bennett will enter in the Congressional Record a copy of a letter which has been sent from this office to members of the church who have inquired whether or not the church objects to their joining the John Birch Society.

President McKay has instructed me to tell you that Senator Bennett has his permission to have printed in the Congressional Record the letter in question as follows:

‘Inasmuch as President McKay is under such a heavy schedule of duties and meetings associated with the general administration of the church, he has asked me to acknowledge for him your letters of January 25 and 28, 1963, wherein you make reference to a recent statement published by the first presidency setting forth the position of the church regarding partisan politics and other related matters.

I have been directed to say that members of the church are free to join anti-Communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it definitely is opposed to anyone’s using the church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.

‘Sincerely yours,

Clare Middlemiss

Secretary to President David O. McKay

With best wishes, I remain,

Sincerely yours,

Clare Middlemiss,

Secretary to President David O. McKay

Mr. Bennett:  Mr. President, by inserting the full text of these three statements, I hope I will have been able to clear up any misunderstandings that may have been created by the earlier – and incomplete – text in the RECORD.”

Fri., 9 Aug. 1963:

John Birch Society

President Moyle gave me a letter which he had written to Elder Ezra Taft Benson in response to Brother Benson’s letter transmitting a copy of the book ‘The Politician’ by Robert Welch of the John Birch Society, and explained that he desired me to know what he had written before the letter is delivered.

I said that I have a letter from Mr. Welch asking that Ezra Taft Benson be permitted to join the Board of the Birch Society.  I said that the letter will be answered that Brother Benson may not join that Board; that he cannot be a member of that Board and be a member of the Quorum of Twelve Apostles.”

Tues., 24 Sept. 1963:

“9:15 a.m.

Visit of Robert Welch of the John Birch Society

By appointment Reed Benson brought Mr. Robert Welch of the John Birch Society, Belmont, Massachusetts, into the office of the First Presidency.  Mr. Welch reviewed the success of the meeting of his organization in Los Angeles in which Elder Ezra Taft Benson was the featured speaker.  He also told of his busy personal schedule since he left Boston a week ago, and explained that his wife has been obliged to accompany his ninety-year-old mother back to her home, and, therefore, could not be present with him for this visit.  He stated that about half the people attending the Los Angeles meeting were members and half non-members of the John Birch Society.  Mr. Welch and Brother Benson then withdrew from the office.  (see newspaper clipping following.)

Mon., 30 Sept. 1963:

“8:30 a.m.

President Milan D. Smith of Washington, D.C. called at the office and, among other things, reported matters pertaining to the Bensons.'”

Fri., 18 Oct. 1963:

“11:00 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came into my private office at my request.  I told him of our desire to have him preside over the European Mission, covering Germany, Scandinavian countries (Finland, etc.) to succeed Brother Theodore M. Burton.  (See Diary of October 24, 1963, for announcement of Brother Benson’s appointment.)

Brother Benson expressed himself as being willing to go.  He had a lovely spirit, and said he would do whatever I wanted him to do.”

Wed., 20 Nov. 1963:

John Birch Society – Elder Ezra Taft Benson

President Brown reported that last night after 10 o’clock, he had a call from the United Press and CBS representing broadcasting and television stations, also from the Associated Press, regarding statements made by Reed Benson in Boise, Idaho, regarding talks made by his father pertaining to the John Birch Society, indicating that his father, Brother Benson, had been assigned by the President of the Church to give the talk that was made by him at the John Welch Testimonial in Los Angeles.  President Brown mentioned a news article in the Salt Lake Tribune this morning giving a report of remarks by Reed Benson in Boise last night and said that Henry Smith of the Deseret News wanted to know whether the News should run a report of this interview at Boise.  President Brown mentioned that these things are causing a lot of confusion among our people.  President McKay said that we should say nothing further about the matter, and that if Reed Benson has spoken out of turn he will have to answer for it.  President McKay said that we should let the whole thing drop and that the News should not publish anything on the question.”

Mon., 23 Dec. 1963:

“10:00 to 11:30 a.m.

My secretary, Clare, came over to the apartment with her arms full of Christmas packages which had arrived at the office.

I dictated a letter to her to Mr. Robert Welch of the John Birch Society in Belmont, Massachusetts, in answer to one he had sent me asking if Elder Ezra Taft Benson could serve on the National Committee of the Society.  I told Mr. Welch that Elder Benson’s duties as European Mission President would preclude his accepting his invitation.”

Fri., 21 Feb. 1964:

“Ezra Taft Benson – Statements and Letters in Newspaper Regarding Idaho Representative Ralph R. Harding’s Criticism of Elder Benson before the House of Representatives, Washington, D.C., etc.

I told Clare that I am greatly concerned over the letters which were sent to Representative Harding by President Joseph Fielding Smith and my son Robert R. McKay, and that I am also disturbed over Ralph Harding’s alleged claim that I had sent Elder Benson out of the country to stop his political activity, and that I had apologized to President Lyndon B. Johnson when I visited him recently for Elder Benson’s actions.

I approved the publishing of a letter addressed to Mrs. Frank K. Root, Jr. of Boise, Idaho, who had asked me if ‘the rumor is true that you went back to Washington, D.C. to vindicate Representative Ralph R. Harding and apologize for Apostle Benson’, and ‘was Elder Benson sent to Europe because he had embarrassed the Church in any way?’  The reply, signed by my secretary, said:  ‘President McKay has directed me to acknowledge your letter for him, and to tell you that there is no truth whatever in the rumors you related in your letter.  President McKay has also instructed me to tell you that Elder Ezra Taft Benson was not sent to Europe for any of the reasons given in your letter.  Elder Benson was called by inspiration to preside over the European Mission.  I am directed further to say that President McKay responded to an invitation from President Lyndon B. Johnson to talk over matters with him that had nothing whatever to do with Elder Ezra Taft Benson’.

I shall have to take steps to have these accusations stopped.  Wide publicity has been given to these matters over Radio, Television, and in the newspapers.  (See following newspaper clippings.)

Friday, February 21, 1964

IKE PRAISES IDAHO SOLON FOR BENSON CRITICISM

BY ASSOCIATED PRESS

POCATELLO, IDAHO, FEB. 20

Rep. Ralph R. Harding (D-Idaho), has received a letter from former President Dwight D. Eisenhower commending him for his criticism of the political views of former Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson.

Letters expressing similar views also have been sent Rep. Harding by a high official of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the son of the LDS Church president.

The letters were made public Thursday by the Idaho State Journal.

Mr. Benson, agriculture secretary during the eight Eisenhower years, is a member of the LDS Council of Twelve Apostles and new president of its European missions.

The newspaper said one of the letters was from Joseph Fielding Smith, President of the Council.  The other, it said, was from Robert R. McKay, son of LDS Church President David O. McKay.

Rep. Harding also is a member of the LDS Church.

‘I am grateful … for the speech that you made in congress concerning the support and encouragement that the former secretary of agriculture, Ezra Benson, has allegedly been giving to a Mr. Welch, said to be the founder and leader of the John Birch Society,’ Gen. Eisenhower wrote Harding.

‘Your honest and unselfish effort to set the record straight is something that warms my heart.’

The paper then quoted Mr. Smith’s letter as saying:

‘I am glad to report to you that it will be some time before we hear anything from Brother Benson, who is now on his way to Great Britain where I suppose he will be at least for the next two years.  When he returns, I hope his blood will be purified.

Robert McKay’s letter, the paper said, expressed a similar sentiment.

‘We shall all be relieved when Elder Benson ceases to resist counsel and returns to a concentration on those affairs befitting his office,’ he wrote.  ‘It is my feeling that there will be an immediate and noticeable curtailment of his Birch Society activities.’

The paper said Rep. Harding, reached in Washington, D.C. refused to comment.  But it said the congressman had sent copies of the letters to at least two key supporters in Idaho.

The letters apparently were prompted by a speech Rep. Harding made Sept. 25, 1963, on the floor of the House in which he criticized Mr. Benson for supporting the Birch Society.

All three letters were dated late in 1963.

In his speech, Rep. Harding quoted from a book, ‘The Politician,’ in which Birch Society founder Robert Welch attempted to link Gen. Eisenhower with a Communist conspiracy.

There was speculation last December when Mr. Benson was sent to Europe by the church that he was being exiled for his political views.  The LDS Church officially denied the rumors.

Mr. Benson’s son, Reed, is a coordinator for the Birch Society in Utah and Idaho.

President Smith, when contacted in his Salt Lake apartment Thursday afternoon, said he had written to Rep. Harding late last year stating that Elder Benson was on his way to Great Britain to serve as a mission president.

‘I don’t recall writing ‘When he returns, I hope his blood will be purified.’  If I did write such a statement, I meant that when he returned he would be free of all political ties,’ President Smith declared.

The church official said his letter was personal to Rep. Harding and was not intended for publication.

The same view was held by Mr. McKay who said that he had written Rep. Harding in reply to a request made of him last fall.

‘He sent me a copy of a speech he made on the floor of the House in which he criticized Elder Benson for supporting the Birch Society.

‘He asked me to deliver it personally to my father (David O. McKay, president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), which I did.’

Mr. McKay admitted that he had written to Rep. Harding and was quoted correctly but said that when the statement was taken out of context it had a different meaning than was intended.

The Salt Lake Tribune – Friday, February 21, 1964

Friday, February 21, 1964

SOLON EMBARRASSED BY LETTER PUBLICATION

Stating that he is ‘extremely embarrassed’ about the unauthorized release of three personal letters to the press, Rep. Ralph R. Harding, D-Idaho, said Friday in Salt Lake City he is making a ‘reappraisal of the rewards and satisfactions of public service.’

He said a ‘trusted friend’ released three letters to the press, and that he felt this was a betrayal of the writers’ confidence.

The letters were written by former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, President Joseph Fielding Smith of the Council of the Twelve, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and Robert R. McKay, son of President David O. McKay.

All of the letters reportedly were sent after Rep. Harding criticized former Secretary of Agriculture Ezra Taft Benson for his support of Robert Welch, leader of the John Birch Society.

The congressman said the letters were personal, and that they should not have been released to the press.

Counteract Recruiting

He added that he had sent the letters to the friend in an effort to counteract ‘John Birch Society use of the Church to recruit new members.’

‘I gave instructions that the letters were not to leave the friend’s possession nor be released to the press,’ he said.

Rep. Harding said the Idaho reporter who got the letters called him for comment, and that he asked the newsmen not to print the letters’ contents.

He called the publication of the letters ‘poor journalism.’

Refuses To Identify

The youthful congressman refused to identify the reporter or the person who released the letters.

‘This incident has caused me to be most discouraged with my role in public life,’ he said, adding:

‘I am making a complete appraisal of the rewards and satisfactions of public service as contrasted with the family sacrifices, the controversy and the other disadvantages of serving in Congress.

‘I am tired of making news and fighting battles against special interest groups.’

‘I sincerely regret that these letters fell into the hands of the press, and I intend to contact President Eisenhower, President Smith and Mr. McKay to apologize.’

He termed the incident ‘a terrible embarrassment to me,’ and said ‘it certainly must be embarrassing to the writers of those letters.’

Rep. Harding was in Salt Lake City Friday to make a speech on the University of Utah ‘Challenge Week’ program.

He said he has ‘never been sicker in my life.’

Rep. Harding said he had ‘no comment’ on the contents of the letters.

Deseret News – Friday, February 21, 1964

Friday, February 21, 1964

CHURCH DENIES MISSION RUMORS

BOISE (UPI) – President David O. McKay of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints denied in a letter released here Friday he sent Elder Ezra Taft Benson to Europe because of Elder Benson’s alleged activities with the John Birch Society.

The President also denied he visited President Lyndon Johnson recently to vindicate Idaho Rep. Ralph Harding who chastised Elder Benson and the Birchers in a speech delivered on the House floor last year.

The letters from the President were to Mrs. Frank K. Root Jr., Boise, a member of the Church.

Mrs. Root had asked President McKay if ‘the rumor is true that you went back to Washington, D.C., to vindicate Rep. Ralph Harding and apologize for Apostle Benson?’ and ‘was Elder Benson sent to Europe because he had embarrassed the church in any way?’

President McKay’s secretary, Clare Middlemiss, replied:

‘President McKay … has read your letter … and has directed me to acknowledge it for him and to tell you that there is no truth whatever in the rumors you related in your letter.

‘President McKay has also instructed me to tell you that Elder Ezra Taft Benson was not sent to Europe for any of the reasons given in your letter.  Elder Benson was called by inspiration to preside over the European Mission.

‘I am directed to say further that President McKay responded to an invitation from President Lyndon B. Johnson to talk over matters with him that had nothing whatever to do with Elder Ezra Taft Benson.

‘I have been directed to say that members of the Church are free to join anti-Communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposing the John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone’s using the Church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies…’

Deseret News – Friday, February 21, 1964

Friday, February 21, 1964

‘RELEASE UNAUTHORIZED,’ SOLON SAYS OF LETTERS

Rep. Ralph R. Harding (D-Idaho) said Friday he was embarrassed and discouraged by what he termed the unauthorized release by a personal friend of three letters written to the congressman praising his criticism of former Agriculture Secretary Ezra Taft Benson.

‘It just wasn’t right.  They were published without my permission,’ the congressman declared in a press conference at the University of Utah.

Publication of the letters has ‘played a large part’ in his reexamination of whether to try for reelection, he said.

The letters were from former President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Joseph Fielding Smith, president of the Council of Twelve Apostles of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, and Robert R. McKay, son of LDS Church President David O. McKay.

They were published Thursday in the Idaho State Journal in Pocatello.

Rep. Harding said he gave the letters to a close personal friend ‘with great confidence,’ for use in a ‘local battle in which the John Birch Society was trying to recruit LDS members into the Society.’

‘When the press called me I asked them not to publish the letters, and I asked them not to comment on them at the time … I’ll say they were published without my permission.’

He said he had apologized to the three authors of the letters ‘for letting this happen.’

‘I am evaluating whether or not it’s worth it all,’ the congressman said when asked if the publication of the letters would affect his public life.

‘You become involved in these controversies at the sacrifice of time with your family, even financial sacrifice.  I am considering very carefully whether I will announce for re-election.’

The letters, as published in the Pocatello paper, quoted President Eisenhower as thanking Rep. Harding for a speech he made in Congress concerning Mr. Benson’s alleged support of Robert Welch, head of the Birch Society.

Mr. McKay’s letter was quoted as expressing prospective relief  ‘when Elder Benson ceases to resist counsel and returns to a concentration on those affairs befitting his office.’

President Smith wrote, ‘I am glad to report to you that it will be some time before we hear anything from Brother Benson, who is now on his way to Great Britain where I suppose he will be at least the next two years,’ the State Journal said.

Mr. McKay said Thursday that he had written the letter, and that it had been correctly quoted, but had been lifted out of context.

Mr. Smith said his letter was personal and not intended for publication.

Rep. Harding denied claims by an Idaho Republican State senator that copies of the letter had been sent out ‘whole-sale.’

The ‘wholesale’ charge was made Friday by State Sen. Perry Swisher who said according to a United Press International story from Boise, that he could not understand Rep. Harding’s dismay that the letters were published.

Sen. Swisher, who publishes the weekly Pocatello ‘Intermountain,’ said, ‘I went looking for some copies and they were not hard to find.  I think they were more widely circulated than my own newspaper.’

The Salt Lake Tribune – Saturday, February 22, 1964

Friday, February 21, 1964

LETTER DENIES REBUKE IN BENSON CALL

By Associated Press

BOISE – A Boise woman made public Friday a letter from the Office of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints saying that Ezra Taft Benson was sent to Europe because he ‘was called by inspiration.’

The Idaho Statesman said the letter was written to Mrs. Frank K. Root Jr. of Boise, a member of the LDS Church.  It was signed by Clare Middlemiss, secretary to LDS Church President David O. McKay.

Mrs. Root said she wrote President McKay Feb. 5 asking if ‘the rumor is true that you went back to Washington, D.C., to vindicate Rep. Ralph Harding, (D-Idaho) and apologize for Apostle Ezra Taft Benson?’

It also asked: ‘Was Elder Benson sent to Europe because he had embarrassed the church in any way?’

The reply to Mrs. Root from President McKay’s office said ‘there is no truth whatever in the rumors you related in your letter.’

The Salt Lake Tribune – Saturday, February 22, 1964″

Thurs., 5 Mar. 1964:

10:00 to 2:20 p.m.

Was engaged in the meeting of the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve.  Very Important Meeting.  Some of the matters discussed were:

Political Differences – Unfortunate Statement in letters to Congressman Ralph R. Harding of Idaho about Elder Ezra Taft Benson

I said that before partaking of the Sacrament this morning, I should like to refer to an unfortunate incident which has occurred since the Council last met in this capacity.  I mentioned that a man by the name of Harding in Idaho, who is a congressman, has created quite a stir, and has been misinterpreted as far as lack of unity among the General Authorities is concerned by the Nation.  I said that I had received a lot of letters relative to this matter.  I said that this matter affects one of the members of the Council, and indirectly all members.

I then read to the Council one of the letters I have received regarding the situation.  In this letter the writer referred to a letter written by President Joseph Fielding Smith and also one by my son, Robert, having reference to and criticizing Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s attitude toward the John Birch Society.  The writer stated that this indicates a lack of harmony among the leaders of the Church, and that this dissension is creating confusion among members and friends of the Church.  I said that I have other similar letters from faithful members of the Church.

I said that I should like to know today that there is no dissension among the members of this Council, and that we partake of the Sacrament in full fellowship and full support of one another.  I mentioned that since President Smith’s name is associated with Brother Benson, particularly in the matter of the John Birch Society, that I think it would be well for President Smith on this occasion to explain his association with the controversy.

President Smith said he was glad to do so, that he had received similar communications to the one read by me and that he had written to Brother Benson about the matter.  He said that he had had no intention of saying anything detrimental to Brother Benson; that he did say that when Brother Benson comes home, he hoped he would not get into politics and would keep his blood pure.  President Smith said that was not intended as an attack on Brother Benson, but he was aware of the fact that in politics a lot of things are done that are somewhat shady.  He said he was speaking of conditions that exist in the political world, and intended no reflection upon Brother Benson.

President Smith said he had communicated with Brother Benson, and Brother Benson had with him, and that he had written letters to these people who had written them that he and Brother Benson are on the best of terms and fellowship with each other, and that he would not do anything in the world to hurt him, but he did say he hoped Brother Benson would keep himself out of politics.

President Smith said he wished that he had not written this private letter to Congressman Harding, that it was never intended to be circulated, and he was sorry he said it the way he did because it was misunderstood, that he had no intention whatever to cast any reflection on Brother Benson’s character, and he had done the best he could to straighten out the matter.

I told the Brethren that I have spoken to my son, Robert, and that he had said that he had no intention whatever of bringing me into it.

President Smith said that he had written to Brother Benson and told him that as far as he was concerned they were in full fellowship with each other, and that he had never intended to say a thing against his character.  I asked President Smith if Brother Benson had accepted his statement.  President Smith said yes, that he had heard from him.

I then said that Elder Benson had permission from the President of the Church to give the lecture that he gave in the auditorium in Hollywood.  I mentioned that some people had said that that was one activity wherein Brother Benson went contrary to the counsel of the Presidency and General Authorities.  I said that Elder Benson had full permission to give that lecture and he gave a good talk, but that young Benson has associated the remarks I have made against the Communists in his talking about the John Birch Society.  I said that the stand of the Church regarding Communism has nothing whatever to do with the Birch Society, which is a private organization, and the Church in no way sustains it.

I further said that Brother Benson had said publicly that he was in favor of the John Birch Society, and that I had told Brother Benson that he could not, as one of the Twelve, join that Society.  This was before Brother Benson was called to be President of the European Mission, and his call as President of that mission had nothing whatever to do with the John Birch Society.  I said that I had told him back in November last that he could not join the Society as one of the Twelve.

I further said that some people have written in saying that a person cannot be a member of the Church and join the John Birch Society.  That, I commented, is the wrong interpretation.  Two things I said we should know:  First, that a person’s standing in the Church is not affected by membership in that or any other private organization.  People are free to join what they wish.  Second, that Brother Benson’s call to preside over the European Mission had no relationship whatever to his desire to join that Society.

I stated that so far as this Council is concerned, we have no connection whatever with the John Birch Society, no matter how good it may be and how noble its purposes; that Brother Benson received his call to go to Europe without any thought of associating his call to the European Mission Presidency with his views regarding the John Birch Society, and that so far as we are concerned this morning as the Council of the First Presidency and the Twelve, we have nothing whatever to do with it, and Brother Benson’s call over there had nothing to do with it.

I then said:  ‘We shall partake of the sacrament this morning in the spirit of the opening prayer; that we be one in all things pertaining to this Church.’  (See Diary of February 21, 1964, regarding the Benson-Harding Controversy.)”

Thurs., 4 June 1964:

“Germany – Distribution of Church Literature in East German Zone

President Ezra Taft Benson’s report of difficulties encountered recently in East Germany when police found Church literature for use by Latter-day Saints in the branches in East Germany was considered.

It was agreed that President Benson be advised that visits of President Tate and his representatives from Berlin each two weeks may seem to be too frequent, and that President Benson be cautioned about his going into East Berlin lest he be detained.

Tues., 18 Aug. 1964:

“8:30 to 10:30 a.m.

Although not feeling very well, I met with my counselors at the regular hour this morning.

Ezra Taft Benson in Politics

President Brown reported that President Mark E. Petersen of the West European Mission had submitted to him a memorandum stating that he wished there was some way to keep Brother Benson out of politics; that Europe hates Goldwater, and Brother Benson recently gave an interview to the Danish newspapers, and his statement in one of these papers bears this headline:  ‘Mormon Apostle said America needs Goldwater’.

Brother Petersen said that this sort of publicity hurts us in Europe, and asks if there is any way to stop it.

I said that this ought not to be done, but asked that a communication be sent to Brother Benson calling attention to the report, and asking as to the accuracy of it.

Political Involvement

President Brown suggested the giving of a word of caution to the Brethren of the General Authorities regarding keeping out of politics.  He mentioned a letter that had come to him from a Dutch Saint which was signed by former presidents of the Netherlands Mission and by LeGrand Richards urging the Dutch Saints to vote for Goldwater.  President Brown said he phoned Brother Richards about it, and that Brother Richards said, ‘Well, it is too late to do anything now.  We have sent it out, and you know and I know that we ought to have Goldwater and we ought to get him in.’  I said that it is not right for the Brethren to become involved in politics, and that I would like to talk to Brother Richards about it.  President Brown will hand the letter to me.

Thurs., 17 Sept. 1964:

8:00 a.m.

Brother Arch Madsen, President of KSL, called at the office by appointment, and presented the following matters:

1)  Content of Church Radio Broadcasting over WRUL

He said that to the best of his knowledge, the WRUL Church-sponsored programs still are not being cleared through the General Authorities as I had directed.  He said that Richard Maycock was appointed to serve as radio-television program coordinator, reporting to the First Presidency and other General Authorities as directed.  Brother Madsen asked that a letter be released to the Board, over my signature, calling their attention to Brother Maycock’s appointment and responsibility.

I agreed to this letter being sent out.  (See copy of letter following.)

2)  Appointment of Elder Gordon B. Hinckley on the WRUL Board

Brother Madsen said he would like to have Brother Gordon B. Hinckley appointed to the WRUL Board as he felt that he would magnify the WRUL opportunities, as he is well informed in all other radio and television Church operations.  Would like a letter sent out under the signature of the First Presidency on this appointment before October 1, prior to the next Board of Directors Meeting.  Said that Brother Thomas S. Monson is currently on the WRUL Board and is providing indispensable services.  (See copy of letter regarding Brother Hinckley’s and Stanley McAllister’s appointments to the IEBC Board following.)

3)  Said that he had received a telephone call from Mr. Rex Howell, a member of a special committee of broadcasters, who has been chosen to select the new President for the National Association of Broadcasters.  This Association represents most of the television and radio stations in the United States, as well as all radio and television networks, and is a very vital factor in the present operation and future development of the nation’s great system of broadcasting.  According to Mr. Howell, the name of Brother Ezra Taft Benson has been selected for consideration.  Brother Madsen said that he had been asked to check with me to see if Brother Benson could be spared from his Church assignment to accept the position as full-time President of the National Association of Broadcasters in the event he is selected for this important position.

I asked Brother Madsen to remain and meet with the counselors, at which time we would discuss the matter regarding Elder Benson’s being considered for the new President of the National Association of Broadcasters.

8:30 to 9:30 a.m.

Held a meeting of the First Presidency.  Elder Arch Madsen met with us and pursuant to invitation, discussed the matter of the possible selection of Elder Ezra Taft Benson to serve as the new President for the National Association of Broadcasters.  Brother Madsen reiterated what he had presented earlier to me.

After hearing all the facts pertaining to the matter, I indicated that so far as the Church is concerned, Brother Benson would be available for such an appointment; that, however, before his name is presented the First Presidency would like to talk with Mr. Rex Howells about the matter.  Brother Madsen will arrange for Mr. Howells to meet and discuss this matter with the First Presidency.

After Brother Madsen left the meeting, in discussing this matter further, President Brown said that the only concern he had is Brother Benson’s attitude toward the Birch Society, which Society, President Brown claims, is becoming more and more unpopular with both the Republican and Democrats.  He said he felt if Brother Benson severed his relationship with that organization and accepted this position as a non-partisan assignment for the benefit of the Church primarily, he could do a lot of good; otherwise, he could do us a lot of harm. 

I said that if we find later that there is a probability that Brother Benson will be named for this position, we shall have a talk with him about the whole matter.  (See First Presidency’s minutes of this day for further details.)

Wed., 7 Oct. 1964:

“9:30 to 10:30 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson, President of the European Mission, called at my office in the apartment, and had a long conference with me on matters pertaining to his mission presidency, etc.

Wednesday, October 7, 1964

October 16, 1964

(Original in 1964 Correspondence File)

PERSONAL

President David O. McKay

Hotel Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah

U.S.A.

Dear President McKay:

It was a real joy and blessing to have the opportunity of meeting with you in your study October 7 and 11, and also to be in your company at the time you received Senator Barry Goldwater.

Thank you so much for the generous amount of time you extended to me so unselfishly.

It was a real pleasure to discuss problems pertaining to the Kingdom with you.  It was also a pleasure to see Sister McKay.

Sister Benson and I returned to Frankfurt this morning, after I attended some consultations and meetings pertaining to Corn Products Company and the National Executive Board of the Boy Scouts of New York.

We are happy to be back in the mission field and grateful for the privilege which is ours.

If your German isn’t better than mine, you won’t be able to read much of the enclosed printed matter, but I did want you to see something of the quality of the printed materials which we are using in the Germanic area of the European Mission.

Thank you again for the great opportunity of meeting with you at Conference time.

With prayerful wishes for your welfare.

Affectionately your brother,

Ezra Taft Benson

President”

Fri., 23 Apr., 1965:

John Birch Society

President Brown having mentioned that the John Birch Society has charged him with certain things, I said that many accusations had come to me about President Brown’s opposition to the Birch Society.  I asked President Brown why he is so bitter against the organization.  President Brown said that he did not consider it a good society, and he thought that they were doing more harm than good.  He further stated that since I had told him about a year ago to be quiet on that subject, he had said and done nothing further regarding it.

I said that it is wise not to mention the society.

Ezra Taft Benson’s Remarks in Conference

President Brown referred to the April Conference address of Elder Ezra Taft Benson and his remarks about civil rights and Communism, and said that he had had many unfavorable reactions regarding Brother Benson’s remarks.  He mentioned an article that appeared in the Washington Post with a big headline statement as follows:  ‘Rift in the Mormon Church, Benson Says that Civil Rights is Communistic’, and that the Presidency have announced that the Church stands for complete brotherhood and fairness.  President Brown said that he thought that Brother Benson should be told to take care of his missionary work and leave such matters alone.

I said that I had not noticed anything objectionable in what Brother Benson had said, and asked that President Brown bring to me a report of Brother Benson’s remarks, which President Brown said he would do at once.

I said that we should leave such subjects alone.

Referring to this same matter, President Tanner said that he had received telephone calls and letters from two areas particularly, one the Phoenix area and the other Idaho, in which he was told that these things have ‘split the people down the center’ in their thinking in Priesthood meeting classes, discussions in Sunday School classes, etc., that the complaint is made that Brother Benson is taking one position and that President Brown has taken another.

I said I had told everyone not to mention the Birch Society but let the matter die out.”

Mon., 3 May 1965:

“Ezra Taft Benson – Conference Sermon

President Brown discussed with me the recent Conference address by Elder Ezra Taft Benson, and I authorized the elimination from this address of the following statements by Brother Benson:

‘Before I left for Europe I warned how the Communists were using the Civil Rights Movement to promote revolution and eventual take-over of this Country.  When are we going to wake up?  What do you know about the dangerous Civil Rights agitation in Mississippi?  Do you fear the destruction of all vestiges of state government?

Now, Brethren, the Lord has never promised there would not be traitors in the Church.  We have the ignorant, the sleepy and the deceived who provide temptations and avenues of apostasy for the unwary and the unfaithful.  But we have a Prophet at our head and he has spoken.  Now what are we going to do about it?’

Thurs., 21 Oct. 1965:

“1:15 to 3:45 p.m.

Choosing of Two Additional Counselors in the First Presidency

Met with my secretary, Clare, for a few moments, and then told her to call Elder Thorpe B. Isaacson and tell him to come in.

Told Elder Isaacson that I had decided that someone should be assigned to take his Stake and Mission assignments in Europe.  I again discussed with him the matter of his becoming one of the Counselors in the First Presidency.  I stated that probably I should call the First Presidency and members of the Twelve into a special meeting right now, but when I noted the time, decided that it was too late to do that this afternoon.  I then called my secretary and asked her to have Brother Ezra Taft Benson, who was waiting in the outer office, to come in.  It told Brother Benson that I planned to call Elder Isaacson to be a counselor in the First Presidency, and asked him if he could support me in this, and he answered ‘One hundred percent, President McKay — I have expected it, and have been glad that you have used him over the past few months for various phases of your work.’

Brother Benson then explained that he had wanted to see me about the fact that a very prominent man, representing a large group of Americans who are strongly in favor of freedom and the preserving of a conservative government, had approached him and solicited his support in their efforts to preserve freedom and conservative government in the United States.  He said that even the Republicans are becoming soft toward socialism and Communism, and that they may have to start a third party.  I told Elder Benson that he must not have anything to do with a ‘third party’; that it would be completely useless; that, however, he should look into what these men have in mind.

Elder Benson then referred to an article by J. Edgar Hoover, and asked if it could be printed in the Improvement Era.  He told me of the contents of the article, and I said that it would be all right to have this printed in the Era.  Elder Benson then left the office, and I continued my conversation with Elder Isaacson.  I asked my secretary to call President Joseph Fielding Smith and ask him to come down, and when he came in I told him that I had called Elder Isaacson as my Counselor and asked him whether he could sustain me in that action, and President Smith said that he could one-hundred percent.  I also asked him if he could support Elder Isaacson, and he said that he could with all his heart.

I then took President Smith by the hand, and said that I wanted him also to serve as a Counselor in the First Presidency.  That took President Smith by surprise, and he said, ‘You mean you want me to serve in the First Presidency?’  With tears in his eyes, President Smith said, ‘I’ll do anything you ask me to do.’  He then reminded me of the years we have been together in the Council.  I told President Smith that I knew he had been loyal to me and that I trusted him completely.

I told the Brethren that I would decide when to call them, and that they should stay close; that I would call a meeting of the Twelve and present this matter to them.  I told President Smith to assign one of the other Brethren to take the Stake and Mission assignments in Europe that had been given to Elder Isaacson; that Elder Isaacson could take the Servicemen’s Conference in Germany and then return home.  

Thursday, October 21, 1965

M E M O R A N D U M

Thursday, October 21, 1965                            3:45 p.m.

Today at 1:20 p.m., Brother Darvey Wright, building manager, came to my office and told me that Sister Clare Middlemiss, President McKay’s secretary, had asked him to step into my office and tell me that President McKay was in his office and that he would like to see me.  So I went with Brother Wright to President McKay’s office.  President McKay had me come in and take a seat by the side of him.  He told me that someone would be assigned to take my conference assignments in Germany.  He stated that he had just come from the meeting of the Twelve, but that he had left his notes on his desk in Huntsville.  He came directly from Huntsville to the temple meeting, and he did not, therefore, take up with the Presidency and the Twelve the matter he had discussed with me on Monday.

He hesitated and then stated that perhaps he should call in the Presidency and the Twelve for a special meeting in the board room next to his office.  Then he looked at his watch and thought it was too late.  He asked me when I would be leaving for Germany, and I told him next Saturday, October 30.

President McKay asked me to remain seated where I was, that Brother Benson was coming in and he wanted me to stay there with him.  He asked his secretary, Clare Middlemiss, to have Brother Benson come in as he was waiting in the outer office.  Brother Benson entered and greeted both of us.

President McKay asked Brother Benson whether it was all right with him if I remained there while they talked, and Brother Benson agreed and said it was all right.  Then President McKay stated to Brother Benson that he had called me to be his counselor and asked Brother Benson whether he could sustain him in this.  He said he could support President McKay in this 100%.  He congratulated the President and congratulated me and told the President that he felt that he needed me very badly.  President McKay said that was why he had called me.  Brother Benson assured President McKay and me that this decision met with his approval 100% and expressed to President McKay that he had expected it and was glad he had used me over these past months.

After that announcement, President McKay asked Brother Benson to proceed with the things he had on his mind.  Brother Benson told President McKay that on Wednesday in New York City a very prominent man who represented a large group of Americans who were strongly in favor of freedom and the preserving of the conservative government had approached him.  He did not wish to divulge the name of this man because it was so confidential.  Brother Benson explained to President McKay that they had solicited his support in this movement to preserve freedom and to develop a conservative attitude and conservative government in the hopes that we could stem the tide of socialism and the softness toward communism.  President McKay concurred and asked Brother Benson how they would proceed.  Brother Benson answered by saying that they wanted him to contact Senator Thurmond of South Carolina and that they wanted Senator Thurmond and Brother Benson to get together and they would take this throughout the states of the nation, hoping they could get it into the Republican Convention.  Although Brother Benson explained that the Republicans were becoming soft toward communism and drifting toward socialism and away from conservatism about as badly as the Democrats.  They hoped they could keep it in the Republican Party; but if not, they may have to start a third party.  President McKay strongly disagreed and expressed his opinion and hoped that Brother Benson would not become associated with any third party because it would be completely useless.  Brother Benson stated that he did not care to get into politics, but he thought the Church should take a stand; that if somebody did not do something it would be too late.  President McKay agreed with this.  Brother Benson asked whether he should look into it further or forget it.  President McKay told him to go ahead and make further inquiry and to do what he thought was right.

Brother Benson discussed with Brother McKay an article by J. Edgar Hoover and wondered whether it could be put in The Improvement Era.  He told President McKay of the contents of the article and asked President McKay whether he could talk to Brother Green and have it put in The Improvement Era.  President McKay authorized him to contact Brother Green and have this article published in The Improvement Era.

That ended our discussion with Brother Benson and he left.  I was going to leave, but President McKay told me to stay there and asked Sister Middlemiss to call President Joseph Fielding Smith and have him come down, which she did.  President Joseph Fielding Smith came in and greeted President McKay.  President McKay told President Smith that he had called me as his counselor and asked President Smith whether he could sustain him in that action, and President Smith said he could 100%.  The he asked him whether he could support me, and President Smith said he could completely and was very complimentary in his remarks.

Then President McKay took President Joseph Fielding Smith’s hand and said he wanted him to serve also as a counselor in the First Presidency.  President Smith was shocked and said, ‘You mean you want me in the First Presidency?’  President McKay said he did.  President Smith answered President McKay and said he would do anything President McKay asked him to do.  They exchanged greetings and President Smith reminded him of the years they had sat together in the Council.  President McKay said he trusted President Joseph Fielding Smith and knew he was loyal to him.

President McKay then made some confidential remarks and stated that the Church would receive a ‘shock’.  I did not know nor did I try to interpret what he meant.

President McKay said he would decide when to call us, but for us to stay close.  He had not determined as to when he would talk to the Twelve.  He did state that he wanted to do it before I left.  He asked us to stay close in the next few days.

That finished our conversation.  President McKay asked President Joseph Fielding Smith to arrange to assign someone else to take the four stake conferences in Germany and Switzerland that had been assigned to me so that I could go to the Servicemen’s Conference at Berchtesgaden, meet with the mission presidents of that area, and return home as soon as possible.  Then President Smith and I went and talked to Vella.  She and President Smith studied the assignments and decided to send Elder S. Dilworth Young to attend these conferences – one to be in midweek, and one to be on the weekend.  

/s/Thorpe B. Isaacson”  

Sat., 30 Oct. 1965:

“Elder Ezra Taft Benson came over to the apartment and discussed matters pertaining to the socialistic trend of our government.”

Fri., 19 Nov. 1965:

“Did not hold a meeting of the First Presidency this morning.  Called my secretary and told her to tell my Counselors to go ahead and take care of the letters and other matters without me.  Asked Clare to bring over what she has to present to me.  She said that Elder Ezra Taft Benson wants to see me, so I told her to bring him over when she comes.

10:00 to 11:00 a.m.

Communism – Inroads of

Elder Ezra Taft Benson gave a report on the serious inroads the Communists have made in this country.  Now that the United States Supreme Court has ruled that the Communist Party does not have to register in this country, they will have greater freedom than ever.

Elder Benson is pleading that the Church have a course of study for our Priesthood members on Free Agency, Communism, and the Constitution such as was prepared sometime ago, but never used.

I agreed that we should have a course of study on these subjects as I am convinced that our country is already on the road to Socialism, and that the Communists are making gains here.  Elder Benson asked if President Isaacson could go back East and take a two-day seminar on Communism and conditions in our country to be given in December by the John Birch Society.  I said that it would not hurt President Isaacson to be informed on these matters.  (Later, President Isaacson decided not to go; that inasmuch as he has records containing all the information to be given at the Seminar, he will listen to the recordings and get as much enlightenment as if he were to take the time to go back to the Seminar.)

Thurs., 9 Dec. 1965:

“Priesthood Course of Study on Freedom, Communism, Etc.

I read a memorandum to the Brethren stating that we should have a Priesthood Course of Study on man’s long and continuing struggle for freedom, God’s gift of free agency, the inroads that have and are being made by the Communists, etc., and suggesting that Elder Ezra Taft Benson be asked to serve as the Chairman of a committee, with Elders Marion G. Romney, Delbert L. Stapley, and Thomas S. Monson to supervise the preparation of a manual for use by the quorums of the Priesthood throughout the Church for the year 1967.

It was decided to present this matter to the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve today in their regular weekly meeting.

Later, at the meeting in the Temple, this matter was discussed at some length, and Elder Harold B. Lee, Chairman of the Correlation Committee, did not favor the course of study suggested, and I left the matter with the committee to consider and report back later.”

Fri., 7 Jan. 1966:

Utah Forum – Speakers in Assembly Hall on American Idea

Consideration was given to a request from Mark Anderson of the Utah Forum for the American Idea for the use of the Assembly Hall to present a series of speakers at 8:00 p.m. on February 10, March 4, April 22, May 5, and June 4 — these speakers to emphasize the American Idea.  The speakers to appear are Ezra Taft Benson, February 10, 1966; W. Cleon Skousen, March 4, 1966; Al Leppert, April 22, 1966; John Stormer, May 5, 1966; and Clarence Manion, June 4, 1966.

President Tanner suggested that this smacks very much of the John Birch Society.

President Isaacson stated that in approving this series it should be done with the understanding that any additional speakers should come to the First Presidency for approval.  He said that he could see no objection to any of these speakers who are on the list submitted.

President Smith said that he would be in favor of granting the permission requested with the provision that if we find anyone of the speakers saying anything harmful to the Government we should withdraw our permission for the other speakers.  This became the sentiment of the meeting.  It was decided to so notify Mark Anderson in answer to his letter.

Tues., 1 Feb. 1966:

“8:00 a.m. to 9:50 a.m.

Held a meeting of the First Presidency.  Presidents Hugh B. Brown and Thorpe B. Isaacson still confined to the hospital.  Presidents Tanner and Smith were present at the meeting.

Brother Tanner reported an improvement in the physical condition of Presidents Brown and Isaacson; also, that Franklin D. Richards of the Assistants to the Twelve, who is confined to the hospital, is improving.

We discussed a number of general items, some of which were:

Benson, Ezra Taft – Publicity Given to Speaking Appointments

President Tanner called attention to newspaper notices that had been received regarding a talk to be given by Elder Ezra Taft Benson, reading as follows:  ‘The Honorable Ezra Taft Benson will bee the keynote speaker by express permission of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, David O. McKay.’  President Tanner said that this same matter had been brought to him from two or three different sources, and that those who have mentioned it to him have indicated their feeling that it is wrong for Brother Benson to be advertised as a speaker with President McKay’s express permission.  President Tanner said that these people had not come directly to him, but that these comments have been sent to him.

I said that I feel Brother Benson should not be advertising that permission had been given him, and that in the future should he write for such permission.  I shall tell him that he is accepting the appointment on his own responsibility.”

Wed., 9 Feb. 1966:

“8:00 a.m.

Met by appointment Elder Ezra Taft Benson who said that the editors of the ‘American Opinion’ magazine would like to have my portrait on the cover of their April issue.  He said this magazine is published in Belmont, Massachusetts, and is a high-class publication.  He showed me several past issues with pictures of Senator Barry Goldwater, the Honorable J. Edgar Hoover, Director of the FBI, and other prominent Americans.  Brother Benson said that they needed a colored photograph and some biographical material, and I asked him to get these from my secretary, Clare.

After discussing the matter, I could see no reason why I should not grant permission for the editors to use my picture.

Thurs., 10 Feb. 1966:

“8:30 a.m.

Met with Counselors — Presidents Brown and Tanner — in a meeting of the First

Presidency.  President Smith is meeting with the Council of the Twelve in the Temple, and President Isaacson is in the hospital.

Some of the matters considered by us were:

Constitution of the United States – Church’s Attitude Toward

We read a letter from Elder Ezra Taft Benson addressed to me complaining that some of our Stake Presidents and Bishops refuse to grant permission for circulation in their meetings and classes of material explaining the Constitution and urging people to support it.

President Brown stated that he did not like to see the Church involved in the political aspect of this subject.

I made no commitments at this time.”

Fri., 11 Feb. 1966:

Ezra Taft Benson’s Talk in Assembly Hall

Clare said that Paul Evans of KSL had called to inquire if I wanted to listen to Elder Benson’s talk in the Assembly Hall, I said that I should like to hear Elder Benson.  Arrangements were therefore made by KSL to check to see if everything is in order.

8:05 p.m.

Listened to Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s talk at the Utah Forum for the American Idea, held in the Assembly Hall, Temple Square.  The subject of his talk was ‘Stand Up for Freedom’.  I thought his talk was very good, and enjoyed listening to it.”     

Mon., 14 Feb. 1966:

Elder Ezra Taft Benson – Talk to be Published in Deseret News

I called Henry Smith and told him to publish in the Church Section as soon as possible the speech delivered by Elder Benson in the Assembly Hall on Friday evening, February 11, 1966.  This pertained to the inroads Communism and Socialism are making in this country.  I told Brother Smith that I should like to have it published just as it is with a modification of what Elder Benson said about the John Birch Society.  I asked Brother Smith to talk to Elder Benson about it — that we should not bring the John Birch Society into it — that we do not oppose it, but as a Church we cannot support this Society more than any other Society of like nature.”

Tues., 15 Feb. 1966:

Deseret News – Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s Talk

Earl Hawkes called on me at the apartment, without appointment.  He seemed very disturbed about printing Elder Benson’s talk in the Church section.  When he told me that a full account of Elder Benson’s talk had been given in the Deseret News on February 12, the day after the talk, I agreed that there was no need to publish it again.  The matter was left that way.”

Wed., 16 Feb. 1966:

11:30 to 12:50 p.m.

Deseret News – Publishing of Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s Talk 

Following the departure of the BYU group, I held a  meeting with my secretary, Clare.

She reported that Henry Smith of the Deseret News had called her and said that Earl Hawkes of the Deseret News had told him that I had countermanded the order to publish Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s talk of February 11, 1966, in the Church Section of the News.

I answered that Brother Hawkes had called at my home yesterday and said that the talk had been published almost in full in the daily paper on February 12.  Clare said that probably I should talk to Henry Smith about this matter, so I told her to get him on the phone and tell him to come right over.

Brother Smith arrived shortly thereafter, and he explained that Earl Hawkes had told him that I do not want Elder Benson’s talk published in the Church Section.  I said, ‘Well, I do, and it is going in.’  I said that Brother Hawkes gave me to understand that the talk had already been printed almost in full in the daily paper.  Brother Smith said, ‘It was just a regular coverage, and was not in any way published in full.’

I then told Brother Smith to go ahead with the printing of it in the Church Section, as I had heretofore instructed him.

Brother Smith later reported that Brother Hawkes was ‘furious’ when he heard about it; and said to Brother Smith, ‘Shall I go to President McKay again?’, and Brother Smith said to him, ‘I would not if I were you; just do as he has asked.'”

Fri., 18 Feb. 1966:

“John Birch Society

Elder Garff stated that a condition has developed in his office that has upset him terribly which must be corrected.  He said that the John Birchers are moving into his office and are selling tickets.  He said there is quite a propaganda going on in his office in regard to Brother Benson’s talk and the other four or five talks that are to be given in the Assembly Hall of a somewhat similar nature.  Brother Garff said that he and his associates cannot be a party to supporting, buying and selling tickets for anybody or anything that is not sponsored by the Church.  He stated that he has learned that there is a number of Birchers in the Building Department offices and there is one man in particular who must discontinue his propaganda or it will be necessary for him to discharge him.   He said that these people are trying to infiltrate the John Birch Society into the Building Department through Brother Benson.  He said he wanted me to know what he proposed to do, so that in case any complaints should come, I would be informed.  He stated that so far as he was personally concerned, he was not going to permit them to use his department as a vehicle for the John Birch Society.  Reference was made to the talk given in the Assembly Hall by Brother Benson in which he referred to the John Birch Society, which was responsible for some of the problems we are now confronting.  Brother Tanner mentioned that we shall have a great division in the Church and that there is now much discussion and argument in some of the Priesthood meetings in the stakes on this Birch Society question.

Elder Petersen mentioned Elder Benson’s interview with representatives of the Associated Press while he was in Boise, stating that the John Birch Society is the great organization to save America.  Brother Petersen said that people reading these things think the Church is giving its endorsement to the Society.  Elder Petersen further said that in his speech at the Assembly Hall Elder Benson gave strong endorsement to the Birch Society.  Elder Garff said that the problem is we have so many people confused because Breather Benson is teaching and saying that the Birch Society is the thing that will save the nation, and that people even in the Building Department accept what Brother Benson says about the Birch Society, and it puts us in an awkward position.

I stated that I had heard Brother Benson’s speech in the Assembly Hall by means of a wire connection with the Tabernacle; that Brother Benson gave a good talk on anti-communism until he started talking about the Birch Society, and that he went to an extreme in his remarks in this regard.

Elder Petersen stated that the Church Information Service had received a bill for $25 for a photograph of me which Brother Benson had requested, and it is proposed will be printed on the front page of the ‘American Opinion’ magazine, which is the John Birch Society organ.  According to Brother Petersen, Brother Benson had asked a photography shop in town to furnish a colored photograph of President McKay to be used on the cover of this magazine, the bill of $25 in payment therefor to be sent to the Church Information Service.  Elder Petersen said that if my picture is so published it will certainly look as though the Church is endorsing the John Birch Society.

I said that my picture should not appear on this magazine; that the Church has nothing to do with the John Birch Society.  I authorized Brother Petersen to tell Brother Benson that he had brought this matter to my attention, and had been told by me to stop the printing of my picture on this magazine; that I do not want it used in that way.

I said to Brother Petersen, ‘You are ordered in the presence of these men to stop it.’  I further said that I do not want to have anything to do with the John Birch Society; that the Church has had nothing to do with it in the past, and that so far as Brother Benson is concerned, I do not think we would hear anything more about it.

Note by CM

Later, when Elder Benson visited with President McKay, the President recalled that he had given Elder Benson permission to use his picture on the cover of the American Opinion magazine since it had carried pictures of such men as Barry Goldwater, J. Edgar Hoover of the FBI, and other prominent Americans.  This magazine is not the regular publication of the John Birch Society.

(See Diary of February 19, 1966; See also diary of March 8, 1966 — President McKay stopped printing of his picture on this magazine.)

Sat., 19 Feb. 1966:

“Spent the day at home.

American Opinion Magazine – Photograph for Cover

Elder Benson said that Elder Mark E. Petersen had come to him and said that I had told him that I do not want my picture placed on the cover of the April issue of the American Opinion magazine.

Elder Benson asked me if I had withdrawn my permission to have this done as given to him when he called to see me on February 9.  I asked Elder Benson how far they had gone into the preparation of this, and he said that he assumed that they are well into it; that the colored picture had been sent; that the artist in New York is working on it, and that all the biographical material had been sent to them.

Elder Benson said ‘All I want to know is what your pleasure is in this matter.’  I told Brother Benson that they had better go ahead with it since I had given my permission for this to be done.  Elder Benson then said that that they have carried pictures of Senator Barry Goldwater, J. Edgar Hoover, and others; that the magazine is considered a high-type magazine.

Wed., 2 Mar. 1966:

“8:30 a.m.

Held a meeting with the counselors in my office in the apartment.  Only Presidents Tanner and Smith were present, both Presidents Brown and Isaacson absent on account of illness.  A few of the matters discussed at this meeting were:

John Birch Society

A letter received from Margaret E. Jordan, YWMIA President of the Capitol Hill Ward, Potomac Stake, was read.  She requests a copy of a statement by the First Presidency setting forth their attitude regarding the John Birch Society, and a copy of the First Presidency’s letter to Reed Benson on the matter.  She also asks if there is any truth to the statement attributed to me that I had complimented Reed Benson on his work in behalf of the Society.  I said that I have never made such a statement.

Thurs., 3 Mar. 1966:

“Ezra Taft Benson – John Birch Society

A letter was read from Elders Kent Price, Bob Johnson, and Lon Pierce of Salt Lake City referring to the activities of Elder Ezra Taft Benson and his son Reed Benson in reference to the John Birch Society.  They make particular reference to Elder Benson’s recent talk in the Assembly Hall and talks that are to be given by other speakers along the same lines.  These young men say that they are in total disagreement with Brother Benson’s ideology and that many other members of the Church feel the same way.  They sustain him as a high official of the Church, but they are confused when he speaks on political matters.  They inquire if in so doing he is speaking for the Church.

In discussing this matter, I said that we would tell Brother Benson not to mention the Birch Society in his remarks, and that I do not think we should mention the Birch Society or have anything to do with it.  I said that I have been careful not to mention the Birch Society in remarks that I have made.

Tues., 8 Mar. 1966:

“Received a telephone call in Huntsville from President Nathan Eldon Tanner stating that it was very urgent that President Smith, Elder Mark E. Petersen, and he see me this morning.

I told President Tanner that I would see them at 10:30 this morning.  He said that he had been in touch with my son Lawrence, and that they were bringing him with them; that he would drive them up to Huntsville.

John Birch Society – American Opinion Magazine

This meeting concerned the matter of my picture appearing on the cover of the April issue of the ‘American Opinion’ magazine, and the publicity that has been given to it by the circulation manager of the magazine.  Elder Petersen said that if my picture is so published, ‘It will certainly look as though the President is endorsing The John Birch Society’.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s participation in this matter was called to my attention by the three brethren present.

It was decided to telephone and also to send a telegram to the managing editor of the ‘American Opinion’ magazine, telling him not to use my picture on the cover of the magazine in question.

The following telegram was sent, signed by me, from the office of President Tanner:

‘Confirming telephone conversation with Mr. Bleumenfeld have been informed that you plan to use my portrait on your magazine.  This is unauthorized and must not be done.

/s/David O. McKay’

(For a full report of this meeting, see minutes of First Presidency meeting following.)

(See also Diary of Wednesday, February 9, 1966, also February 19, 1966, for Elder Benson’s visit regarding picture on cover of ‘American Opinion’ magazine.)

Tuesday, March 8, 1966

Special meeting of the First Presidency held in President McKay’s home in Huntsville, Tuesday, March 8, 1966, at 10:30 a.m.

There were present the following:  Presidents David O. McKay, N. Eldon Tanner and Joseph Fielding Smith; also Elder Mark E. Petersen and David Lawrence McKay.

Picture of President McKay in ‘American Opinion’ Magazine

President Tanner made the following explanation of the purpose of the visit of these brethren to see President McKay this morning:

‘Last night I received a letter, and when I read it I got in touch with Mark E. Petersen.  This letter is signed by Philip K. Langan, Circulation Manager of the American Opinion:

‘To All Friends Of American Opinion in Utah

‘The cover of the April 1966 issue of American Opinion will feature the President of the Mormon Church, David O. McKay.

‘We feel that our Standing Order Agents will want to increase their monthly shipment, as newsstand sales should improve with the well-respected President McKay on the cover.

‘Our Subscription Agents now have a good selling point for any Mormon prospects they might be trying to ‘sign up’.

‘And for our regular Subscribers and John Birch Society Chapter leaders, you now have an opportunity to favorably impress your Mormon friends, who are not yet actively involved in the battle against Communism.

‘Below is a form pertaining to our Agents, subscribers and Chapter leaders.

‘We hope to hear from you.

Kind regards,

/s/Philip K. Langan,

Circulation Manager’

President Tanner:  As soon as I received that I got in touch with Mark E. Petersen because he had been instructed to stop that.  When we met in your office a few days ago you told him to be sure and stop that because you did not want to have anything to do with it.  It is evident they are using your name and picture for their circulation and financial benefits, so I got in touch with Brother Petersen immediately and he said he had told Brother Benson that you had instructed him to stop this.  We got in touch with Lawrence to know if you knew anything about this, if anything had been done, he felt he knew your feelings too.  We felt we should come up and let you know what the situation is to see if you wanted to do anything about it because we knew you had directed Mark to stop the use of your picture.  We were there when you told Mark to do that.

President McKay:  Who is back of that, insisting?

President Tanner then read to President McKay copy of the minutes of the First Presidency held February 18, 1966, reading as follows:

‘Elder Petersen stated that the Church Information Service had received a bill for $25 for a photograph of President McKay which Brother Benson had requested, and it is proposed will be printed on the front page of the American Opinion magazine, which is the John Birch Society organ.  According to Brother Petersen, Brother Benson had asked a photography shop in town to furnish a colored photograph of President McKay to be used on the cover of this magazine, the bill of $25 in payment therefor to be sent to the Church Information Service.  Elder Petersen said that if the President’s picture is so published it will certainly look as though the President is endorsing the John Birch Society.  President McKay said that his picture should not appear in this magazine, that the Church has nothing to do with the John Birch Society.  President McKay authorized Brother Petersen to tell Brother Benson that he had brought this matter to President McKay’s attention and had been told by the President to stop the printing of his picture in this magazine, that he did not want it used in that way.  President McKay said to Brother Petersen, ‘You are ordered in the presence of these men to stop it.’  President McKay said that he did not want to have anything to do with the John Birch Society, that the Church has had nothing to do with it in the past, and that so far as Brother Benson is concerned he did not think we would hear anything more about it.’

President Tanner:  As soon as I got this letter I could not understand it.  I wanted to check with Mark to see if he had carried out your orders and he said he had.  We are here to see what you want us to do, if anything, about it.  They are using your picture to promote their own interests.

Lawrence McKay:  I hated to see your picture used to favor circulation of the magazine so I took the liberty of bringing these brethren up here.

President McKay:  How far have they gone with it?

President Tanner:  As soon as I got this I got in touch with Mark and said:  ‘You must not have carried out the President’s wishes.’  He said he had.

President McKay:  They have resorted to everything they could to get me associated with that. 

Elder Petersen:  As soon as I left your office that day, without going to my own office, I went to Brother Benson and gave your message to him, so that there wasn’t five minutes delay.  He at the time expressed surprise that you would object but he made no commitment as to what he would do, but I did deliver your message to him and I suppose that he is responsible for this.

President Tanner:  One reason we thought we should come this morning is if you thought it should be stopped we ought to get word to them immediately.

President McKay:  You get them by telephone.  Tell them I do not want anything to do with it, that I do not want my name associated with John Birch.

President Tanner:  We knew this and could not understand their action.  How should we proceed then, Lawrence, to do what your father wants?

Lawrence McKay:  I think we ought to send them a telegram.

President McKay:  I do not want to appear with the John Birch Society in any way and I am sorry Brother Benson took so much time when he gave the opening address; that at the close of his address he devoted all his time to John Birch.  He said:  ‘I am not a member of it but I stand for its principles.’

President Tanner:  We felt that we knew how you stood and we felt action should be taken immediately.  Lawrence, you know better than any of us what action to take to carry out your father’s wishes.

Lawrence McKay:  I think a telegram should be sent to them followed by a letter signed by you, and I think some representative ought to go back shortly to wherever this magazine is published.  I think it is Boston.

President Smith:  May be we have someone in Boston who can handle the situation on the ground.

Lawrence McKay:  And let him get an attorney to bring an injunction if necessary.

President Tanner:  It is quite possible the magazine for April is being printed now.  All they would need to do is put another picture on it.  This is the one with Brother Benson’s picture on it, and that is the way they would want to put your picture, and even if they have it printed they could put a new cover on without any trouble.

President McKay:  I do not want my picture on it.  Stop it!

President Tanner:  We three, President Smith, Mark Petersen and I, were there when you made this statement, and that is the reason we thought we should come.

Elder Petersen:  I carried out your instruction explicitly, and I did it that very afternoon, within five minutes.

President McKay:  It is a good thing you did.

Elder Petersen:  I feel like Lawrence, that we should send a telegram and a letter, and that the letter should be signed by you ordering them to stop it.  It would seem to me something ought to be said to Brother Benson also to stop it.  He will carry on his campaign.  He is the man we have to deal with.  You are the only man that can stop him.

President McKay:  You do not mean Reed.

Elder Petersen:  No, I mean Elder Ezra Taft Benson.

President McKay:  What campaign is Brother Benson carrying on?

Elder Petersen:  He is out speaking on this all the time.  It was only about ten days ago that he attended a John Birch Society meeting in Seattle and spoke vigorously in favor of their program, and he mentioned another meeting last Thursday.  He gives press interviews and is promoting this all the time, Ezra Taft is.

President McKay:  Why is he doing it?

Elder Petersen:  I am sure he will not stop for anybody but you.  I do not think he will pay any attention to any of us, like he paid no attention to me when I told him about the picture.  He paid no attention to it.  It hasn’t been stopped.

President McKay:  What has he in mind.  He is one of the Twelve.

President Tanner:  After you gave such firm and positive instruction and said ‘I want to say it before you men,’ we knew how you felt about it and to see this come out shocked us.

It was decided to send a telegram to the managing editor of the American Opinion magazine reading as follows:  ‘Have been informed that you plan to use my portrait on your magazine.  This is unauthorized and must not be done.  /s/David O. McKay’

This proposed telegram was written on a blank sheet of paper and President McKay attached his signature to it.

President Tanner continued the discussion as follows:

‘I cannot understand his position.  We all feel opposed to communism as much as can be, but when you and all the Twelve say not to use the Birch Society, it is quite serious.’

President McKay:  There is no reason why it should be called the Birch Society.  Other men have lost their lives by sacrifice the same as John Birch did.

President Tanner:  We can carry on the attack against communism without using the John Birch Society, but if we attach ourselves to a society we are in difficulty.

President McKay:  We haven’t done it and why should we?

President Tanner:  We haven’t but if your picture appears on it we have.  Elder Petersen was just saying, and I think we ought to consider this, that maybe something ought to be sent to Brother Benson from you so that he will know of your decision direct, not for Mark to take it to him or for me to do so, if you felt that you could send him a note.

President McKay:  Lawrence, you get him on the telephone and I will speak to him.

Brother Lawrence McKay called Brother Benson by telephone and spoke to him as follows:

‘Brother Benson, I am calling from Huntsville.  The First Presidency are here.  It is the plan of the American Opinion to publish father’s photograph on the cover.  Father does not want it done.  He has asked us to send a telegram stopping it.  They have sent a brochure out, that is how the First Presidency first got the word, stating ‘Our subscription agents now have a good selling point for any Mormon prospects that might want to sign up.’  This letter was addressed to President Tanner.’

President McKay then spoke to Brother Benson on the telephone as follows:

‘Good morning, Brother Benson.  My associates in the Presidency are here and they inform me that the publishers want my picture on the outside cover of American Opinion.’

Brother Benson:

President McKay:  Now would be a very poor time to put my picture on it.  I wish they would not do it.

Brother Benson:

President McKay:  At the present time I think it would be unwise because the members of the Church conclude that my giving permission to have my photograph on it was an implication that I belonged to this and was in favor of their ideals.  I do as far as opposing communism.  I would like a telegram sent to the publishers of the American Opinion telling them not to print my picture.

Brother Benson:

President McKay:  Let them know how I feel about it if you will.

Brother Benson: 

President McKay:  Call them by telephone and tell them I do not want my picture on it.

Following this conversation President McKay said that Brother Benson had said that he would call them and tell them.  President McKay further stated that this is purely advertising.

Lawrence McKay:  He says they can do it, that they ran his without his permission and they can do President McKay’s.

Elder Petersen:  I wonder if you ought to add that it must be stopped if necessary by injunction.  I think you have to be unusually firm with these people.

President Tanner:  I think inasmuch as he is phoning, Lawrence should phone to the same people right now from here and tell them what your wishes are so that there will be no misunderstanding, and if necessary let the President speak and tell them this will be confirmed by wire and letter.

Elder Petersen:  I think that’s a very good idea because Brother Benson is taking the position they have gone so far they cannot stop it, and they can do it anyway.

President Tanner:  Another thing, they have been supplied with the names to whom they should send these.  Just last week we refused to give somebody a list of names.

President McKay:  They want to put the Church in with the John Birch Society.

Lawrence McKay:  I suppose the managing editor would be the one to talk to.

At the request of the brethren, Lawrence then put in a call for the managing editor of American Opinion and asked to talk to Mr. Scott Stanley.  Mr. Stanley was out to lunch and Lawrence talked to Mr. Blumenfeld as follows:

‘Hello, this is David Lawrence McKay speaking from the office of President David O. McKay of the Mormon Church.  Word has just reached him that the American Opinion plans to publish his picture on the front cover of the April issue.  He is very much upset over that and asks that it be stopped no matter what the cost.  In fact, he has directed us to take whatever steps that are necessary in order to stop it.  This implies the approval of the John Birch Society by him as President of the Mormon Church and if that happened it would be necessary to deny that throughout the Church, besides taking any necessary legal action if there is any.

Mr. Blumenfeld:

Lawrence McKay:  I am sure there is.  We would appreciate it very much if you do not use it.

Mr. Blumenfeld:

Lawrence McKay:  Yes, if you will have him confirm this by telegram to President David O. McKay at 47 East South Temple Street —better, confirm it to me personally.  That would be David Lawrence McKay, 720 Newhouse Building, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Mr. Blumenfeld:

Lawrence McKay:  I can within an hour and a half.  I am now speaking from President McKay’s private residence in Huntsville, Utah in his office, but I will be back in Salt Lake City in an hour and a half.  My number if 363-7685, area 801.

Mr. Blumenfeld:

Lawrence McKay:  Thank you very much, but we prefer confirmation by telegram.  We will follow this by telegram and a letter from President McKay.  Thank you.

Brother Lawrence then said to the brethren:  ‘He says there is plenty of time to stop it.  Mr. Stanley is out to lunch and will be back in a half  hour or an hour and he will confirm that. 

President McKay:  I am glad you came.

Lawrence McKay then called LaRue Sneff, President Tanner’s secretary, and asked her to send the telegram that had been prepared.  The telegram as it was ultimately approved reads as follows:

‘Confirming telephone conversation with Mr. Blumenfeld have been informed that you plan to use my portrait on your magazine.  This is unauthorized and must not be done.  /s/David O. McKay’

Minutes by Joseph Anderson?”

Tues., 15 Mar. 1966:

“In Huntsville.

Ezra Taft Benson – Film Showing of Elder Benson’s Talk in the Assembly Hall on the Utah Forum Program on February 11, 1966, in St. Johns Ward, Arizona

Received a telephone call while in Huntsville from President Nathan Eldon Tanner, who at the time was in a meeting of the First Presidency at the Church Administration Building.  He reported the telegraphic request that had been received for use in the St. Johns Ward Cultural Hall for presentation of a film containing the talk given by Elder Ezra Taft Benson in the Assembly Hall on the Utah Forum Program, February 11, 1966.  This film is being distributed by The John Birch Society.

President Tanner said that he had discussed the matter with President Brown and David Lawrence McKay, and that it was decided to telephone to me regarding it, which President Tanner did with Lawrence McKay listening in on the line.

I concurred in President Tanner’s suggestion that permission should not be given for use of one of our cultural halls for this purpose.  A telegram was sent to Bishop Theron M. Halls as follows:

‘After discussing your telegram, President McKay and Counselors advise against use of hall for showing film referred to.  /s/First Presidency’

John Birch Society Dinner in Hotel Utah

When I returned home, I read the following minutes of the discussion held at this meeting regarding a dinner to be held in the Hotel Utah during Conference time in the Hotel Utah, Thursday evening, April 7, at 7:00 p.m., and that letters have been sent to Bishops of Wards inviting them and their counselors to attend this dinner and listen to an address by Mr. Robert Welch of The John Birch Society.

(See copy of letter and decision of the Brethren regarding this matter following.)

Notice in Deseret News this Evening about John Birch Society Dinner

This evening a notice to Church members was carried in the evening paper stating that the ‘Church is not involved in the dinner in any way, and, furthermore, has no connection with The John Birch Society.’  (See copy of notice following.)

Tuesday, March 15, 1966

4577 Wellington

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 8, 1966

Dear Brethren:

As members of the LDS Church we have been told that our Constitution would some day hang, as it were, by a single thread.  Our Constitution has never been in as great a danger as it is today.  A world-wide totalitarian communist conspiracy threatens it from without and men in high places threaten it from within.  At least two U.S. Senators have spoken against our Constitution as being obsolete and nothing more than a product of an eighteenth century agrarian society, and further, that the separation of powers with its checks and balances must be curtailed because it hobbles the president from making quick and decisive decisions.  Others are making statements that are equally offensive to our Constitution.  This two-pronged attack, both from without and from within, threatens to break the back of a Constitution which the Lord, through his prophet Joseph Smith, revealed to be divinely inspired.

Just recently, in the Assembly Hall on Temple Square, an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ, Elder Ezra Taft Benson, delivered a message entitled, ‘Stand Up For Freedom.’  In this talk Elder Benson reiterated his previous statement concerning the John Birch Society, viz., that he considered the Society ‘the most effective non-Church organization in our fight against creeping socialism and Godless communism.’  This talk was delivered to a turn-away crowd of over 2,000 persons.  President David O. McKay had requested that he be allowed to view the proceedings over closed-circuit television.  A major part of the speech was put into the Deseret News Church Section of February 26, 1966.  The message has created such wide-spread interest that local citizens have desired that other persons in the Utah area and surrounding states have an opportunity to hear this message.  They have undertaken the task and expense of sponsoring the televised broadcast of this talk which was previously filmed for future viewing.  Tape recordings of the talk are being requested form all over the country.  In short, people are hungry for the message which Elder Benson so bravely and forthrightly delivered.

A group of local citizens in the Salt Lake City area have decided to continue this educational process respecting the things which threaten us today.  In consequence of this, they have asked Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, to speak at a dinner which will be held in the Hotel Utah, April 7th, at 7:00 P.M.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson will be present and will introduce Mr. Welch.   Many people will be in Salt Lake City at the time for the purpose of attending Conference.  As you know, Conference will be held April 6th, 9th, and 10th this year.  Thursday evening will be free for most people and we invite your attendance, along with your counselors and wives, at this dinner.  Tickets must be reserved in advance, so we urge you to act promptly.  Fill out the enclosed card and send it, along with your check, to the person and address listed on the card.  Seating will be arranged according to the date your reservation is received.  For preferred seats you will need to act now.

These are critical times for freedom everywhere.  Elder Benson has said it is a time to ‘Stand Up For Freedom.’  Come and join us in this great undertaking.  There is no better place to start than at the ‘Freedom Dinner’ this April 7th.  We hope to see you there.

Sincerely,

J. Reese Hunter, Dinner Chairman

P.S.  We hope you will inform others in your area of this Freedom Dinner and encourage their attendance so they may see how this affects us as a people.

Birch Society Dinner in Hotel Utah

It was reported that the Birch Society has made arrangements to hold a big dinner at the Hotel Utah, Thursday evening, April 7th, at 7:00, and that letters have been sent out to bishops of wards inviting them and their counselors to attend this dinner and listen to an address by Mr. Welch as follows:

‘Dear Brethren:

‘As members of the LDS Church we have been told that our Constitution would some day hang, as it were, by a single thread.  Our Constitution has never been in as great a danger as it is today.  A world-wide totalitarian communist conspiracy threatens it from without and men in high places threaten it from within.  At least two U.S. Senators have spoken against our Constitution as being obsolete and nothing more than a product of an eighteenth century agrarian society, and further, that the separation of powers with its checks and balances must be curtailed because it hobbles the president from making quick and decisive decisions.  Others are making statements that are equally offensive to our Constitution.  This two-pronged attack, both from without and from within, threatens to break the back of a Constitution which the Lord, through his prophet Joseph Smith, revealed to be divinely inspired.

‘Just recently, in the Assembly Hall on Temple Square, an Apostle of the Lord Jesus Christ, Elder Ezra Taft Benson, delivered a message entitled, ‘Stand Up For Freedom.’  In this talk Elder Benson reiterated his previous statement concerning the John Birch Society, viz., that he considered the Society ‘the most effective non-Church organization in our fight against creeping socialism and Godless communism.’  This talk was delivered to a turn-away crowd of over 2,000 persons.  President David O. McKay had requested that he be allowed to view the proceedings over closed-circuit television.  A major part of the speech was put into the Deseret News Church Section of February 26, 1966.  The message has created such wide-spread interest that local citizens have desired that other persons in the Utah area and surrounding states have an opportunity to hear this message.  They have undertaken the task and expense of sponsoring the televised broadcast of this talk which was previously filmed for future viewing.  Tape recordings of the talk are being requested from all over the country.  In short, people are hungry for the message which Elder Benson so bravely and forthrightly delivered.

‘A group of local citizens in the Salt Lake City area have decided to continue this educational process respecting the things which threaten us today.  In consequence of this, they have asked Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, to speak at a dinner which will be held in the Hotel Utah, April 7th, at 7:00 P.M.  Elder Ezra Taft Benson will be present and will introduce Mr. Welch.  Many people will be in Salt Lake City at the time for the purpose of attending Conference.  As you know, Conference will be held April 6th, 9th, and 10th this year.  Thursday evening will be free for most people and we invite your attendance, along with your counselors and wives, at this dinner.  Tickets must be reserved in advance, so we urge you to act promptly.  Fill out the enclosed card and send it, along with your check, to the person and address listed on the card.  Seating will be arranged according to the date your reservation is received.  For preferred seats you will need to act now.

‘These are critical times for freedom everywhere.  Elder Benson has said it is a time to ‘Stand Up For Freedom.’  Come and join us in this great undertaking.  There is no better place to start than at the ‘Freedom Dinner’ this April 7th.  We hope to see you there.

‘Sincerely,

/s/J. Reese Hunter, Dinner Chairman’

‘P.S.  We hope you will inform others in your area of this Freedom Dinner and encourage their attendance so they may see how this affects us as a people.’

The brethren discussed at some length what should be done in regard to this matter.  It was agreed that so far as the proposed broadcast on television over KSL and other stations of Elder Benson’s remarks in the Assembly Hall, President Tanner would talk to Arch Madsen about it and tell him to stop it if he has not already committed himself to carry the program.

The question was discussed as to the advisability of presenting this whole matter to the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve on Thursday next.  The thought was also expressed that inasmuch as Elder Harold B. Lee is in the east he should be requested to return home to be present at the discussion.  It was decided to postpone presentation of this matter to the Council until a week from Thursday when President McKay will no doubt be present, as will also Brother Lee and other members of the Twelve.

Minutes by Joseph Anderson

Tuesday, March 15, 1966

NOTICE TO CHURCH MEMBERS

Letters have been received by bishops and other officials of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints inviting them to attend dinner in honor of Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, to be held at the Hotel Utah on April 7.

It is explained in the letter that since many people will be in Salt Lake City for General Conference it will be convenient for them to attend the dinner at that time.

It also is explained that Elder Ezra Taft Benson will introduce Mr. Welch as the principal speaker of the evening.

In order to avoid any misunderstanding we wish to notify bishops, other church officers, and members of the Church in general, that the Church is not involved in this dinner in any way, and furthermore, that the Church has no connection with the John Birch Society whatever.

David O. McKay

Hugh B. Brown

N. Eldon Tanner

Joseph Fielding Smith

The First Presidency

Deseret News – Wednesday, March 16, 1966″

Wed., 23 Mar. 1966:

“7:45 a.m.

Conference with Elder Ezra Taft Benson concerning the John Birch Society, the dinner to be held in Salt Lake City during Conference time for Robert Welch, and the article which appeared in the Deseret News, (see March 15, 1966), etc.

I told Brother Benson that I think it would be best for him not to speak at strictly John Birch Society meetings, but approved of his filling speaking appointments already accepted which were not associated with this group.  (See also March 25, 1966)

Fri., 25 Mar. 1966:

“7:30 a.m.

Brother Ezra Taft Benson called, and again discussed matters pertaining to his acceptance of various non-Church speaking appointments concerning freedom and Communism, etc.

(See following letter signed by Elder Benson, which contains subject matter discussed and counsel I gave him, which he submitted to me for my approval.  This letter was read and approved by me.) 

Friday, March 25, 1966

March 25, 1966

PERSONAL

CONFIDENTIAL

President David O. McKay

BUILDING

Dear President McKay:

Thank you for seeing me at an early hour this morning.

It is my understanding that you counseled me, after referring to our visit last Wednesday a.m. and the meeting in the Temple yesterday as follows:

1.  Although you had advised me last Wednesday to attend the Freedom Dinner April 7 and introduce Mr. Welch else it would appear that I ‘was being slapped down,’

you advised me this morning to attend the dinner but to arrange for someone else to introduce Mr. Welch.

2.  You counseled it would be best that I not speak at strictly John Birch Society meetings such as the so-called, testimonial dinners for Robert Welch.

3.  You also approved my speaking to the following groups, using much of the same material used in my talk in the Assembly Hall, February11, in keeping with the requests of these organizations and my promise to them.

March 25 – Hood River Chamber of Commerce, Hood River, Oregon

April 14 – Phoenix Citizens Forum, Phoenix, Arizona

May 13 or 14 – San Fernando Valley Business and Professional Men’s 

Association, San Fernando Valley, California

May 24 – Florida State Dental Association, Miami, Florida

4.  I also reported I had learned that American Opinion Magazine would carry President J. Reuben Clark’s photograph on the front cover with appropriate tribute to him as a great patriot.  You said you had already been informed of this and commented, ‘I think that’s all right.’

If the above, which is my understanding, is in error on any point, please let me know.  I desire to follow your counsel at all times.

I am still convinced that the John Birch Society is a great patriotic, non-political, voluntary, educational organization which is doing great good in the fight against the Godless socialist-communist conspiracy which you have warned is the greatest evil in this world.

The attached clipping from last Wednesday’s Salt Lake Tribune is a true statement.

If you feel at any time I am getting off the right track please do as you promised and ‘tap me on the shoulder.’

Faithfully your brother,

Ezra Taft Benson

ETB:sei”

Tues., 29 Mar. 1966:

“John Birch Society – Elder Benson’s Participation In

President Brown reported that Elder Mark E. Petersen had stated that while in Spokane over the weekend, he learned that the Birch people had met with the Stake Presidency and urged that all of them attend the Birch Society dinner to be given in the Hotel Utah on the evening of April 7.  He mentioned that our people in Spokane had not seen the notice published by the First Presidency in the Deseret News regarding this dinner.

President Tanner reported that following the meeting on Thursday last, Elder Benson had told him that he thought he, President Tanner, was a little hard on him in his presentation of the case pertaining to his relationship to the Birch Society.  President Tanner told Brother Benson he thought that he was a reasonable as he possibly could be under the circumstances.  Elder Benson raised the question as to what he should do about the dinner to be given by the Birch people the evening of April 7.  President Tanner told him that he did not see how the question could have been stated more clearly to him by the President and by the Twelve, that everyone wanted to let him know that he should discontinue speaking about the Birch Society and for it, and that President McKay in the discussion had said two or three times that he should not participate further with them.

Brother Benson inquired about the dinner, that in the letter that had been sent out it was announced that he would be in attendance and introduce the speaker.  President Tanner said that he told Brother Benson that he could not give him any further answer than was given in the meeting on Thursday.  Elder Benson asked President Tanner if he would clear this matter for him with President McKay, and President Tanner had said no, that he felt that it was just as clear as anything could be.

President Tanner told us that he was considering writing Elder Benson a letter mentioning the questions that he had asked him and giving him his understanding relative thereto, quoting from the minutes of the meeting at Huntsville and from the minutes of the Council meeting on Thursday last.

President Tanner asked me if that would be a good thing to do.  I gave my approval, with the suggestion that President Tanner show the letter to me before it is sent.

I commented that I thought that it was made very clear to Brother Benson in the meeting Thursday that we do not want anything to do with the Birch Society.

Sat., 16 Apr. 1966:

“8:00 a.m.

Elder Erza Taft Benson – Matters Pertaining to Committee of 1776

Met by appointment at his request Elder Ezra Taft Benson who spent the next hour and a half telling me about a visit he had received from two or three prominent Americans who explained to him that a movement is under way to set up a non-partisan committee to try and stem the drift towards socialism in this country, and to draft Senator Strom Thurmond and him as candidates for the Vice-Presidency and Presidency respectively, which they propose to support through a committee to be named ‘The 1976 Committee’, which will consist of 100 men and will include prominent men from all over the country.

He explained that the purpose of the committee is to ‘inspire, promote, and guide political action which will help restore, maintain, and strengthen our Republic’.  The committee is to hold a meeting in Chicago on April 30, at which time they propose to announce that all conservative Americans of both parties demand an immediate nomination and election of the ‘Honorable Ezra Taft Benson and Senator Thurmond to the Presidency and Vice-Presidency of the United States.  (See following copy of statements.)

After reviewing this matter with Elder Benson, I expressed the feeling that it would not be wise to start a third party, and Elder Benson said that he also is opposed to this, but this Committee and movement might result in a realignment between the two political parties.

I said that this nation is rapidly moving down the road of soul-destroying socialism, and that I hoped and prayed that the efforts of the 1976 Committee would be successful in stemming the tide.

I told Elder Benson not to withdraw his name; to let them go ahead and wait and see what develops.

Brother Benson read to me a proposed statement which he might issue if and when the press contacts him following the announcement of the Committee after their meeting in Chicago.  I approved of the statement and also of a statement which I might issue to the press following the announcement if I am contacted by the press.  I told him to acquaint my secretary, Clare, with this confidential matter, and put copies of statements in her hands.  (See copies of these statements following.)

Communism – Statement on at Priesthood Meeting

Elder Benson expressed appreciation for the statement I made in the recently-held Priesthood Meeting (April 10) on Communism, and said he was sorry to see that the Deseret News Church Section had not carried the full statement.  I said that this was a mistake and I hoped to carry it in full in some future publication, possibly the Improvement Era.

(See minutes of this meeting by Elder Benson following.)

Saturday, April 16, 1966

The 1976 Committee

The Articles and Data of Organization

Origin.  At a meeting in Chicago, Illinois, on April 30, 1966, this Committee is hereby established by those citizens of the United States whose names appear below.  All of these men are either present, or are represented by proxies authorized to act in this matter on their behalf.

Purpose.  It is the purpose of The 1976 Committee to inspire, promote, and guide political action which will help to restore, maintain, and strengthen our republic.  These objectives are understood and intended to be in accordance with the basic concepts of government as followed by the Founding Fathers of our nation, and as formally set forth in the original Constitution of the United States and the first Ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights.

Structure.  The 1976 Committee, when fully formed, will consist of one hundred members.  Preferably, but not necessarily, there will be at least one member from each of the fifty states of the Union; but the total of all members will be limited to one hundred throughout the life of the Committee.  An expanded organization, or subsidiary or affiliated groups, may be formed, through franchise arrangements, under such names as Supporters Of The 1976 Committee, or 1976 Clubs.  But full authority over all activities of such groups shall be bested in this parent Committee.

The 1976 Committee, when fully formed, shall have a Chairman; five Vice Chairmen; an Executive Committee consisting of the Chairman, Vice Chairman, and nine other members; and eighty-five members at large.  The Committee will be self-perpetuating, with both its officers and any new members always to be elected by the current membership at any given time.  And it is the intention of these founding members that the Committee will dissolve and go out of existence on July 4, 1976.

Signatures

(Officers elected, and other members present or

represented at the organization meeting.)

Saturday, April 16, 1966

Statement By The Honorable Ezra Taft Benson

The original statement of the recently organized The 1976 Committee has been brought to my attention.  I approve of its general purpose, as I understand them, and am of course complimented and humbled by its specific reference to me.  But this does not in any way make me a candidate for any political office.  So I feel that it would be inappropriate and even presumptuous for me to accept any of the responsibilities of a candidate.  It will be my policy, therefore, not to answer questions or to comment on current events and developments, at any time, or in any way that my remarks could justifiably be construed as being political in nature.  If and when, in later months or years, whether because of public demand created by The 1976 Committee, or due to other causes, I should become a candidate for political office, I shall then be glad to accept a candidate’s role and discuss my views freely and frankly concerning all relevant matters on all suitable occasions.  Until and unless that happens, I expect to continue to devote my full time and energy to my duties as a member of the Council of Twelve of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.*

*Statement for public press by Elder Benson approved by Pres. McKay

Saturday, April 16, 1966

Elder Ezra Taft Benson

Dear Brother Benson:

Herewith is a statement concerning the movement to draft you for the Presidency which I intend to use at the appropriate time.

Statement by President David O. McKay

I have been informed of the interest of many prominent Americans in a movement

to draft Ezra Taft Benson for the Presidency.  It appears that this is gaining 

momentum and is definitely crystallizing into a formal draft movement.  Elder

Benson has discussed this with me and to whatever extent he may wish to become

receptive to this movement, his doing so has my full approval.

May the Lord bless you in all of your patriotic endeavors to help preserve our inspired Constitution and our liberties.

Faithfully yours,

David O. McKay

*Just statement in parenthesis to be announced publicly if called for

Saturday, April 16, 1966

Minutes of meeting held with President David O. McKay in his office in the Hotel Utah apartment, Saturday, April 16, 1966, at 8:00 a.m.  (By Elder Ezra Taft Benson)

This morning I spent an hour and fifteen minutes with President David O. McKay in his office in the apartment in the Hotel Utah.  I discussed with him fully, a most important and highly confidential matter.  Some few months ago, I was informed by two or three prominent Americans that a movement was under way to set up a non-partisan committee to try and stem the drift towards socialism in this country and to draft Senator Strom Thurmond and me as candidates for the Vice-Presidency and Presidency respectively, which they could support through their committee by playing up a crescendo and ground-swell of support.  I expressed serious concern and tried to dissuade them from using my name, but without success.  I then tried to get them to put Senator Thurmond first and my name second, also without success.  I immediately discussed this matter with President McKay who said, ‘Do not withdraw your name.  Let them go ahead and and we shall see what develops.’

This morning I told him that I had recently been informed that the movement is gaining momentum and that plans were definitely underway to establish a national committee known as ‘The 1976 Committee.’  I read to him, while he held a copy in his hand, the announcement of this committee which they propose to release at a meeting in Chicago, April 30, 1966.  It is a very comprehensive statement, copy of which is attached.  It provides for a national education program which starts on April 30, 1966, and to continue for a ten year period, expiring when the Committee dissolves July 4, 1976.  The committee will consist of 100 men and will include such prominent men as William Grede, Past President of the National Association of Manufacturers and former national President of the YMCA; the Honorable H.J. Hiestand, Sixth Term Congressman from California; Lloyd Wright, Past President, American Bar Association, and head of the largest law firm in Los Angeles; Admiral Ben Moreell, head of Jones Laughlin Corporation.

After very careful review of the entire matter, President McKay gave his wholehearted approval to the effort of this bi-partisan Committee as set forth in what will be a proposed brochure.  He also approved the statement which I had prepared which I might issue to the press following the announcement, if and when I am contacted.  He also approved a proposed statement which he might issue if and when the press contacts him regarding my part in this movement.  I had also drafted a letter for President McKay’s consideration which would be directed to me and which would incorporate the proposed statement.  This he signed.

It was then agreed that I should acquaint Clare Middlemiss, his secretary, with this very highly confidential material, leave her copies of all of it so it would be available on call from President McKay.  I told President McKay I would probably be out of the country on April 30, that I was leaving Monday, April 18 for Germany and would probably return about the first day of May, although if there were dedications, it would possibly be two or three days later.  He indicated he thought it would be better if I came back after the first of May.  He cautioned me that I would have to be as wise as possible and that I should feel free to come to him anytime for counsel.

President McKay emphasized the fact that this nation is moving rapidly down the road of soul-destroying socialism, and he hoped and prayed that the efforts of the 1976 Committee would be fully successful.  I explained to him that whether or not their efforts to nominate particular people for office were successful or not, they planned to continue their ten-year crusade to restore the American Republic.  This pleased President McKay very much.  He expressed his feeling that it would be wise not to start a third party.  I told him I was opposed to this, but this committee and movement might result in a realignment between the two parties.

I expressed my appreciation for the statement made in the Priesthood Meeting last April 10, on Communism, and expressed my regret that the full statement had not been carried in the Church News.  He said this was a mistake and he hoped to carry it in full in some future publication, possibly the Improvement Era Editorial page.

He held my hand for a long period as I bade him good-bye and invoked the blessings of the Lord upon me in the days ahead.  It was a most satisfying interview.”  

Sun., 17 Apr. 1966:

Note by CM

At 12:30 p.m., Elder Ezra Taft Benson, upon instructions from President McKay, presented to Clare Middlemiss, secretary, confidential information regarding the Committee of 1976, which information had been given to President McKay yesterday morning.  Elder Benson explained that President McKay had asked that the secretary follow through for him regarding the releasing of certain statements to the press already prepared and approved by President McKay.  Elder Benson explained that he is leaving for assignments in Europe tomorrow morning, and will not be here when this matter is released, and that, therefore, President McKay has asked that the secretary keep in touch with him about the releasing of the statements, which will be sometime following the meeting to be held by the Committee in Chicago on April 30.”

Tues., 19 Apr. 1966:

11:00 a.m.

BYU to Issue Statements on Communism and John Birch Society

President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the Brigham Young University called by appointment.  He read excerpts from a speech he will deliver to the student body of the BYU next Thursday morning in which he wishes to quote my statement on Communism given at the General Priesthood Meeting, April 9.  I gave permission to use this statement.

I listened with interest to the talk President Wilkinson has prepared in which he points out that all the Prophets of the Church from the Prophet Joseph Smith down have freely spoken out against Communism or any issue effecting the freedom of the people of this country.  I approved in general of the talk he will give.

President Wilkinson then asked if there is any objection to the schools’ paper (The Daily Universe) printing all of the statements that were made by the First Presidency and by me with respect to the John Birch Society.  He said that he had previously written a letter regarding this.  I said that I had no objection; that he could print all of the statements made, and that I think it would be a good thing to have them in sequence.  I then handed to him the following statements, which I had asked my secretary to gather for me:

1)  January 3, 1963 – the original statement of the First Presidency on the John Birch Society

2)  February 15, 1963 – clarifying letter sent to numerous persons who made inquiry as to whether the statement of the First Presidency of January 3, 1963, meant the Church was opposing the John Birch Society

3)  Undated letter – additional clarifying letter answering inquiry as to whether Elder Ezra Taft Benson was sent to Europe because of his having befriended the John Birch Society.

4)  March 15, 1966 – notice to Church members

5)  The latest official pronouncement on the subject.

Later the summary appeared in the Brigham Young University ‘Daily Universe’ of Friday, April 22, 1966.  (See newspaper clipping following.)

Statement on Communism – Deseret News to Reprint in Full

Following President Wilkinson’s departure, Clare came over at my request with a large folder of letters and telegrams requesting that the Deseret News reprint in full the statement on Communism which I gave at Priesthood Meeting, and in full, that I have decided to have you run it again in next Saturday’s Church Section.’

Brother Hawkes could hardly speak for a moment, and then said, ‘All right.’  I then called my son Lawrence and told him that I was having the article reprinted in full, and he said, ‘Well I must see you about it.’

That afternoon, Lawrence visited with me about reprinting the statement on Communism, and Lawrence was so upset about its being reprinted that I decided not to have it reprinted in the News.  Lawrence therefore called Brother Hawkes and told him not to run it.

Clare then told me that Doyle Green of the Improvement Era had telephoned and has asked to run both my address and statement on Communism given at the Priesthood Meeting in the June issue of the Improvement Era.

I dictated a letter to Brother Green giving him permission to print both the address and the statement in this issue.  (See April 9, 1966 for copy) 

Tuesday, April 19, 1966

MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT DAVID O. MCKAY

TUESDAY, APRIL 19, 1966

I met with President McKay at about 10:30 a.m.  I had previously written to ask whether there was any objection to the school paper printing all of the statements that were made by the First Presidency and by President McKay with respect to the John Birch Society.  When I met him I referred to my letter and asked whether there was an objection and he said there was not — that he would be happy to have all of them printed, and that he thought it would be a good thing to have them in sequence.  He then personally handed to me the following statements, with the suggestion that they be printed in full:

1.  January 3, 1963 – the original statement of the First Presidency on the John Birch Society.

2.  February 15, 1963 – Clarifying letter sent to numerous persons who made inquiry as to whether the statement of the First Presidency of January 3, 1963, meant the Church was opposing the John Birch Society.

3.  (undated letter)  Additional clarifying letter answering inquiry as to whether Elder Ezra Taft Benson was sent to Europe because of his having befriended the John Birch Society.

4.  March 15, 1966 – Notice to Church Members.

5.  April 9, 1966 – The latest official pronouncement on the subject.

Tuesday, April 19, 1966

SUMMARY GIVEN ON CHURCH STAND TOWARD ANTI-COMMUNISM GROUPS

Repeated requests reach the campus of Brigham Young University, and the offices of officials of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, concerning the official Church attitude on Communism and on whether members of the Church should or should not join organizations which oppose Communism.

The Daily Universe has obtained permission from the First Presidency to publish, in sequence, the official statements that have been made on the subject during the past three years or more.  These appear in this issue of the Daily Universe, which brings them together at one time in one place for the first time.

The statements appear below in chronological order:

Original Statement of First Presidency on John Birch Society printed in the Deseret News January 3, 1963.

The First Presidency of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Thursday issued a signed statement setting forth the stand of the Church on ‘political questions in general and the John Birch Society in particular.’  (The statement is as follows:)

‘The following statement is made to correct the false statements and unwarranted assumptions regarding the position allegedly taken by the leaders of the Church on political questions in general and the John Birch Society in particular.

‘The Church recognizes and protects the right of its members to express their personal political beliefs, but it reserves to itself the right to formulate and proclaim its own doctrine.

‘We believe in a two-party system, and all our members are perfectly free to support the party of their choice.

‘We deplore the presumption of some politicians, especially officers, co-ordinators and members of the John Birch Society, who undertake to align the Church or its leadership with their partisan views.

‘We encourage our members to exercise the right of citizenship, to vote according to their own convictions, but no one should seek or pretend to have our approval of their adherence to any extremist ideologies.

‘We denounce communism as being anti-Christian, anti-American, and the enemy of freedom, but we think they who pretend to fight it by casting aspersions on our elected officers or other fellow citizens do the anti-Communist cause a great disservice.

‘We again urge our bishops, stake presidents, and other officers of the Church to refuse all applications for the use of our chapels, cultural halls, or other meeting places for political meetings, money-raising propaganda, or to promote any person’s political ambitions.’

/s/David O. McKay

/s/Henry D. Moyle

/s/Hugh B. Brown

The First Presidency

  Under date of February 15, 1963, the following clarifying letter was sent by President McKay’s secretary to numerous persons who made inquiries as to whether the statement of the First Presidency of January 3, 1963, meant the Church was opposing the John Birch Society:

‘Dear Brother…………:

‘Inasmuch as President McKay is presently under such a heavy schedule of duties pertaining to the general administration of the Church, he has asked me to acknowledge for him your letter of …………(date)……….., where in you make reference to a recent statement published by The First Presidency setting forth the position of the Church regarding partisan politics and other related matters.

‘I have been directed to say that members of the Church are free to join anti-Communist organizations if they desire and their membership in the Church is not jeopardized by so doing.  The Church is not opposing The John Birch Society or any other organization of like nature; however, it is definitely opposed to anyone using the church for the purpose of increasing membership for private organizations sponsoring these various ideologies.

Sincerely yours,

Clare Middlemiss

Secretary to:

President David O. McKay

The above letter was read in the United States Senate by Sen. Wallace F. Bennett, and was published in the Congressional Record.

An additional clarifying letter was written by Miss Middlemiss at the request of President McKay late in 1965, answering inquiries as to whether Elder Ezra Taft Benson was sent to Europe because of his having befriended the John Birch Society.

The first three paragraphs of this letter were a repetition, for the most part, of the letter written in February 1963.  However, the final paragraph, concerning Elder Benson, reads:

‘President McKay has further instructed me to tell you that Elder Ezra Taft Benson was not sent to Europe for the reason given in your letter. Elder Benson was called by inspiration to preside over the European Mission.  He has the love and respect of President McKay and other General Authorities; and, furthermore, was sustained and upheld by them and the membership of the Church as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles at the recent General Conference of the Church.’

The question of the John Birch Society and the Church arose again in March of this year, which resulted in the following official notice in the Deseret News of Wednesday, March 16, 1966:

NOTICE TO CHURCH MEMBERS 

Letters have been received by bishops and other officials of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints inviting them to attend a dinner in honor of Robert Welch, founder of the John Birch Society, to be held at the Hotel Utah.

It is explained in the letter that since many people will be in Salt Lake City for General Conference it will be convenient for them to attend the dinner at that time.

It also is explained that Elder Ezra Taft Benson will introduce Mr. Welch as the principal speaker of the evening.

In order to avoid any misunderstanding we wish to notify bishops, other Church officers, and members of the Church in general, that the Church is not involved in this dinner in any way, and furthermore, that the Church has no connection with the John Birch Society whatever.

David. O. McKay

Hugh B. Brown

N. Eldon Tanner

Joseph Fielding Smith

The First Presidency

The latest official pronouncement on the subject is the statement concerning the position of the Church on Communism, made by President David O. McKay at the General Priesthood Session of the 136th Annual Conference of the Church, held in the Salt Lake Temple, Saturday, April 9, 1966, at 7:00 p.m.  The complete statement follows:

In order that there may be no misunderstanding by Bishops, Stake Presidents, and others regarding members of the Church participating in non-Church meetings to study and become informed on the Constitution of the United States, Communism, etc., I wish to make the following statements which I have been sending out from my office for some time, and which have come under question by some Stake authorities, Bishoprics, and others.

‘Church members are at perfect liberty to act according to their own consciences in the matter of safeguarding our way of life.  They are, of course, encouraged to honor their highest standards of the Gospel, and to work to preserve their own freedoms.  They are free to participate in non-Church meetings which are held to warn people of the threat of Communism or any other theory or principle which will deprive us of our free agency or individual liberties vouchsafed by the Constitution of the United States.

‘The Church, out of respect for the rights of all its members to have their political views and loyalties, must maintain the strictest possible neutrality.  We have no intention of trying to interfere with the fullest and freest exercise of the political franchise of our members under and within our Constitution which the Lord declared ‘I established…by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very purpose,’ and which, as to the principles thereof, the Prophet Joseph Smith, dedicating the Kirkland Temple, prayed should be ‘established forever.’  The Church doesn’t yield any of its devotion to or convictions about safeguarding the American principles and the establishments of government under Federal and State Constitutions and the civil rights of men safeguarded by these.

‘The position of this Church on the subject of communism has never changed.  We consider it the greatest Satanical threat to peace, prosperity, and the spread of God’s work among men that exists on the face of the earth.

‘In this connection, we are continually being asked to give our opinion concerning various patriotic groups or individuals who are fighting Communism and speaking up for Freedom.  Our immediate concern, however, is not with parties, groups, or persons, but with principles.  We, therefore, commend and encourage every person and every group who are sincerely seeking to study Constitutional principles and awaken a sleeping and apathetic people to the alarming conditions which are rapidly advancing about us.  We wish all of our citizens throughout the land were participating in some type of organized self-education in order that they could better appreciate what is happening and know what they can do about it.

‘Supporting the FBI, the Police, the Congressional Committees investigating Communism, and various organizations which are attempting to awaken the people through educational means, is a policy we warmly endorse for all our people.

‘The entire concept and philosophy of Communism is diametrically opposed to everything for which the Church stands – belief in Deity, in the dignity and eternal nature of man, and the application of the Gospel to efforts for peace in the world.  It is militantly atheistic and is committed to the destruction of faith wherever it may be found.

‘The Russian Commissar of Education wrote:  ‘We must hate Christians and Christianity.  Even the best of them must be considered our worst enemies.  Christian love is an obstacle to the development of the revolution.  Down with love for one’s neighbor.  What we want is hate.  Only then shall we conquer the Universe.’

‘On the other hand, the Gospel teaches the existence of God as our Eternal and Heavenly Father, and declares:  “Him only shalt thou serve.’

‘Communism debases the individual and makes him the enslaved tool of the state, to whom he must look for sustenance and religion.  Communism destroys man’s God-given free agency.

‘No member of this Church can be true to his faith, nor can any American be loyal to his trust, while lending aid, encouragement, or sympathy to any of these false philosophies; for if he does, they will prove snares to his feet.’

Brigham Young University ‘Daily Universe’ – Friday, April 22, 1966″

Thurs., 21 Apr. 1966:

“Note by CM

April Conference – Statement on Communism Given at Priesthood Meeting

Henry A. Smith of the Church Section called Clare Middlemiss, secretary, and said, ‘Did you know that the Church Section is not going to run President McKay’s statement on Communism in the Church News; that Lawrence McKay, under instructions from his father, had called Earl Hawkes, the Manager, and told him not to publish it.

Lawrence later came in and explained to the secretary his reasons for believing that the statement on Communism should not appear in full in the Church Section.”

Fri., 22 Apr. 1966:

“3:30 p.m.

At my request, my secretary Clare came over.  I discussed with her the matter of the statement on Communism which I asked my son Robert to read at the Priesthood Meeting of October Conference.  I had in my hand a copy of the Church Section and noted that the statement had been left out.  I said, ‘I made that statement, and it will be printed in its entirety in so many places that we cannot get away from it, and I made the statement, and there it stands.  I have never seen people so upset, thinking that this statement will tie the Church in with the John Birch Society.  We shall have more letters than ever now asking why the statement was left out.  I do not believe it ties the Church in with the Society — the Church is not sponsoring it any more than any other anti-communism organization.”

Sat., 14 May 1966:

“8:00 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came to the apartment and spent forty minutes talking to me about what had happened relative to the press release regarding the formation of the 1976 Committee of One-Hundred, and their desire to have him (Brother Benson) run for President of the United States.

He said more publicity was given to the matter in Europe than here in this country where Brother Benson was at the time attending to Church assignments.  He said that no inquiry had come for the statement he had asked me to make to the press regarding this matter, but that he had released his own statement.  He also said that none of the Brethren had made inquiry regarding it, excepting for Elder Delbert L. Stapley.

I said that is all right; we shall wait and see what develops.  Brother Benson left me a brochure covering plans of the Committee.  He said they have printed 100,000 of them.  He also said that Dan Smoot had devoted some columns to it in weekly papers, and that several other sources have carried good coverage regarding it, but that it is just getting started.  I commented that I had always liked Dan Smoot who was formerly assistant to J. Edgar Hoover, National Director of the FBI, and had listened to his talks many times.

Brother Benson then said that he will be in the East next week, and that the ‘For 

God and Country Rally’ is being held in Boston at that time.  Although I had told them by letter that Brother Benson was too busy with Church matters to speak at their rally this year, I told him that inasmuch as he will be in Boston that he may as well accept their invitation to speak at this Rally.”

Thurs., 26 May 1966:

John Birch Society – President Brown Reported Letter and Alleged Activity of Elder Benson in this Society

A letter was read from William L. Knecht of Berkeley, California, enclosing a circular which he states is being passed among Church members in the Bay area regarding Elder Benson and the John Birch Society.  In his letter Brother Knecht says that reports regarding Elder Benson’s expressed attitude regarding the Birch Society and the talks that he has given at Birch Society functions, etc., have caused confusion and misunderstanding among the members of the Church.  President Brown mentioned that information had come to him that Brother Benson is still talking about the Birch Society and that the Birch people have been showing at the BYU and in seminaries a film showing the riots on the University of California campus at Berkeley, California.  In connection with it they say that the riots were instigated by the Communists and that the Birch Society are fighting these things.

President Brown further stated that the Birch people are claiming that the Communists will take over the Constitution and are asking their people to arm themselves and a great many of them have guns in their homes.

President Brown also mentioned that Brother Benson had converted some of our people in Europe to the Birch Society philosophy, and mentioned particularly Mark Anderson, who was formerly President of the Finnish Mission.

I asked President Brown to furnish me with evidence that Brother Benson has been active within the past month in promoting Birch Society philosophy.

Sat., 28 May 1966:

“Minutes of a meeting with President McKay by Elder Ezra Taft Benson

This morning, May 28th, I called President David O. McKay from my home at 7:45.  I talked to one of the women in his apartment regarding the possibility of my seeing the President, possibly Tuesday morning or this morning.  She talked with the President and then asked if I could come in at 8:30 this morning.  I have just completed an hour visit with him from 8:30 to 9:30.  It was lengthened because of his request.

1976 Committee

I brought him up-to-date on the work of the 1976 Committee and my relation to it and also the response of Senator Strom Thurmond.  I told him of Mr. Sligh’s letter and the report I had had that last week the Committee at their new offices in Displains, Illinois had received 100 letters, all of which were favorable.  I told him of the letters I had received and also Mr. Thurmond, which were favorable also.  He said he was very pleased to hear it and hoped I would do nothing to interfere with the movement following a natural course.  He indicated the country needs strong, conservative, spiritual leadership, as it has never needed it before in our day.  I also indicated that there were a few newspapers that had indicated their support, and mentioned particularly the one in Hurricane, Utah, the ‘Tri-State News Advertiser’ published by Myrlan Brown.  I wasn’t quite sure of his first name.  It has circulation of 10,000 in Southern Utah, Eastern Nevada and Northern Arizona.  He asked me for the man’s name and I wrote it down for him.  He said he would like me to determine whether or not he is related to President H.B.Brown.

Elder Benson’s Family

He asked me about my family and I told him that our youngest daughter Beth was being married on the 8th of June and that we were having a reunion of our family.  All of the children and their companions were coming to Salt Lake with the sixteen grandchildren.  He asked that I convey his love to them.

Salt Lake Temple Organizational Problems

I then mentioned that I had been in the Temple yesterday for marriages, including one for my nephew, Taft Benson and that I had also had a few words with President McDonald, in which President McDonald had said he would like to tell me briefly the circumstances surrounding his release.  I then recounted to President McKay as best I could from memory, what Brother McDonald had said.  I told him that I felt Brother McDonald had had a fine spirit, was devoted to the Church and so far as I could tell, had done a good work as Temple President.  He apparently was very much surprised at his release, but is accepting it graciously.  He said he would be willing to do whatever the President wants him to do.  President McKay then indicated it was not his doing, that he was notified that he had been released.  I said President McDonald should have an opportunity to tell his side of what has happened.  President McDonald indicated he would not ask for a hearing, but would be willing to come if the President invited him.  President McKay said ‘I want to have him come in.  I want to hear what he has to say.  I would like to have the facts regarding this case.’  He said he had not asked that Brother McDonald be released and it was not his wish.  He also said it was not his wish that the second counselor, Brother Byron Bunker be appointed as President of the Temple.  The inference was that his first counselor had gone beyond his authority in the matter.  I mentioned that Brother McDonald had indicated that President Hugh B. Brown and President Byron Bunker are related and that I thought Brother McDonald had said that President Brown’s daughter had married Brother Bunker’s son.  President McKay indicated he would call Brother McDonald in.

Prayer, and Elder Benson’s Call as Secretary of Agriculture

Our conversation then drifted to the matter of prayer and President Mckay asked me to recount for him my call into the Cabinet.  I then told him of the circumstances of Senator Arthur Watkins’ call, my meeting President McKay on the parking lot the following morning, at which time President McKay said to me, ‘I had a very important call last night.’  I said, ‘Yes, I guess from Senator Watkins.’  Then I told him that Senator Watkins had called me the day before indicating that there was a groundswell of support for me for Secretary of Agriculture and asked if I would be willing to serve and I told him and he asked what the attitude of the Church would be.  I said, ‘There is only one man who can answer that and that is President David O. McKay.  I would be happy to try to do anything I can to fill his desires.’  President McKay said, ‘Yes, Senator Watkins called me and told me about the ground swell of support for you.’  And then he said this, ‘Brother Benson, my mind is clear.  If the opportunity comes in the proper spirit, you should accept.’

I then told him of being with Elder Mark Petersen and dividing the Sharon Stake when the call came from the Eisenhower headquarters in New York.  I told him of my trip to Washington, my interview with President Eisenhower, the first cabinet meeting in which I was asked to offer prayer, the request by Jim Haggerty for copies of the prayer for the press and my finally trying to reconstitute what I had said.  I also told him of my memorandum to the President, following our first cabinet meeting after the inauguration in which there was no prayer, and how the President sent a memorandum as a result to every cabinet member and then finally decided that each cabinet meeting would be opened with prayer.  I also told him of prayer with my own staff in the meetings and experience with Jim McConnell who was later added to the staff.  I also mentioned that I frequently emphasize prayer with my brethren as I meet with stake presidencies, high councils and bishoprics and told him of experiences where a mere suggestion had resulted in an invocation at important meetings at which I was the speaker.  President McKay emphasized the need for greater spirituality in America and that the Priesthood should do all in their power to help bring it about.

I told him of my appreciation that he had issued the item in the Priesthood meeting, encouraging our people to become alerted and informed regarding the greatest threat to our Country, namely the Godless socialist-communist conspiracy.

Miscellaneous

He then asked where I was going this weekend and I told him to Mesa.  He said he had organized the first branch years ago in Phoenix and asked me to convey his love to the people.  He asked when I would return and I told him Sunday night.  He said, ‘I want to see you when you get back.’  I said ‘That night or the next morning.’  He said ‘Come in at 8:00 o’clock Monday morning.’  This I promised to do.

It was a delightful visit, long because he insisted that I remain.  He is truly a great soul.  I am so grateful the Lord has prolonged his years and hope he will continue to do so.

I left for Mesa at 2:00 p.m. where we held preliminary meetings and interviews in preparation for the reorganization of the stake presidency.  Brother John Longden joined me in these conferences and meetings.”

Mon., 30 May 1966:

“Minutes of visit with President David O. McKay by Elder Ezra Taft Benson, held in President McKay’s apartment in the Hotel Utah, Monday, May 30, 1966, at 8:00 a.m.

This morning at 8:00 a.m. on Memorial Day, I met with President David O. McKay in his small office in his apartment, as he requested last Saturday when I saw him.  Always, he was in fine spirits, although his breathing seemed a bit difficult for him.  He asked me to report on my visit to East Mesa Stake where I told the people that President McKay organized the first branch in the Phoenix-Mesa area.  I also conveyed his love and greetings.

President McKay seemed just a bit lonely and wanted to visit.  Sister McKay was still resting.  He was looking forward to going to Ogden and Huntsville to visit this morning the graves of his parents and his brother.  He especially mentioned Morgan McKay’s grave, and apparently knew that I was acquainted with Morgan.  As a matter of fact, we were fraternity brothers at USAC, and were both in the field of agriculture.  In fact, we both served as county agricultural agents.  We talked about Morgan briefly and asked about my family who are assembling for reunion in about a week on the occasion of Beth’s wedding, and asked that I extend his love and blessing to all of them.

President McKay had a copy of Dan Smoot’s report on his desk, and I asked him if he was planning to hear Dean Manion when he speaks in the Assembly Hall next Friday, June 4.  He said he was not sure whether he would be back from Huntsville, but expressed his admiration for Dean Manion.  He said he used to hear him regularly on the radio.  I indicated that the Committee for the American Idea who are sponsoring this Forum Series had asked if it would be permissable to film Mr. Manions’ talk, which will be on the Constitution.  President McKay said, ‘I think it would be a fine thing to do, especially inasmuch as the talk is on the Constitution.’  I told him that I would report to the Committee.  We were together for about one-half hour.

Ezra Taft Benson”

Mon., 13 June 1966:

“8:00 a.m.

Freedom Award Plaque Presented

By appointment Elder Ezra Taft Benson called at the apartment and presented to me a plaque for ‘patriotism and support of the Constitution of the United States’ which was awarded to me by the Utah Chapter of the Young Americans for Freedom, a conservative organization which is being established on College campuses throughout the Nation.  I had received a letter from Mr. Zane Miskin, President of the Utah Chapter, asking me to be present at a banquet to be held at the Teogra Restaurant in the City, Saturday evening, June 11, 1966, at which time the plaque would be awarded to me.  But, I was unable to accept his invitation, and had asked Elder Benson to attend and accept the award for me.

Brother Benson said that Mr. Zane Miskin, President of the Utah Chapter, paid high tribute to me for my stand for freedom and the Constitution of the United States, and that when he received the plaque for me the audience gave me a ‘standing ovation and prolonged applause.’

The plaque reads:  ‘In grateful tribute to his life-long dedication to the ideal of freedom under God.’

At this point, I learned that Elder Benson’s sons, Reed and Mark, were standing out in the hall waiting for Brother Benson, and insisted that they come in.  I then asked Brother Benson if he had a photographer with him so that a picture could be taken of the plaque, and he said, ‘No, but I could call Henry Smith and have him come right over with a photographer.’  I asked him to do this, and in a few moments Brother Smith and the photographer were there, and I invited Reed and Mark to join their father and me in the picture.

We had quite a discussion regarding the current trend of the country, and the struggle that is going on to maintain our freedom and the rights vouchsafed by the Constitution.

Brother Benson then mentioned the statement on Communism which I made at the General Priesthood Meeting in April, which now appears in the June issue of the Improvement Era, and I said, ‘I will stand or fall on that statement.’  Brother Benson said that he would like to have the statement printed in pamphlet form so that it could easily be mailed out, and I told him to give a memorandum to my secretary and that I would follow through with it.  I also gave Brother Benson permission to contact Brother Parry, Manager of the Deseret Book Store, about the printing of the statement.

I then reminisced about my world tour of missions years ago with Elder Hugh J. Cannon, and of the experiences of that historic trip.

Brother Benson then mentioned that his father’s family will always be grateful that I spoke at the funeral services of their mother.  I said that I could recall it very well and that Brother Benson’s mother was a noble woman.  Brother Benson then said that he had given a copy of the funeral address to my secretary for the scrapbooks, and I said that Sister Middlemiss has been very faithful and has done a wonderful work in preserving my talks and activities, for which I am very grateful to her.

Brother Benson and his sons then took their departure.  I enjoyed meeting and talking with them very much!  (See following minutes by Elder Benson, also newspaper clipping.) 

Monday, June 13, 1966

Meetings with President David O. McKay – (Minutes by Elder Ezra Taft Benson)

Saturday evening, June 11th, at the request of President David O. McKay, I called at the banquet of the Utah Chapter of the Young Americans for Freedom at the Teogra Restaurant, 1900 South State, to receive a plaque which the Association were presenting to President David O. McKay.  Mr. Zane Miskin, President of the Utah Chapter paid high tribute to President McKay and presented the plaque to him, through me.  President McKay received a standing ovation and prolonged applause from the men and women present.  Sunday night, I called President McKay’s apartment at the Hotel Utah and reported that the plaque had been received and asked what his wishes were.  He asked if I could come in on Monday morning, June 13th, to deliver the plaque.  We kept the appointment with Reed and Mark accompanying me.  President McKay was very pleased with the plaque and read the inscription.  Several times he repeated how lovely it was for the Young Americans to present it to him and how deeply he appreciated it.  We all commented on the great leadership which President McKay has provided in this freedom struggle.

Statement on Communism to be Printed by Deseret Book Co.

We also referred to the statement on Communism which was made in the General Priesthood meeting in April, which copy appears on the Editorial Page of the June issue of the Improvement Era.  President McKay said, ‘I will stand or fall on that statement.’  At my suggestion, President McKay indicated that he would be pleased to have me go to the Deseret Book Company and see Brother Parry about having it printed in appropriate form for maximum distribution.  Following my suggestion that it might be helpful to have it placed in the hands of the Home Teachers, in the Priesthood Bulletin and sent to Stake Presidents with a suggestion that it be read in the Sacrament meetings, he suggested that I give a memo to his secretary, Clare Middlemiss, in the hope that this distribution could be made.

In response to Reed’s comment that more and more people are coming to appreciate President McKay’s fight for freedom, President McKay replied to Reed, that he, Reed, was leading the fight for freedom (referring, of course, to Reed’s responsible position in Washington).  He asked about Mark’s activities and commented about his being in Texas, and Mark indicated that he was active in the MIA on the Stake Board and had been on the General Board before going to Texas a year earlier.  Mention was also made about the Temple Project and that Mark is teaching the class which has grown from some fifteen to fifty and that one family had come to Salt Lake and joined Mark here for their sealing in the Salt Lake Temple.

I mentioned to President McKay, as I had done at an earlier appointment, that the people more and more over the country, especially the patriots, are looking to the Church for leadership in this freedom fight; that the Churches of the world have become so socialistic and so soft on Communism that real patriots have no other place to go.  Reed also mentioned that he had baptized four people recently who are real patriots and became interested in the Church because of the stand of the Church and the stand of President McKay on the freedom issue and also because of the book by Jay Newquist entitled ‘Prophets, Principles and National Survival.’  I mentioned that the Churches of the world are becoming softer on this freedom fight and more and more they are looking to our Church for leadership and that we seem to be about the only Church standing up on this freedom question.  President McKay replied, ‘It certainly appears to be so.’

As we were leaving the question was raised about a photograph of the plaque with President McKay and President McKay said he would like that and would like to have me in on the picture and in fact he said, ‘I should like all of you in on the picture.’  When it was mentioned that Reed and Mark were not members of the Young Americans for Freedom, President McKay indicated that everybody knows that and insisted he wanted them in the picture if it could be arranged.  On returning to the office, I called Henry Smith, who indicated he had a photographer immediately available.  After calling President McKay’s apartment, we met Henry Smith and the photographer at the apartment where the picture was taken of the four of us in the act of presenting the plaque to the President.  When Henry Smith asked us to draw close together President McKay said, ‘The closer I am to Brother Benson, the better I like it.’  During the conversation, Reed mentioned the importance of our keeping our eye on the Captain, and I indicated that probably no two young men had quoted President McKay more often.

From that we went into a discussion of his world trip years ago with Hugh Cannon.

Our first appointment occupied about fifteen minutes, and the period for the picture approximately the same.

I also mentioned to President McKay, that my father’s family would be ever grateful for the great uplift which he gave at the funeral service of my mother.  He said he could recall it vividly and referred to my mother as a ‘noble woman.’  I mentioned that I had obtained a copy of his talk at the funeral service from the family scrapbook and had placed a copy in Clare’s hands.  He paid high tribute to his secretary, Clare Middlemiss, and said she had done a wonderful work in preserving his talks and activities for which he was deeply grateful.”

Fri., 24 June 1966:

“Minutes by Elder Ezra Taft Benson of meeting with President David O. McKay held in his apartment on Friday, June 24, 1966, at 3:00 p.m.

At three o’clock this afternoon, I had a forty-five minutes conference with President David O. McKay in his office in his apartment in the Hotel Utah.  I discussed with him two matters.  One, the work of the 1976 Committee.  He seemed pleased to learn that Mr. Bill Grede, Chairman of the Committee had received over five hundred letters and that all were favorable except three or four which were mildly in opposition.  I told him that Mr. Charles R. Sligh, Jr. has agreed to serve as Executive Vice-Chairman and that they are going to open an office in Holland, Michigan, while continuing the office in Des Plaines, Illinois.  I mentioned Mr. Sligh’s letter of June 14, in which he had indicated that he had received word from Senator Bennett whom he had visited in Washington that there might be some unfavorable action within the Church in connection with the program of the 1976 Committee.  I told him of my conversation with Mr. Sligh when he called me on the telephone from Biloxi, Mississippi and also his talk with Reed.  After this conversation, Mr. Sligh indicated his complete satisfaction and that he did not feel concerned about any unfavorable action from within the Church.  I also recalled to President McKay the letter which he had given me sometime ago in which he had quoted a statement which he intended ‘to use at the appropriate time’.

‘I have been informed of the interest of many prominent Americans in a 

movement to draft Ezra Taft Benson for the Presidency.  It appears that this 

is gaining momentum and is definitely crystalizing into a formal draft movement.

Elder Benson has discussed this with me and to whatever extent he may wish to

become receptive to this movement, his doing so has my full approval.’

I asked him whether or not he felt this should be released to the press or carried in the Church News.  After discussing the pros and cons, he said he thought for the time being it might be best to make a copy available to the officers of the 1976 Committee to reassure them that if the draft movement does develop I would be free to become receptive to the movement to whatever extent I may wish and in doing so would have his full approval.  It was understood that I would place a copy in the hands of Mr. Sligh or Mr. Grede and that possibly it might be best to do it personally rather than transmit it by mail.

Mon., 31 Oct. 1966:

“8:35 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson called at the apartment and spent about fifteen minutes with me regarding my appointment with Mr. William J. Grede, Chairman of the 1976 Committee, and Executive Vice-Chairman and Treasurer Charles R. Sligh, Jr.  He reviewed with me the objectives of the Committee which was organized on April 30, 1966, in Chicago, Illinois, and called to my attention the 1976 Committee brochure which I have already seen.

Elder Benson reviewed with me the draft effort which is under way to have him stand for the Presidency of the United States and Mr. Strom Thurmond for the Vice-Presidency.

Elder Benson read to me the letter which I had written to Elder Benson which is as follows:

‘Elder Ezra Taft Benson

Dear Brother Benson:

Herewith is a statement concerning the movement to draft you for the Presidency, which I intend to use at the appropriate time.

Statement by President David O. McKay

‘I have been informed of the interest of many prominent Americans in a movement to draft Ezra Taft Benson for the Presidency.  It appears that this is gaining momentum and is definitely crystalizing into a formal draft movement.  Elder Benson has discussed this with me and to whatever extent he may wish to become receptive to this movement, his doing so has my full approval.’

May the Lord bless you in all of your patriotic endeavors to help preserve our inspired Constitution and our liberties.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ David O.McKay’

This letter has not yet been released to the press.  I reaffirmed my earlier statement to Elder Benson that I would support him in any effort which he might make in his efforts to help preserve the Constitution.  I then asked Elder Benson to remain during the visit of Messrs. Grede and Sligh.

9:00 a.m.

1976 Committee – Visit of Messrs. William J. Grede and Charles R. Sligh, Jr.

Met by appointment Mr. William J. Grede, Chairman, and Mrs. Charles R. Sligh, Jr., Executive Vice-Chairman and Treasurer of the 1976 Committee, both of Chicago, Illinois.  These gentlemen had written to me asking if they might come to Salt Lake for an interview with me.

After greeting them, they presented to me the plan and purpose of the 1976 Committee, and their determination to draft Elder Benson for the Presidency of the United States.

I told them that they had my support, and that I hoped their effort to get this country back to the basic concepts embodied in the Constitution would be successful.  (See following minutes of this meeting by Elder Benson.)

Later, I received a letter from Mr. Charles R. Sligh, Jr. expressing their appreciation for the meeting he and Mr. Grede had with me.  (See copy of letter following.)  (See also diary of April 16, 1966, for further detail.)  (Also, see copy of letter following received from Mr. Grede.)

Monday, October 31, 1966

October 6, 1966

President David O. McKay

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

47 East South Temple Street

Salt Lake City, Utah 84111

Dear President McKay:

I am enclosing a booklet which The 1976 Committee plans to distribute widely immediately after the November election.  The booklet clearly states the problems of our country and the world as we see them and indicates our Committee’s high regard for Elder Ezra Taft Benson.

Mr. William J. Grede, our Chairman, and I would deeply appreciate an opportunity to visit with you personally in connection with the work of The 1976 Committee.  I know that you have been extremely busy in recent weeks, but I wonder if you would find the possibility to see Mr. Grede and me during the week of October 14th.  The only day that is impossible for us is October 26.  Any other day would be entirely satisfactory.

I will greatly appreciate an early reply to the address on this letterhead.

With every good wish,

Cordially,

Charles R. Sligh Jr.

Executive Vice-Chairman

crs/jf

Enc.

Monday, October 31, 1966

November 1, 1966 (Original in Benson – 1976 file)

President David O. McKay

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints

Hotel Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear President McKay:

It was both a pleasure and a privilege for Mr. Grede and me to meet with you and Brother Benson yesterday.  We deeply appreciate your willingness to receive us and to give us so generously of your time.

As we told you yesterday, we both feel that Brother Benson is ideally fitted for the Presidency of the United States.  He is a man of high principles and unquestioned integrity, and is one who can be trusted to follow his conscience in doing his best to serve this great country of ours.  The 1976 Committee plans to do everything in its power to assure Brother Benson of the nomination for the office of the Presidency.  It is especially gratifying to know that you join us in recognition of his outstanding qualities which would make his nomination a benefit to the nation.

We deeply appreciate your permission to quote your letter, which you wrote to Brother Benson, concerning the movement to draft him for the Presidency.  It is our intention to utilize this statement in our announcement to the press, and it is our understanding that this plan has your approval.

I am forwarding several of the packets of material which we plan to mail to about 35,000 people immediately after this November election.

Thank you again for your gracious hospitality.

With every good wish,

Cordially,

Charles R. Sligh, Jr.

Executive Vice-Chairman

crs/jf

Monday, October 31, 1966

November 11, 1966

President David O. McKay

The Church of Jesus Christ 

   of Latter-Day Saints

47 East South Temple Street

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear President McKay:

Since my return to my office this week, I have had an opportunity to reflect on the visit Mr. Sligh and I had with you and Elder Benson last week.  It was a great privilege for us and we deeply appreciate your time and your hospitality.

You must realize, after reading The 1976 Committee brochure and from the things we said in the meeting, how deeply we appreciate the qualifications of Elder Benson for the presidency of the United States.  We received from him the dated letter which you have given us permission to use as evidence of your approval.  This we realize is an important step for you to take and we also realize it is done only because of your deep conviction about and your dedication to the principles of your Church and this great Nation of ours.

As we explained to you, I am chairman of the executive committee of The John Birch Society, the membership of which is also dedicated to the re-establishment of these principles, and I re-read with great interest your statement concerning the position of the Church on communism.  We appreciate this very much and feel confident that working together we can, before the 200th anniversary of the founding of our country, re-establish in the hearts and minds of our people and the administrators of our government a more wholesome and devoted dedication.

Sincerely yours,

Wm. J. Grede, Chairman

The 1976 Committee

WJG:dc

(Original in 1976 File)”

Wed., 16 Nov. 1966:

“Ezra Taft Benson – October Conference Talk

President Brown said that each of the Counselors (President Isaacson excused) had read Elder Benson’s October Conference sermon, which Elder Benson desires to have printed in mimeograph form for wider circulation.  It was reported that President Tanner had called attention to certain parts of the talk which he indicates would give one the impression that Brother Benson and I stand alone among the General Authorities on the question of freedom.  Brother Brown said that so far as he is concerned is felt that the talk is wholly objectionable because it does impugn the other Brethren of the Authorities as to their motives when they have advised the people to live their religion and stay away from extremist ideas and philosophies.

We decided that the talk should not be mimeographed and distributed in pamphlet form.

Following the meeting of the First Presidency, I retired to the living room.  Did not feel up to holding any more meetings this morning.”

Fri., 2 Dec. 1966:

“9:30 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Council of the Twelve came in by appointment.

He referred to the Council Meeting held yesterday in the Salt Lake Temple, and said it was one of the ‘greatest spiritual experiences he had witnessed’ in our Thursday meetings.

Statement on Communism

Elder Benson said that the statement I had made on Communism at the April Conference of this year is being distributed by the hundreds of thousands.  Brother Benson feels that it should be reprinted in the Instructor and other Church magazines.  I told him that so far as the Instructor is concerned, he could speak to Lawrence McKay about it.

Brother Benson also mentioned that he had written to the First Presidency asking for permission to mimeograph his talk given at the October Conference.  As yet he has received no answer to the letter.  However, in our meeting of the First Presidency on November 16, 1966, President Tanner called attention to certain parts of the talks which he (President Tanner) indicates would give one the impression that Brother Benson and I stand alone among the General Authorities on the question of freedom.  President Brown said that so far as he is concerned, he felt that the talk is wholly objectionable because it does impugn the other brethren of the Authorities as to their motives when they have advised the people to live their religion and stay away from the extremist ideas and philosophies.  At this meeting, we agreed that the talk should not be mimeographed and distributed in pamphlet form.  However, later as I re-read Elder Benson’s talk, I could see no objection to its being mimeographed and sent out.  In his talk he had quoted almost in its entirety (and this with my permission) the statement that I had made on Communism at the October 1966 Conference.  There is nothing wrong with the talk, so I told my secretary to tell Elder Benson he could have it mimeographed if he wished.  Elder Benson informed the secretary that he had given practically the same talk at the Brigham Young University, and that they had published it in pamphlet form and that it is receiving wide distribution.  So the matter stands where it is now.  (See notes following by Elder Benson on the above Conference.)

Friday, December 2, 1966

To: Sister Clare Middlemiss Date:  December 2, 1966

From: Elder Ezra Taft Benson

Re:

In order that your file may be complete, I hand you copy of a press release which came to my home yesterday from The 1976 Committee.  I believe you already received the packet containing the booklets.  385,000 copies have been mailed.

Two or three things came out in the conversation with President McKay today, for your information.

He seemed very pleased as I referred to the Thursday meeting in the Temple and the remarks he made at the conclusion of the administration of the Sacrament.  It was one of the greatest spiritual experiences I have witnessed in our Thursday meetings.  We were so impressed with his remarks and testimony that as we went into dress, not a word was spoken in the large room until we had finished dressing and came back into the meeting room.  My reporting this seemed to please him very much.  I think I have never felt the spirit of the man and witnessed how the Lord operates through him more powerfully that I did last Thursday.

I told him how widely his statement on communism which was read under his direction at the April Conference was being distributed and told him I thought that if it were reprinted in the Church magazines, particularly The Instructor it would help.  He authorized me to talk to Lawrence McKay and see if it could be run in The Instructor.  He was highly pleased when I told him the distribution was going into the hundreds of thousands.

As I talked to him about my letter of October 15th to the First Presidency requesting permission to mimeograph my conference talk, I could see he was somewhat confused and seemed to feel it was somewhat out of his hands.  I told him there was really no need for it now as the talk was largely embodied in my BYU talk given October 25th and that the conference talk would appear in The Improvement Era within the next few days.

As I left him he told of his love for me and said, Brother Benson, we always know where you stand.  I responded by indicating that I was only following the example of my file leader, President David O. McKay.  He chuckled and said, ‘It’s true of both of us.'”

Tues., 13 Dec. 1966:

‘8:30 a.m.

Held a meeting of the First Presidency.  Presidents Brown and Smith were present; President Tanner is in Los Angeles, and President Isaacson is absent on account of illness.

Benson, Ezra Taft – Movement to Draft Him for President

President Brown called attention to a publication entitled ‘Tri-States News Advertiser’ of December 8, 1966, which is published weekly at Hurricane, Utah, and of which Myrlon G. Brown is editor and publisher.  The front page of the paper bears a headline, ‘America Offered Leadership’, and reproduces a picture of Elder Benson.  The lead article states, ‘1967 committee heads patriot’s name Ezra Taft Benson for President.  Church President David O. McKay gives approval.’  The editorial on the front page contains the following statement, which is attributed to the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints:  ‘…many prominent Americans in a movement to draft Ezra Taft Benson for the Presidency.  It appears that this is gaining momentum and is definitely crystallizing into a formal draft movement.  Elder Benson has discussed this with me, and to whatever extent he may wish to become receptive to this move, his doing so has my full approval.’

President Brown was disturbed about this, and asked as to whether or not Elder Benson’s proposed candidacy has my approval, and not remembering at the moment that I had given full permission for Elder Benson to stand ready to enter into this movement should circumstances permit, and said that I had not approved; but later recalled the whole matter and that Elder Benson had talked to me about the whole matter, and that I had given him permission to participate in this movement should it come to a point where he was drafted into it.  (See Diary of April 16, 1966.)

I therefore instructed Clare to tell Brother Anderson to strike out of the above minutes the statement that I did not approve, and state that I did not recall at the time that I had given Elder Benson permission and had indeed dictated and signed the letter giving my approval to the matter.”

Fri., 6 Jan. 1967:

9:30 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and reported the progress of the ‘1976 Committee.’  He said that they are having a meeting in Chicago on the tenth of this month; that they are in real earnest trying to get the people of the country to return to the fundamentals of the Constitution and to draft him to become a candidate for the Presidency of the United States, and Strom Thurmond as Vice-President.  He said they now have automobile bumper stickers with ‘Benson for President’ and ‘Thurmond for Vice-President – 1968’.

I said to Elder Benson, as I said before, these matters will have to take their own course, and we shall see what comes of it; that Elder Benson is not to take an active part in this campaign until and unless he is drafted!”

Wed., 15 Feb. 1967:

“8:30 a.m.

Met with Presidents Brown, Tanner, and Smith in a regular meeting of the First Presidency.  Among matters discussed were:

Ezra Taft Benson – Nomination for Presidency of United States

A letter was read from Ernest Cook of Ogden, referring to a reference in a letter to the Deseret News to a statement by President McKay that he had given his approval to the movement to sponsor Elder Ezra Taft Benson for nomination and election as President of the United States.  Brother Cook asks if this is true, and if so, if he may obtain a statement of such endorsement.  In discussing this matter, President Tanner mentioned that the policy has been as he understood it that no one of the General Authorities should seek a political nomination without the approval of the President of the Church.  He stated that the President’s approval is always obtained before the Brethren accept various Church assignments such as visiting missions, etc.  President Tanner stated that for instance he is leaving today for Great Britain under assignment to attend the Manchester Stake Conference and reorganize the Presidency, that he would not, of course, do this without consulting me and receiving my approval.  I said that this was the proper thing to do.

In discussing the matter of Brother Benson, the sentiment was expressed that while I had given Brother Benson permission to become receptive to the nomination, it had not yet come to the point where any draft movement had been made and that we would meet that when it came.

Fri., 24 Feb. 1967:

10:45 – 1:10 p.m.

My secretary, Clare, came over with a brief case full of letters and other office matters.  She presented five petitions for cancellation of Temple sealings, which I considered and passed upon.

I then went over a number of letters prepared for my approval and signature.  Clare handed me a 12-page letter marked personal and confidential from Robert Welch of The John Birch Society, a cursory glance of which indicates or pleads for permission for Ezra Taft Benson to serve on the National Council of the Society.  Clare left the letter with me for my attention and final decision.

Wed., 22 Mar. 1967:

“8:30 a.m.

Ezra Taft Benson – Conference

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and visited with me regarding the efforts of the 1976 Committee to draft him for high office in the United States.  He said that he is receiving many hundreds of letters from people from various parts of the country, and that the Committee is receiving about one hundred per day.

He also showed me a tape recording of the lecture given by Miss Lola Belle Holmes, a Negress, who spoke in Salt Lake City last Friday under the title, ‘Why I Became a Communist for the FBI’.  I told Brother Benson that I should like to listen to it at some convenient time.

Brother Benson then referred to the letter which Robert Welch of the John Birch Society had sent to me asking for the second time for permission to have him (Elder Benson) on the Council of the Society.  In discussing this with Elder Benson, I told him that I do not feel that he should accept a position of this kind with the Society, but that I enjoyed reading Mr. Welch’s letter and felt that he is sincerely dedicated, and that he displayed a very good spirit in his letter.  It was agreed that Elder Benson would answer Mr. Welch and tell him that it would be impossible for him to serve on the Council at this time.

Wednesday, March 22, 1967

Minutes of meeting held with President David O. McKay on Wednesday, March 22, 1967, from 8:35 to 8:55 a.m.  (Prepared by Ezra Taft Benson)

Today, between 8:35 and 8:55 a.m., I enjoyed a delightful visit with President David O. McKay.  He was in good spirits and it was a joy to visit with him.  In keeping with his request, I brought him up-to-date on the efforts of the 1976 Committee to draft me for high office in the United States.  He reported that his secretary, Clare Middlemiss, had read several letters to him which I had received from people from various parts of the country.  I mentioned that I received many hundreds of such letters and I understood the Committee were receiving about one hundred per day, while the number I am receiving runs all the way from 10 to 25 per day.  I showed him the letter which the committee had sent out which he read very carefully, also the flyer mailed out recently under the caption, ‘We believe in the two-party political system’, and a statement on the reverse side under the caption, ‘We are dedicated to the cause.’  These he also read very carefully.

He again said, ‘We will not do anything to stop or promote this program, but it seems to be gaining momentum.’  Again he repeated the words, ‘Time will tell.’  He asked me to give copies of this printed material to his secretary so that he would have a complete file.

I also showed him a tape recording of the lecture by Miss Lola Belle Holmes who spoke in Salt Lake City last Friday under the title, ‘Why I Became a Communist for the FBI’.  He asked that I mention this to his secretary so she could arrange for him to hear it.  The tape was left on his desk.  I also mentioned that I had received a letter from Robert Welch of some length, asking me for the second time, to come on the Council of the John Birch Society.  He mentioned that he had received a very nice letter from Mr. Welch, which he felt was very sincere from a man with a good spirit and a good heart.  I suggested to President McKay that I had in mind answering the letter, indicating that I had discussed the matter with President McKay and felt that now was not the appropriate time to become a member of the Council.  President McKay indicated that this would have his approval, and would I write it in a way so that he would not be required to respond

to the letter he had received.  I wrote the following letter:

‘This morning I had a very pleasant visit with President David O. McKay, now in his 94th year.  He is quite well and is busy preparing for the Annual Conference of the Church, the meetings for which start in less than two weeks.

He mentioned the very lovely letter he received from you and said, ‘It was a great letter from a man who is sincere and with a good heart.’  He appreciates, as do I, your kind invitation for me to join the Council.  After discussing the matter at some length, it was our feeling that now would not be the proper time for me to make such a move.

President McKay, as you know, has given his full support to the draft effort through the 1976 Committee, response to which has given us considerable encouragement.  I assume you saw the press release issued by the Committee in which they quoted President McKay’s statement.  I believe I realize, Bob, as do few people, your concern.  This concern is shared also by President McKay who has spoken out in words of warning regarding the Communist conspiracy as few men in America have done.

I express for President McKay, and myself, our deep appreciation for your lovely letters and for the kindly spirit in which you have presented this matter for the second time.  We, of course, do not know fully what the future holds, but you may be assured of my desire to be helpful in the great struggle in which we are engaged.  It is the greatest evil in this world and the greatest threat to all we hold dear.

With warm personal regards and prayerful wishes for your welfare.

Wednesday, March 22, 1967

Robert Welch

Belmont, Massachusetts 02178 February 21, 1967

(Original in Birch File)

Personal and Confidential

President David O. McKay

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

47 East South Temple Street

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear President McKay:

First, let me apologize, sincerely and earnestly, for writing you so long a letter.  I can only hope that its length will seem to you to be justified by its substance and its purpose.

For that purpose, to state it plainly and promptly, is to ask that you permit the Hon. Ezra Taft Benson to become a member of the COUNCIL of The John Birch Society.  And since there can be no question about the seriousness of such a step, I am undertaking to give you the basic information and explanation which might be helpful to you in considering our request.

It is also clear that Secretary Benson, in his position in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, owes and gives a devotion to the Church which overrides all other demands on his loyalty, his energy, and his time.  We are aware that he would not be willing to accept a place on our COUNCIL, nor would you consent to his doing so, unless the action were consistent with a deep concern for the future welfare of both his church and his country.  It is with these thoughts in mind that we plead with you to hear our story.  And despite appearances to the contrary, it will be kept as concise as is practicable.

II

Second, let me try to indicate, as well as I can within these feasible limits, the value and effectiveness of the Society in the effort to save the United States from the Communist tyranny which has already been imposed on so many other countries.  In this protracted struggle The John Birch Society has already accomplished a great deal more in this fight with the Communists than anybody except the communists themselves seems to realize.  For evidence, I paraphrase our brief comments in our February Bulletin on just two major projects.

Five years ago not one American in a thousand was aware of the already far advanced Communist plot to discredit, neutralize, and undermine our local police forces, so that they could be replaced by the brutal gestapo of a central government — such as Robert Kennedy sent into Oxford, Mississippi under the name of ‘federal marshals’; and so that Communist-led riots could run unchecked, or actually be aided, by this federal gendarmerie.  It is true that years ago the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee had made and published an excellent study, showing that there was such a worldwide Communist plot with regard to local police forces everywhere.  But it had been completely smothered and forgotten.  Then The John Birch Society inaugurated its nationwide Support Your Local Police Drive.  Today this drive has been so successful, as shown specifically by the overwhelming defeat of Mayor John Lindsay’s referendum for a civilian police review board in New York City, that this important part of the Communist program is being completely spiked.  And all it took was exactly what The John Birch Society provides, namely the creation of sufficient understanding.

Five years ago, few people who were thoroughly familiar with the main divisions of Communist strategy saw any chance of keeping the Negro Revolutionary Movement from reaching decisive proportions.  It was to supply the flaming front to the whole ‘proletarian revolution,’ as planned by Walter Reuther and supported by his stooge, Bobby Kennedy.  But the one thing the conspirators could not stand was to have sufficient light turned on their plans and their activities.  Because of that increasing light, the march on Selma turned into an obscene farce, and the revolution started in Delano never got off the ground.  The John Birch Society proved in Americus, Georgia, that the most carefully plotted campaign of destruction by the ‘civil rights’ agitators could be thwarted by American good will and common sense.  And in the Rio Grande Valley of Texas, members of the Society proved that the fuse lit in Delano could be stamped out by enough patient and courageous labor.

The required semblance of civil war which was to have been created — exactly as had been done in China and Algeria and Cuba — to help the Communists in the final stages of taking over our Country, failed to materialize.  The failure was so complete, and our part in causing it was so obvious, that Reuther turned loose against us during the latter half of 1966, through the distribution of separate folders and the publication of long editorials in the labor press, running altogether into millions of imprints, one of the most vicious and massive campaigns of vilification to which we have so far been subjected.

The danger of this ‘pretense of civil war’ development is still with us, because the Communists never give up in connection with any predetermined course.  But as of right now their progress on this front has been slowed almost to a standstill.  Walter Reuther is losing out to George Meany in their battle for supremacy in the American labor movement; M.L. King is becoming more widely recognized as an over-inflated Comsymp; and Saul Alinsky’s professional riot productions have remained in the planning stage.

Plenty of other American groups and individuals have played worthy roles in this accomplishment, of course.  But The John Birch Society, through its distribution of hundreds of thousands of excellent books and literally millions of forceful pamphlets; through its hundreds of local or regional TACT Committees, its scores of speakers (including especially its courageous and convincing Negro speakers); through a wide showing of its film, Anarchy USA; through its letter writing campaigns, and the unceasing efforts of its members; through all of these means together the Society has clearly made a tremendous, effective, and successful contribution to spiking the program of the King and his associates.  And again, all it took was the creation of sufficient understanding, on the part of enough people, as to what was behind all of this civil turmoil and what were its real purposes.

(One of our Negro speakers, Lola Belle Holmes, who serves in the Communist Party for seven years as an undercover agent of the FBI, is right now carrying out a schedule of eighty-three speeches on eighty-three consecutive nights.  The theme of each of these speeches can be summarized as follows:  ‘Don’t tell me that the Communists are not running the ‘civil rights’ movement, because I was for years one of the Communists that was doing it.’  And that speech, before she gets through, really creates understanding of what is taking place.)

We could give you hundreds of illustrations of our specific but cumulative effectiveness on many fronts.  But perhaps the above will serve our present needs.  We are a kind of force, and a kind of opposition, which the Communists have never faced before.  And their typically Communist reaction has been, not to meet us on those few fronts where we were being successful, but to try to discredit and then destroy the Society itself.  This they had fully expected to do, long before now.  Instead, I believe that, in connection with this Vietnam mess, we are just about to cause them more of a problem and a setback than we have ever accomplished before.  It can also be done simply by creating sufficient understanding of what is really taking place.  And to that end we need the unceasing help of all other truly patriotic Americans.

III

Third, I hope you will be willing to look with me at a highly condensed account of what we have been obliged to survive.  For the Communists have gone about their campaign of intended destruction of The John Birch Society by every means known to their book of strategy and their manual of tactics.

They have, of course, used all of their massive influence over the American communications media to have unceasing falsehoods and misunderstandings created and spread about us.  Knowing that Communism must be advanced at least ninety percent by non-Communist hands, they have found ways to have their smears disseminated most widely and most effectively by misguided Conservatives or pseudo-Conservatives of the Richard Nixon or Bill Buckley type.  At the same time, through articles and editorials in Communist or Comsymp publications, they have tipped off every crypto-Communist and ‘sleeper’ who ever climbed out of the woodwork, to do everything possible to damage the Society at all times and in every way.

A part of this smear campaign, which now ranges through an average of more than a thousand items per day about us in the American press, is aimed at me personally.  An explanation of this feature is offered in a signed statement by our Executive Committee, just issued as a part of our effort to obtain wider readership for The Truth In Time and The Truth About Vietnam.  Please forgive my lack of modesty in quoting two paragraphs out of that statement as follows:

‘We have now worked closely with the founder of The John Birch Society for many years.  It is our belief, from our own experience and observations, that the smears heaped on his head have not arisen because he has been wrong; but have been inspired by Socialist-Communists behind the scenes because, repeatedly and continuously, he has been right, both as to what had already happened in the past and as to what was going to happen in the future.  The smears have then been widely spread by innocents who were unaware of what they were really doing.

‘In our opinion the greatest danger to the Communists from The John Birch Society, the reasons why it has been vilified and undermined more extensively than any other organization in American history, and the unceasing efforts to weaken the Society by somehow getting Mr. Welch out of his position of leadership, have all derived from his thorough knowledge and understanding of the background, methods, purposes, and progress of the conspiracy…’

The attacks on the Society in the communications media, because of what our members can accomplish as an educational army, and on myself for what I am able to see and reveal about what the Communists are really up to, have combined to put more obstacles in our way, and more brakes on all the wheels which we try to keep turning, than could possible be imagined by anybody not sitting, as I do, right at the center of the whole operation.  But this gigantic weight which we must carry, in every forward step we try to take, from recruiting new members to exposing the truth about Vietnam, is matched by an entirely different form of Communist strategy aimed at our destruction.

This second approach is through the creation of misunderstanding, factionalism, dissension, disputes, bitterness, and feuds within the Society itself.  The Communists are, of course, grand masters at this game.  And ever since they became convinced that they were not going to be able to destroy us by attacks on the body as a whole, they have gone to work with increasing energy and cunning to damage and destroy us by internal division.  Here again, as in everything else, they work mostly through non-Communist hands, using every trick in human psychology to have influential members turn against us or against each other.  By cunning fabrication, subtly put together, of exaggerations, distortions, and outright falsehoods of amazing variety, both sides of every dispute have been supplied reasons which appeared to justify their actions and their feelings.

Sometimes we are able to discover the source of these troubles, whether local, regional, or national, and to eliminate that source.  Sometimes the problem arises so largely from natural human cantankerousness and jealousies, with such a small amount of Communist manipulation having been required to blow it up into serious proportions, that any drastic remedy would be more damaging than letting the feud run its course.  But the worst situation of all is when we know who is continuously causing us major problems within the upper echelons of the Society’s nationwide organization, and even largely how — that is, we recognize the general Communist formula for trouble making which is being followed — but because of the position of the culprit and the circumstances which must be considered, we do not think it wise to bring the whole matter out into the open.  We must try, instead, to carry our top people along with us anyway, by our own dedication, leadership, and actions, despite the constant clever knifing of this inside enemy.  We have now been faced with one such situation, high up in the top circles of the Society, for over four years.  It has caused us considerable damage and many problems, for which I have usually been given the blame.  We’ll do something decisive about it when the time is ripe–but not before.

The cumulative and total effect of all Communist-inspired efforts of every kind to undermine us and destroy us is beyond all measure and beyond most imaginations.  We ourselves make mistakes of course.  We would undoubtedly make our share anyway.  But we are operating a crash program, with time an imperative consideration, against every conceivable form of opposition and handicap provided by the most vicious, ruthless, and best organized enemy that any group has ever faced.  So we undoubtedly make more than our normal share of mistakes, some of them running to more than the normal cost which would be acceptable for any business.  And that confession brings us a huge step nearer to the end of this long letter.

IV

Next, let me set forth certain premises which are a part of the circumstances behind this letter.  Some of them are premises with which you may not yet be in entire agreement.  And I doubt if you can spare the very considerable time and energy to do the reading which I think would bring you into agreement.  But enclosed with this letter is a thin sheaf of carefully selected materials which will go quite a way towards convincing support of what I have to say below.  In due course you may find them of sufficient interest to be worth your time.  In the meantime, here are the premises which I think sufficient study will substantiate. 

1.  The horror and fear abroad in the world today are direct results of the plans, the cunning, and the ruthlessness of a longstanding international conspiracy.  For convenience we may refer to the top command of that conspiracy as the INSIDERS.  This clique is self perpetuating, through decades and even generations.  It is the unswerving ambition of these INSIDERS to establish their brutal tyranny, through the vast conspiratorial organization which they now control, over the whole population of the earth.

2.  This conspiratorial force works primarily from the top down.  In every country its controlling members are to be found in the very top financial, economic, social, educational, and political circles.  The agents of this ruling clique create revolution, or the semblance of revolution, at the bottom, as simply one of the many means by which the INSIDERS carry forward their purposes.  During the past fifty years this worldwide fraternity of INSIDERS has become so powerful and so pervasive that, for most practical purposes, they now control, alike, Moscow and Peking and Paris and London and Washington and New York (including the United Nations).

The effective governmental regimes in these cities today are all but arms of one octopus-like body, controlled by a central nervous system which serves as its brain.  Any strife anywhere, between any of these arms, is but a show put on — at whatever cost in death and cruelty and destruction — to serve some purpose of this ruthless and cunning brain.  You do not have your right hand appear to fight your left hand, or proclaim your worry about which hand holds the biggest pistol or the sharpest knife, except as a means of distracting children while you are putting them to sleep.

Today we talk a great deal about blunders and stupidity and naivete on the part of the controlling powers in Washington.  But deep inside we are well aware that the true explanation is far more sinister.  The actual purpose being carried out by many of the very top men in the present Administration, as in all recent Administrations, must be classified in any realistic appraisal as either treason to the United States, or as an overriding loyalty to the concept of one-world government — which necessarily involves treason to the United States.

3.  The success of this conspiracy has always depended, and still depends, primarily on deception.  The greatest single aim of that deception, since long before the days of Karl Marx, has been to keep the very existence of the conspiracy a secret.  To serve that end there was created a clever phrase, ‘the conspiratorial theory of history,’ which could be used to ridicule all of those who sought to expose the truth.  For all further deceptions depended ultimately on keeping this one effective.

With this underlying fraud solidly sustained, however, a thousand more specifically directed deceptions could be built at need upon it.  The pattern being applied to the United States follows in general some proven formulas which have already been used to enslave other countries.  A gullible and basically decent people, unable to believe that other men can be so massively cruel and so completely evil, is led to destruction by the cunning use of every conceivable division among them.  Whether these divisions are based on race, color, religion, political views, old prejudices, economic status, plain greed, or purely imaginary and fabricated reasons for bitterness, they all become grist for the Communist mills.  From them there is ground out by these mills an ever increasing stream of confusion, cross purposes, frustration, and despair.  And all during this process the infinite threads of total power are — at first slowly, then more rapidly, but always gradually, insidiously, and patiently — being woven around the American people, by INSIDERS who know exactly what they are doing.

4.  The one thing, the only thing, which this conspiracy (or any conspiracy) cannot withstand is sufficient light on its activities.  If enough understanding could be created of what is really happening, the determination and the steps to keep it from happening would come into existence as surely and rapidly as men rush to put out a fire which threatens to devour their homes.  Let enough of the American people – Republicans, Democrats, or Independents — grasp the fact, for example, that the present Administration is actually controlled by the influence and agents of an international conspiracy which seeks to enslave America (exactly as it has already enslaved China and Czechoslovakia and Cuba and a score of other countries of all levels of ‘development’), and a great many things would start happening fast.  As just one important change, the massive steps being taken by Washington right now to help our Communist enemies all over the world would stop as suddenly as the bagstuffing of a burglar when caught in the act by a posse of policemen.

5.  It is not too difficult, with careful enough research, observation, and analysis, to show the Communist hands and plots at work in any area chosen for study.  We are prompted, for instance, by thoughtful comments from many sources, to believe that our own pamphlets, Two Revolutions At Once and The Truth About Vietnam, give a convincing exposition of what the INSIDERS are really trying to accomplish under the deceptive banners of ‘civil rights’ and ‘resisting Communist aggression in Vietnam.’  We are equally encouraged to feel that our more general study, The Truth In Time, gives an adequate and accurate bird’s eye view of the total conspiracy.  At least we are certainly willing to let you be the judge of the value of these booklets in support of their purpose.  The whole difficulty, and one which has been skillfully created by the Communists, is to get such books and pamphlets widely enough distributed and read.

6.  To bring about this smothering of material which exposes the conspiracy, the Communists rely on the weapon of prestige more heavily than on anything else.  And they use it very effectively for both defensive and offensive tactics.  They prepare smooth roads and green lights — and awards by national and international committees — for those who will ridicule all exposures, and exposers, of the conspiracy.  Especially favored in this respect are those who oppose socialism and communism on an ideological or academic plane, because such ‘opponents’ are considered more convincing than the Communists themselves on this one point which is so important to their strategy and their aims.  On the other hand, let even a good socialist, who supports the Communists in every matter or doctrine, but advances some suggestion of there being a conspiracy at work, and he will be hounded out of all the rewards of scholarship.

Since, we believe, The John Birch Society has done more than all other groups put together to awaken our fellow citizens to the existence and the workings of this conspiracy, we were already being smeared by the Communists and their dupes and allies, even during our early years, more viciously and more extensively than all other anti-Communist groups put together.  This was not done because of hatred, or for the sake of revenge.  The Communists are too ruthlessly cold to have time or room for any such ‘human’ sentiments, except when those sentiments serve some calculated need.  But there was a need, and by the fall of 1965 it had grown considerably greater.  For we had broken through their smothering blanket at two points.  These were our campaigns under the banners of Support Your Local Police, and Expose The ‘Civil Rights’ Fraud, as already discussed earlier in this letter.

Both of these successful drives on our part were seriously damaging to the Communist schedule.  So they redoubled their efforts, to make sure that the same thing could not happen again.  And the Communist reaction to any exposure always follows a predetermined formula: Do not fight the accusation; merely destroy the accuser.  But that intended destruction can itself take several forms.  In this case, one major direction of the vastly increased campaign of vilification against us during the past eighteen months has visibly been to create a situation in which the public, including even many good anti-Communists, simply would not read our publications.  And in this extremely important step of their strategy, the Communists have been substantially successful.  Our enemies are quite confident at the present time that no matter how revealing, how interesting, how well documented, or how convincing may be anything we put out, we shall never again be able to get it widely enough read to create the wave of understanding which will upset their plans.  And this is the barrier which we must now overcome.

V

Which brings us, at long last, to one of the main points in this impassioned cry for help.  For there is one way, and so far as I can see only one way of our breaking through, or crossing over, this barrier which has been so diligently created across our path.  And that is by our use, on the offense, of the same weapon of prestige.

The fact that our COUNCIL of The John Birch Society consists of men of considerable prominence, who are widely recognized for both their character and their accomplishments, has always presented a problem for the Communists.  It is one of the factors which has made the Society more feared by our enemies, and the harder for them to neutralize, than any or all other anti-Communist groups.  Secretary Benson has met with these men, briefly or informally, on several occasions, and I am sure would support my appraisal.

But the influence of the names and standing of these leaders, on the attitude of the general public towards the Society, has been heavily eroded by the unceasing attacks of the Communists for that purpose.  What we need now, and what would be of decisive significance at this point, is an accession of new strength and new prestige to our COUNCIL.  The one man who could most effectively spearhead that accession, and thus do more than anybody else to provide the reinforcements we now need in this battle, is the Hon. Ezra Taft Benson.  With tremendous reluctance, therefore, because I do know what it will require of him in courage and sacrifice, I have written to Secretary Benson asking him to give us this powerful help, by becoming a member of our COUNCIL — and to do it now!  And I am pleading with yourself, as earnestly as I know how, for your consent to his doing so.

The effect on the morale of our membership, of the addition to our COUNCIL of three or four outstanding Americans headed by Secretary Benson, would of course be very beneficial.  Much more immediately important, however, would be the decidedly greater ease with which our members could again get our literature read by a considerable element of the more literate public.  But most important of all in the long run would be simply having so able and honorable a man as Ezra Taft Benson on our leadership team.  Of those who were both good men and great men, whom it has been my privilege to know fairly well personally among leaders on the national or international scene, the two most admirable human beings within my experience have been Syngman Rhee and Ezra Taft Benson.  So you can see why we would be so justly pleased and proud simply to have him on our COUNCIL, even if we did not so badly need, at the present time, his official adherence to our cause.

I am aware, and have wanted to make sure Secretary Benson realized, that in extending this invitation I am asking him to be prepared to put his reputation on the line, and to be prepared to stand up against attacks on the Society, and on himself personally, which I am sure are coming in the years ahead.  For the INSIDERS who control the ‘pressures’ which can be exerted by government, press, and some of the largest banks, are ruthless beyond the imagination of ordinary decent human beings.

But I am also aware of his deep-rooted belief, which I am sure you share, that the preservation of our Constitution, and hence of the American Republic itself, would at some time hang by a thread.  And it is not too far-fetched a possibility that this very action could be that saving thread.  The fact that this war is being fought in a different way from all previous wars makes realistic courage and daring decisions none the less vital.  It simply makes their proper time and place and form harder to identify.  And there can be no doubt, in any event, that this action on the part of Secretary Benson would constitute a powerful blow against our Communist enemies, and on behalf of the one force which they now fear most.

That last clause is not an exaggeration of our own position or responsibility.  And it does deserve careful attention among the considerations to be weighed.  For I believe, and I am convinced the Communists believe, that if The John Birch Society does not gather the strength to play the leading role in exposing and stopping the Communists, there is simply nobody else on the horizon today with any chance to do so.  And while I am also convinced that the Mormon Church will survive through anything, and come out of any storm as a mighty force for the rebuilding of a sane world, the incredible destruction, darkness, cruelty, and suffering, which could be imposed even on America for a decade or a generation, is a horror to be avoided by all of the dedication and heroism which mortal men can put into the task.

Finally, and on the positive side, Secretary Benson would find himself in The John Birch Society, a member of what is, outside of some church organizations, quite literally the finest body of men and women on the earth today.  And as a member of the top governing body of the Society he would find himself one of a small group who are unsurpassed anywhere, for character, for courage, for ability, for a sense of responsibility, and above all for dedication to our epic undertaking.  That undertaking, basically, is simply to preserve for our children and their children the glorious country and humane civilization which we ourselves inherited.

Needless to say — but let me say it anyway — that I am, ardently and prayerfully, hoping to hear from yourself, or from Secretary Benson, that you have given or would give your consent to his own favorable decision with regard to our plea.  And in the meantime, please permit me to send to yourself this further expression of my good wishes, my admiration, and my kindest regards.

Respectfully and sincerely,

Robert Welch

RW:jg

P.S.  The carefully selected material enclosed is merely for you to read or refer to if you might ever have the time and the inclination to do so.  They would offer both documentation and a more detailed exposition of many points made in the above letter.  But there is no suggestion that they should be read before you arrive at any decision.  For that purpose we must be willing to have the letter stand on its own feet.

RW”

Tues., 18 Apr. 1967:

“8:00 a.m.

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came in and first brought up the subject of the General Conference and how pleased and satisfied he was with it.

He then asked if he could bring Mr. Robert Welch of the John Birch Society in to meet me later this morning.  I said that 11:00 a.m. would be a good time for him to come in.  Brother Benson said that Mr. Welch is in Salt Lake City to deliver a talk at the Highland High School.  I said, ‘All right, I’ll see you following the meeting of the First Presidency.’

11:00 a.m.

John Birch Society – Courtesy Visit of Robert Welch

By appointment Elder Ezra Taft Benson came over to the apartment with Mr. Robert Welch of the John Birch Society, Belmont, Massachusetts.

Following greetings and introductions, Elder Benson explained that in order to save my time, Mr. Welch had written a letter to me which contains the subject matter he would like to discuss with me this morning.

I said, ‘All right, Mr. Welch, you read the letter to me.’  So he read very slowly and clearly the letter which he had prepared.  The letter outlined, as he sees it, the present situation of our country, the very fate of which he thinks hangs in the balance.  At the conclusion of his reading, he said that it would help the cause exceedingly if I would give my permission for Elder Ezra Taft Benson to become a member of the National Council of the John Birch Society.

I explained to him, as I have on two other occasions by letter, that it would not be wise for Elder Benson to serve in this capacity.  (See following Mr. Welch’s letter, also letter and minutes from Elder Benson).

Tuesday, April 18, 1967

Robert Welch

Belmont, Massachusetts, 02178

April 18, 1967

President David O. McKay

Hotel Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear President McKay:

This is probably the most important letter I have ever written.

The reasons why this is so will constitute the letter itself.  They will also serve as my excuse and my apology for presenting again the plea made in my long letter of February 21.

For I fully believe what I must set forth so briefly below to be the facts of the present situation, where the very fate of our country hangs in the balance.  And I further believe that, with the hundreds of pages of explanation and documentation which might be required, this series of plain and frightening facts could be made entirely clear and wholly convincing.

1.  Infiltration of Communist influences into strategic positions within our government, and within every great organization and major division of our national life, has now reached so far that rampant treason is gradually but surely establishing Communist control over the United States, exactly as it has already done in dozens of other countries.

On one side of Stettin Harbor in Communist Poland today, ships are being unloaded with wheat, sent by our government to feed the workers in the Communist armament factories.  Simultaneously, on the other side of that same harbor, ships for Haiphong are being loaded with the guns produced in those factories, to be used against us by the North Vietnam Communists.  This is only a tiny but dramatic illustration of the incredibly extensive, enormous, and comprehensive effort to supply our enemies with the means to kill our sons.

2.  This war, in which our government, either directly or indirectly, is supplying the equipment and paying the bills for both sides, has been planned and is being used as the means for gradually imposing the shackles of Communist tyranny on the American people here at home.

The long planned Communist strategy, as we have now been pointing out for three years, while our forces in Vietnam steadily grew from a few thousand to half a million men, has been and still is to make this carefully stage-managed show a larger and larger war, despite all of the pretenses and motions by our government of seeking peace.  And then to bring the American people, by frustration and dissension and confusion and despair, and by coercive use of the controls and powers already established, to an acceptance of ‘peace’ under the full and formal rule of a one-world Communist tyranny disguised as the United Nations.

3.  Simultaneously the Communists are marching toward this same goal along every road and by every means which will insidiously convert the American people into helpless slaves of the central government.  They plan to use every form of pressure which they have learned and rehearsed elsewhere, from the arrest of patriots for ‘treason’ to the starvation of patriots by planned famine, to subdue all resistance and force a helplessly divided and disarmed people into abject submission.

4.  The one form of resistance which can possibly prevent this catastrophic horror, the only form of organized opposition which the Communists have not faced in any other country, is adequate exposure, while there is still time, of these plans, methods, and purposes of the Communists.  If — and only if — we can create, in time, sufficient understanding of what is happening, can the Communists be slowed down and stopped before they have sufficient force and terror in their hands with which to replace pressures and deception.

5.  Steadfastly pursuing this policy of creating understanding, the John Birch Society has now become not only larger and more influential, by practically any standard of appraisal, than all other anti-Communist groups and organizations in America put together, but by our unwavering sense of direction and unshakable purpose, we have not visibly become the one enemy which the Communists fear most anywhere in the world.  For the culmination of the communist work of decades, and the ultimate complete success of the worldwide Communist conspiracy, now depend entirely on what happens right here in the United States.  And the John Birch Society is the one formidable, unshattered bulwark remaining in their way.

6.  Having spent years trying unsuccessfully, but by every form of attack and of undermining tactics in their book, to destroy the John Birch Society, the Communists have now turned practically their whole effort against us into measures to keep us from being heard, and our literature from being read, by the much larger audiences which we now need to reach.  And in this undertaking they have the help of the cumulative effect of their years of vicious smears and unceasing propaganda against the Society.

7.  The outcome of the struggle, the future of our children, our country, and indeed of millions of people in other countries, and even our own lives and freedom, now depend literally on how many people we can get to listen to us, to see our films, and to read our literature.  And that, as the Communists are well aware, depends very largely on the intangible but vital factor of prestige.

8.  It is this fact which would make the immediate accession of Ezra Taft Benson to our COUNCIL of inestimable and even of vital importance.  Not only for the value of his own name and influence and guidance and support, but because this would give just the needed amount of courage and of encouragement to some three or four other men whose addition to our COUNCIL at the present time would also be of great value to our cause.

One such man, for instance, is Dr. James Fifield, Jr., of Los Angeles.  He has been invited to join our COUNCIL, and is deliberating over his decision.  I am confident that, on being told of Ezra Taft Bensons’ acceptance, Dr. Fifield would immediately give me a favorable reply for himself.  There are others on whom this accession by Secretary Benson and Dr. Fifield would immediately have the same effect.  And the reinforcement of our present COUNCIL at this time by three or four additional men of recognized stature and character and leadership would be to our embattled troops like Blucher arriving on the field of Waterloo.

9.  The effect on the morale of our COUNCIL, our staff, and our total membership, in these visible hours of crisis, would be electrifying.  The effect on the public would be equally so.  The most beneficial direct and tangible result would be the ability thus given us, by the psychological impact of these reinforcement, to have at least twice as many good patriotic Americans, throughout the whole extent of our country, willingly accept and read our literature — and then join with us in persuading still others to do the same.  And it is my earnest belief that this one development, at this particular juncture of the long struggle, would open eyes, breed confidence, and set off reverberations which would later prove it to have been the decisive turning point in the struggle.  Many a great battle has been won by the impact of some similar reinforcement at the crucial moment.

10. Our members, despite all odds on the side of entrenched evil, have accomplished a great deal, and have been visibly successful in stopping or slowing down the Communists on many fronts.  But for the opposition of the John Birch Society our country would already have been carried by Communist internal subversion beyond the point of ‘no return’.  Despite the unceasing labors and courage and sacrifice of our members, we are now getting nearer to that point anyway, and the future of our republic is hanging by a thread.  For many years I myself have given all that I have and all that I am to this battle to save our people from Communist slavery.  I am still doing so — even by writing this letter and by trying so hard to obtain the help we so badly need.  Our members, our COUNCIL, and myself, have fought the good fight, against every conceivable form of harassment and persecution.  We shall still do so, and we can still win despite the lateness of the hour.  But our cry for help is a realistic expression of our realization of the present state of the battle and of the immensity of the stakes.

The Honorable Ezra Taft Benson is, in my opinion, one of the world’s truly great men.  Here is, I really believe, an opportunity for him to perform for his country an act of greatness equal to that of many another hero in our history.  And we are making this most fervent and earnest plea for your blessing on his courage and his willingness to do so.

Respectfully and sincerely,

Robert Welch

Tuesday, April 18, 1967

April 19, 1967

PERSONAL

President David O. McKay

Building

Dear President McKay:

Thank you for seeing my good friend, Robert Welch, today.  He appreciated it deeply, as did I.

Mr. Welch is a great American, a true patriot, and a devoted worker for freedom.  His letter, which he read to you, I am sure, represented his very deep convictions, although I am pleased to abide by your decision that I should not go on the Council at this time.

Thank you so much for seeing him and for your kindness in inviting me to stay during the interview.

With affectionate greetings.

Sincerely your brother,

Ezra Taft Benson

ETB:sd

Tuesday, April 18, 1967

Memorandum

To: Sister Clare Middlemiss Date:  April 18, 1967

From: Elder Ezra Taft Benson

Re: Visit of Mr. Robert Welch and me with President McKay — for the journal

Today, April 18th, I met with President McKay for about fifteen minutes at 8:15 a.m.  I took him two booklets.  A current issue of ‘Review of the News’ and a booklet which my son Mark had sent entitled, ‘Let Freedom Ring’.  I also read two paragraphs from Mark’s letter transmitting this latter booklet to his salesmen of Saladmaster Corporation where Mark is Sales Manager.  I also outlined to President McKay, our plans to visit Europe and tour the missions.  He asked that I carry his love and blessings to the people.  I also talked to him about the recent conference.

I told him that Mr. Wm. J. Grede, Chairman of The 1976 Committee was in the city yesterday and made a report to me regarding The 1976 Committee, indicating that two meetings were held recently.  One, in Los Angeles, about the 1st of April and the other, in Pittsburgh, April 6th.  The Committee is moving forward and there is much encouragement.  I indicated that they have been receiving about $400.00 per day and around 100 letters daily.  President McKay seemed pleased and asked me to keep in touch with him and keep him informed.

I mentioned that there was a distinguished man in the Hotel who would like very much to see him, by the name of Robert Welch.  Mr. Welch is a true patriot and a very devoted American who is doing a great work having devoted the last twelve years of his life fighting the Communist Conspiracy and striving to preserve our freedom without a dollar of compensation.  President McKay said, ‘I want to see him.’  I arranged to have him come in as soon as the First Presidency’s meeting was over.

At about 10:00 o’clock I took Mr. Welch to the President’s apartment.  The nurse escorted us into the living room.  At the President’s request, I remained during the forty-five minute interview.  Mr. Welch indicated his joy at meeting the President and expressed his great admiration for him and his gratitude for the fight the President has made in support of the Constitution and freedom.  Mr. Welch then read a letter, while President McKay followed it on the original copy which was left with him.  The reading was slow and distinct so that the President could follow it easily.  After the reading, President McKay asked several questions regarding the seriousness of conditions in our own country, to which Mr. Welch responded.  Mr. Welch emphasized that the Socialist-Communist conspiracy is closing in and unless there is a great upsurge of activity and increased prestige thrown into the fight, the Untied States might well go the way other nations have gone.

In commenting on the last part of the letter having to do with Mr. Welch’s request for Elder Benson to serve on the Council of the John Birch Society, the President asked if he didn’t feel that Elder Benson could do as much outside the John Birch Society as he could serving on the Council.  Mr. Welch felt very strongly that if I would go on the Council it would also attract other prominent Americans, which Mr. Welch felt are very much needed.  President McKay then turned to me.  I indicated that I would be glad to try and serve anywhere the President wanted me to serve and that I would be willing to do anything that is right to help preserve our freedom and the Constitution.  After some further discussion, President McKay said, ‘Well, I think Elder Benson should not go on the Council at this time.’  This ended our conversation as Mr. Welch expressed his appreciation.”

Fri., 21 Apr. 1967:

“10:15 a.m.

Conference with Mark E. Petersen

Met with Elder Mark E. Petersen of the Council of the Twelve.  I discussed the following with him:

3)  The John Birch Society

I then read to Elder Petersen the letter Mr. Robert Welch of the John Birch Society had given to me personally when he visited me on Tuesday, April 18.  After I had finished reading the letter, Elder Petersen remarked, ‘President McKay, Elder Harold B. Lee has some hair-raising stories to tell about the Birch Society which I am sure he will tell you, which I think would scare you to death.  We have the Church, and if we live up to its teachings, we do not need to worry about what will happen to this country!’

11:30 a.m.

Brother Alvin R. Dyer came in at my request and gave me a report on:  1) Deseret Management Corporation; 2) Independence, Missouri; and 3) Nauvoo Corporation; 4) KSL; 5) Priesthood law; 6) Church Real Estate Department; 7) Elder Dyer’s talk on ‘Center Place of Zion’, etc.  (See minutes following)

12:00 noon – 12:20 p.m.

Knowing that I was tired, Clare who had been present during Elder Dyer’s conference, said that she would take up with me just a few important letters that needed to go out.  She read two or three letters that had come addressed to me from members of the Church inquiring regarding their status in the Church if they should join the John Birch Society.  One member of the Society said that he had applied for a teaching position in one of our Seminaries and had been told by his Bishop that his membership in the Society would prohibit his being accepted as a teacher.  I instructed Clare that so long as this man did not advocate the John Birch Society during his teaching at the Seminary, membership therein should not prohibit his becoming a Seminary teacher.

Clare said she did not want to do anything contrary to what I wanted in this matter, and, therefore, would prepare the answers to the letters as I directed and bring them to me for my approval.

Clare left the apartment, and I joined Sister McKay in the living room.

Tues., 8 Aug., 1967:

11:00 to 11:30 a.m. 

Elder Ezra Taft Benson called at the office in the Hotel and gave me a report on the developments of the “1976 Committee”, and their decision not to pursue any active program in the political field. Brother Benson said that the political situation is so mixed up that he doubts that it would be wise for him to attempt to get into the battle; that he, however, will speak out on suitable platforms regarding some of the problems which face our country and particularly the threat to our freedom. I told Brother Benson that this is all right.

He then gave me a report of the wonderful success of the National Boy Scout Jamboree, which was held at Farragut, Idaho.

Brother Benson said that he had received an invitation from P. Wendel Johnson, Director of the Ogden LDS Institute of Religion, Ogden, Utah, to be the guest speaker at the annual “David O. McKay Honor Day”, and that he felt honored to have this assignment.

I told Elder Benson that I am glad that they have invited him to be the speaker on this occasion (to be held September 24, 1967), and told him how much I appreciate his loyalty and friendship.

(See copy of Brother Benson’s minutes of the meeting following.)”

“PERSONAL

MEMORANDUM

TO: Clare Middlemiss

FROM: Ezra Taft Benson

DATE: August 8, 1967

RE: 1976 Committee

This morning I reviewed with President McKay new developments in the program of the 1976 Committee. I pointed out to him that the Committee had decided to continue its educational program but has felt that it does not have sufficient funds to pursue any active program in the political field. They reached this decision after consulting with me regarding the matter.

The attached copy of a letter from Charles R. Sligh, together with a copy of their letter to Mr. Harold F. Falk which is similar to the letters going to all members of the Committee, will, I believe, help to bring you up to date and make your files complete. I told President McKay I was going to do this.

I am also enclosing a sample of letters which came in one mail which indicate there are still people writing to me encouraging me to get into the political fight. I presume I have received thousands of letters, Clare, but frankly the political situation is so mixed up that I doubt very much if it would be wise for me to attempt to get into the battle. I will, however, continue to speak out on suitable platforms regarding some of the problems which face our country and particularly the threat to our freedom.

Thank you for your constant cooperation and understanding.

ETB:pp

P.S. You may return the letters when you are finished with them, I mean the ones from those promoting me for high office.”

“August 3, 1967

Mr. Harold P. Falk

7077 North Merrie Lane

Milwaukee, Wisconsin  53217

Dear Mr. Falk:

Since our last meeting in Pittsburgh on April 6, we have been striving to continue our activities with a minimum of expense.  As was expressed at the Pittsburgh and Los Angeles meetings, the groundswell of support for our chosen candidates has not developed to the point where they can at this time be realistically considered serious “contenders.”  While we have received no discouragement from either Secretary Benson or Senator Thurmond, we are forced to admit that our organizational and financial resources are too limited to assure success in our “Draft the BEST” campaign in 1968.

It has been apparent since our campaign began that the “liberal” press would not “give” us any publicity.  In order for our campaign to have succeeded in 1968, we needed more and wider financial support than was available to obtain needed publicity.

We no longer have any full-time paid staff and so our standby expenses are very small.  There are about $1,500 in unpaid bills that we are trying to clear up.  Any help on this will be appreciated.  We have informed Secretary Benson and Senator Thurmond of this situation.  The 1976 Committee still dedicated to the goals originally outlined will continue to work toward success by July 4, 1976.  To avoid misunderstanding and to permit our committee members to support any candidate of their choice without embarrassment we will no longer use committee names on our literature or letterheads.

However, it is our hope that you will continue to work with us in our long-range plans and that you fully understand that the reason for our “tactical retreat” is not loss of resolve but lack of major financial support.

We are not releasing a statement to the press unless requested.

It is our sincere hope that in the near future a national Benson for President committee will be formed.  When and if this occurs, we will cooperate in every possible way.

Cordially,

Charles R. Sligh, Jr.

bc: Ezra Taft Benson”

Fri., 22 Sep., 1967:

“Did not hold a meeting of the First Presidency today.

11:45 a.m. 

Elder Ezra Taft Benson came over to the office and interrupted the meeting long enough to discuss with me the subject of the address he would like to give at the General Conference. He briefly talked about the plight of the Negroes in this Civil Rights Issue, and how the Communists are using the Negroes to further their own schemes to foment trouble in the United States. He said that he would talk on this subject from the viewpoint of bringing peace in our country instead of uprisings of the Negroes in riots, etc.

I told Brother Benson that under these circumstances, he may go ahead with his subject.

Thur., 8 Feb., 1968:

“8:00 p.m.

Telephone Call to CM

Elder Ezra Taft Benson called regarding the desire of Governor George C. Wallace, formerly Governor of Alabama, who has just announced that he is a candidate for President of the United States to run on a third party ticket, to see President McKay Friday or Saturday. Brother Benson will talk to President McKay about this tomorrow. He mentioned how wonderful it was to have President McKay at the Council Meeting today; that he conducted and took part in the discussions held. “He was wonderful — there is no one like him.”

Tues., 13 Feb., 1968:

“Convalescing at home from an illness under doctors’ orders.

With Dr. MacFarlane’s consent, I gave permission for Elder Alvin R. Dyer (since my secretary is ill at home) to come over to deliver a letter personally addressed to me from George C. Wallace, formerly Governor of Alabama, who has announced his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States on a third party ticket. (See newspaper clipping following.)

3:00 p.m. 

Elder Alvin R. Dyer came to see me, having received permission from Dr. MacFarlane.

(See following report by Elder Dyer.)”

“February 12, 1968

President David O. McKay 

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints 

Church Offices 

47 E. So. Temple Street 

Salt Lake City, Utah

Dear President McKay:

On Thursday, February 8, 1968, I announced my intention to become a candidate for President of the United States.

This decision was made in the belief that our Nation must have a new and vital leadership based on a governmental philosophy which finds its foundation on the basic precepts of the Constitution of the United States. The founding fathers would be astonished to observe the current trends which have subverted our constitutional system.

It is my belief that countless millions of the citizens of this country are concerned about these trends and wish to have their voice heard. Further, it is apparent to me that neither of the existing political parties will offer a position which will in fact reverse these trends.

I am aware that I propose the unorthodox, but my personal and political life has been devoted to doing whatever may be necessary to perpetuate the greatest governmental system on earth. There is nothing wrong in being unorthodox if you are right. I have long ago determined that I will simply be dedicated to principle and will do what I believe to be right and, therefore, will be satisfied in the future that I have fulfilled my destiny.

I am enclosing certain background information which discloses my position and which may be of interest to you.

I respectfully address this letter to you, not only as a leader among churchmen in our country, but as one of the known and respected patriots of our Nation. I specifically direct your attention to the Honorable Ezra Taft Benson.

I request that you grant your permission and blessings to Mr. Benson to become a candidate for Vice President of the United States on a ticket which would include my name and that of Mr. Benson.

Mr. Benson has spent many devoted years in the service of the church and his Nation. His philosophy and stature are recognized throughout the world. It is my belief that if a cause is right, then it calls forward those who have the capability of serving. Ezra Taft Benson is such a man. He, too, is a patriot.

My philosophy and that of Mr. Benson are consistent and compatible. His service could only lend dignity to a concerted effort to offer the American people a basic choice in 1968.

I request the service of Mr. Benson and your indulgence in granting him a leave of absence.

If you feel it to be necessary and appropriate, I will be pleased to visit with you and discuss this very serious request. Due to the illness of my wife I am directing this letter to you in lieu of the more appropriate request for a personal appointment with you.

With very kind regards, I am

Sincerely yours,

George C. Wallace”

“February 14, 1968

Hon. George C. Wallace

P. O. Box 1968

Montgomery, Alabama

Dear Mr. Wallace:

I have read your letter of February 12, 1968 with keen interest, and have given it thoughtful and careful consideration.

You no doubt have received word from Ezra Taft Benson as to my decision regarding his being placed on a ticket to become a candidate for Vice President of the United States with you as candidate for President.

Please be assured that my decision is not political in essence, but one that involves Mr. Benson’s calling as a member of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles of the Church.

I am informed that you will be coming to Salt Lake City at some later time, and want you to know that I should be most pleased to visit with you when and if you do so.

Please accept my greetings, and my prayerful wishes that Mrs. Wallace is improving in health each day.

Sincerely yours,

David O. McKay 

President”

“(President McKay Meets with Elders Alvin R Dyer and Ezra Taft Benson)

JOURNAL RECORD OF ALVIN R. DYER

TUESDAY, February 13, 1968

(Proposed Wallace – Benson Ticket)

At 6:30 A.M. I received a phone call from Elder Ezra Taft Benson at my home. He asked if I would come to his office as soon as I reached the Church Office Building. This I did arriving at his office at 7:30 A. M. (On the telephone he spoke of an important matter that he should see President McKay about.)

When I arrived at the office, Reed Benson was with his father. I soon learned the purpose of Elder Benson’s anxiety. A Press Conference was held in Washington D. C. a short while ago for former Governor Wallace of Alabama, at which time he announced his candidacy for the Presidency of the United States. This he had vowed to do if either of the parties failed to evidence a trend toward getting the country back on the principles that the founding fathers had established it upon.

As I learned, this Press Conference was attended by Reed Benson, who afterward spent some time with Governor Wallace. It was evidently during this conversation that the possibility of Ezra Taft Benson running with Governor Wallace as Vice President was given some concern.

Brother Benson related to me that Governor Wallace subsequently called him concerning the possibility of occupying the ticket, which would be a third party, with him. Brother Benson said he had never really met the man and consequently would want to meet with him for a conference before pursuing it further.

Elder Benson advised of his Stake Conference assignment on February 10-11, 1968, in Milwaukee, had arranged a meeting with Governor Wallace in Chicago on Sunday afternoon. This seemed agreeable. However the meeting there did not materialize due to the illness of Mrs. Wallace, who has been operated on three times for cancer and is now undergoing cobalt treatments; instead, by telephone arrangement from Chicago, Elder Benson, having picked up his son Reed in Washington, flew to Montgomery, Alabama.

(Conference Held In Governor’s Mansion)

The Conference between Eldel Benson and Governor Wallace took place in the Governor’s Mansion on Monday, February 12, 1968. Reed Benson was also present. The Conference lasted approximately 3 1/2 hours, during which time Elder Benson reports he became satisfied with Governor Wallace’s concepts and determinations concerning the operation of the Federal Government.

(Note: A listing of the areas of political and governmental pursuits sought for by Governor Wallace, which he will be committed to if elected President, as prepared by Elder Benson, is made part of this Journal Record. )

(His Willingness To Run Dependant Upon President McKay’s Decision.)

It appears that Elder Benson informed Governor Wallace that he would respond to his request only if President McKay would give permission so to do. It was determined that the Governor would make a request for that permission by direct and personal letter to President McKay.

I was informed that Reed had the letter in his possession, and they were now soliciting my help to get the matter before President McKay. The request was also made of me by Elder Benson that I be present when the matter was presented .

(The President’s Illness)

Before proceeding with the Journal which will relate how the meeting with the President was held, it is important to refer to the fact that since the meeting which President McKay attended with the Quorum of the Twelve in the Temple on the past Thursday, he has been ailing somewhat physically. The doctor, seeking to arrest this setback, had ordered no further meetings with the President until he felt better. No meetings had been held by The First Presidency.

This complicated the whole affair, but through discussion with Dr. Macfarlane, Elder Benson was able to get approval for this one appointment after the doctor checked the President’s condition about noon-time.  The appointment was set for 3 P. M. for Elder Benson and me to meet with the President.

(Reason For Urgency)

The urgency for Elder Benson to see the President on this particular day stemmed from the need of Governor Wallace to name his running mate in seeking the names quota in the State of Pennsylvania in order to be placed upon the ballot. This being required in that State.

It was known by me that Governor Wallace had obtained petition quotas in a number of states including California.

(Circulation of Non-Authenticated Statement of the Prophet Joseph in California)

In the discussion which I had with Elder Benson and Reed on this morning I was told that Wallace would seek the Presidency on The American Independent Party, a name very similar to that which the Prophet Joseph Smith is alleged to have said would rise up in America at a time when the Republican and Democratic Parties would be at war with each other. The name of the party which the Prophet is supposed to have used is the Independent American Party.

It developed that a group in California, calling themselves “Mormons for Wallace”, used the supposed prophecy to get members of the Church to sign the petition in that State.

(Comment: With regard to the alleged prophecy, the article published in California and other printed material including the quotation from Duane Crowther’s book and the Hancock article – the source, is made part of this Journal Record. Sufficeth it to say, there is a very real doubt as to whether the Prophet ever made this statement.)

(My Own Anxiety Over The Whole Matter)

My own concern in this matter at this point was to make sure in my own thinking that my mind remained open. I did not want to become set against Elder Benson’s acceptance of the Wallace offer, neither did I want to indicate to them that I favored it. The important thing was to go to President McKay with the facts both positive and negative, and in no way attempt to influence him in the decision which Elder Benson sought. I determined also that Elder Benson should present his case and not I.

Elder Benson had prepared a paper listing the things that Governor Wallace stood for and which he too supported. In addition to these was the supposed Joseph Smith prophecy which I advised Elder Benson should not be used. But we discussed all of the points most of which seemed to me well taken. (This paper is also part of this Journal.) To satisfy myself on several points I asked Elder Benson a number of questions:

(1) What had happened to the “76” group who had announced his candidacy for the Presidency on a party emanating from this group, and upon which he had obtained a letter of permission to run, which letter had been publicized.

He stated that this group had more or less faded.

(2) I asked what part the John Birch Society would take in a Wallace – Benson ticket, and if Welch, the leader of the John Birch Society, was in support of Wallace.

Reed Benson answered this, but not too conclusively. He said he did not know of any open support indicated by Welch. I was not completely satisfied with this phase of the situation, but felt to let it pass.

(3) I asked Brother Benson — in light of the “76” situation and now this, if it were simply his desire to get back into public life. He answered that it was not — only if he could serve his country in helping to turn the trend away from Socialism. To me it seemed that Elder Benson is completely sincere in his desire to serve his country.

At this point I expressed the thought that perhaps Reed and I should see the President first, and then have Elder Benson come in, but prompted by the feelings of Clare Middlemiss, the President’s personal secretary, whose counsel I sought and who has had much experience in these matters, it was determined that I would see the President first at 3 P. M. and Elder Benson would follow about 10 minutes later.

I am not completely sure that Elder Benson was in full accord with this procedure, but I explained to him that from my own experience in seeking counsel from the President it had proved beneficial to have one person outline the problem and the issues to be decided upon without any slants or recommendation; that the President could then reach his decision in the matter. Whether or not this registered with Elder Benson I do not truly know. At any rate this is the way the President was approached.

COMMENT:

During the time before the appointment, Reed Benson came to rny office with the personal letter from Governor Wallace to President McKay, and also a copy of Elder Benson’s paper on the policies of Governor Wallace. It was at this time that Reed injected the thought that if the ticket of Wallace and Benson were elected and anything happened to Wallace, Elder Benson would be President. He also stressed how important he thought a decision made by President McKay, a prophet of God, was, and that it should be his own decision. I heartily agreed with this, but told Reed how necessary it was to such a decision for the President to have the facts and understand the problem.

The nurse called me by telephone and asked that the appointment with the President be changed to 3:30 P.M. I informed Elder Benson of the change.

At 3:30 P.M. I was at the President’s apartment and by the side of the President. He said how glad he was to see me, and while he did not look too good, he said he felt he was getting better. He held onto my hand for quite some time.

I told the President of the reason for my visit with him before Elder Benson joined us; for I felt that he should have the facts and issues involved stated beforehand. He completely agreed with this.

With his permission I took Governor Wallace’s letter from the envelope. He asked me to read it, which I did very slowly. (Letter made part of Journal Record.) I then mentioned that Governor Wallace was seeking the office of President of the United States on a 3rd party ticket, and that if Elder Benson ran with him it would be on a 3rd party effort. The President almost immediately said he opposed a 3rd party setup.

I also mentioned to the President several of the issues involved. Such as the Negro situation, the use of a non-authenticated prophecy of Joseph Smith concerning a 3rd party by the California contingency of “Mormons for Wallace”, and the possibility of that erroneous usage on a widespread basis.

I also mentioned the fact of George Ronmey seeking the Republican nomination for President, and what effect having a member of the Quorum of the Twelve with apparent Church approval, who would be in national opposition, might have upon the Church.

At no time in my preliminary visit with President McKay did I make any recommendation one way or another, nor did I slant what I said about the issues involved.

(Elder Benson Arrives)

Elder Benson arrived about 10 or 12 minutes after I did. He sat next to President McKay, having exchanged mutual greetings and well wishes. I stated to Elder Benson that Governor Wallace’s letter to President McKay requesting his permission and blessing for Elder Benson to become a candidate for the Vice President of the United States on a ticket with Governor Wallace as candidate for President had been read.

Elder Benson then related to the President the story of his involvement in the situation. (Note: This part I have already covered.) Elder Benson spoke of his great desire to serve his country, and that he felt after meeting with George C. Wallace and questioning him and receiving his views concerning the needs of the Country, he would be willing to accept the invitation of Governor Wallace to run with him — but only if it met with President McKay’s approval and blessing.

Elder Benson read from the paper he had prepared, already referred to, and with many of the points the President seemed in agreement — especially reference to the Socialistic trends in the Country. However the alleged prophecy of Joseph Smith concerning a 3rd party — as used in California — was spoken against by the President most positively. He also stated that his name should not be used in the Wallace campaign.

Elder Benson told the President that had it not been for the illness of his wife, George C. Wallace would have come to see the President personally. The President manifested a concern for her health.

(The President Gives His Answer)

At this point President McKay picked up the letter which was on the desk in front of him and for the next 10 or so minutes perused its two pages, while Elder Benson and I sat in complete silence. Finally he let the letter and his hand fall to his lap. Elder Benson said, “President, what is your decision?” The President very clearly uttered, “You should turn the offer down.” There was no question in his mind. His answer was precise.

Elder Benson indicating his willingness to follow the counsel of the President said, “If that is your answer I will abide by it.” The President then said for the second time that he should not accept the invitation.

Elder Benson then asked if it would be all right for him to call Governor Wallace personally to give him the answer. The President said it would, and to advise him that a letter would follow. He asked me to prepare the letter which I did, and it was sent to Governor Wallace on February 14, 1968. (Note: The letter from George C. Wallace to President McKay and the President’s reply are made part of this Journal Record.)

After the decision had been made, we sat there together. I told the President of my high regard for Elder Benson, and that I felt he had an important destiny to fulfill for our Country, but that this no doubt was not the time for it. President McKay responded quite alertly to this thought saying that he felt it was right.

Elder Benson then said how pleased he was that I was there with him, and to this the President said, “Yes, and you could have no one any better.”

We both had a lingering handshake with the President as we said goodby, hoping and praying for his complete recovery from his current physical setback.

Elder Benson and I walked back to the Church Office Building together. We both were aware of and appreciated the experience of the past 30 or 40 minutes wherein we had listened to the counseling direction of a prophet of God.

I said to Elder Benson, “Well, you have your answer.” “Yes” he replied, “And without any recommendation to him.” He then said thoughtfully, “You did not make any recommendation did you?” I assured him completely that I did not. The decision was solely the President’s.”

“(This is the paper prepared by Elder Ezra Taft Benson concerning the political viewpoints of George C. Wallace.)

1. No trade with the enemy – Russia and her satellites.

2. No aid to nations helping the enemy.

3. Crime in the streets – he will enforce the laws and protect the people.

4. Overt actions of treason must be punished promptly such as stopping troop trains; sending food and clothes to the Vietcong. Peaceful dissent is okay but treasonable acts must be punished.

5. Domestic conditions must be returned to the states; especially schools. Control at the state and local level is best.

6. Property rights – there are no human rights without property rights.

7. Opposed to open housing – people should be free to sell, buy and use their property as they wish.

8. No aid to illegitimate children or their parents.

9. Big government must be curtailed, especially government controls. Local people are wise enough to make local decisions.

10. Support of the Constitution as written and conceived by the founding fathers. Opposed to decisions of the court on prayer in the schools, communists working in defense plants etc.

11. States should be permitted to reapportion their own legislators and determine their own voting requirements.

Two Party System – There is nothing in our constitution or in the federalist papers to control or suggest the number or the nature of political parties. The Republican Party itself was started under Abraham Lincoln as a third party. There is nothing in our experience to prove or even indicate that the two-party system is in any way superior to the multi-party system of European Parliamentary governments. It is reported that the Prophet Joseph Smith predicted that following the establishment of the two present parties that an Independent American Party would arise.

With the leadership of both major parties increasingly embracing more socialist philosophies, patriots in both of these parties are looking for a means where their views can be properly represented. The communists who have great influence in both present parties will oppose any effort to rally the patriots through an independent organization and many gullible Americans will accept such nonsense by atheistic traitors.

Differences – 

(1) trading with the enemy by us and our allies;

(2) open housing and property rights;

(3) civil rights legislation;

(4) vigorous law enforcement and punishment of crime;

(5) no liquor served at Governor’s mansion – residence

Mr. Wallace thinks very highly of the Church and its leadership.

Man of high moral standards.”

Tues., 9 Apr., 1968:

“9:00 a.m.

Did not hold a regular meeting of the First Presidency this morning; however, Brother Alvin R. Dyer called me and asked if he could see me, and I told him to come right over. He was at the office within ten minutes, and discussed the following matters with me:

April Conference — Requests for Copies of Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s Talk 

Brother Dyer handed me a personal letter from Elder Benson, and showed me a bulging file of letters and telegrams which Elder Benson has received requesting copies of his Conference talk. After looking at these letters, I authorized Elder Dyer to tell Elder Benson that he has my approval to have his talk mimeographed in order that the requests made by many influential people could be filled.

Thur., 18 Apr., 1968:

“Did not hold a meeting of the First Presidency today.

9:40 a. m. 

Left the Hotel for the Salt Lake Temple.

10 to 1:30 p.m. 

I was very happy to be present this morning, and commenced the meeting promptly at 10:00 a.m. I presided and conducted and directed the reports and discussion on the various matters discussed by the brethren. Although I did not intend to do so, I remained the full 3-1/2 hours of the meeting. Many important matters were discussed during that time, and I wanted to consider them carefully.

One or Two of the Matters Discussed:

Ezra Taft Benson — Letter Addressed to the First Presidency and Council of the Twelve on Dangers Ahead in the Country was Read.

At my request, Elder Benson’s letter on ” Dangers Ahead” dated April 10, 1968 was read at the meeting. In this letter Elder Benson called attention to dangers ahead in the future of our country, and mentioned his conviction (which he claims is supported by some of the best authorities in America) that we are rapidly approaching a substantial economic recession or major depression, etc. (See copy of letter following)

Priesthood Course of Study

Elder Benson mentioned that some months ago I had requested and approved an outline for a course of study for quorums of the Priesthood which has not been used. President Tanner commented that the suggestions made by Elder Benson were all good. He said the only thing he had noticed that we have not done is to put into practice the proposed course of study by the priesthood. 

Referring to the priesthood study course, Elder Romney, speaking for the Correlation Committee, Brother Lee being absent, said that the courses of study for a two-year period in advance. He said although he is not handling it personally, he assumed that the recommendation for a study on communism in each priesthood class has not been formally acted on in the Correlation Committee, but that there is a feeling among the brethren that were we to go forward with that course of study as suggested, it would turn the priesthood quorums all over the Church into a battle between the two extremes, and that the wisdom of that would have to be determined bv the President of the Church himself.

Elder Benson said he was not suggesting a course on communism, but the outline was entitled “The Perfect Law of Liberty”, and it is really a course of study on man to maintain his freedom and free agency, and that communism would be incidental; that the course would go back to the beginning to our preexistent state, and continue from then on. He said it wasn’t his thought to get into controversy — either right or left — but state the basic principles of freedom and free agency, and our belief in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and then bring in the threat of communism along with it. He thought there was a real need for it in the Church. President Dyer mentioned that he had conferred with Elder Monson, chairman of the Adult Correlation Committee, in regard to this matter, and stated that the lessons are prepared for two years, and that at least the first lessons for the ensuing year are already on the press; that, however, there might be a possibility of working something into the lessons for next year. He said he had turned over to Brother Monson his complete file on the subject; among other things showing the organization of groups in various areas throughout the country sponsored by our people, but without control by the Church or church organizations.

Elder Benson read to the brethren a list of the chapters that were included in the proposes course of study. President Tanner raised a question as to whether it is the responsibility of the Church and of the priesthood to try to direct this kind of discussion. Personally he did not feel that it was. He thought that if we were to do so, we would involve ourselves immediately in the whole question of politics, which he felt presented some dangers. Elder Hinckley mentioned that the course of study that has been provided for the next two years is based on President J. Reuben Clark, Jr. ‘s book. He said that one thing that gives him concern is that whatever course of study is prepared for the priesthood quorums is used in England, Sweden, Japan, Hong Kong, and all over the world where the Church is organized. He said he couldn’t think of any program which would be more likely to create divisiveness in the Church and to increase the natural inclination of people overseas to be critical of America than a program of this kind sponsored by the Church for the study of all priesthood quorums. He said he felt just as alarmed as does Brother Benson about some of the trends in this nation, but he felt a course of study of this kind by the priesthood would do more to divide the Church than to unite it, and that it would tend to influence the meeting of little groups outside the sponsorship of the Church, rather than to stop those things. He said he could not feel that this would have the desired result, but that it would create all kinds of criticism of the Church on the part of our priesthood brethren overseas. Elder Romney said that he thought he was as near to Brother Benson in his feelings as anybody on this subject, but he felt to agree with Brother Hinckley’s feelings that it would not be wise to line up the Church throughout the world against the governments of many of the countries of the world; that our responsibility is to teach the gospel throughout the world, in communist countries as well as others. He said he understood President Tanner to feel that it would be unwise for the Church to go out as an enemy of the governments of the countries where we want to teach the gospel, and we cannot have a course of priesthood study that would attack the governments of some of the countries. 

President Tanner suggested the wisdom of referring this matter to the Correlation Executive Committee for their study and recommendation. He thought if left with them it would be handled in the best possible way. This committee, he mentioned, is composed of Elders Harold B. Lee, Spencer W. Kimball, Marion G. Romney, Richard L. Evans, Howard W. Hunter, Gordon B. Hinckley, Thomas S. Monson, and Bishop John H. Vandenberg. Elder LeGrand Richards commented that there is nothing that can divide us more than a discussion of political issues.

I said it would be all right to leave this with the Correlation Executive Committee.

“April 10, 1968

The First Presidency and

Council of the Twelve

Building

Re: Dangers Ahead 

Dear Brethren:

While I hope you will not consider me an “alarmist”, I am deeply concerned regarding the future of our country and the impact which the policies of the last 35 years are having and will continue to have upon our country and the members of the Church. It is my conviction that the United States and its great majority of honest, hard-working and decent citizens have never been in greater danger than at the present time.

It is my conviction, supported by some of the best authorities in America, who are not in the public eye, that we are rapidly approaching a substantial economic recession or major depression. Present strikes, zooming interest rates, restrictive money policies, speculation, and stock volume draw a frightening close parallel to the year 1929 which most of us remember well. The addition of our immense private debt and the ever rising government deficits could combine to cause one of history’s most devastating financial debacles. Great dangers are rapidly developing which will likely result in a series of serious crises between now and 1970.

Destruction from within which is fast developing in our beloved country is rapidly taking the form of anarchy and bloody revolt which is and has been fomented by the Communist masters of Russia. The purpose is the destruction of America from within as President David O. McKay has been warning for years.

By Communist agents over a period of years the yellow man has been incited against the white man in China. In the Middle East Arabs are incited against Jews and for many years carefully trained Communist agitators have done everything in their power to make Negroes hate white men and white men hate Negroes.

Recent riots, and more to follow, are merely “warm-ups” or rehearsals for what the Communist high command plans as the “big push” a year or two or three hence. The “march on Washington” of 5,000 Negroes and white radicals, the killing of Martin Luther King (a Communist or Communist tool) to make room for more vigorous leadership is all in preparation for the ultimate mobilization of all the dissident elements at a time when the United States is in the throes of a serious economic depression. These Godless destroyers of America anticipate that during such a period some 20 million or more people will be out of work, millions more will be suffering foreclosures of their homes as in the 1930’s. Banks will be closing and a weak and impotent President and Congress will be sitting fearfully in Washington as they are doing today during the preliminaries.

A so-called investigation of racial riots by the recent presidentially appointed commission is a farce and will be totally unproductive of any real deterrent to “anarchy in the streets” in the future . If the truth were known, the F.B.I. has made some investigations that would disclose clearly who is “back” of the riots, but the reports have not been made public. In fact, the President himself has power to order U.S. Attorneys throughout the country to impanel special grand juries to immediately and thoroughly investigate who instigated the riots but it is doubtful he will do so. It is also doubtful that Congress will make a thorough investigation although it may go through the motions.

Real investigation would no doubt reveal-some politically unpalatable facts about the connections of some radically involved supporters of the present administration.

Looking ahead it seems to me to be quite clear that we may expect three or four crises which are definitely in the formative or evolutionary stage. These may include:

1. Concerted racial violence in a hundred or more cities. These riots will be extended to many of the urban middle-class areas.

2. The possible outbreak of World War III.

3. A monetary and credit squeeze of great severity and,

4. A prolonged recession or depression.

One or more of these may be avoided by changes in policy of the present administration or by the election of new leadership.

These threatening dangers impose serious obligations on the leadership of the Church. What can be done? As a minimum, I believe we should give increased attention to the following:

1. The Priesthood of the Church must be alerted and informed regarding the threat to our freedom by the Godless Conspiracy. Some months ago the President of the Church requested and approved an outline for a course of study for Quorums of the Priesthood. It has not been used. The need is much greater today.

2. The recommendation of the Church over a period of years that our people keep a year’s supply of basic food and other products on hand is more important today than ever.

3. Our people should be encouraged to pay their debts, get their homes clear of encumbrances where possible and get some cash on hand preferably in the form of coins. If possible it would be well to have access to a small home away from big centers of population, and to have land and equipment ready for productive use. No home or law abiding person should be without means of defense. Neighborhoods should be organized for defense. Pending bills in Congress to limit the sale of fire arms would simply handicap law abiding citizens without effectively preventing the lawless from burning, looting and wrecking homes and businesses and killing or raping the occupants.

4. Every member of the Priesthood should magnify his calling. Every father should stand at the head of his home – attend to family prayers, hold regular home evenings and with the cooperation of his wife promote real family solidarity by teaching their children the ways of the Lord.

The threat to our peace, prosperity and freedom from within is very real. The days ahead are ominous to say the least.

Sincerely your brother,

Ezra Taft Benson”

Fri., 19 Jul., 1968:

“9:30 a.m.

Held a meeting of the First Presidency with President Hugh B. Brown, President Joseph Fielding Smith, and President Alvin R. Dyer. President Tanner was absent, still being on his vacation in Canada.

The discussion for the entire time of the meeting concerned the letters that have been received relative to President Hugh B. Brown’s statements in his commencement address at the Brigham Young University on May 31, 1968. The letters made mention of portions of President Brown’ s talk in which he made statements which are contrary to remarks made by Elder Ezra Taft Benson. Special reference has been made to the following comments by President Brown:

“First, I would like you to be reassured that the leaders of both major political parties in this land are men of integrity and unquestioned patriotism. Beware of those who feel obliged to prove their own patriotism by calling into question the loyalty of others. Be skeptical of those who attempt to demonstrate their love of country by demeaning its institutions. Know that men of both major political parties who guide the nation’s executive, legislative, and judicial branches are men of unquestioned loyalty, and we should stand by and support them.

“Beware of those who are so lacking in humility that they cannot come within the framework of one of our two great parties. Our nation has avoided chaos like that which is gripping France today because men have been able to temper their own desires sufficiently to seek broad agreement within one of the major parties, rather than forming splinter groups around one radical idea. Our two party system has served us well, and should not be lightly discarded.”

(For full discussion see copies of minutes by both the secretary to the First Presidency and President Alvin R. Dyer which follow.)

Conclusion

We came to the conclusion that the Church does not oppose the candidacy of any individual; that it is the right of Church members to support whom they will; that we believe in honoring, sustaining upholding the law; and also that we should sustain and support men in governmental positions after they have been elected to office by the vote of the people, even though they may not belong to the same party that we do.

The Brethren decided that this matter should be taken to the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve for their consideration and action at the next meeting of the Council in the Temple which will be held on August 22, 1968. However, President Dyer then said that it appeared to be President Brown’s wish that the matter be presented to the Quorum of the Twelve for discussion, and I quickly answered that if it were presented to the Quorum of the Twelve, then it would be the Quorum of the Twelve’s policy, and that such policy could not be sent out from the Church; that the same would have to come from the President of the Church. (President Dver stated that it was plain to see that the President recognized that only from the President of the Church could come a basic policy statement for the Church. While he may listen to the counsel and discussion of the Quorum of the Twelve, and his Counselors, yet he is the one to determine the policy.)

It was agreed before the meeting ended that this problem is twofold, and that the first phase of it produced a foregone conclusion that every member of the Church has the right to vote for whichever candidate he desires to do so without any fear of reprisal in membership standing in the Church. The second question as to whether a leader of the Church should support a third party and impugn others who run on other party tickets, and also whether he should criticise and berate the head of the existing govern- ment of the United States, the Supreme Court, and the cabinet of the President — undoubtedly this will be the last area where the discussion will develop.

President Dyer pointed out the fact that Joseph Smith, the Prophet, was a third party candidate for the Presidency of the United States; for at that time the citizens of Nauvoo felt that the only consistent step that they could take was to place their own candidate in the Field. Consequently, at a political convention held in Nauvoo January 29, 1844, Joseph Smith was nominated as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States, and that on May 17 a State Convention was held in Nauvoo where this nomination was sustained. Others who have run on a third party ticket have been: John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, James Weaver, Theodore Roosevelt, Robert M. L.aFollett, J. Strom Thurman, Henry A. Wallace; and now, in the present elective period, George Wallace, the former Governor of the State of Alabama.

“Minutes of the meeting of the First Presidency

Held Friday, July 19, 1968, at 9:30 a. m. in President McKay’s Apartment

Present: Presidents David O. McKay, Hugh B. Brown, Joseph Fielding Smith and Alvin R. Dyer

President Brown’s BYU Commencement Address

President Brown called attention to a letter he had received signed by Frank R. Rahlf and others of Glasgow, Montana, referring to his commencement address at the Brigham Young University on May 31, 1968. The letter mentions portions of President Brown’s talk which he indicates are contrary to remarks made by Elder Ezra Taft Benson in addresses given by him. They make special reference to the following comments:

“First, I would like you to be reassured that the leaders of both major political parties in this land are men of integrity and unquestioned patriotism. Beware of those who feel obliged to prove their own patriotism by calling into question the loyalty of others. Be skeptical of those who attempt to demonstrate their love of country by demeaning its institutions. Know that men of both major political parties who guide the nation’s executive, legislative, and judicial branches are men of unquestioned loyalty, and we should stand by and support them. * * *

“Beware of those who are so lacking in humility that they cannot come within the framework of one of our two great parties. Our nation has avoided chaos like that which is gripping France today because men have been able to temper their own desires sufficiently to seek broad agreement within one of the major parties, rather than forming splinter groups around one radical idea. Our two party system has served us well, and should not be lightly discarded.”

The writers of the letter inquire whether the comments of President Brown express the attitude of the Church, or if on the other side Elder Eenson’s statements regarding the corruption of our government and creeping socialism in our country should be accepted as the Church’s position.

In this connection President Dyer mentioned that letters had been received from the presidency of the Dallas Stake, and Clyde B. Freeman, chairman of the American Independent Party, and another letter from another group of people asking if the Church is in opposition to any specific candidate for the presidency of the United States, or if we are opposed to candidates for the presidency on an independent party ticket. President Dyer said that he thought President Brown’s attitude was well taken in his remarks, but he did not believe that the Church should establish a policy of saying that we should confine our support to the two candidates of the major parties. He thought that we would be interfering with the rights of the people if we attempted to tell them how they must act in regard to politics. 

The brethren agreed that the Church does not oppose the candidacy of any individual, that it is the right of Church members to support whom they will, that we believe in honoring, sustaining and in upholding the law, and also that we should sustain and support men in governmental positions after they have been elected to office by the vote of the people, even though they may not belong to the same party that we do.

It was decided that this matter should be taken to the Council of the First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve for their consideration and action at the next meeting of the Council in the temple, which will be held on August 22. 

In the meantime, it was felt that we could answer questions that have come in regarding the attitude of the Church toward candidates for office to the effect that individuals may work for and vote for whomsoever they wish, that that is their right and privilege.

Minutes by Joseph Anderson”

“(Minutes of a Meeting with the First Presidency — Minutes by Alvin R. Dyer)

(Meeting of The First Presidency)

A meeting of the First Presidency was held in President McKay’s apartment. President Tanner was absent, being still on his vacation in Canada. There was only one matter discussed at this meeting. President McKay seemed quite well and listened intently to the discussion of this one single matter which lasted for over one hour.

President Brown had Joseph Anderson read a letter from a small group of members of the Church from Montana. The nature of the letter was asking for a clarification from the First Presidency on the apparent opposite statements of President Hugh B. Brown of the First Presidency and Elder Ezra Taft Benson of the Quorum of the Twelve. The whole matter seemed to center around the statements which President Brown had made in his Commencement Day remarks at the Brigham Young University. In this latter, President Brown called upon the students who were going forth from that school at a particularly vital time and that they should give concern to the candidates of the two major parties, implying that actions of a third party were usually of the insurrectionist type and that our nation had been served for many long years by honorable men of the two basic parties.

At this point, I referred to three other letters of a similar nature, one received from the Dallas Stake, another from Clycle B. Freeman, the Chairman of the American Independent Party, and from Ivan D. Workman, Las Vegas, Nevada, and mentioned that undoubtedly a great many other letters of a similar nature had been received. President Brown also referred to the manner in which Elder Benson is impugning and criticizing the President of the United States, the Supreme Court, and the President’s Cabinet, and that such inflammatory remarks should not be made by one holding a high position in the Church. He recalled to the President a meeting that was held in the Temple of the First Presidency and the Quroum of the Twelve (which I did not attend, having been held before my appointment) at which time the President had asked Brother Benson to desist from making such remarks.

As the discussion continued, it became apparent that President Brown wanted a statement from the Presidency of the Church nullifying the statements of Elder Benson and justifying the statements of President Hugh B. Brown.

The President did not seem to be getting the full importance of the meaning of President Brown’s remarks, so I attempted to explain and iron out the premise of the situation so that it could be understood. In doing my part in the discussion, as I understand and as I feel it now, I made the following points:

1. That if the Presidency were to prepare a policy statement on this matter, that Elder Benson should be called in and be permitted a hearing.

2. I also pointed out the fact that it was apparent to me that there were two issues at stake in the discussion:

a. As to whether or not a member of the Church has the right of freedom to vote for any candidate placed on any ticket for the Presidency of the United States or for any other elective position in the State or the Government, whether it be on the two parties as nationally recognized, or whether it be on a third party.

b. That such election to sustain either of the candidates could not possibly produce a jeopardization of the membership of that member of the Church who chose to vote on either of the candidates at any time so long as they were officially placed upon the ballot.

3. I mentioned to the President that it appeared to be President Brown’s wish that 

the matter be presented to the Quorum of the Twelve for discussion. The President quickly answered that if it was presented to the Quorum of the Twelve, then it would be the Quorum of the Twelve’s policy and that such policy could not be sent out from the Church, that the same would have to come from the President of the Church. It was plain to see here that the President recognized that only from the President of the Church can come a basic policy statement for the Church. While he may listen to the counsel and discussion of the Quorum of the Twelve, and his Counselors, yet he is the one to determine the policy.

It was agreed before the meeting ended that this problem was two-fold and that the first phase of it produced a foregone conclusion that every member of the Church has the right to vote for whichever candidate they desire to do so without any fear of reprisal in membership standing of the Church. The second question as to whether a leader of the Church should support a third party and impugn others who run on other party tickets and also whether he should criticize and berate the head of the existing Government of the United States, the Supreme Court, and the Cabinet of the President–undoubtedly it will be in the last area where the discussion will develop.

President Brown was quick to agree that every man had a right to vote for any candidate that he so desired, stating that he thought he had made that clear in his remarks at the Commencement Exercises at the Brigham Young University. I commented that while this may have been in his mind, that his remarks seemed to imply that no Latter-day Saint should sustain or support a third party and this is the reason why the letters have been coming concerning the same. It was apparent that this is how President Brown feels and yet he cannot help but recognize that in order for a member to have his complete freedom within the Church he would have the right as a member of sustaining the heads of a third party should one develop in this particular elective period.

I pointed out, and read to the Brethren, the fact that Joseph Smith himself was a third party candidate for the President of the United States, for at that time the citizens of Nauvoo felt that the only consistent step that they could take was to place their own candidate in the field. Consequently, at a political convention held in Nauvoo January 29, 1844, Joseph Smith was nominated as a candidate for the Presidency of the United States and that on May 17 a State Convention was held in Nauvoo where this nomination was sustained. There evidently was no thought on the part of President Joseph Smith or the Saints that he would be elected, but it gave to them an opportunity to express their feelings and to sustain a candidate who would advocate their rights against oppression. I also stated that we could not erase from our memories the great patriots of our Country who had at different times stood out against the tyranny of men who held office.

(Com ment:)

In connection with this, it is interesting to note, and I would like to make this a part of my Journal Record mostly for the basis of information, for while I implied this in my remarks in the meeting with the President, I did not refer to these names, but I did so by saying that there were many great patriots who had either attempted through a third party to remove the tyrannies of action of the other two parties, or who had stood against certain actions and policies of the main two parties. Therefore, I add to the Prophet Joseph Smith’s name as a third party candidate those of John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, James Weaver, Theodore Roosevelt, Robert M. LaFollett, J. Strom Thurman, Henry A. Wallace, and now, in the present elective period, George Wallace, the former Governor of the State of Alabama.

(The Third Party)

See the attached “Memo to File”.”

“Memorandum

July 19, 1968

To: File

From: Alvin R. Dyer

Re: The Third Party

I quote the following excerpt from the address given by President Brown to the graduating students at the Brigham Young University on May 31, 1968:

“I have found from long experience that our two-party system is sound. Beware of those who are so lacking in humility that they cannot come within the framework of one of our two great parties. Our Nation has avoided chaos like that which is gripping France today because men have been able to temper their own desires sufficiently to seek broad agreement within one of the two major parties rather than forming splinter groups around one radical idea. Our two-party system has served us well and should not be lightly discarded.”

The above statement made by President Brown has much merit, but we must not overlook the fact that a great deal of the progress that has been made in this Country, has been by a patriot spearheading movements which have lead to reforms that have ended in the accomplishment of good for all. In this respect, we must not overlook the zealous efforts of the following men who have served a great purpose, not only in establishing of the government existing in the United States of America, but also in the preservation of its rights. Such men among the vast list could include John Quincy Adams, Henry Clay, James Weaver, Theodore Roosevelt, Robert M. LaFollett, J. Strom Thurmond, Henry A. Wallace, and now, in the present elective campaign, former Governor George Wallace of the State of Alabama.

It will be of interest to learn that the Prophet Joseph Smith himself was once a third party candidate. Quoting from “Essentials in Church History” by Joseph Fielding Smith, we have the following:

“The citizens of Nauvoo felt that the only consistent step they could take was to place their own candidate in the field. Consequently, at a political convention held in Nauvoo, January 29, 1844, Joseph Smith was nominated as a candidate for the Presidency of the United Stales and on May 17 a State Convention was held in Nauvoo where his nomination was sustained. There was no thought on the part of President Joseph Smith or the Saints that he would be elected, but it gave to them an opportunity to express their feelings and sustain a candidate who would advocate their rights against oppression.””

Thur., 15 Aug., 1968:

“9:00 a.m.

Held a meeting with Presidents Brown, Tanner and Smith. Some of the matters discussed were:

Benson, Ezra Taft – Compilation of Talks by

President Brown referred to the compilation of talks by Elder Ezra Taft Benson by Gerrald Newquist who wants to publish these talks in book form. Elders Harold B. Lee, Marion G. Romney and Howard Hunter have made a report on the talks. The report of these brethren was turned over to me for my reading.

Thur., 22 Aug., 1968:

“At 9:15 a. m. held a meeting with my counselors – Presidents Brown, Tanner, and Dyer.

Some of the items discussed were:

Benson, Elder Ezra Taft – Compilation of Talks in Book Form

President Brown mentioned that the other day he had brought me a report from Elder Lee, together with letters from Elders Marion G. Romney and Howard W. Hunter, who had read the talks by Elder Ezra Taft Benson which Brother Jerrald Newquist desires to publish in book form. President Brown asked me if I had any decision to make on the matter. President Tanner mentioned that the things that concerned Elders Lee, Romney, and Hunter most were frequent references in some of the speeches to the views and statements often given in private by me, and wittingly or unwittingly implying that the speaker, Brother Benson, was expressing the views of the Church. President Dyer suggested that Brother Benson be asked to delete these inferences from the book if it were to be published.

President Dyer said he did not think it was fair to prohibit the publication of the book just because there were several things in it that these brethren questioned. (It was apparent to me that Presidents Brown and Tanner were arguing that the book be not published.) President Dyer thought that in fairness Elder Benson should know the objections and be given the privilege of making the necessary corrections if he desired so to do, as there is much good in his writings.

I directed President Brown to send a letter to Elder Lee and the Reading Committee instructing them to point out to Elder Benson the various features they considered objectionable, and ascertain what he wishes to do About it.

Note by President Dyer:

Telephone Conversation with President Arthur Kay – Seattle Stake

I later talked to Elder Benson confidentially and advised him of the forthcoming criticism and suggested that he give consideration to the feelings of the Reading Committee, relating my own experience to him.

I later talked to Dr. Arthur Kay of the Seattle Stake who is the Stake President where Gerrald Newquist lives. It is to be recalled that in the First Presidency meeting President Brown alleged that Brother Newquist is a member of the John Birch Society and consequently, if the book were published, it would be used as propaganda by the Society.

Not knowing Newquist personally, but knowing of his previously published compilations, (A) Prophets and Principles and National Survival; and (B) Discourses and Writings of George Q. Cannon; I felt to satisfy my own curiosity to find out if Brother Newquist was actually a member of the John Birch Society. This is the reason why I talked to Dr. Kay, his Stake President. President Kay stated that he regarded Brother Newquist as a very solid member of the Church. He has four children, two of which are married. He is a member of the Seattle Stake High Council. He is a jet pilot for the United Airlines and he is not now, nor ever has been, a member of the John Birch Society. I gave Joseph Anderson, the secretary of the First Presidency, a memo stating these facts as I had learned them concerning Gerrald L. Newquist, that they could become part of the minutes rather than the erroneous statements made by President Brown concerning this man.”

“MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 27, 1968

TO: Clare Middlemiss 

FROM: Ezra Taft Benson

I kept my appointment with President McKay this morning at 11:00 a.m. Brother Lundstrom and a photographer at the Deseret News were there and took the picture of me presenting to President McKay the first copy of the Doctrine and Covenants in Korean. This was presented to me by President Robert H. Slover, new president of the Korean Mission, with a request on behalf of him and the missionaries that it be presented to President David O. McKay with their love and greetings.

President McKay was quite touched as this volume was presented to him and I think even more so, Clare, when I told him of the Japanese Youth Conference, the first to be held in Japan which I attended August 8-11. I mentioned particularly the 800 white-faced black-haired Japanese youth who participated and especially how they sing in spirit, We Thank Thee Oh God For A Prophet. They asked that I convey their love and greetings to President McKay whom they sustain as a Prophet of God. During a 4 and a quarter hour testimony meeting we heard 80 testimonies and 125 young people were standing in line waiting, hoping for a turn to bear theirs.

BOOK — President McKay’s Statement Concerning: 

At President Dyer’s suggestion made in the Expenditures Committee Meeting when I gave him a note indicating that I had the appointment, I discussed with President McKay briefly my forthcoming book which I believe now is back in the hands of the Reading Committee. President McKay said, “I hope, it is published soon,” and then he rather jokingly said, “Are you going to publish it in Korean also?” He thanked me for coming and said, “I hope you come again soon.” I said, “I would like to come every day.” He said, “I’d like to have you come every day.” His spirit was good and I enjoyed the visit so much.”

Mon., 9 Sep., 1968:

“In Huntsville

During the early afternoon received a telephone call from President Alvin R. Dyer who asked if he might come up this afternoon on an important matter. I arranged for him to come at 4:00 o’clock this afternoon.

4 p.m.

President Dyer arrived at the appointed time and after a few words of greeting, he took up matters pertaining to the following:

Governor George Wallace – Third Party Presidential Candidate – Elder Ezra Taft Benson’ s Invitation to Run With Him As Vice-President

President Dyer referred to the pressure that has been placed upon Elder Benson by the Third Party ticket representatives, and especially George Wallace, the presidential candidate.

This matter was brought to me by Elder Benson early in the year, and at that time I told Elder Benson not to accept George Wallace’s offer because of Church responsibilities. At that time George Romney was also seeking nomination on the Republican ticket as a presidential candidate. I informed George Wallace by letter that it would be impossible for Elder Benson to accept his invitation, and Elder Benson, who said that he was not seeking this position, also wrote to Mr. Wallace and told him that he would not be able to accept his invitation. Now this matter has come up again, and they are pressing Elder Benson to accept and to run with Mr. Wallace as they feel he has a good chance to win.

I said that my decision is still the same; and that I feel that Elder Benson should not launch out on this political campaign; that it could lead to confusion and misunderstanding in the Church. I also expressed the opinion that Mr. Wallace cannot win, and then what position would that put Elder Benson in. President Dyer said that Elder Benson only wants to serve his country, but most important, to be directed by what the Prophet of the Lord says in this matter. I expressed my feelings that Elder Benson is truly a great man.

Later, Elder Dyer reported that he had contacted Elder Benson relating to him the details of his meeting with me, and of my decision concerning the Vice-Presidency. Elder Benson said: “I feel relieved and will abide by the counsel of the President.””

“Minutes of meeting in Huntsville with President McKay by President Alvin R. Dyer

Ezra Taft Benson’s Quandary Regarding Vice Presidency on the Same Ticket with George Wallace

Of late much pressure has been placed upon Elder Benson to share a Presidential ticket with George Wallace as Vice President. Several States–Idaho, Arizona, Nevada– had arbitrarily placed his name on this ticket at their State Conventions. Mr. Jackson, Executive Secretary for George Wallace, had called, stating that he was still the former Governor’s choice as a running mate. Many other national figures called or wrote to him, urging that he accept, including Dean Mannion.

(Note: This same situation came up in February of this year when George Wallace wrote a personal letter to President McKay requesting that Elder Benson be given permission to run with him. At that time I went with Elder Benson to see President McKay, who told him not to accept the offer because of his Church responsibilities. Governor Wallace was so advised by Elder Benson and a letter was also sent by President McKay in courteous response. At that time George Romney had announced himself as a Republican candidate. Both Elder Benson and I felt that this had influenced President McKay’s decision.)

Elder Benson, being advised that Mr. Wallace was scheduled to announce at a Press Conference in Washington D.C. on Tuesday, September 10, who his running mate would be, felt the need of counsel and direction from President McKay, with which I agreed.

Because of this, I went to Huntsville to discuss the matter with President McKay, an appointment being made for 4 p.m. by Clare Middlemiss.

It was thought at first, meaning the previous Friday, that Elder Benson and I would go together. I did tentatively make an appointment for us on Friday, but thought better of it at that time. Besides, President McKay was somewhat wearied because of so many visitors.

Visit with President McKay

I arrived at the Huntsville cottage at precisely 4 p m. I was greeted at the front door by the nurse (Mrs. Noyse?). I found the President in the living room, awaiting me. I noticed that Sister McKay lay asleep on the couch.

The President locked exceptionally well. I apologized for coming there with Church matters during his birthday holiday. The room was still laden with flowers from the many who had sent well wishes. The President said I was more than welcome to come any time.

Telegram from Richard W. Nixon

Just before I left Salt Lake City, Clare Middlemiss brought to my office a copy of a telegram from Richard M. Nixon, Republican candidate for President, to President David O. McKay as a birthday greeting. She asked that I take it to President McKay, which I did, and at his request read it to him. Mr. Nixon praised him for his great leadership throughout the world, and wished him well on his 95th birthday. He also stated that he was looking forward to his visit to Salt Lake City on September 18 and would see the President then.

The telegram delighted President McKay, who spoke of Mr. Nixon as a good man. It was plain to see that he favored him. The nurse mentioned that Hubert Humphrey had called the President the night before on the telephone to extend birthday greetings. (See Sept. 8, 1968 for copy)

As to Elder Benson’s Acceptance to Run as Vice President

I outlined the situation to President McKay of the pressure and requests being placed upon Elder Benson to accept the nomination to run for Vice President on a ticket with George Wallace of Alabama. I recalled to him the personal correspondence to him from Mr. Wallace under date of February 12, 1968, and of the meeting that Elder Benson and I had with him concerning the request for his services by Mr. Wallace. I pointed out at that particular time Governor George Romney was active in seeking the Republican nomination to run for President and that this may have had some bearing upon his decision, instructing Elder Benson that he should not accept the offer to run as tendered. The President seemed to remember this former incident quite well.

I reported to the President that many influential people had called and written to him encouraging his acceptance to run with Mr. Wallace, that Mr. Jackson, Executive Secretary to Mr. Wallace, called to inform him just a few days ago that he was still Mr. Wallace’s choice as a running mate. I also referred to the conventions of the Wallace Party in Idaho, Nevada, and Arizona, which had placed Elder Benson’s name in their balloting to run for Vice President.

I explained that Elder Benson was not pressing the issue. He wants only to serve his Country, but over and above all, to be directed by the Prophet of the Lord.

The President seemed quite spontaneous in his decision that he had not changed from his original feeling, that such a venture by Elder Benson in this direction, before it could prove itself, could lead to confusion and misunderstanding in the Church. The President expressed himself in saying that Mr. Wallace could not win, and where would that leave Elder Benson.

I said to the President that knowing Elder Benson as I do, a man whom I love ard respect, he would abide his desire and would feel all right about it. I said Elder Benson, I believe, is a great man. The President said, “Yes, he is, and President Dyer, you are a great man.”

Fri., 4 Oct., 1968:

“This is the opening day of the semi-annual Conference of the Church. Beautiful Fall weather existing throughout the Valley.

At 8:30 o’clock Presidents N. Eldon Tanner, Joseph Fielding Smith and Alvin R. Dyer came over to the apartment for a short meeting with me. President Brown and President Isaacson were absent because of illness.

The following matters were taken up:

American Independent Party — The Speaking in the Salt Lake Tabernacle of Governor George C . Wallace – Presidential Candidate

Read a letter addressed to me from Robert E. Dansie, legal counsel, American Independent Party of Utah, requesting the use of the Tabernacle for Governor George C. Wallace, U. S. Presidential Candidate, to give a major address at 10:00 a. m. Saturday, October 12. The letter also states that 6,000 students and faculty at the Brigham Young University have signed petitions requesting that he be invited to speak there. Mr. Dansie also states that he hopes that my schedule will permit Governor Wallace to visit with me when he comes.

President Tanner and President Dyer said that inasmuch as Governor Wallace is a candidate for the presidency of the United States, that state conventions of 50 states have placed his name on the ballot, it would seem that he should be entitled to have the consideration he requests inasmuch as the candidates for the two national parties have spoken in the Tabernacle.

I gave approval for Governor Wallace to speak in the Tabernacle and asked President Dyer to telephone Mr. Dansie telling him that his request has been approved, including his request for Governor Wallace to speak at the Brigham Young University.

(See copy of Mr. Dansie’s Letter which follows)

Thur., 31 Oct., 1968:

“A meeting of the First Presidency was held this morning at 9:00 a. m. in the President’s hotel apartment. Present were: Presidents N. Eldon Tanner and Alvin R. Dyer. President Brown was indisposed and President Joseph Fielding Smith was meeting with the Twelve.

The following matters were discussed:

Book – Publication of Jerreld Newquist’s Manuscript of Talks by Elder Ezra Taft Benson

A letter was read from Elder Ezra Taft Benson relative to a manuscript prepared by Jerreld Newquist containing talks and writings by him which has been referred to the Church Reading Committee. Elder Benson states that Elders Harold B. Lee, Marion G. Romney and Howard W. Hunter of the Committee had read the manuscript and made some comments as to suggested changes, which suggestions Elder Benson says have been adopted in the manuscript. He now asks if approval may be given for the publication of the manuscript.

I gave my approval, the brethren concurring, that inasmuch as the suggested corrections and amendments have been made there should be no objection to its publication.

Sat., 7 Dec., 1968:

“Note by CM:

This morning at 8:30 the secretary received a long-distance call from New York City from Elder Ezra Taft Benson who stated that he had just completed his tour of the Oriental Missions and had returned via New York City in order to visit his daughter and had just learned of the ground-breaking services of the Washington Temple, and since he was the first President of the Washington Stake, and had been on the ground-work for the need of the Temple, he had decided to attend the services. He asked that President McKay be notified that he will attend these services, and felt sure that the President would approve of his attending.

John Birch Society – Suggestion to Send Telegram of Congratulations

Then Elder Benson said: “Clare, President McKay has told me on various occasions that there are two things he regretted in his presidency: (1) the untimely decision, which was later changed, to move the college at Rexburg to Idaho Falls; and (2) the issuing of the statement in the public press against the John Birch Society.”

“Now”, continued Elder Benson, “in order to alleviate that feeling about the John Birch Society, I wonder, since they are celebrating their 10th Anniversary tonight at a meeting and banquet in Indianapolis, Indiana, if President McKay would send a telegram similar to the following: ‘John Birch Society, c/o Mr. Robert Welch, Stauffer Inn, Indianapolis, Indiana — Congratulations upon reaching ten years of courageous and effective service in defense of our freedom and acquainting the American people with the insidious dangers of the atheistic communistic conspiracy. Best wishes for future success in the fight to preserve our God-given liberties.'”

The secretary told Elder Benson that she thought it would be impossible to reach the President by telephone this morning to discuss the above matter, but that she would see what she could do. She did try to call the President, but was informed by the nurse that he was in a meeting with his son Lawrence and Fred E. Schluter of Trenton, New Jersey, and that he could not be interrupted.

Clare then called President Alvin R. Dyer and informed him of Elder Benson’s desire to have the above telegram sent to Robert Welch, and President Dyer advised against the sending of the telegram. He said it would have an “adverse affect upon the Church and that it would be used by the John Birch Society everywhere–in their publications etc.” He said it would be better for President McKay to make a statement, probably at Conference time, complimenting societies, some of which have now fought atheistic communism for ten years, and that in that way President McKay could get over to the people a message about the Church’s feeling regarding Communism. President Dyer said that inasmuch as this meeting will be held on this very day, it would bring pressure on President McKay, and that it is not fair to place this decision on him in this way. He said that he would talk to Elder Benson about this matter upon his return to the city. No further report was given on this matter. 

Washington Temple – Elder Ezra Taft Benson’s Attendance at Ground-breaking

Regarding Elder Benson’s attending the ground-breaking services of the Washington Temple, the secretary reported this to President McKay at the first opportunity, and he said “Good, I am glad that he attended; he should have been there.”

Wed., 22 Jan, 1969:

“Due to a cold President McKay was not present at the First Presidency’s meeting held today.

Two matters of importance discussed were:

Book – Jerreld Newquist’s Manuscript of Talks by Elder Ezra Taft Benson

President Tanner reported regarding the assignment given to Elders Mark E. Petersen and Thomas S. Monson to confer with Marvin Wallin of Bookcraft regarding the Lindsay Curtis book. While they were there they learned that the new Ezra Taft Benson book compiled by Jerreld Newquist had on the inside jacket that the book had been approved by the Reading Committee and the First Presidency.

Note by President Alvin R. Dyer

“President Brown then said, ‘I thought that we got that book stopped.’ President Tanner made the query as to where the approval had come from for the book to be in a publishing form with Bookcraft. Joseph Anderson then left the meeting, went to his office, and returned with a letter to Brother Benson indicating that changes and recommendations of the Reading Committee had been met and, inasmuch as they had, that the First Presidency had no objection to the publishing of the material. This was signed by David O. McKay, Hugh B. Brown, and N. Eldon Tanner. I then mentioned the fact that approval had been given, virtually, to Brother Benson to publish the material as evidenced by the letter which they had signed.

“I then commented that I had talked to Brother Benson about two of the chapters in the book which leveled abject criticism at constituted authorities of the Government and had encouraged him to remove these chapters, which he had done. I told them that I was sure that Brother Benson realized that the removing of objections to the publication of the book did not mean that it had the approval of the Reading Committee or of the First Presidency since the First Presidency does not give approval to books of this nature. It was determined that the information proposed to be contained on the inner side of the jacket of the book would be checked into and, if such a statement was to be placed there, that it would be removed before publication.

“Both President Brown and Tanner seemed out of patience with the fact that the book had gotten so far toward publishing and I mentioned to them that, ‘You brethren, yourselves, signed the letter, so there isn’t anything that can be done about that.’ President Tanner then said that the letter should never have been written.””

Mon., 3 Feb, 1969:

“8:45 to 10:30 a. m. Held a meeting of the First Presidency. Present were Presidents Hugh B. Brown, N. Eldon Tanner, Joseph Fielding Smith and Alvin R. Dyer.

The following were among the matters discussed:

John Birch Society – TACT, TOLD

Reference was made to a letter addressed to the members of the First Presidency by Mr. and Mrs. Woodrow Parsons of Richfield, Utah. Brother Parsons states that he is an ex-bishop and currently high priest group leader in the ward, that he and his family have joined the John Birch Society which they did following my talk in the General Priesthood meeting at the April 1966 Conference, and that they feel that it is their responsibility to warn their friends and accordingly have tried to hold educational meetings along this line. They say, however, that they are somewhat bewildered at times because of the difference of opinion that seems to prevail on the subject between some of the members of the General Authorities. The brethren commented upon the difficulty that we have been encountering and are encountering because of talks that are given by Elder Benson in various places criticizing leading men of the nation, etc., and claiming that they are communistically inclined. It was decided to write these people the usual letter about the Church’s attitude toward the Birch Society. In this connection President Dyer mentioned that he had received a letter from a man in Indiana where Brother Benson had been to conference who said that he came home from the conference spiritually impoverished because of the reference to certain governmental officials in Brother Benson’s conference talk stating what the people should be doing to counteract these things. President Dyer said that this man had said that he and his family were at first considering the possibility of withdrawing from the Church but because of their love of the gospel and their testimony they felt they could not do this. President Tanner mentioned that this question had been discussed in detail by the First Presidency and the Twelve some time ago at which time I had directed Brother Benson not to do this any more in his Church work but that he has continued to do it. President Dyer said that this man in his letter mentioned also that so many of the brethren go there to conference and tell stories and take up the time but do not preach the gospel.

President Dyer also stated that it was his belief that the statements made by me, which have been printed and circulated, are sometimes taken advantage of and abused in their application. He cited for example the organization of TACT and TOLD which were organized by members of the Church throughout the northwest and in some cases in Arizona, where regular meetings were being held and that such meetings developed into a denunciation of the United States Government and also the governmental leaders. President Dyer expressed the opinion that he knew that I was opposed to Communism and the inroads that are being made in our way of life and that we, as a people, should be opposed to it and he felt there was a genuine opposition to this by the brethren, but it is probable that well-meaning members are going beyond this in endeavoring to set up centers of interest for themselves and their groups.

President Dyer asked if I might be willing to make a further statement at this Conference which might help clarify, at least to some of these groups, just how I and the Church felt about this matter.

Note by President Dyer:

“After the others had left the meeting, I stayed with President McKay for a brief visit and discussed with him personally the articles that had been sent out under his name concerning Communism regarding which, I believe, there is some misunderstanding. I suggested to the President that perhaps I could get this material together and then discuss it with him and if he felt to make any changes or clarifications this could be done and incorporated in one of the talks that he would give at the April General Conference of the Church. President McKay encouraged me to get this material together and to discuss it with him.”

Wed., 12 Feb, 1969:

“9:00 a. m. First Presidency Meeting in President McKay’s Apartment. Present were: Presidents Hugh B. Brown, N. Eldon Tanner, Joseph Fielding Smith and Alvin R. Dyer.

Among the matters discussed were the following:

Elder Ezra Taft Benson–Complaint Regarding his Talks

A letter was read from Dennis R. Judd, John W. Rider and Brent W. Brown referring to Brother Ezra Taft Benson’s remarks at the recent quarterly conference of the Illinois Stake. They claim that his talk dwelt largely on political matters, that he discussed “Godless communism” and “Socialism” and linked these “insidious influences” to the decisions of the Supreme Court, the Civil Rights movement, and other political matters. President Dyer mentioned that he could see no objection personally to making references to the principles of free agency and unrighteous dominion, that these are gospel principles, but it was another matter when we begin to localize these things and tie them to officials in government, that this creates confused feelings among the people. President Dyer mentioned a letter that he had received from someone else in regard to this same conference and Elder Benson’s remarks on that occasion. President Brown had received a letter from another man on the same question with which he enclosed copy of a letter he had written to Brother Benson about the matter, together with a copy of Brother Benson’s reply saying that if he would keep his eye on the prophet he would be all right, that if his, Brother Benson’s, teachings are published in the Era he might know that they have the sanction of the Church.

I asked what conclusion the brethren had reached regarding the matter. President Tanner said the same conclusion that was arrived at about two years ago, that Elder Benson should discontinue this kind of thing, and particularly in stake conferences, and should limit himself to talking about the gospel and its applications. President Tanner said that he thought I made as clear a statement on the subject as he had heard made in the meeting of the Council of the First Presidency and the Twelve at that time. 

I said that there is no reason why we should not continue that understanding.

Note by President Alvin R. Dyer

“During this day I met with Elder Ezra Taft Benson and discussed with him a letter signed by three men of the Priesthood from the Champagne, Illinois, area and also a letter which I had received from that same area concerning a talk which he gave at a Stake Conference which highlighted the denouncement of Communism and of certain blames placed upon members of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning present difficulties in the United States.

“In my own feelings Brother Benson is a man of great influence and Gospel messages about righteous and unrighteous dominion and free agency are not out of line but to localize and denounce Governmental Agencies in a Stake Conference would create wrong impressions and set up controversies among the people. I expressed these thoughts to him and suggested that he might give concern to the matter.

“Elder Benson said that his talk was not out of line as he felt it. I then asked the question if it might be possible that a tape was made of his talk and that if we could receive this then we could refute the statements that were made by these men.

“In my own way of thinking, I think it would be a tragedy if we did not have the freedom of speech for a man of the caliber and type of Brother Benson. However, when issues are spoken of that create divisions among our people, then these issues should be avoided. I believe that a campaign against Communism and origins of unrighteous dominion can be carried on within the realms of the teachings of the Gospel just as effectively as when we attempt to denounce those in public office.”

Mon., 24 Mar, 1969:

“In Huntsville.

Note by CM:

At the suggestion of Lawrence McKay to turn over the matter of Conference Speakers to the counselors, Secretary Clare Middlemiss went to President Brown to show him the list of proposed speakers, including the broadcast speakers which had been gone over by President McKay before he left for Huntsville.

President Brown was quite disturbed over the fact that Elder Ezra Taft Benson and President Joseph Fielding Smith were assigned to the broadcast sessions. He said that all Elder Benson ever talks about is political and that President Smith does not give a good talk over the air. (President Brown said he could not sleep nights because of the condition of the Church.)”

Mon., 12 May, 1969:

“9:30 a. m. Meeting of the First Presidency in the President’s Hotel Apartment. Present were Presidents Hugh B. Brown, Joseph Fielding Smith.

President Brown and President Smith called at the hotel apartment this morning and discussed with me the matter of a message to be given by President Brown from the First Presidency in his devotional talk tomorrow at the BYU. President Brown stated that Elder Ezra Taft Benson had made a talk at the Y last week which was a very inflammatory speech against the government and the United Nations. He said it left the students with the feeling that what Brother Benson said was the Church’s position. President Brown felt that the First Presidency should make a statement of their position regarding sustaining law. He had prepared a statement which was read to me emphasizing that we believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring and sustaining the law. The statement that he proposed for the First Presidency to sign consisted mainly of a quotation from President Joseph F. Smith on that subject. President Brown stated that he thought we should get such a statement before the students before the school closes and the devotional at which President Brown will speak tomorrow will be the last devotional of the school year. He further stated that he thought President Nixon was doing a good job and that he thought he should have our support.

President Smith agreed with the statement as presented and said that we must sustain the government, that while the government makes mistakes sometimes he believed that President Nixon, who is now president, is doing the best that he can.

I, in commenting on the matter, said that I did not think that any government officials should be accused of these things.

I authorized President Brown to have my signature attached to the statement. 

(See May 19, for further discussion of this matter with my secretary; also see May 20 and 21 for further pressing presentation of this matter by the counselors. )

(See complete copy of statement following)”

“STATEMENT BY THE FIRST PRESIDENCY

In order that there may be no misunderstanding about the stand of the Church in matters having to do with and supporting constituted authority, the First Presidency of the Church reaffirms our traditional and revealed position epitomized in one of our Articles of Faith, namely, “We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring and sustaining the law.”

We make no statement on how this country can or should try to disengage itself from the present regrettable war in Vietnam; that is a problem, a very difficult problem, which must be solved by our governmental officials in whom we have complete confidence.

We believe our young men should hold themselves in readiness to respond to the call of their government to serve in the armed forces when called upon, and again we repeat, we believe in honoring, sustaining, and upholding the law.

We quote with approval and re-emphasize what President Joseph F. Smith, former president of the Church, said:

TRUE PATRIOTISM.   Patriotism should be sought for and will be found in right living, not in high sounding phrases or words.  True patriotism is part of the solemn obligation that belongs both to the nation and to the individual and to the home. Our nation’s reputation should be guarded as sacredly as our family’s good name. That reputation should be defended by every citizen, and our children should be taught to defend their country’s honor under all circumstances.  A truly patriotic spirit in the individual begets a public interest and sympathy which should be commensurate with our nation’s greatness.  To be a true citizen of a great country takes nothing from, but adds to, individual greatness.  While a great and good people necessarily adds greatness and goodness to national life, the nation’s greatness reacts upon its citizens and adds honor to them, and insures their welfare and happiness.  Loyal citizens will probably be the last to complain of the faults and failures of our national administrators. They would rather conceal those evils which exist, and try to persuade themselves that they are only temporary and may and will in time be corrected.  It is none the less a patriotic duty to guard our nation whenever and wherever we can against those changeable and revolutionary tendencies which are destructive of a nation’s weal and permanence.

IMPORTANCE OF NATIONAL PATRIOTISM. Our national welfare should always be a theme deeply rooted in our minds and exemplified in our individual lives, and the desire for our nation’s good should be stronger than political party adherence.  The nation’s welfare means the welfare of every one of its citizens.  To be a worthy and prosperous nation, it must possess those qualities which belong to individual virtues. The attitude of our country toward other nations should always be honest and above suspicion, and every good citizen should be jealous of our nation’s reputation both at home and abroad. National patriotism is, therefore, something more than mere expression of willingness to fight, if need be.

The First Presidency

David O. McKay

Hugh B. Brown

N. Eldon Tanner

Joseph Fielding Smith

Alvin R. Dyer”

Mon., 19 May, 1969:

“There was no meeting of the First Presidency held this day.

ll:00 a. m. President Dyer came over for a few minutes to take up some matters with me.

My secretary Clare reported to me that several telephone calls had come to the office including one from President Wilkinson who said he was very disturbed over President Brown’s talk to the students, especially the part which read: “Loyal citizens will probably be the last to complain of the faults and failures of our National Administrators. They would rather conceal those evils which exist, and try to persuade themselves that they are only temporary and may and will in time be corrected.”

I said in thinking this statement over that it was appropriate for the times when President Joseph F. Smith was living, but we cannot always trust men in high offices in these times.

(See May 12, for initial discussion on President Brown’s talk; also see May 20 and 21 for further pressing presentation of this matter by the counselors.)”

Tues., 20 May, 1969:

“No First Presidency Meeting held on this day.

9 00 a. m. President Dyer met with President McKay on the following matters:

President Smith’s Accident

President Dyer reported to me that President Joseph Fielding Smith had met with an accident by slipping on the stairway and hurt his head requiring some stitches. His doctors told him to remain in his apartrnent for the present.

President Brown’s Talk to the Brigham Young University

For further discussion on the statement President Brown made to the students at the Brigham Young University see copy of the minutes as dictated by Joseph Anderson which follow.”

“(Minutes by Joseph Anderson of a Meeting of President Alvin R. Dyer with President McKay regarding President Brown’s talk at the BYU including the statement from the First Presidency.)

“President Dyer reported that he had received a telephone call from Ezra Taft Benson in Washington, D. C., that Brother Benson is quite concerned about a statement by the First Presidency regarding upholding and sustaining the government that was read by President Brown in his recent devotional talk at the Brigham Young University. President Dyer said that Elder Benson made specific reference to two paragraphs in President Brown’s talk and had asked him, President Dyer, to read these two items to President McKay, which he promised to do. President Dyer mentioned that the talk had been read to President McKay and received his approval before it was delivered. The items mentioned were as follows:

“We make no statement on how this country can or should try to disengage itself from the present regrettable war in Vietnam; that is a problem, a very difficult problem, which must be solved by our government officials in whom we have complete confidence. “

President McKay said, “That is good.”

President Dyer then read to him the other item which he said is part of President Joseph F. Smith’s statement on patriotism as contained in President Smith’s book “Gospel Doctrine”. The statement reads:

“Loyal citizens will probably be the last to complain of the faults and failures of our national administrators. They would rather conceal those evils which exist, and try to persuade themselves that they are only temporary and may and will in time be corrected. It is none the less a patriotic duty to guard our nation whenever and wherever we can against those changeable and revolutionary tendencies which are destructive of a nation’s weal and permanence.”

President McKay said, “That is a good statement. “

President Dyer said that he had told Brother Benson that he thought it was a good statement but Brother Benson is quite concerned about it. President Dyer said he could see nothing wrong with it himself.”

(Minutes by President Alvin R. Dyer from his journal of his meeting with President McKay regarding President Brown’s talk at the BYU including the statement from the First Presidency.)

“I reported to President McKay that I had received a telephone call the night before from Elder Benson in Washington, who objected strongly to the statements which President Brown had made concerning the alleged neutrality of the Church with regard to the behavior of certain Governmental officials. In accordance with my promise to him, I had brought with me the statement and there, in the presence of Brother Joseph Anderson who kept a record of the same, I read the statement again to President McKay, referring particularly to those segments which Elder Benson had spoken against.

After reading the statements, the President asked me to read them again, which I did, and then made the statement that he could see nothing wrong with them.””

Wed., 21 May, 1969:

“President Alvin R. Dyer met with President McKay this morning at the hotel apartment in company with Secretary Joseph Anderson and Henry Smith.

Further discussion was held concerning President Brown’s talk to the students at the Brigham Young University and the statement he read from the First Presidency.

(See Minutes by Joseph Anderson and President Dyer which follow.)”

“(Minutes by Joseph Anderson of a Meeting of President Alvin R. Dyer with President McKay regarding President Brown’s talk at the BYU including the statement from the First Presidency.)

“President Dyer read to President McKay a telegram that had come addressed to President McKay from Reed Benson, son of Ezra Taft Benson, pertaining to the recent talk by President Hugh B. Brown at the Brigham Young University devotional, in which President Brown read a statement from the First Presidency setting forth the Church’s attitude toward sustaining government officials. Brother Benson states that he was grieved to hear of the statements of the First Presidency which President Brown had quoted. President Dyer said that President Brown in his address referred to the war in Vietnam and stated that we have confidence in our government officials that they will do everything they can to settle that most regrettable incident. He said this is the particular part of the statement they disagree with, that they do not think the government is doing everything that can be done, and he feels that the First Presidency ought not to make a statement saying we support the government in their efforts to try to settle the war in Vietnam. Brother Benson sets forth in his telegram a number of reasons why he feels that we should not have complete confidence in our government officials. He concludes the telegram by saying: “You are a great soul, President McKay, as well as the mouthpiece, and if you want me to have complete confidence in our government officials I want to know it and then if the spirit confirms it I will adjust my life accordingly.” President Dyer said it seemed to him that this is a disrespectful wire. President Dyer reminded the President of the interview had with him yesterday when certain statements from the First Presidency’s announcement by President Brown were read, at which time the President indicated his approval of the statements. President Dyer mentioned that Henry Smith was present for the reason that he wished to be sure whether or not the First Presidency wished the talk by President Brown and the statement therein by the First Presidency published. He asked President McKay if authorization should be given to Brother Smith to go ahead and publish it in the Church News and the President said yes. President Dyer commented that we must have confidence in men placed in government positions, that President Nixon was elected by the vote of the people and that one of our articles of faith says that we believe in honoring, obeying and sustaining the law, and being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, magistrates, etc. He said that it seems evident that President Nixon is making a real effort to end the conflict in Vietnam, and President McKay stated it as his belief that this is so.”

(Minutes by President Alvin R. Dyer from his journal of his meeting with President McKay regarding President Brown’s talk at the BYU including the statement from the First Presidency.)

“I read to President McKay the telegram received frorn Reed Benson of which I had received a copy, which referred to certain quotations from the statement which he objected to in President Brown’s address at the Brigham Young University. He felt that these were not the statements of President McKay and asked that reconsideration be given to them before they were published. I read the wire from Reed Benson very carefully to President McKay and from all that I could observe, the President was not too pleased with it. He again affirmed his feeling that the statement was agreeable to him.

Henry Srnith was there to have confirmation from the President as to whether or not the statement signed by the Presidency, which was presented in connection with the talk given by President Hugh B. Brown at the Brigham Young University, should be printed. The President, as he had stated the day before, said that the statements were all right and he gave approval for them to be published.””

Mon., 26 May, 1969:

“9:00 a. m. 

Meeting of the First Presidency in the President’s Hotel Apartment. Present were Presidents Hugh B. Brown and N. Eldon Tanner.

The following were among the matters discussed:

Communism – Students for a Democratic Society

President Tanner called attention to a letter that had been received from a Brother John S. Kelley addressed to Elder Ezra Taft Benson, in which reference is made to a priest in his ward who is actively supporting the program of the Students for a Democratic Society. This brother asks if the young man should be allowed to officiate at the sacrament table and to perform other Church ordinances. The brethren were agreed that we should refer the matter to the stake president and tell him to try to dissuade the young man from continuing his membership in this organization, and if he refuses to do so he should not be used in the ward or stake; that, however, he should not be cut off the Church even though he may be a communist, and that this should be our attitude toward all members of the Church who are communists.

(See also item on Communists on May 29, 1969.)

“August 28, 1969

Clare Middlemiss 

Building

Dear Clare:

PERSONAL

Yesterday, August 27th, at 11:45 a.m. I had a fifteen minute interview with President David O. McKay. He seemed happy to see me and pleased with my visit. Although in a somewhat weakened position and with breathing somewhat heavy, his mind was clear and he was able to get out his sentences quite well.

I reported to him on my visits to various parts of the Church and the expressions of love on the part of the people which they had asked me to convey to their beloved leader.

I discussed with him, Clare, the matter with which you are familiar having to do with BYU and the possible appointment of a Chancellor of Education. He was firm in his feeling that President Wilkinson should remain at BYU and he seemed to favor the appointment of a Chancellor and seemed to respond to the thought of having a member of the Twelve serve in that capacity. I simply told him that I was offering unsolicited suggestions. He seemed to appreciate the suggestions.

I also reported on the plans to create a new mission by a division of the Southern Far East Mission with headquarters possibly at Singapore or Bangkok. I told him of our plans to visit the area of the Asian Missions in October. We also talked about his visit to some of these countries back in 1921 as I recall.

He seemed reluctant to let me go but in the interest of his health I felt I should not prolong my visit. His eyes filled with tears as I told him of the love the people have for him and how I carried his greetings and love and blessings to the various congregations throughout the Church as I travelled. I told him of my love for him and he reciprocated in the warmest feelings. It was a joy to be with him again.

Sincerely,

Ezra Taft Benson”