Below you will find diary entries on the topic of “Education.” You can view other subjects here.
Search the diary entries below for specific dates, names, and keywords using the keyboard shortcut Command + F on a Mac or Control + F on Windows.
Wed., 30 Jun., 1943:
“9:00–Went to the Tracy Loan and Trust Company to see Mr. Newell Dayton, and while I was in conference with him, he called in Mr. James W. Collins, President of the Tracy Loan and Trust Company, and we considered some matters. I wished especially to explain to Mr. Dayton that when I called im the afternoon of the evening the School Board met to vote on Released Time, that I was perfectly sincere in suggesting to him that I thought the matter of voting for Released Time would be postponed, and I was somewhat surprised that the body passed on a strictly Mormon and Non-Mormon vote.
I told Mr. Dayton and Mr. Collins that there are three ways now in which further misunderstanding or hatred can be avoided:
1. I am sure there will be no objection on the part of the Church of those opposed to Released Time desire to take it to the Courts and test its legality.
2. That if the ministers wish to use the Latter-day Saint Seminaries, they are welcome to use them for their classes, or the Church, I am sure, will unite with them in building a union seminary which the outside churches can use for themselves.
3. If it be found that application for Released Time interfere with the present curriculum, then, I am sure, that the Church Board of Education will so modify the courses so that it will not in any way upset the educational courses as prescribed for the High Schools of the city.”
Mon., 8 Mar., 1948:
“10 a.m.–Dr. A. Ray Olpin of the University of Utah called at the office, and reported that Leroy Robertson had made application to head the Music Department of the University of Utah. President Olpin said that he had taken no action or had not even answered the application because he didn’t want the First Presidency to think that he (Dr. Olpin) was trying to take good teachers away from the Brigham Young University. President Clark and I told him that that was a matter for Professor Robertson to decide, and that the Presidency would take no formal action against Robertson’s accepting the position if it is offered him.”
Mon., 14 Feb., 1949:
“12:30–Speaker at the funeral services of Mosiah Hall, 86, held in the 27th Ward Chapel. Brother Hall started me out as a Teacher–he had me assisting him in his school room the year I completed the 8th Grade. As boys and girls we use to meet in the Hall home where he held ‘elocution’ classes.”
Mon., 20 Mar., 1950:
“7:45 a.m.–Having received telephone calls yesterday from both Brother and Sister Roy West of the Church Department of Education insisting that I give Brother West an audience on a personal matter, I met Brother West at my office. He said he has been offered a position at the Utah Agricultural College, and wanted advice as to whether he should leave his present position and do some extra work at the University of Utah towards getting his Ph.D. I told him I thought he had better remain where he is and do extra studying, if he can, at the University of Utah–that that would give him a chance to work out his investigation on the marriage and divorce problem in the Church.”
Mon., 22 May, 1950:
“Bishop Thorpe Isaacson telephoned, and discussed matters pertaining to the choosing of a president for the U.S.A.C. Said the Board of Trustees had held a meeting and wanted to call in Dixon from Ogden for interview. Bishop Isaacson said that he discouraged the idea, and asked them to wait awhile on that, and to go ahead with what they are already doing. Said that after commencement exercises at Cedar City, they held another meeting. Said they were very much impressed with Wayne Driggs; that he (Bp. Isaacson) had checked his tithing record and found that he had paid a full tithing for the past three years; further, that he seems to have that warmth that they would like in a President. Bishop Isaacson then spoke of Dr. Louis L. Madsen–said he has not had any administrative experience; his wife would not be able to help him much–they have seven children. Said they took a tentative vote at their last meeting; and Dixon got a few votes, and Madsen and Wayne Driggs got more than any one.
I said that with relation to the Brigham Young University matter, it looks as though the recommendation of the Executive Committee will go, so that will exclude my choice of man for President (Aldous Dixon). I said confidentially that I believe Dixon would rather stay where he is, but that Bishop Isaacson should see him; that he is a mighty fine man, that he has experience, training, personality, spirituality. Bishop Isaacson said that his age might go against him, but commented that Dr. Harris’ five years with the college had certainly enhanced the school, and that if Dixon could spend that length of time with the school, he certainly would be an asset in every way.
Bishop Isaacson also reported that in checking on the tithing record of Dr. Daryl Chase he was greatly disappointed to find that it was not as it should have been.”
Wed., 2 Aug., 1950:
“At 8 a.m. I met Brother Henry D. Moyle of the Council of the Twelve. He came in to ask if we had any suggestions for him on his visit to Hawaii to attend the Centennial of the opening of the Gospel in that land. I suggested that he listen and observe how local matters stand with respect to the following:
(1) Stake Presidency
(2) Mission Presidency
(3) The need of a church High School at Laie.
Also to observe carefully for possible successors in the Presidency of the Stake and in the Presidency of the Mission.”
Fri., 16 Feb., 1951:
“Bishop Isaacson telephoned–he would like to know what attitude he should take towards the bill that has been introduced in the Senate, making Snow College a Branch of the U.S.A.C. He stated that President Madsen of the U.S.A.C. had asked him whether the college should support the bill, urging its passage, or say nothing about it. Bishop Isaacson inquired as to the church’s attitude regarding this matter.
I answered that the attitude of the Church towards these college questions now before the legislature is expressed completely in the letter of the First Presidency to the Governor, which in substance is this: The suggestion about returning the three colleges–Weber, Dixie, and Snow–back to the Church came from the Governor of the State. The attitude of the Church is that this is in keeping with the original deeds that when the State discontinued the use of these buildings for educational purposes, the property reverts back to the Church. The Church has answered the Governor that if and when these properties so revert to the Church, the latter will accept them without commitments as to future policies, excepting that they be used undoubtedly for the educational interests of the communities involved.
Suggested that Brother Isaacson could say that the church has no objection to the State’s turning the Snow College over as a Branch of the U.S.A.C.”
Fri., 25 May, 1951:
“Dr. H. Ray Olpin telephoned to ask me if I had any preference relative to the degree the University [of Utah] is bestowing upon me June 9–said their committee had made the suggestion that an appropriate degree would be a doctor of Letters, thereby giving a different degree from each of the Universities in Utah. I answered that the degree of Doctor of Letters would please me very much, that although the Temple University has suggested the same degree, yet it would be appropriate to get the same degree from my home school. Dr. Olpin stated that the duplication of degrees would certainly be all right.
Dr. Olpin then brought up the matter of choosing the person to confer the degree upon me. Said that he noticed int he paper that my son Edward is to confer the degree upon me at Temple University, and that they should also like to ask Dr. Llewellyn McKay who is a member of their faculty present their degree to me, but thought it might not be very ‘tactful’ to have another son confer the degree. I said I thought he was entirely right. He then asked me if I had any particular choice, and I answered that I did not; in fact, that I had not given it a thought. Dr. Olpin then said that he thought Dr. Lowell Lees would be a good choice, and I answered that that would please me very much; that I had worked with him on the Centennial Committee, and that I would be honnored to have him present the degree to me.
I then told Dr. Olpin that I had chosen as my subject for the commencement address–True Education, The Paramount Purpose of a free People; that I feel this nation has reached a critical period in its history. Dr. Olpin said that he is glad I have chosen this particular subject as he too feels that there is a wrong concept of true education. He then said that he was to a meeting the other night and heard favorable remarks over the choice of the commencement speaker. I said ‘Well I hope you won’t be disappointed; I have worried a great deal about it during my convalescent period.’ Dr. Olpin said he understood and sympathized because he was aware of my illness and the great responsibility that had just come to me.”
Sun., 3 Jun., 1951:
“6:30 p.m.–At the home of President and Mrs. Ernest Wilkinson where Sister McKay and I rested for a few moments. I then got into my robes and at 7 p.m. joined the procession which formed at the upper campus. Near-perfect weather, with only a trace of the chill remaining from the cold which had hung over central Utah for several days, provided an ideal setting for the evening ceremony.
Nearly 5000 people crowded the fieldhouse where at 7:30 p.m. the Baccalaureate services commenced. This was the first time the new fieldhouse had been occupied.
The subject of my sermon was Eternal Verities.”
Thur., 14 Jun., 1951:
“We arrived at the Municipal Auditorium [Philadelphia] about an hour before the procession began–we put on our caps and gowns, and were ready when the others arrived. We were then introduced to Eddie Cantor, John S. Fine, Governor of Pennsylvania, Robert C. Hendrickson, U. S. Senator, and Frank Pace, Jr., Secretary of the Army–all of whom are to receive honorary degrees from Temple University.
There was no indication whatever of any slight so far as we were concerned–on the contrary everyone was very considerate, and when President Robert J. Johnson (President of Temple University) got up and introduced me, he dod not hesitate a moment in his remarks. He said: ‘We are honored today to have as our Commencement speaker the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a body of a million members. He is also President and Director of many business Corporations, an able speaker, and one of the great men of the United States.’
It was quite an experience to stand before that audience of 15,000 people and 1,920 graduates. The subject of my address was Two Precious Possessions Indispensable to a Free People. At the conclusion of my address I knew by the countenance of President Johnson that he was not disappointed. The members of the faculty and others were very profuse in expressing congratulations and appreciation.
One man said: ‘I have attended every commencement exercise of the Temple University, and I think this is one of the very best I have ever attended!’ Dr. Edward said that one man said to him that the address was the best he had ever heard, so it pleased me that they were not disappointed.”
Wed., 27 Feb., 1952:
“Dr. J. Aldous Dixon called at the office to invite me to the last session of the Weber College groundbreaking ceremonies Wednesday, March 5.
I told him I would be at the meeting to be held in the Ogden High School at 8 o’clock in the evening. He kindly proffered to send a man down to take me up there and bring me home following the meeting. I told him that I appreciated his offer, but that I would find someone to drive me up there.
Dr. Dixon then said that the Republicans are urging him to run for Congress. I said that his position at the College is probably more important than his going to Congress.”
Thur., 16 Oct., 1952:
“The regular First Presidency’s meeting continued until 9:45, at which time I left for the meeting of the Council of the Twelve in the Salt Lake Temple. Returned to the office at 3 p.m., where I signed scores of letters and documents for the next two hours. While engaged thusly, my son Robert called at the office. He is interested in using some of my old Sunday School outlines. Had Clare get these in the files in the basement. As soon as I find the time I shall go over these outlines which I prepared many years ago when we were inaugurating in the Sunday Schools a teacher training program.”
Tues., 10 Feb., 1953:
“8:45 a.m.—President Clark and I (President Richards being confined to his home with illness) met with Dr. Ernest Wilkinson, President of B.Y.U., Dr. A. Ray Olpin of the U. of U., Dr. Lynn Bennion, Supt. of City Schools, and David Wilson.
They called to see what the attitude of the First Presidency would be regarding the establishment of an educational television station, an opportunity now being open for another channel to be secured here in the State of Utah.
I favor the establishment of an educational TV station, and told them so. They asked if I would act as chairman of a committee, and I told them I thought it advisable for me to act as chairman of their proposed committee. I said that I would support them in their efforts, which would probably do more good than were I to act directly with the committee.”
Wed., 11 Feb., 1953
“Supt. Lynn Bennion called with further reference to the educational television channel which was discussed with the First Presidency yesterday. Said that he had taken the matter up in his Board of Education meeting held yesterday at which he reported his visit to the First Presidency. In an ‘off the record’ statement, he told them that President McKay felt that we should have an improvement over the present Television set-up. Unfortunately, there was a Tribune reporter present who promised he would not make any reference to the statement make by Brother Bennion. In the paper this morning is the following statement:
He (Dr. Bennion) noted a meeting with the 1st Presidency of the Church, which had brought high endorsement, with L.D.S. Pres. David O. McKay very much in favor of the educational television proposal.
Bro. Bennion said he is ‘concerned’ about the statement—he would not want to quote Pres. McKay without his permission.
The second matter he wishes presented to Pres. McKay is that the group thought they should talk to the Governor, and felt that Orval Adams would be the one to go with David Wilson, and wanted to know if Bro. McKay would talk to Bro. Adams. Said he knows Orval very well, but though Bro. Adams would be the one to go with David Wilson, and wanted to know if Bro. McKay would talk to Bro. Adams. Said he knows Orval very well but thought Bro. Adams would respond if he knew Pres. McKay is interested.
Later: Pres. McKay had his secretary speak to Orval Adams about seeing the Governor, and he (Bro. Adams) suggested that Henry Pierson, of the Utah Foundation, would be the best man to get in touch with the Governor.
Bro. Bennion was so advised—and also that Pres. McKay said that the statement in the paper this morning is all right—because, in fact he is much in favor of educational TV.”
Wed., 11 Feb., 1953:
“[First Presidency meeting] Discussed the matter of the Church taking over the Snow college at Ephraim. We favored accepting it if the State offers it to us; that we are not, however, applying for it.”
Sun., 15 Feb., 1953:
“At the office practically all day attending to special duties.
Telephoned to Supt. Lynn Bennion and reported to him my contact with Senator Tietjen who expressed himself as favoring the educational TV channel. Also said that my investigations and inquiries lead me to believe that the proper steps will be taken (1) to secure for the State the educational channel, and (2) that the present legislature would probably appoint and recommend to the Governor that a committee be appointed to work out the details of its installation and operation.”
Mon., 16 Feb., 1953:
“7 a.m. Met by appointment Gus Backman of the Chamber of Commerce. Consulted with him regarding (1) The securing the right to have an educational TV channel. Brother Backman is in favor of having the channel, and having it under the control of the leading educational institutions—University of Utah, B.Y.U., Utah Agricultural College—and recommends the appointment of a committee to investigate its installation, and how it should be conducted and controlled.
We agreed that the Legislature should protect out right to get the channel, and recommend that the Governor appoint a committee on which would be represented the leading educational institutions and some leading citizens to determine how best to install it and to control it.
(2) We considered the Corrupt Practice Act now before the legislature.
(3) Also considered the ‘Right to Work’ bill. We had a very worthwhile consultation.”
Mon., 16 Feb., 1953:
“Called Brother Lawrence B. Johnson, State Representative, who was in session at the State Capitol. I asked him what he thinks of the Educational Channel the state is trying to get through. He said that there is a chance to get another television channel in the state of Utah for educational purposes.
I said this channel would be sponsored by the University of Utah, the Brigham Young University and Utah State Agricultural College.
Brother Johnson thought there might be some propaganda attached to it but inasmuch as the BYU is sponsoring it he believed that it would take out the propaganda angle. I suggested that a committee could be appointed to study the matter further. Brother Johnson said he would check and see what he could find out about it and would let me know later.”
Tues., 17 Feb., 1953:
“Meeting of President David O. McKay with Representatives S. J. (Vean) Postma of Logan and Simeon Dunn of Hyrum, and Secretary of State Lamont F. Toronto, February 17, 1953, in regard to the Utah State Agricultural College.
POSTMA: The people of Cache Valley and Logan are very concerned about the welfare of the Agricultural College. The majority want to support President Madsen. He is capable of handling the job. We feel it would do the College serious damage if he were removed. We know that removing Dean Symons was a preliminary step to get President Madsen out. Groups have met with Governor Lee on various occasions to urge him that President Madsen is capable of doing the job. The Governor concurred with us that board member Preston perhaps was the cause of a lot of the difficulty and ought to be removed. He has two more years to go in his term. The Governor himself initiated the proposal and asked our opinion as to a means of removing Preston or whether to request the entire board to resign. We felt that Preston would not of himself resign. In all the meetings, the governor has preferred that as a solution. We thought he was going to go through with that, but in the meeting a week ago with the board, a reversal of opinion was taken, and, we understand, out of that board meeting came a united opinion from the Governor and the Board of Trustees that President Madsen must go. We people in Cache Valley want to go about this in a consistent manner. We realize that you met with the Governor and assume that you took a position in the matter. We want to support you and do the right thing, and that is why we are here, to learn your thinking in the matter, if you have assumed a position. A good many people in Logan called me Sunday and said, ‘We understand President McKay visited with the Governor, and whatever his judgment is, we want to go along with him.
PRES. McKAY: My only attitude with the Governor was that it is none of my business, but I think President Madsen must not be hurt, and there should be no reflection on Brother Madsen in this matter. I think that he should be given a reappointment and let him and the board work this out for his own interest and the interest of the school. That is my position. I think he will not be dismissed. I do not know, but I think he and the board should work this out, whatever difficulties there are.
POSTMA: The reason I invited Rep. Dunn to meet with us is because he has met with me and Senator Muir in meeting with the Governor last Friday. The Governor implied that he feels that President Madsen must go by July 1, when the term of his present board expires.
DUNN: That is right.
PRES McKAY: I think you are right on that. Governor Lee thinks President Madsen is not an executive, and there has been some talk that Brother Madsen does not like that type of work. My talk with Brother Madsen indicates that he would like to go on and work this out. I think this is what he will do.
POSTMA: That is the impression he left with me. He did not make any statement that he would like to get out and get to into another field.
PRES. McKAY: He did not say to me, either, that he would like to change. Nothing should be done to reflect on Brother Madsen, because he is a great man, and he is a good man.
POSTMA: That is exactly our feeling up our way.
PRES. McKAY: I know there are those who would like to get him out.
POSTMA: The students are very concerned. Many parents have approached me and said if this is not worked out satisfactorily, our students will not stay. They will go to B.Y.U. My feeling is that that school can be as great an asset to the Church as the B.Y.U.
PRES. McKAY: That is right! How do the people in Logan know I had a conference with the Governor?
POSTMA: Professor L.R. Humphreys was working in the board room next door. As he came out, he said he saw you.
PRES. McKAY: I told the Governor it is none of my business. He said, ‘Yes, it is your business, because everything in this office is the business of the people.’ I soon found out his attitude. I said, ‘Let nothing be done that would injure this man.”
POSTMA: Yes, the Governor has consistently said he has a very high opinion of President Madsen as a man, but he does not feel he is an executive. We do not feel he has had an opportunity to demonstrate his ability!
PRES. McKAY: This should not go out of this committee: Have you heard, as I have heard authoritatively, that this man Preston, whom I do not know, has changed his attitude, that he came here two weeks ago or three weeks ago and acknowledged, to use his phrase, ‘I have been a damn fool in fighting the Church in this matter.’ He said, ‘We need the Church up here. We need the Church influence here.’ He said, ‘I hope the time will never come when we will not have a prominent Church man at the head of the board; and the head of this school should be a Latter-day Saint.’
DUNN: George (Preston) has good blood. He is a son of Bishop W.B. Preston. He went through World War I.
TORONTO: I have gone to two meetings, and Preston needled President Madsen all the way through, especially about the carpets in the Union Building. In executive session, they considered what should be done about Madsen, and in this session they decided not to do anything at that time. There is a breach between the faculty and the board and possibly public relations, between the citizens, alumni and the board. I feel that if President Madsen resigns at this time, or if he is asked to resign or resigns on his own accord, the board of trustees will have caused such a breech that nobody will have confidence in them up there.
PRES. McKAY: I think that he is not going to be asked to resign; neither will the board be asked to resign. The board, as presently constituted, are appointees of the Governor. Why should he ask his own appointees to resign? I do not think he will do it. I think he will fill the vacancies. The new board will have the job of appointing a new president. I think they should appoint President Madsen.
TORONTO: Does President Madsen intend to tender his resignation?
PRES. McKAY: I do not think so.
POSTMA: He did not indicate such a thing Sunday in my hearing.
DUNN: Last Friday, the Governor, in our visit with him, was pretty strong.
PRES. McKAY: He thinks that President Madsen is not an executive.
DUNN: He even said it was unanimous in the board that Madsen had to go.
PRES. McKAY: I think that it is not conclusive. The latest word that I received is that President Madsen can meet the board and solve the problems and go on. I think he should do that.
DUNN: Yes, but that is not the idea of the Governor.
POSTMA: We took that stand with President Madsen, and asked that he even make some apologies if necessary. I went in with the President and told him I had to bite my tongue several times. He said, ‘So did I.’
PRES. McKAY: He has a mind of his own.
POSTMA: I admire him for that.
PRES. McKAY: Yes, but the board has a mind of its own, too, so when an irresistible force meets and immovable object, you know the result.
POSTMA: The board has taken the stand that Madsen has refused to carry our their recommendations in the case of President Nuttall and Snow College. The board accuses Madsen of doing nothing to try to find a replacement for President Nuttall. The state took over Snow College July 1, 1951, the board held a meeting and President Madsen submitted sex or seven names for board consideration for a man to take Nuttall’s place; and after some discussion, board member Woolley made a motion that Nuttall’s contract be renewed for another year. A meeting or so later, the board asked President Madsen to contact Symons to see if he would be interested in taking that position. In a board meeting a little later, President Madsen said he had approached Symons but he was not interested. He had approached L.G. Noble about it, but he had turned it down. Nothing further was said until last July 1, and Woolley or Preston again made a motion that Nuttall’s contract be renewed for this year in which we are now. In November, the board asked Madsen to again approach Symons. They knew he had turned it down once, but they wanted him approached again. That does not look to me as if President Madsen has failed to carry out the action of the board. He made a sincere effort; yet the board said he defiled them, he refused to do anything about it, he drug his feet. Those minutes do not indicate that to me.
TORONTO: I sit on both boards, and there is a different way of doing business on both boards. The board of regents listens to the recommendations of the president and discuss the recommendations. If the president makes a recommendation and the board disapproves it, the president will withdraw the recommendation, and the board of regents does not dictate what the president ought to do. Now, the board of trustees rather get too far into the administrative field in advising President Madsen, and that is one of the things that is wrong with that board.
PRES. McKAY: Yes, if the board would decide what to do and say, ‘Now, President Madsen, the administration is yours,’ it would be much better. There is one other thing which seems to be a pertinent factor in this: that is your executive secretary, Berntson. Judging from what I have heard, he assumes to dictate to teachers and groups what should be done, rather than the president. Is that right?
TORONTO: I think he has a certain following with some of the faculty. He has a tendency to go around the president to the board. I believe the board is all agreed that Mr. Berntson should be relieved.
PRES. McKAY: What does President Madsen think about it?
TORONTO: I don’t know.
PRES. McKAY: I have not been able to ascertain it.
TORONTO: President Madsen is coming down, and I will ask him.
PRES. McKAY: Do that. It appears to me that Preston will be put back; Brother Isaacson will be put back; Mrs. Ercanbrack will be put back, some of these others will be reappointed, and that board will then function just as it is. The board should reappoint President Madsen as president of that College. He should be given a new executive secretary. He should call him in, if he is President Madsen’s choice. I thought a good deal of him when I was up there on the board.
TORONTO: He is a good public relations man.
PRES. McKAY: Yes, but he has not sustained Brother Madsen.
TORONTO: That is right.
POSTMA: I don’t think he has sustained the administration at all, Secretary Toronto. Two years ago I was on the Appropriations Committee. In several meetings he said the figure the Governor recommended was all right, we could get along with it. During the last year, starting about last January, President Madsen and Director Frischknecht realized they would need a deficit appropriation in order to carry our their program for the balance of the year, and they intended to approach the board and ask their approval for a deficit appropriation. President Madsen told me that Berntson, being secretary of that subcommittee, told them that he did not think the Extension Service needed that money. When Madsen and Frischknecht met the board and presented their arguments, the subcommittee challenged it and said they did not need it, and the executive secretary backed them up. They got the deficit appropriation form the Governor, some $22,000, having later convinced the Governor they needed it, through the facts. I have the feeling that Berntson is in alliance with the Governor in his financial stand, and he just undermines the president in every move.
PRES. McKAY: No doubt about it. I think we should work along those lines.
POSTMA: Can we build confidence in the board? I wonder if the public, faculty and student body can have their confidence built up in that situation.
TORONTO: I think President Madsen could do a lot by talking to each board member privately and telling the board members that he may have made a mistake or two, that he would like their vote of confidence, and I think the breach could be held there if the board would give him a vote of confidence and another year.
POSTMA: If eight new faces came onto that board, I wonder if that would allay the fears of the public, faculty and student body. If we cannot remove the cause of the difficulty, Preston, I wonder if we can offset it by eight strong people.
PRES. MCKAY: You can’t get him off.
POSTMA: I wonder if the entire board can be removed.
PRES. MCKAY: You cannot do that.
DUNN: I asked Representative White, former member of the board, his opinion about Preston. He said, “If there was ever a devil upon the earth, it is George Preston!”
PRES. MCKAY: Well, the remark I mentioned may have been made just as I quoted it, but it might have been because of the reappointment in the offing and he wanted to be reappointed. I am not going to accuse him of that, however.
TORONTO: Not too long ago I heard he went to one of the Presbyterian members of the faculty and said, ‘We have got to get together and get rid of some of these Mormons!’
PRES. MCKAY: Well, if this repentance is true, let us give him credit for it.
DUNN: I think Preston knows what is right. He had a good bringing up.
PRES. MCKAY: Well, this came to me within the last two weeks. He said, ‘I have been wrong; my attitude has been wrong, and I am sorry I have caused lots of trouble, and I did it willfully.’
POSTMA: I talked with President Perry within the last two weeks, and he said Preston had told him he had made some mistakes.
PRES. MCKAY: Well, here is where we stand: the board will be reappointed.
POSTMA: The majority of those whose terms will expire?
PRES. MCKAY: Yes.
POSTMA: I know the Governor would like to reappoint some of them. He indicated that.
PRES. MCKAY: I am pretty sure that will be done. That being the case, the responsibility of appointing a new president will be with the new board. I hope, and I have reason to think, that the board will reappoint President Madsen as president. I am sure they will not do anything that will reflect discredit in any way upon President Madsen. There are members of the board who blame him for not cooperating, and they give specific instances, but President Madsen can meet the board and sincerely say that he wants to cooperate. He should see that there is no interfering from the board in the administrative affairs of the school. Whatever the board members would like him to do, they should tell him and then let him deal with the deans and faculty. No teacher or other staff member should come around talking to the board members, ignoring him in administrative matters. He should be given authority to conduct the school, and I think he can do it!
TORONTO: A number of the board members have a tendency to go into the school and talk directly to the faculty.
PRES. MCKAY: And faculty members have a tendency to go directly to the board, and the president should resent it! I think that is what should be done. If President Madsen would like to go into research, of course that is up to him; but now that the fight is on, surely he will not give up. He is one of the greatest research men in the United States. It may be that he can serve the college, state and nation better in that respect.
POSTMA: That is the position we have taken with the Governor. If another year under a proper atmosphere shows that he cannot administer the College, then he should be allowed to leave the position.
PRES. MCKAY: That is my attitude, and I sincerely recommend it.
DUNN: It is like the trouble Dr. Widtsoe had at the A.C. and at the University.
PRES. MCKAY: I think the board, if appointed as we have indicated this morning, will not ask Brother Madsen to resign, and I think Brother Madsen should take a compromising attitude with the board, because there is antagonism now, which makes it pretty hard to give in. Somebody must give in. I am sure Brother Madsen will come half way.
POSTMA: Would you care to suggest which board members we should contact? The public has put terrific pressure on the board, and they are not satisfied with the board members in the Symons case.
PRES. MCKAY: Is the Symons case closed?
POSTMA: Yes.
PRES. MCKAY: Brother Madsen told me he is a good man. He was in hopes that Brother Symons would stay up there on the faculty.
POSTMA: That was the public’s wish too. They are afraid the same policy will continue to undermine the College. I think we have enough support in the Senate to control the appointments of the Governor. There is a fine attitude in the majority about the College. They want to protect the College. This action of the Governor on the Sunday Closing bill did not win any support from the Legislature. I think we can override the Governor’s veto today. Frankly, a lot of us are getting fed up on supporting the Governor. He takes such an obstinate view!
PRES. MCKAY: Let me have another talk with one or two members of the board who are leaders of the board. More good can be done by quietly influencing those who wield an influence than having the public enter into it, because the public does not understand all the conditions. I believe, brethren, if we talk to the board and to Brother Madsen, that this can be ironed out to the good of the College, the good of the people, and to the honor of Brother Madsen. My attitude is that no action should be taken that would reflect upon that great and good man. I have confidence in his sincerity and ability.
POSTMA: President Madsen told me that he wanted this man Kelly, head of the Survey Commission, to be his assistant and to help adopt the proposals of the Kelly Committee. He approached the board, which the minutes will show. The board said, ‘We favor that proposal of yours, President Madsen. You approach him and see what arrangements can be made.’ President Madsen approached Kelly and asked him to come in for a year for $4,500. Kelly said he could not afford to come to Utah for that. They negotiated and settled on a figure of $6,000. Kelly said, ‘I will come on that figure, on one condition, that Secretary Berntson be dismissed immediately.’ Madsen went to the board with that proposal, and the board voted him down on it, which is an indication to me that they want to retain Berntson. Madsen said, ‘I saw that my hands are tied and I cannot move.’
TORONTO: Saturday they discussed this matter, and it is the feeling of the board that Berntson has to ho, but I don’t think they will do it immediately.
PRES. MCKAY: I asked two members of the board if Madsen could work with Berntson, and Madsen said yes.
TORONTO: I feel, and I believe that three-fourths of the members of the board feel that Berntson has to go.
POSTMA: Madsen said Sunday that this arrangement could be worked out if Berntson stuck to the book work and a business manager came in to handle the matters with the faculty.
PRES. MCKAY: If the board will give President Madsen another appointment and let him choose another executive secretary and assistant, everything will work out.
POSTMA: I hope Preston is sincere.
PRES. MCKAY: So do I.
POSTMA: We feel that Preston works very closely with F.P. Champ. Many people say Preston is just a stooge of Champ. The Governor has asked me on two occasions to go and get my advice from Mr. Champ. I have done so. If you have any influence with Mr. Champ, maybe this could be worked out.
PRES. MCKAY: I have always liked him. He was president of the board when I was up there. I have not said a word to him about this, but I would not hesitate.
POSTMA: We feel sure that the Governor is listening to Champ.
PRES. MCKAY: You are right in the fact that the Governor wants Madsen out.
POSTMA: He demanded it, Friday.
DUNN: I think Champ appointed Preston to the board.
PRES. MCKAY: We cannot get him off, so let us hope his repentance is sincere.
DUNN: The Governor can get rid of those he wants to; he has done so. He got rid of White and Stringham.
PRES. MCKAY: I am pretty sure that the board as now constituted, or the new board, will not take any action that will case reflection upon President Madsen. If they do, then my assurances are not correct.
POSTMA: Possibly they won’t if the Governor will quit pressing for it.
PRES. MCKAY: That is what the legislator said to me last night, but I am very careful about going up. I did not think anyone knew of it.
POSTMA: L.R. Humphreys saw you walking out, and it was just assumed that it had to do with President Madsen and the A.C….We want to work with you on this.
PRES. MCKAY: That is my stand. I am pretty sure the Governor will reappoint the men. Who the men are to be appointed to fill vacancies, I do not know. When he does make his appointments, we can see who they are.
POSTMA: We have a pledge from the Governor that he will not submit any names without first getting Republican Party concurrence in them in naming future appointments. If he will stay with his pledge, it will give us a chance to block anyone undesirable.
PRES. MCKAY: In contacting board members, take the attitude that nothing should be done to reflect upon President Madsen. Give him a chance to administer the work without interference. There has been too much of that. Madsen is an easy-going man, and would do nothing to hurt anyone. That school must be upheld; it is one of the best in the country. No school wields a better influence. The flare-up regarding the Dean of Students surprised me very much.
May I ask you men what your attitude is on this educational television? We have a chance to get an educational channel here in Utah, and between now and July, somebody is going to get this new channel. The state superintendent started it. There is opposition to that, because it will be a propaganda means. Now, President Olpin, President Wilkinson and, I think President Madsen, head this committee who are favoring an educational channel free from advertising, free from beer, tobacco, and all that, but putting into the home a channel which would be educational to our children. I have spoken to Gus Bachman about it. He opposed it at first, but yesterday morning he was in favor of it.
If we can get the approval of the Legislature, the second step is the appointment of a committee by you legislators or the Governor, consisting of the leading men in the institutions; so there will be no propaganda here by the Church or by the state, let those three men, Madsen, Olpin and Wilkinson represent the educational features, three layman whom the Legislature will appoint, and one other, and let them work out the details.
DUNN: I believe a bill has been drawn up and will be introduced, that will provide for a commission which will have the authority to deal with the F.C.C. and ask for an extension of time beyond next June, and this bill would provide for a token appropriation to start the thing out and will give a little more time. There are members of the Legislature opposed to it. I am one of the teachers who were under fire.
POSTMA: There is certainly a great need for a better program on television.
PRES. MCKAY: Thank you, brethren. Let us keep public agitation down until we can talk to members of the board, and save Brother Madsen and the school.
Mark Peterson—February 17, 1953
Called Brother Petersen and asked him is he is acquainted with the proposal to establish in Salt Lake City an Educational TV channel. He answered that he had read about it in the newspaper, and that one day David Wilson from Ogden came in and asked him to serve on a committee.
I then explained to Brother Petersen that they had to ask me to be chairman of the Committee, but we thought it unwise for me to act in this capacity, and that I had suggested we ask him to represent us on that committee. I said that we must do something to utilize this force for educational improvement in our home—that we invite the tobacco and whiskey advertisements right into our home—but are doing very little to bring through the television the worthwhile, educational features into our homes.
Said that I had spoken to several senators and representatives who are now in Session at the Capitol—including Lawrence B. Johnson, S.J. Vean Postam, Simeon Dunn of Hyrum, Secretary of State, Lamont Toronto, Senator Titetjen.
Also told Brother Petersen that I had had a talk with Gus Backman who had opposed the establishment of the channel at first, because he file that the State Teaching Association was using the issue for propaganda purposes. Now that he knows the leading educational institutions of the State—the B.Y.U.—the U. of U.—A.C.U. are heading it, and favoring it, threw a different light on it and took it out of the propaganda field.
I said that I told Brother Backman that the Federal Communications Commission had given until July 1 to get the channel, but that we have assurance that the time will be extended if necessary. If not, we shall take steps to secure the channel if the Legislature will give some meager appropriation sufficient to make an investigation. It is felt the Legislature of the Governor should appoint an investigating committee or commission comprised of representatives from leading institutions and other representative citizens to study the situation with a view of installing it.
Brother Petersen then said that he will be delighted to work on this committee, and at my suggestion will be pleased to get in touch with Senators Kerr and Hopkins to ask for their interest in the project. Brother Petersen then said that Lew Roberts is being sent to Hawaii by the National organization of the Boy Scouts, and inasmuch as he is a member of the Y.M.M.I.A. General Board, wonders if it will be all right to hold meetings in the interest of scouting in the Oahu Stake. As M.I.A. General Board members do not go into the Mission, Brother Roberts is asking for special permission as he felt he might do some good. I told Brother Petersen to have Brother Roberts consult President Nelson of Hawaii Mission, and if it is agreeable with him, it will be all right for Brother Roberts to contact the L.D.S. workers.
Fri., 20 Feb., 1953:
“7:00 a.m.—Came to the office—busy with office matters until 8:05 a.m., at which time Brother Anderson on Manti, Utah called at the office—he discussed with me matter pertaining to the Snow College. (see note at end of next page)
Mon., 2 Mar., 1953
“Discussed matters pertaining to the U.S.A.C. Board—the assignment of new members to the Board, and the retirement for the Board of Bishop Isaacson. I said confidentially that is the Governor will reappoint the Board and let the Board and the President work out the difficulties for the present, that nobody will be hurt and the school will be benefited. Further, that Brother Isaacson’s health is not good, and that he will have to resign after he has straightened out things at the College.
Brother Johnson mentioned the stories that have come out about Bishop Isaacson, and I stated that there is absolutely no truth in them; that I had received letters making apologies for what has been said. I stated that Bishop Isaacson is fine executive, and that for the present I have in mind the good of the school—it is a good school and must not be permitted to deteriorate.
Bro. Johnson said he would hate to have anything happen to President Madsen this year. I said that sometime during the year they could probably work things out. Brother Johnson said that just now it would be tragic for Pres. Madsen to leave—felt that if he had a different Board it would be better for him. Mentioned that Bishop Isaacson has two more years on the Board if he cares to remain.
(3) Bro. Johnson then brought up the Appropriation’s Bill now before the Legislature. I said that I think everything should be done to maintain our schools. Bro. Johnson wondered if I should call Orval Adams and ask him to get in touch with the Governor regarding the allotment to our schools. I said that I had refrained from entering into this—that it is a matter for the State to decide. Bro. Johnson said that his judgment is that if we had a temporary Board, and studied the bill for the next two years, then we should be in a position to know what we should do about higher education.
I said I had not given any thought to the matter, and would hare to express myself offhand.
I said I had received a call this morning from Ogden regarding the elementary schools in that district, and that I had told the person calling to contact Senator Woolley who is chairman of the Appropriations’ Committee and get his side of the question.
I told Brother Johnson that it does not strike me as a wise thing to have a Board who can tell institutions what to do; that if I were President of the U of U or Agricultural College, and the State Legislature would say to me: ‘We are going to have a Board who will tell you how to direct your school,’ I think I should hand in my resignation.
Bro. Johnson answered: ‘Well if you were there, we would not have to have a Board.’
Brother Johnson then asked that I think about putting both schools—U of U and U.S.A.C.—under a joint Board.
I said that I had been a member of the Board of Regents of the U of U and a member of the Board U.S.A.C., and think eventually the joint board will be a good thing; that I have always favored it, but to do it now would be critical; that I believe it could be done more effectively when the difficulties are ironed out.
Bro. Johnson then went into the appropriation for the TV Educational channel—said that three of our professors had shown the Governor some programs on this modern are business, and that the Governor was perturbed at what they had shown him, and since they are seeking $100,000 for their TV educational program, it was very unwise to bring that sort of thing before the Governor when the money can be used to much better advantage.
Bro. Johnson then said he is sure the Governor would enjoy a visit form me to talk over some of these problems.
5. Governor J. Bracken Lee called—said that he had a ‘little brain storm’ and wanted my advice regarding the situation at the Utah Agricultural College—‘I am wondering if it would be beneficial to do something like this: Put Thorpe Isaacson on the University of Utah Board, and Dr. Adam S. Bennion on the Utah Agricultural College Board.’
I stated that I had suggested to Bishop Isaacson that he had better ask to be released from the Board at the USAC because of his health; and that I thought it would be a good move for him; that when he gets back and can get matters moving along smoothly at the College, he could resign. His health is not good and he should get off that Board.
The Governor then said that he thought that could be done without injuring him at all.
I further stated: ‘Now, I believe that if you appointed him at the U of U you would have to release him from that Board because of his health; otherwise it would be good move.
The Governor then said that he wished to smooth things our without injuring or hurting any one.
I told him that we appreciate his consideration.
It was agreed that I should think about the Governor’s proposal and then call him later giving him my advice on the matter.
Tues., 3 Mar., 1953:
First Presidency.
“At 8 a.m. I telephoned to Governor J. Bracken Lee in response to his request that I give thought to the advisability of appointing Bishop Thorpe Isaacson a member of the Board of Regents of the University of Utah, and Dr. Adam S. Bennion as a member of the Board of Trustees of the U.S.A.C.
I said that inasmuch as Brother Isaacson is one of the four oldest on the Board of Trustees of the College that I think it would be better for him to remain there and with the new appointees on the Board help to settle the difficulties that are now rampant between the Board, the President, and the faculty of the U.S.A.C.
I remarked further that as Brother Isaacson’s health is not very good, it may be necessary in a few months for Brother Isaacson to request a release from the Board of Trustees.
The Governor stated that he had no desire whatever to get rid of Bishop Isaacson because, he, the Governor, considers the Bishop on of the ablest men interested in the welfare of the College.
Wed., 4 Mar., 1953:
Telephone Calls
“Bishop Wirthlin telephoned regarding the school at Albion, Idaho. Senator Barlow (member of the Church) of the Idaho State Legislature and two or three others have held off action regarding the school. They are trying to save it, and if the Church is interested action should be taken right away. I asked Brother Wirthlin if they are saving it for a State School—that he should find out definitely regarding this, for if it is for a State School, the matter should be straightened out up there.
Bishop Wirthlin said they want a rural church school. I stated that if we assumed the responsibility of this school, we shall probably take on a burden; that in the present stage of transition in our church school system, we had better not undertake to do anything just now.
Bishop Wirthlin then brought up the matter of the donation to the Church by Elder Henry D. Moyle of stock valued at $20,000. Bishop Wirthlin thinks Bro. Moyle prefers that the money be credited to the building account of the Los Angeles Temple—I asked Bishop Wirthlin to find out just what Brother Moyle wishes to do, because funds for the Temple in Los Angeles are coming in very well, and that probably it would be better to credit it to the Swiss Temple as Brother Moyle is a former missionary to the Swiss-German Mission.”
9 Mar., 1953:
Telephone conversation President A. Ray Olpin of the University of Utah at 11:00 a.m.
“President Olpin said he tried last night to contact President McKay but President McKay said he didn’t arrive home until nearly midnight.
President Olpin said he had two matters to discuss with President McKay. The first he asked President McKay if he had seen the list of the new Board of Regents for the University and President McKay said that he had. President Olpin said there were two L.D.S. men appointed who would be good, they are Albert Bowen and Richard L. Evans. President McKay said the one man from St. George, (LeRoy H. Cox) was no good in his opinion.
President McKay remarked that Arthur Woolley, who was transferred from the USAC Board of Trustees to the U of U Board of Regents, is good and will stand for right. Mr. Woolley has been in a troubled spot at USAC and the AC has not bettered their situation any by transferring Mr. Woolley because he is a good man. President McKay asked if Mr. Woolley is a University boy and President Olpin said he imagined he was because he is a lawyer. President McKay said he has always gotten along well with Mr. Woolley and President Olpin said he has always liked Mr. Woolley.
President Olpin said that Richard L. Evans was Alumni President so he will probably be there even though he doesn’t get re-elected.
The second thing President Olpin was concerned about was a visit form President Wilkinson and Adam S. Bennion where President Wilkinson served notice that he has offered Dr. Virginia Cutler a position at the BYU. President Olpin said this was just like a ‘stick of dynamite’ because the Home Economics House was built with Dr. Cutler in mind and Sterling Sill has contacted some 800 people to raise money for the building—the whole thing has been built around Dr. Cutler and her plans and it is quite a shock to lose her after all the work and plans.
President Olpin said that President Wilkinson’s excuse for offering Dr. Cutler the position was that they couldn’t find a person and the L.D.S. girls at the BYU need the guidance which Dr. Cutler could give. President Olpin said that the U of U is made up primarily of LDS girls also.
President Wilkinson has been trying for 2 years unofficially to get Dr. Cutler. He has been in and out of her office half a dozen times to talk to her. She has turned him down several times.
President Olpin said that President Wilkinson claimed that he had come with Dr. Bennion with the full approval of the Board to try to get her. President McKay said that was not a fact. He said that ‘I had opposed all the time his going to the University and taking any teacher without the approval of the President, and finally we said ‘this matter be left entirely to Mrs. Cutler, and if she wishes to go, we shall approve, and Dr. Bennion, as a member of this Board, and also a member of the University Board of Regents, should accompany President Wilkinson and they together should see Dr. Olpin and the matter be left entirely with Dr. Cutler.’
Dr. Olpin said, ‘I would not in any way stand in her way; I had no indication of her desire to go; she has told me how much she has resisted offers before.’
Dr. Olpin said that Dr. Bennion came and said ‘President Olpin, I am here because the Board suggested that I come; I suppose it is because I am a member of both Boards. President Wilkinson is qualified to speak for himself.’ This is the only statement made by Dr. Bennion.
Dr. Olpin then remarked that Dr. Cutler is under the impression that Dr. Bennion thinks she should go.
President McKay then said, ‘Will you please tell her that you have it directly from the President of the Board of Trustees of the BYU that there is no desire on the part of the Board to influence her in the least—that if she has any feeling of obligation to the U of U (and she should have) she is perfectly free to remain where she is—that there is no coercion whatever from a religious standpoint—it is left entirely with her. And furthermore, even if she decided to go to BYU, she should not go without consulting Dr. Olpin.’
Dr. Olpin said that they had consulted him, but they did not ask for his objections; that he had plenty of objections to raise. He said there are several hundred people and industries who have contributed generously to the program, and that Dr. Cutler has been right in the middle of it, and just now for her to leave the U of U would be, in a way, for her to leave the building unoccupied.
President McKay answered that this matter is in his (Dr. Olpin’s) and Brother Sill’s and Dr. Cutler’s hands.
Dr. Olpin said that he feels the BYU should be happy in having LDS people in other schools; that ‘Ernest’ has the desire to make the BYU the biggest University in the world.
President McKay said that it will be a very discouraging condition and very detrimental if we let the sentiment go throughout the State that the U of U is a non-member school—that in reality the U of U is our School as much as any other school, and LDS people are supporting it.
President Olpin said if President McKay feels Dr. Cutler should go he would not oppose it. If she wants to go it is her responsibility. President McKay said he feels her (Dr. Cutler’s) responsibility to Brother Sill stands out preeminently. Brother Sill feels hurt about it but he never complains.
President Olpin said that President Wilkinson is ambitious, efficient, and dynamic. He has found difficulty getting teachers who were right for the school. He has two or three of the faculty upset all the time, talking informally to them.
President McKay said that the U of U is and LDS Institution. President McKay asked if he had made himself clear. He said he feels that Dr. Cutler owes obligation to Brother Sill. There isn’t another man who would have done the same thing. He went on with his work after being released from the Board of Regents and he did the work without financial help from the State.
President McKay said there would be no disfavor in the eyes of the President and the Board if she decides to stay at the U of U.”
Thurs., 12 Mar., 1953:
8:40 to 9:15—Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson came in to report that the Legislature had passed the bill for educational television, but that there is evidence that the Governor will veto it. He appealed to me to go and see the Governor, but he would not do so as he did not want to place himself in the position of being turned down. There is assurance from Washington however, that the limit for greeting this TV channel will not be June 1, 1953. Brother Wilkinson said that he would see the Governor about it.
Later Dr. Wilkinson came back to report his conversation with the Governor—said that he is determined to veto the bill.
I stated that I think it is not wise for me to try to bring undue influence, or to try to influence the Governor against his own personal convictions regarding the bill.
Fri., 27 Mar., 1953
“At 7:35 a.m., in company with Howard J. McKean, Bishops Wirthlin, Isaacson, and Beuhner, went to the Beuhner Auto & Concrete Products Company at 640 Wilmington Avenue (between 21st and 22nd E) to choose the color for the 1,750 blocks that will make up the outside wall of the Los Angeles Temple.
I returned to the office at 9 a.m. where I attended Executive Committee meeting of the Department of Education. We tacitly approved of reorganizing the governing boards of the Church Educational system, the suggestion having been made that we place the Brigham Young University and Colleges, Institutes and Seminaries under one head.
Following the aforementioned meeting, the Bishopric and the Presidency viewed suggestive elevation and internal plans of a proposed temple for Bern, Switzerland.
President Clark and I then drove out to the Beuhner Concrete Establishment, and examined more carefully and critically the proposed material for the outside of the Los Angeles Temple wall.
We returned to the office and at 11:05 a.m. attended a meeting of the Church Board of education. We considered recommendations of Commissioner Franklin West on retirement and employment of teachers, and heard his annual report.
Following the meeting I had a confidential talk with Commissioner West on the proposed reorganization of the Church School educational system. He thought is was a wise thing to do; however, it was evident that he believes that the controlling body under the Board of Education should be the Commissioner and his associates rather than under the Brigham Young University. However, he expressed a willingness to cooperate in whatever the authorities deemed best.”
9 Apr., 1953:
“Telephone Conversation with Elder Ezra Taft Benson re: Pres. Louis L. Madsen at Washington, D.C. Tele. 7-4142
Pres. McKay: ‘You’re back on the job already.’
Elder Benson: ‘Very much so. I should like to have stayed longer—I enjoyed those three days of Conference so much—it was like going into another world.’
Pres. McKay: ‘I am sorry I was not here to say goodbye when you called at the office.’
Bro. Benson: ‘I wanted to shake your hand and tell you it was amazing to me the way you went through the Conference. Your instructions were wonderful—you rose to the heights.’
Pres. McKay: ‘Thank you.’
Pres. McKay: “I should like to have just a word with you on the problem at the U.S.A.C. Is there any chance whatever for the head (Dr. Madsen) to be utilized in the government?
Elder Benson: ‘I talked with him when he was here, and I also talked with Bishop Isaacson when I was in Salt Lake. I told Pres. Madsen if he wanted something and had made up his mind he was going to move, we would do everything we could for him. I had already spoken to Dr. Sharen (?) Department of Research. At that time he said he would be glad to have him back. He was in the department at one time—that was right after you were here—two months ago. I don’t know what the situation is now. The President of the A.C.U. did not talk as though he was interested in the position—he did not give me any indication of what he will do.’
Pres. McKay: ‘He cannot stick it out here; it would make it easier if he would resign from the presidency of the College—it would not reflect upon him here.’
Elder Benson: “I think it is the wise thing for him to do and not be forced out. He didn’t take to my suggestions very well. He said he was being counseled to fight it out to the bitter end. He did not volunteer who was advising him. I will be glad to do a little checking. I also indicated that there were one or two vacancies in important spots. Dr. Sharen (?) said that there were two of three vacancies in spots that would be almost as important as being President of the smaller school. Will try to get this information to the President.’
Pres. McKay: ‘Thank you very much, and my blessings and best wishes to you in your important work.’
Elder Benson: ‘Thank you, and love to you and to the brethren.’”
Tues., 14 Apr., 1953:
“For the next two hours—form 3 to 5 p.m.—met by appointment at his request President Louis L. Madsen of the U.S.A.C. during the last hour of the consultation Mrs. Madsen was present. President Madsen said that he had received definite word that the Board of Trustees had notified him that he would not be reappointed as President of the Utah State Agricultural College, and for the next hour he discussed matters pertaining to it. Later, when Mrs. Madsen came in she evidently heard for the first time that her husband would not be reappointed. She blamed it on the ‘ten percent of Anti-Mormons who are breaking the hearts of people—discharging them without reason’, etc., etc. There then ensued such a tirade as I have not heard for a long time from any woman. She was entirely misinformed and misjudged people without restraint. President Madsen remained quiet during her tirade. I said ‘President Madsen I have information that two positions are open to you—(1) in the government service as a research worker in the Agricultural Department, and the other as the head of the agricultural department at the U.S.A.C. in Logan.’ He said he would decide later—did not mention resigning. Thought he would wait until he was dismissed from the College.”
Tues., 5 May., 1953:
“8 a.m.—Had an interview with Earl S. Paul, former President of the Samoan Mission, regarding the consummation of the purchase of 300 acres of land in American Samoa which the Church is leasing and which certain attorneys have advised the Church is not communal land. The land is located at Mapasaga. President Paul advised me that he had studied and investigated the many different problems pertaining to the purchase of this land. He believes that in view of the fact that Mrs. Salitaima, the owner and a member of the Church, is getting quite old, if we intend to purchase the land steps should be taken right away to obtain it. I therefore believe (and have recommended to the First Presidency and to the Committee on Expenditures) that President Paul should go back to Samoa for the following reasons:
First: Brother Paul has made a thorough investigation of the legal aspects relating to this proposed purchase.
Second: he is personally acquainted with the sister (Mrs. Salitaima) who owns the land and knows also her desires regarding her brother and her desires relating to use of the money should the sale be consummated for genealogical and temple purposes.
Third: He and Brother Stone (present Mission President) working together could decide on the advisability of (a) building a chapel at old Mapasago, (b) the building of a school adjacent to the chapel, and (c) the building of an Elder’s home or a home for the principal of a school. The makeshift school there is a reflection on the Church as well as on the American-Samoan government and unless it is improved it will have to be closed. The closing of the school and the closing of those branches would have a detrimental effect for years to come upon the Mapasaga area. On the other hand, if we choose a capable man to go down there and act as principal of that school and supervise the building we can have a branch of several hundred people flourishing as a center for years to come, and particularly if we can purchase that 300 acres the saints will have to place on which to make a living for generations to come. If we lose it, we lose influence in that vicinity.
(Later, it was decided that President and Mrs. Paul would leave immediately to take care of the above assignment)
Fri., 8 May, 1953:
Telephone Calls
“Allen Bateman, State Supt. of Public Schools.
Called him and said that I had learned only yesterday about the attitude of some of the teachers in Murray toward Labor Unions—that some of them had joined the AF of L. Said that I immediately called Supt. Lynn Bennion, of the City Schools, to see what the trend is in the city, and that I am now calling him to see what is going on in the State. Stated that it seemed to me a very unwise thing for the teachers to become affiliated with the labor unions.
Supt. Bateman answered: “I thoroughly agree with you; it is very unwise and entirely wrong. The teachers are in a state of despair because of the difficulty we are having issuing contracts for next year, because of lack of funds, and because of our inability to make some raises in salary. The labor unions have said that the teachers are now ‘ripe for the picking, and they are going to get them (the teachers).’
I answered that the teachers will not gain anything by joining the unions—if they would only be patient a solution could be found to their problems.
Supt. Bateman said that there is only a minor group joining so far—50 out of 1000. Said that Glen Snow of the National Association came in by air to meet with some of the people—he is meeting everywhere he can on a hurried schedule to try and talk with the people and to point out the unwisdom of their listening to the pleas of the labor unions. Said they are doing everything they can to stop them from joining, however, that it will be impossible to stop a few from joining up. Said he thought what a few there are will not get very far, and that their numbers will dwindle instead of increase.
I told Supt. Bateman that his report made me feel better; that I was wondering what we could do to stop this unwise move on the part of the teachers, and Brother Bateman said he believes a great deal is being done to curtail the group. Said he believes that too much open criticism or publicity would inflame rather than help the cause. Said he had talked to Mrs. Petty, Pres. Of the State Teachers’ Association, to Supt. Lynn Bennion, and to Allan West, each of whom is putting forth a lot of effort to keep the situation in hand.”
Mon., 11 May, 1953:
President Wilkinson then stated that despite the Governor’s veto on the educational TV bill, they have been trying to get non-profit organizations to take advantage of the appropriations for the educational TV. Said that in his meetings with these various organizations, such as the B.Y.U., U of U, ACU, etc., he wonders if he will be permitted to commit the B.Y.U. to its share of expenses if such and Educational TV program can be worked out.
I answered unhesitatingly ‘yes’, but that we should want to know the set-up before we commit ourselves. Pres. Wilkinson said he would tell them that it would be subject to final approval.
2. Bishop Isaacson called for advice regarding the Board of the Dee Hospital. Said the Board has not been using Welfare coal—they have always used the coal from the Dee family, the price of which has been below cost. The Board feels that the Dee family should not be hurt by our refusing to use their coal, but the request has come that Church Welfare coal be used.
I said in this instance it would be better to say that we feel inadvisable to make any change for the present.
Bishop Isaacson, referring to the U.S.A.C. trouble, that he had had a fine meeting with Brother Adam S. Bennion who is conducting the investigation, and who is under terrific pressure because of this investigation. Bishop Isaacson said Pres. Madsen has caused a lot of trouble, and is afraid that Pres. Madsen will suffer because of it. Bishop Isaacson said he fought for hours at Board meetings for Pres. Madsen, and that he pleaded with him not to have any bitterness. Said he is of the opinion that if Pres. Madsen had followed counsel all the trouble would have been avoided.
Tues., 12 May, 1953:
2. President E.G. Peterson, Acting President of the Utah State Agricultural College called to say that the situation at the College seems to be brightening a bit, and that the outlook is encouraging. Said the new students show a wholesome spirit. Mentioned that our friendship will be a great force to help things along. I answered that I am as loyal to that school as my father before me; that for his sake I feel duty bound to uphold the ideals and standards of the school. President Peterson said that he remembers the last speech my father made—that he spoke about the injury done to people by rumor and gossip, etc. I answered that he always held the school in high esteem and did what he could to further its cause.
I invited President Peterson to come in at anytime, and that if I can do anything to alleviate the conditions existing at the present time, or contribute in any way to the peace and harmony of the school I should be pleased to do so.”
Wed., 13 May, 1953:
“Memorandum by Glen E. Snow Assistant Secretary in charge of lay relations of the National Educational Association, formerly President of the Dixie College, and a member of the High Council of the Washington Stake, dictated to Clare, May 13, 1953:
Said he is in Salt Lake on an official assignment from the NEA. Has been making investigations regarding affiliation with the American Federation of Teachers (AFL) of Utah teachers.
They have met with Dr. Robinson of the Deseret News and officials of the Tribune who have promised to cooperate with them in their efforts to stop the teachers from affiliating with the AFL. The papers have been running some very fine articles.
Said he finds in his contact with the teachers of Utah county, Salt Lake county, etc. that there is a great deal of frustration and hurt feelings, because they feel they have been unfairly treated.
Brother Snow me with the Governor this morning—PTA, School Board members, members of the NEA also met with him. They had a long session with the Governor and they say that it is the best meeting they have had with him. Said he also met with the Legislative Council, Louis Lloyd, and Grant Vest of the Committee of 60. Has had conferences with Dr. Bennion (Adam S.) and Dr. Lynn Bennion. Said he has told them that in his opinion something must be done here, if he senses the feeling of the teachers, to assure them that they are going to get consideration. They must be make to feel that they are not a disgraced group. Believes that they have rendered valuable social service. They are frustrated and discouraged, but it is not entirely because of financial matters.
Said he is interested primarily in opposing the AFL. Said their International Secretary Irvin Kuenzli, and F.C. Snow (no relation to Glen Snow) International representative and organizer, are here putting forth utmost efforts to get the teachers to join there union.
Brother Snow says he thinks the Governor should call a special legislation. Said if one is called the labor leaders will take all the credit for it, when all the time the NEA has been working for this very thing.
Brother Snow wants you to know that he will appreciate any help the Church can give in this matter. If you desire to reach him you can find him at 1201 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. or c/o the Washington Stake.”
Tues., 19 May, 1953
1 p.m. Elder Adam S. Bennion, who is Chairman of the investigating Committee at the Utah State Agricultural College called at the office. He gave a preview of the nature of the report the Investigating Committee appointed by Governor J. Bracken Lee will give on the Utah State Agricultural College difficulties. The third recommendation of the report suggests that all members of the Board of Trustees offer their resignations. This seems to me to be very inconsistent especially since the Investigation Committee has approved the actions of the Board of Trustees, and I told Brother Bennion so. I asked him is all members of the Investigating Committee had signed the report and he said ‘No, I have not personally presented it to them as yet.’ I said that nothing will be gained by the recommendation referred to above; that they should let the Board continue as they are until July 1, at which time Bishop Isaacson will have resigned as Chairman, and Brother Woolley will be off the Board, and that matters would then adjust themselves.
Brother Bennion then stated that he would modify this part of the report.
I furthermore suggested that the Investigating Committee do not make their report until after Commencement Exercises.
Tues., 19 May, 1953:
Just after they began a disclosure of their troubles, the telephone rang, and Bishop Isaacson called to say that he had just learned that the Investigating Committee of the U.S.A.C. matter is going to recommend that three of the members of the Board of Trustees resign—Bishop Isaacson, Arthur Woolley, and Dr. Preston. This is a most unwise suggestion. I tried to get Brother Bennion by telephone but failed to reach him.
Wed., 20 May, 1953:
“9 to 10:30 a.m.—First Presidency’s meeting.
While in this meeting was called to the telephone in my private office. Governor J. Bracken Lee was of the line. Said he called to express to me his great confidence in Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson, Chr. of the Board of Trustees of the U.S.A.C. Said he had associated with him for years of the Board, and that there is no man for who he has greater respect, and in whom he has greater confidence. Said he would like to see him go through with his assignment on the Board—at any rate until July. The Governor then said ‘There is only one man who can get him to do that, and that is you, President McKay. I wish you would express to him my confidence in him and get him not to resign as Chairman of the Board of Trustees and to take charge of the Commencement Exercises at the College.’
I thanked the Governor and told him that I would do what I could with Bishop Isaacson.
Later I had a talk with Bishop Isaacson, and he read me his letter of resignation as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the U.S.A.C. He has fully decided to go through with his resignation and will present it to the Board next Saturday—is convinced this is the best thing for him to do.
I then said: ‘I think so, too, first, because I promised Sister Isaacson that I would urge you to do so; and secondly, I think you should resign because of your health. Immediately following your resignation you should take a rest, go on a vacation, and be absolutely free from any worry or anxiety due either to the college or to the Church.’
Bishop Isaacson answered that he would do that provided the report of the Committee would give no implication that he is doing it under duress.
Later in the day (5 p.m.) at his request, I met Dr. Adam S. Bennion who let me read the report of the U.S.A.C. Investigating Committee. I think it is much better than the one he submitted yesterday.”
Wed., 24 June, 1953:
“At 8:45 a.m. I had a meeting with Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson, President Edward L. Clissold and Brother L. Pierce Brady regarding Hawaiian matters. They presented a proposed plan of a planning board there. Pres. Clissold suggested straightening the road from the highway to the temple, which he said can be done without much expense. This appealed to me, but we shall await further report and recommendation after Brother Burton has been there, the Expenditures Committee having authorized Brother Burton to go there and assist in the planning.
We also considered the necessity of appointing an educator to supervise the Church school education in Hawaii. A law has been passed permitting churches to hold religious classes in the school houses, and the other churches are taking advantage of this. Brother Clissold recommends we wend somebody to take the position formerly held by Brother Frank McGhie; he has spoken to Brother West. He asked what relationship the schools would have to the B.Y.U., and I told him we have a plan to unify our whole education system and we would report to him later what the relationship would be. Brother Clissold will utilize the auxiliary workers in conducting these classes but they do need a supervisor.
In planning the village arrangement, utilizing the beach land owned by the Church, and looking forward to the establishment of a two years high school and two years college, he says there is no question about the general attitude of the people, that that should be in Laie. In answer to my question as to why students leave the other islands and come to Honolulu to attend high schools there–schools operated by the different religions, Seventh Day Adventists, Catholics, etc. Brother Clissold favored our going ahead with our plan at Laie and starting out with the first year and then adding a second year. It would mean a boarding school. He said we have sixty students at the B.Y.U. from Hawaii, only ten of whom can afford to go; the others are running in debt. I recommended first, that we look around for a man to supervise the seminary; second, that we should choose a man capable educationally and spiritually, and with a proper personality, to begin this central school at Laie. He should be down there visiting the schools.”
Fri., 26 June, 1953:
The regular First Presidency’s meeting then continued–President Joseph Fielding Smith, Harold B. Lee, Henry D. Moyle, Marion G. Romney, and Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson, President of the B.Y.U. met with us to discuss the new church educational system. They presented a chart, suggesting that the designation of the University of Deseret be given to the entire Church School System. Brother Wilkinson read a statement, a copy of which he gave to each of the Brethren, explaining the meaning and history of the word ‘Deseret.’ The Committee felt that historically, religiously and traditionally, it was the best name they could find. I was explained that the Brigham Young University would be under the direction of the University of Deseret. (They at first suggested Brigham Young Campus, but withdrew that suggestion). For the time being the President of the Brigham Young University would also be the President of the University of Deseret, having under his charge the entire Church School System.
The chart suggests that there be a vice-president in charge of religious education, under whom there would be the heads of religious education departments of the Brigham Young University, principals of 119 Latter-day Saint seminaries, heads of religious educational departments at junior colleges, and Directors of our 16 L.D.S. Institutes, the L.D.S. Seminaries and Junior Colleges.
There would be a vice-president of finances and business administration, and he would have direction over this phase of the work for the Brigham Young University, the L.D.S. Institutes, the L.D.S. Seminaries and Junior Colleges.
There would be an executive assistant to the President, who would have no authority except that which is delegated to him by the President, and would assist him mainly in maintaining high standards of teaching in these various units.
The Brethren discussed at considerable length the matter of the name that should be given to this Church Educational System. The thought was expressed that perhaps it should be called the Brigham Young University, but some Brethren felt, particularly Brother Lee, that it should not be given the name of any one President. The thought was also expressed that if, for instance, we should call the Institute at Logan near the Agricultural College, or at the University of Utah, or in other places where universities are established, the Brigham Young University Institute it might cause some friction.
Pres. Wilkinson was asked to check into the question of who would sign certificates of graduation, also to look into the Articles of Incorporation of the Brigham Young University and other like questions.
The Brethren agreed that we should move ahead right away with this new program. The Committee were asked to make their recommendation to the Board this morning.
Telephone Calls
1. Bishop Isaacson reported that he had received a telephone message from Elder Alma Sonne who is in the East regarding the U.S.A.C. situation. Said that it is rumored that President Madsen is to be employed at the B.Y.U. and that he will bring with him 200 students from the U.S.A.C. The people in Logan are asking Alma Sonne to contact the First Presidency so that this will not be done.
Not from minutes of the First Presidency’s meeting regarding this matter: The Brethren of the President discussed the attitude they should take regarding Brother Louis L. Madsen’s going to the B.Y.U. It was decided to suggest to President Wilkinson that the matter be not brought up in the Board meeting. The Brethren thought that if Brother Madsen were to go to the B.Y.U. it might be interpreted by the people in Logan as an effort on our part to get the Agricultural College dissenters to go to the B.Y.U. President McKay mentioned that someone had phoned or wired stating that a group of citizens from Logan wanted and interview with the First Presidency, protesting Brother Madsen’s appointment to the B.Y.U. The Brethren did not feel they should meet the Committee.”
Wed., 1 July, 1953:
I said that I did not feel right about presenting to the Board of Education tomorrow morning the recommendation that we substitute for the Church Board of Education the term University of Deseret. We were ready, it was agreed, to present the unification plan, that we include under one heading the Brigham Young University, the Ricks College, the institutes and seminaries, this to be placed under Dr. Ernest Wilkinson. It was agreed that no change would be made in the nomenclature and if it was decided to make a change that could be done later. Pres. Wilkinson will be asked to submit the plan and personnel to the Board.”
Tues., 7 July, 1953:
“At 8:30 a.m.–Elders Joseph Fielding Smith, Adam S. Bennion, and Ernest L. Wilkinson of the Brigham Young University met with the First Presidency to discuss matters pertaining to the unification of all educational institutions of the Church under a single administrator.”
Wed., 8 July, 1953:
“At 8:30 a.m.–Met by appointment at his request Dr. Louis L. Madsen, formerly President of the U.S.A.C. at Logan, Utah. He reviewed all the matters that led up to his dismissal as President of the U.S.A.C., read some letters from members of Committees, and then said that he would like to be ‘reappointed President of the Agricultural College.’
After listening to him state his desires in this respect, I said: ‘Dr. Madsen, that matter is up to the Board of Trustees who meet next Saturday.'”
“Deseret news and Telegram, Thursday, July 9, 1953:
CHURCH UNITES SCHOOLS UNDER ONE DIRECTOR
Dr. Wilkinson of BYU to Head Entire Educational Program
The unification of all educational Institutions of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints under a single administrator was announce Thursday by the first presidency.
Named as the administrator was Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson, present president of the Brigham Young University. His offices will continue at the University of Provo.
Included in the new unification program are eight Church Schools; 15 LDS Institutes conducted near colleges and universities, and 192 junior and senior seminaries–throughout the Church.
The new change is made effective upon the retirement of Dr. Franklin L. West, who has been Church Commissioner of Education since 1935.
General Administrator
Under the plan announce Thursday, Dr. Wilkinson will assume general administration under the direction of the First Presidency, President David O. McKay and his counselors, President Stephen L. Richards and President J. Reuben Clark, Jr.; and the Council of the Twelve through an executive committee consisting of President Joseph Smith and Elders Harold B. Lee, Henry D. Moyle, Marion G. Romney and Adam S. Bennion.
With the approval of the First Presidency and the Executive committee, Dr. Wilkinson has appointed three men to assist him in his increased responsibilities. The three and the positions are:
William E. Berrett, vice president in charge of religious education.
William F. Edwards, vice president in charge of finance and business administration.
Harvey L. Taylor, executive assistant.
Many Schools Affected
The Church schools included in the new unification program are the Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah; Ricks College, at Rexburg, Idaho; LDS Business College, Salt Lake City; the McCune School of Music and Art, Salt Lake City; the Juarez Academy in Colonia Dublan, Mexico, and mission schools in the Tongan Islands, British Samoa and New Zealand.
Institutes of religion included are located at Salt Lake City, Logan, Ogden, and St. George, Utah; Pacatello and Moscow in Idaho; Berkeley and Los Angeles in California; Flagstaff, Temple, Tucson, and Thatcher in Arizona; Laramis, Wyo.; Reno, Nev., and Cardston, Alberta, Canada.
In announcing his retirement, Dr. West brings to a close a long and outstanding career in education in Utah. For 18 years he has presided over the institutes and seminaries for the Church as commissioner of education. Prior to that time he was head of the Department of Physics at the BYU from 1905 to 1906. At the Utah State Agricultural College in Logan he served as dean of the School of Arts and Science, professor of physics, geneticist and meteorologist at the state experiment station, dean of the faculty and chairman of the athletic board and dean of men.
62 New Seminaries
As Church Commissioner of Education he has been active in promoting and perfecting the work of the seminaries and of the institutes. A total of 62 new seminaries have been established which meet in buildings constructed under his supervision. Likewise 15 institutes have been established and housed in buildings constructed under his direction.
In many places he had succeeded in setting up seminary classes before regular school time. Through such a program the lives of many young people have been influenced throughout the Church.
According to the First Presidency’s announcement, Dr. West has ‘worked diligently to establish a retirement system for seminary and institute teachers and has been interested always in selecting a staff of teachers whose own spirituality has been impressed upon the students whom they teach. In his retirement Dr. West leaves the service with the heartiest good wishes of hundred of teachers and thousands of pupils. He retires with the benediction of the men under whom he has labored.’
Dr. Wilkinson brings to his new responsibilities a wealth of training and experience. A native of Ogden, Utah, he is a graduate of Weber College, of Brigham Young University, George Washington University and he received the Doctorate of Juridical Science at Harvard University.
After a successful experience as a teacher in the New Jersey Law School, he became a member of the law firm headed by the Honorable Charles Evans Hughes. Later he organized his own law firm and won national recognition because of his success in handling a case for the Ute Indians.
Dr. Wilkinson has been president of the Brigham Young University since the fall of 1950. In the past two years the enrollment at the BYU has increased 42 percent. Enrollment figures at the Church University make it the largest school in Utah when full-time students are considered. Students at the school come from throughout the world, with 39 of the 44 missions of the Church and all of the 208 stakes represented in its student body.
$10,000,000 Building Plan
At present the BYU under Dr. Wilkinson has a projected $10,000,000 building program. About $5,000,000 of this will be used for student housing. The other $5,000,000 is to be expended for a large modern building to house the College of Family Living; an administrative building; a student health center, and engineering building, warehouse buildings and other campus improvements.
Mr. Berrett brings to his new assignment both academic and legal training. He took both his A.B. and LL.B degrees from University of Utah. He has presided over and taught in seminaries in both Utah and Idaho. For a time he served as assistant to Commissioner West.
He has also been assistant to Don B. Colton as director of the Church Missionary Home. He has served many years as a member of the Sunday School General Board, and has been a member of a stake presidency.
BYU Faculty Member
He has been a member of the faculty of the Brigham Young University as associate professor of religion. During the past three years he has been associated with Dr. Wilkinson in recruiting and training members of the faculty of the BYU. He is and author of several books now used throughout the Church.
The other vice president in the new administrative setup, Dr. William F. Edwards, is at present dean of the College of Commerce and professor of economics at the BYU. He brings to his new position the finest of training and experience available in the field of finance and business administration.
He took his A.B. degree from the BYU and his doctor’s degree from New York University in the field of business administration. He has served as a member of the faculty of the latter institution in the field on investments and has managed large trusts in New York City before coming West. He is active in several national organizations associated with financial and business institutions.
Counselor in Bishopric
Dr. Edwards served as a counselor in the bishopric of the Queens Ward, New York Stake and for several years was president of the New York Stake.
Harvey L. Taylor will continue as executive assistant to Dr. Wilkinson. He brings to this position training in the University of Utah, where he took has B.S. degree in 1921; and his M.A. degree from Columbia University. He did graduate work as the State Teachers College of Colorado and Stanford University.
He has been a principal of Utah schools, a teacher in Weber College, president of the Gila Junior College and from 1943 to 1952 he was superintendent of Mesa City Schools, Mesa, Ariz.
According to the First Presidency, ‘President Wilkinson has surrounded himself with strong men to do a big job. He will have at his service the strength not only of these men, but of all the members of the Brigham Young University faculty. This great system of schools, institutes and seminaries can become an ever more effective instrumentality in equipping the youth of the Church with solid foundations to meet the challenge of modern living.'”
July 28, 1953:
4. Dr. Aldous Dixon of Weber college called. Said he has been asked to consider the Presidency of the U.S.A.C. I said: ‘What about Weber College?’ Dr. Dixon answered that everything so far as Weber is concerned is in good shape–that they are moving into their new buildings this Fall, the school is over the ‘hump’ in their major objectives. He feels that the opportunity at Weber College is the finest in the country and that he would not want to do anything to retard its progress.
I said ‘Confidentially and conscientiously, I do not know of anybody who could save the U.S.A.C. and eliminate the trouble up there better than you can.’
Dr. Dixon answered: ‘It would not be the money or the honor, because I should rather stay right here in Weber. If I did consider the position at the U.S.A.C. it would be because I feel I could render a service to the service to the young people and that school. It would mean a sacrifice to me.’
I answered, ‘The school is in danger.’
Dr. Dixon said: ‘They will lose ground very rapidly under the conditions that have taken hold up there. If I accepted I should have the Board take the responsibility of making some changes in personnel up there–they need an administration code and policy that everybody will live up to–the way it is now there is no organization, no leadership, and nothing but confusion.’ He said they had effected just such changes up at Cheney, Washington where he had been sent as a consultant on the Committee appointed to investigate conditions of the school up there.
Brother Dixon then discussed his retirement plan–whether it would be in effect if he should leave Weber.
He further said that it would not be a pleasant undertaking to take over at the U.S.A.C.–thought that is a man could go there for three or four years and get everything in smooth running condition, and then turn it over to someone else it would be all right.
Said he had talked to the State Superintendent of Schools about the matter. So far as Weber is concerned, there are good people at the school who could take over the presidency–Brother Clark, formerly of Ricks, and Brother Ricks–both brilliant and capable men. Said he would not worry for one moment if they took over at Weber. The business affairs at the College are in good shape. Dr. Foulger (Herbert’s son) has received nothing but praise for his capable handling of the finances of the school.
I said ‘You are on who is worthy to enter the kingdom.’ Brother Dixon answered that he appreciated my confidence, however he felt he would not consider the position unless the Board would clear the obstacles away.
I then said that he relieved my mind a little when he said that there are those at Weber Who could take over the Presidency. Said if they did not have Brother Clark as President, he could run things very smoothly for a year. Said that Dr. William P. Miller is another good man. I said: ‘It looks as though the Board has pretty well decided to ask you to consider the position at the U.S.A.C.’ Dr. Dixon said that he had had offers to go to Washington, California, and other places, but that he had been treated so good at Weber that he had not considered leaving. I answered: ‘Well, here is a place where your services are needed; the U.S.A.C. is too valuable to the State to have it lose out now.’ I said further that for the good of the State and education in general here in our state, that I did not know of anyone who could take over the reins and guide that school as successfully as he could.
Dr. Dixon answered that he would do everything in his power to keep my faith in him, but we both agreed that the welfare of Weber College is close to our hearts and that we should do nothing to hamper its progress.”
Mon., 24 Aug., 1953:
Telephone Calls
“President Aldous Dixon of the Utah State Agricultural College.
Called him to congratulate and compliment him on his appointment as President of the U.S.A.C. Also referred to the success of the reception that was tendered him the other night. President Dixon said he was very pleased and happy over the appointment and the wonderful reception that was given to him.
We then talked about Weber College. Pres. Dixon is satisfied that everything will be all right there — that Dr. Miller will be able to handle the position satisfactorily.
I told Pres. Dixon that I was very pleased to see the action of the Board on Friday night when they created the way for him; that it was the right thing for them to do. Dr. Dixon said that he had insisted upon that before he accepted the position.
Dr. Dixon also said that he is very pleased with the way the ‘trouble’ is subsiding at the College. Said the Board members had promised him that they would not interfere, and that they would stay with their legislative functions.
I advised Dr. Dixon to watch the undercurrent; that word had reached me Saturday that there is a chance to reappoint a certain man, and that if that happened it would be disastrous to the College. Pres. Dixon answered, ‘I am not going to waver one bit!’
I commended Dr. Dixon and expressed best wishes and prayers for his continued success, and divine guidance in his responsibilities as President of the U.S.A.C.”
Thurs., 27 Aug., 1953:
Telephone Calls
1. Called Governor J. Bracken Lee regarding the school situation. Said he had wanted to talk to me about the whole thing, but as we had been out of town a good deal of the summer this has been impossible. Has talked to President Clark.
Said his idea is to permit the local units to put the proposition to the local people and let them decide whether they want to pay more taxes in order to meet the demands of the school people. Said he is willing to make a public statement.
I remarked that I believed that if he could make a statement that it would stop any irratic action tomorrow.
The Governor said there is a radical element among the teachers which of course we do not want.
He will prepare a statement and read it to me over the telephone a little later.
At 4:45 p.m. The Governor called me at my home said in substance the following:
That he would (1) make provisions out of the present budget to give sufficient increase to the schools to take care of the increase in the enrollment for this year, which means instead of basing it on last year’s enrollment, they will base it on the current enrollment. This will mean $400,000 to $500,000. (2) He will call a special session of the Legislature between now and January 1, and will consider (a) the advisability of giving increased salaries to the teachers, (b) to favor passage of a law permitting any community to vote an increase in taxes for that community in order to increase the salaries of the teachers.”
Wed., 23 Sept., 1953:
Telephone Calls
“1. Mr. Toronto, Secretary of State (22-4721 – Ext. 206) called regarding the ‘possibility of the Governor of the State recommending to the legislature the transfer of two of our Junior Colleges. Says he is of the opinion that he (the Governor) will not act until he has our (the Church’s) reaction to this transfer.
Bishop Toronto is calling for an appointment for Director Whetton of Snow College.
(Mr. Toronto was later advised by telephone that Conference duties would prevent President McKay’s giving this matter attention right at this time. Will consider the matter following Conference)
Thurs., 8 Oct., 1953:
“8 a.m. Met by appointment at his request, Governor J. Bracken Lee who took up with me matters pertaining to the controversy now raging between school officials and teachers here in the State and his attitude as Governor of the State.
He said that he knows that he has made mistakes; in the heat of argument he has said things for which he is sorry, but says he desires to do the best thing for the State and to preserve the freedom of the individual vouchsafed by the Constitution. He is willing to contribute more money for school buildings to take care of the increased enrollment, but he is not in favor of making a blanket increase in the salaries of all teachers, particularly young girls who can now – immediately after graduation – get $2500 to $2700 a year. He is willing to increase the salaries of heads of families if they are competent teachers.
We had a long talk on these matters, and I was favorably impressed with his attitude. He seems to want to do the right thing. I told him I should be pleased to see what I could do.
Our conversation lasted about 45 minutes.
Mon., 19 Oct., 1953:
Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson called in – discussed matters pertaining to the U.S.A.C., and particularly about the Inauguration of President Aldous Dixon and their desire to have me give the main address on that occasion.
Tues., 17 Nov., 1953:
“Samoan Mission School
President McKay reported he had talked with Brother Earl Paul about conditions in Samoa. He reports that our school in Samoa is in bad shape, and President Stone is not a school man. President Stone does not hesitate to take an elder out of the school who is doing good work and send him elsewhere and call in someone else to take his place. He has appointed his own son as principal and some of the natives are teaching there who have not even graduated from the grade schools. We need a principal who will be appointed by us. We have a man in New Zealand who has his Ph.D. He has taught seminary. He is, however, no more of a research man than an educator. He does not have the language but Brother Paul does not think that is necessary. It was decided that he should be transferred to Samoa.
Telephone Calls
1. Called Dr. Ernest Wilkinson and asked him to the matter of a manual training teacher and his wife to go to Samoa. Inquired especially about Gordan J. Forsythe, who is in the audio visual aids department. Dr. Wilkinson will call tomorrow.
*Samoa – further report
At the First Presidency’s meeting, November 20, 1953, President McKay reported the following:
Felt that action should be taken on two important matters: First, that we should appoint a capable man to have charge of our plantations in Samoa, not leave this work to the President of the Mission. We have a big plantation in Mapasaga and that should be planted to coconuts. In Sauniatu we have had trouble with our cattle and we have cattle in Mapasaga also. I have been informed that we have a man who is working with the Government, whose time with the Government will be up in a few months, who is a practical man and could take care of this work. The Brethren favored doing this.
It was also thought that we should have a practical man there to start the Mapasaga school and to unite the three branches, and that Brother Paul could do this. It was decided to let Brother Paul go back to Samoa. This was approved.
Full instructions will be given to LeGrand Richards regarding Tonga, Samoa and New Zealand.”
Mon., 7 Dec., 1953:
Telephone Calls
1. Dr. O. Preston Robinson, General Manager of the Deseret News, called with reference to the paper’s report on the Governor’s message pertaining to the three Junior Colleges.
I said that whatever is reported would have to be the result of the decision of the Legislature.
I stated that confidentially when the State is ready to turn the schools back to us we are ready to receive them. However, we do not care to be put into the position of asking for them.
2. Dr. Aldous Dixon of the U.S.A.C., Logan, called — said that pressure has been brought upon him to make a statement that the Church will take the Junior Colleges over if the State decides to release them.
I told Dr. Dixon that the Church would not make a statement; that the Church’s attitude is that if the Legislature votes to abandon the schools, then the Church would stand ready to take them back in keeping with the promise made when the Church presented them to the State that when the State decided they no longer wanted these schools, the Church would take them back.
I said further that we do not want them to go against their own judgment. However, if their decision is to turn them back, then the Church will take them over.
Dr. Dixon said it would not hurt the U.S.A.C. to run the Junior College at Ogden, and then have the Church take care of the other two. However, I said I felt that if the Church took any one of them, they should take them all.”
Tues., 8 Dec., 1953:
“At 8 a.m. Brother Lester B. Whetton, Principal of the Snow College at Ephraim, Utah, called at the office. He expressed himself as hoping that the Church would be able to have Snow College under its jurisdiction.
I told him, as I have told others, that if and when the State decides to return the colleges to the Church, we shall be pleased to receive them back.
Wed., 9 Dec., 1953:
First Presidency Meeting
“The following items were among many that were discussed:
However, during the afternoon, I received many telephone calls (among whom, were State Senators) regarding the transfer of the Junior Colleges to the Church.
Orval Hafen, Senator from St. George, called the office and stated that he and others would like to come to the office of the First Presidency, and receive a statement from them relative to the Church’s attitude toward the transfer of the colleges from the State to the Church. My secretary Clare called me at home and informed me of this fact, and I telephoned to President Clark and asked him to interview the Senators.”
Thurs., 10 Dec., 1953:
“At 9 a.m. attended the regular meeting of the First Presidency.
Among some of the items discussed were the following:
1. Discussed the Church’s taking over the Snow, the Dixie, and the Weber College. It was the understanding of the brethren that we are under commitment to operate these schools if they are turned over to the Church by the State.
At 9:50 a.m., accompanied by Presidents Richards and Clark left for Council meeting. At this meeting I made the following report to the brethren on the matter of the transfer of Junior Colleges to the Church:
Have been busy all week with consultations and telephone calls regarding the recommendation of the Governor to close Weber, Snow, and Dixie Colleges as State Institutions. In all conversations I have said that our stand from the beginning was that the responsibility of closing these schools belonged to the State. When the recommendation was made, the Legislature wanted to know the attitude of the General Authorities, the First Presidency at least, and asked to come down and ascertain the same by personal visit.
December 9 that is what they did. Following the introduction of the bill by the Governor that these three Colleges close, a delegation from the Legislature called at the First Presidency’s office and met President Clark at 5 o’clock and he gave to them the decision of the First Presidency, which had been approved heretofore by the Expenditures Committee and by this Council. They were told that if they were turned over to the Church, we should be pleased to operate them. The matter is before the Legislature today December 10.
I am pleased to note that the Governor has expressed himself as being in favor of turning over all the property to the Church just as the Church turned over the property to the State, with the proviso that at any time the Church eases to use these schools for educational purposes, then the property belonging to the State reverts to the State. He has spoken in a commendatory way of the Church School education, and said that they have assurance that the education given by the Church will be in every way satisfactory.
Meetings have been held with the Presidencies of Stakes in the Weber area and a committee from the Chamber of Commerce, and they have unanimously expressed themselves as being in favor of the Church’s taking over Weber College.”
Mon., 14 Dec., 1953:
“8:45 a.m. – At their request, had a conference with two of the State Senators — Clifton G.M. Kerr, and Alonzo F. Hopkins — regarding the matter of transfer of Colleges to the Church.
I repeated to them, as I have to all others who have telephoned or who have contacted me personally, that the attitude of the Church is that in keeping with the deed given when the Church gave the Church schools to the State, if at any time the State ceased to use the property for educational purposes, the property would revert back to the Church, and the Church has expressed itself by saying that if and when it is decided to discontinue these colleges as State institutions, the Church will accept them and continue these schools as colleges.
This is our stand and we have done nothing further, and the responsibility of closing them as State Schools rests entirely upon the State Legislature.
9 a.m. Special meeting of the First Presidency and members of the Council of the Twelve. Arrangement of the funeral services for Elder Matthew Cowley of the Council of the Twelve was discussed.”
16 Dec., 1953:
Telephone Conversation
December 16, 1953
“I called Frank Browning of Ogden in response to a telegram I received from him regarding the Weber College situation. I wanted to let him know exactly where the Church stood. I stated to Mr. Browning that we would abide by the conditions in the deed to the state and if and when the state ceases to take the responsibility of the colleges as state institutions, then we stand ready to take them, and we will continue them as colleges under the Church school program. We are not urging it.
Mr. Browning stated that he felt the people in Ogden had not had sufficient warning that this matter would be taken up in the special session of the legislature. He felt that it would be best if the Weber College question were postponed until the regular session of the legislature next year. Mr. Browning also felt that the Mormon people in Ogden were getting along fine with those of other religions and that if the Church took over Weber College, it would not make pleasant relationships as they had had in the past.
I reminded Mr. Browning that the representatives from their area were here at the legislature to represent the people. Mr. Browning felt that these representatives were pledged to Governor Lee and therefore would vote as he directed. I told Mr. Browning that the representatives at the legislature should vote according to their convictions. The Church has no objection to the Weber College issue being carried over to the next regular session of the legislature. I also informed Mr. Browning that I was going to tell the ministers in Ogden of our stand on the situation.
Mr. Browning suggested that I make a statement. But I informed him that I did not think it wise for the Church to interfer with politics.
Mr. Browning stated that the Church could take over Snow and Dixie College now and let the Weber College stand until the next session of the legislature. However, I indicated to him that I felt that the decision should be made on the three colleges together.
9 a.m. First Presidency’s meeting. Took the time this morning to read telegrams that had been received from people in Ogden –perhaps 25 or 30 — expressing opposition to the Church’s taking over the Weber College from the State. The Brethren reiterated their stand as previously expressed that they had said they would take the three schools – Weber, Snow, and Dixie, if and when the State ceases to operate them as State Institutions, and operate them as Church schools. There was some discussion as to whether, in view of the fact that there is so much sentiment expressed against the Church’s taking over the Weber College, it might not be well to make it known that the First Presidency will feel all right if this matter goes over to the regular session of the Legislature. It was felt, however, that we should first tell the Governor. The question was raised whether or not, in view of the fact that the Governor has gone forward with the knowledge, since our announcement that we would take over and operate the schools if the State gave them up — and this is part of his general plan of trying to save money — he would not feel that we have gone back on him. It was finally decided to ask Brother Lee to call on the Governor and have a confidential talk with him, telling him that this seems to be creating a great deal of trouble, that we are interested as we assume he is, in the peace of the community, and it would be satisfactory with us if it was postponed until the regular legislative session. Brother Lee came down to the office at the First Presidency’s invitation.
Following the funeral services and interment at the City Cemetery, returned to the office where the First Presidency met six senators relative to the return of Weber college to the Church.
Also had appointments with the following:
President Wilkinson
Bishop Isaacson
Harold B. Lee”
Thurs., 17 Dec., 1953:
Telephone Calls
1. Frank M. Browning of Ogden called at 8:15 this morning. I had a half hour’s conversation with him concerning the matter that is now under discussion and debate regarding the State’s returning to the Church the Weber College.
Mr. Browning seems to be opposed to putting this question to the people. He wanted me to say that I am opposed to this procedure, but I said that I did not share his concern that if this question is submitted to the people it will cause strife. Mr. Browning favors having the question of whether or not the Junior Colleges should be turned back to the Church delayed until the next Legislature. I said that my answer as to that is that the responsibility of this question lies with the Legislature, and that my attitude is just as I have said to the Committee who called on us last evening — that if they want to submit the question to the people that it is all right.
2. Senator Kerr. Following my conversation with Mr. Browning, I called Senator Kerr up at the State Capitol, and told him that I had been in touch with a group in Ogden this morning — that they are very much conerened about the Weber College question being put to the people for decision. Told him that I wanted him to know that there is no change in my attitude as expressed last evening to the group who called on us.
Senator Kerr said that Senator Hafen has investigated the matter and finds that it is illegal to submit the question to the people on the bill that has been introduced; this can be done only by constitutional amendment.
I said that the Ogden people did not want it to go through, but that my opinion stands where it was last evening.
Report given by President McKay on the Weber College situation at Council Meeting today.
The President said that the First Presidency had received numerous telegrams from ministers residing in the Ogden district and other groups making an appeal that the First Presidency use its influence to have the State continue its responsibility in conducting Weber College as a State institution. He said that the attitude of the Church is that in keeping with the deed given when the Church gave the Church schools to the State that if at any time the State ceased to use the property for educational purposes the property would revert back to the Church, and the Church has expressed itself by saying that if and when it is decided to discontinue these colleges as State institutions the Church will accept them and continue these schools as colleges. President McKay said that we have made the statement to Bishop Hunt of the Catholic Church regarding Weber College, and to the Governor regarding other schools, that we would be willing to accept the three if the State returned them to the Church. He said that is our stand and we have done nothing further, and the responsibility of closing them as State schools rests entirely upon the State Legislature. President McKay said that during this excitement about the colleges the First Presidency had received an anonymous letter from a man in Ogden who years ago was a student at the Weber Stake Academy while President McKay was Principal there. The writer refers appreciatively to those days, and then states in substance that the night before he wrote this letter he was in a meeting with Catholic leaders in that district, that in that meeting they expressed their intentions of building a Catholic University in Ogden, to go with a big hospital with a monastery and other interests in that area, and that the present movement to have the State colleges go back to the Church would not fit in favorably with their plans. He said: ‘I am not Catholic, though I am considered to be one, because my wife and children are affiliated wtih that Church. I am not an L.D.S., though my parents were pioneers here in this district. I have nothing against the Catholic Church, but I am against what is going on behind the scenes in carrying out the Catholic designs.’ He said he was writing the letter because of his appreciation of his schools days.”
Fri., 18 Dec., 1953:
“9 to 11 a.m. First Presidency’s meeting.
Some of the matters discussed:
1. A brief article prepared by Dr. Preston Robinson, General Manager of the Deseret News, was presented. It was regarding the Church’s taking over the junior colleges in Ogden, Ephraim, and St. George. The statement was approved by the brethren with a slight change.
December 18, 1953
(published statement regarding schools)
Statement of
The First Presidency
Regarding the Proposed Acceptance by the
Church of Certain School Properties
During the special session of the State Legislature a delegation from that body, on Dec. 9, 1953, called upon the First Presidency to discuss proposed legislation for turning back to the Church, under the reversionary clauses of the deeds from the Church to the State, certain properties deeded to the State by the Church in 1930. At the time of that conference the First Presidency gave to the Legislative delegation the following statement:
‘In the early 1930’s the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints transferred to the State of Utah, Dixie College, Snow College and Weber College. The deeds in each instance provided that in the event the particular college was not maintained as a Junior College by the State it would revert to the Church.
‘If the Legislature now decides no longer to operate these three colleges, the Church will again take title to them and operate them as a part of its educational system.’
The foregoing statement sets out the present position and intention of the Church in reference to this matter.
Until the properties are actually turned back to the Church, thus making certain the right of the Church to operate schools in connection with said properties, the Church is not in a position to begin the expenditures of any funds with reference thereto, nor to make any commitments as to the operation of the schools beyond those already made in the above-mentioned statement of December 9, 1953.
With reference to properties owned by these colleges and covered by the Legislative Act, other than those that will be returned to the Church under reversionary clauses in deeds, the Church will be prepared to negotiate touching their acquisition in accordance with the provisions of the Act, if and when the Act shall become definitely and finally operative.
It follows that the Church must await the conclusion of any legal measures in process or that may hereafter be taken regarding the legislation. Concerning such measures the Church takes no position.
David O. McKay
Stephen L. Richards
J. Reuben Clark, Jr.
The First Presidency
Deseret News, Friday, January 8, 1954″
December 18, 1953
(published statements re: schools)
“Church Awaiting College Transfer
Negotiations Hinge on Finality of Act
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is prepared to negotiate for properties of Weber, Snow and Dixie junior colleges, in addition to those that will be returned to ‘the Church under revisionary clauses in deeds, if and when the recently-passed legislative act shall become definitely and finally operative.’
The First Presidency explained the Church’s position regarding acquisition of the colleges in a statement released Friday.
‘The Church,’ the statement explained, ‘is not in a position to begin the expenditure of any funds with reference thereto, nor to make any commitments as to the operation of the schools beyond those already made in the …statement of Dec. 9, 1953.’
Included Statement
Friday’s statement included a statement made by the First Presidency on the date mentioned. It was explained during the special session of the State Legislature a delegation of legislators called upon the First Presidency on Dec. 9 to discuss proposed legislation for turning back to the Church, ‘under the reversionary clauses of the deeds from the Church to the State, certain properties deeded to the State by the Church in 1930.’
Transferred To State
At the time of the above conference, the First Presidency gave the legislative delegation a statement, which was repeated in Friday’s statement. It reads:
‘In the early 1930’s the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints transferred to the State of Utah, Dixie College, Snow College and Weber College. The deeds in each instance provided that in the event the particular college was not maintained as a junior college by the state, it would revert to the Church.
‘If the Legislature now decides no longer to operate these three colleges, the Church will again take title to them and operate them as a part of its educational system.’
Then came the statement Friday that the ‘foregoing statement sets out the present position and intention of the Church in reference to the matter.’
During the special session of the Legislature state legislators voted to turn Dixie, Snow, and Weber junior colleges back to the Church at the end of the present school year. The legislators also passed a bill withdrawing all state support from Carbon Junior College in Price.
Created Furor
Passage of the two measures created an immediate furor in Carbon and Weber counties. Carbon residents protested the abolishment of their school.
Factions in Weber County raised a cry against what they termed hasty action on the Weber College question. They said the Legislature moved with too much speed on such an important matter. They held that the measure should never have come before the special session but should have been held over for the next regular session of the Legislature.
Ready Battle
Both groups set to work to take their fight directly to the people with a referendum on the 1954 election ballot.
Some petitions calling for a referendum already had been circulated Thursday in Weber County. The group promoting the petition had set up headquarters in the Ben Lomond Hotel.
In Carbon County no petitions had yet been circulated but preparations for such a move were being made.
About 33,000 signatures, 10 per cent of the number of people who voted for governor in the last election, will be required to put either measure on the ballot.
Deseret News, Friday, January 8, 1954″
Mon., 21 Dec., 1953:
Telephone Calls
1. President Ernest L. Wilkinson called – said the Ogden Chamber of Commerce is holding a meeting today at noon to decide whether or not they should start a suit against the State of Utah because of the Legislature’s decision to return Weber College to the Church. Said that David J. Wilson, Howard J. Huggins and Frank Browning are taking an active interest in this matter.
Pres. Wilkinson suggested that it might be well for Pres. McKay to have a talk with these men since they are good members of the Church.
Pres. Wilkinson also suggested that since the Weber College school buildings will not revert to the Church until July, and in view of the bitterness that is engendered in Ogden, he wondered if it would not be a good thing to insure the buildings up there.
When this note was handed to President McKay, he said as to the first mentioned subject, he would not enter into the matter, but the second suggestion should be considered by the brethren. (cm)
2. Judge Howell of Ogden telephoned. He would like an appointment with Pres. McKay sometime this week. He also suggested that Pres. Wilkinson be in attendance during the discussion. Judge Howell has been making gifts to Weber College in the past, and he has provided in his will that his library be turned over to Weber College. He mentioned the fact that he would like to contribute $2,000 or $3,000 to the College before the end of the year.”
Mon., 28 Dec., 1953:
“Last day at the office before starting for trip to South Africa and South America.
7 a.m. at the office attending to important duties
8 a.m. Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson and Dr. William P. Miller, President of Weber College called at the office. Some of the special problems presented by them are as follows:
1. Weber College has an option on about 12 acres of additional land immediately south of the new buildings on the new campus. The option expires January 1, 1954. Total amount of the options is $57,000.00.
2. Immediate problems concerning present staff members who are approaching retirement age.
3. Problem of continuing present staff members under church administration and re-staffing the college.
4. Advisability of a public statement that would indicate general plans for the operation of Weber College in the future.
5. The Ogden area is waiting to hear about the possibilities of a four-year program at Weber.
6. Campus Problems
7. Program Problems
8. Staff Problems.
Telephone Calls
Called Ira Huggins, Ogden, Utah regarding the Weber College situation. He said that he intended to attend the dedication of the 33rd and 43rd Wards held last evening, but his son and daughter paid them an unexpected visit and he was unable to get away. I mentioned that I had seen David Wilson there, but did not see him following the meeting.
I then told Mr. Huggins that I am leaving tomorrow at 6 a.m. for an extended trip, and that I am concerned about the school situation in Ogden. I said that this matter has been thrown into our lap, so to speak, and that we have not sought it.
Brother Huggins said that the Governor had said that we have, but that he did not believe it, and believed us 100%.
I told Brother Huggins that to this extent I am responsible — When the bill was introduced to discontinue Snow and Dixie and return them to the State, I stated to my associates, that it was not fair, that the Church had given the State three colleges with the stipulation that when the State ceases to use them as State institutions, the property given to the State would revert back to the Church – that if they are going to cease operating any of these colleges, then they should return the three that were given to them, and that is why later (and I did not speak to the Governor at any time) the Weber College was included.
Great pressure came upon me to say that the Church would not take the Colleges back. I made the statement to Bishop Hunt and to others that when and if the State ceased to operate these Colleges, the Church, according to stipulation, would receive the property back, and furthermore, that it would continue to operate them as church institutions. I made that statement to Bishop Hunt before this matter came up to the Legislature, and to others because Bishop Hunt called on me and asked, ‘What are you going to do with the property if it comes back to you?’ I answered that the schools would be operated as church institutions. He said: ‘If that is the case, I shall take no more steps to get the property.’ This was before any of this agitation came up.
I then said that the brethren of the General Authorities had voted unanimously to sustain me in the statement that if and when the State discontinued these institutions as state institutions, that we would take them back according to the stipulation in the deed, and furthermore, that we would operate them as church institutions.
Mr. Huggins then talked about the controversies that have arisen in Ogden – how the people are taking sides, etc.
I told him that up to this time an official statement has not been made by the Church.
Mr. Huggins then said that there is a statement coming from Senators Hopkins and Kerr that they were told ‘pretty well where to vote on this thing.’ Frank Browning said that after he talked to me, he called Hopkins and Kerr and they both said that they felt they had been told that they should support the bill.
I answered that I questioned very much that those men would say a thing like that — that nobody was bound from this office, and that these brethren were told to do what they thought best, because the responsibility rested upon the Legislature, and that is where the Church stands.”
Mon., 8 Mar., 1954:
“Soon after 7 o’clock this morning, I left Salt Lake City for Logan to attend Inaugural Ceremonies for Dr. Henry Aldous Dixon as President of the Utah State Agricultural College.
My son David L., and his wife, Mildred, accompanied me, David L. doing the driving. Sister McKay, who is confined to her bed with the ‘flu’, was unable to go with us.
At 9:30 – joined the Academic Procession at the Main Building.
10 a.m. – Inaugural Ceremonies commenced. A huge crowd were gathered in the Field House. The services were impressive and successful in every way. I chose as the theme for my address – Education for Citizenship. (Services were televised and broadcast over the radio)
At 12:15 p.m. – Attended the informal luncheon for Delegates, guests, Board of Trustees and their partners held in the Main Dining Room Student Union Building.
2:30 p.m. – Attended reception given in honor of President and Mrs. Henry Aldous Dixon, held in the Main Lounge, Student Union Building.
(see clippings attached)
Arrived home in the early evening – tired, but satisfied with the events of the day.”
Fri., 12 Mar., 1954:
Note: First Presidency’s Meeting
A long discussion was held on the Junior College situation. Referred to misrepresentations that have been made during the past several months. It was decided that a statement should be given to the Press giving the Church’s stand on the matter. (see First Presidency’s minutes of March 12 for further detail)”
Wed., 12 May, 1954:
“8:25 a.m. President Ernest L. Wilkinson presented correspondence with Governor Lee on the Junior College Situation. The Brethren then read and gave consideration to two suggested letters that had been prepared by President Ernest L. Wilkinson. One of these letters was a letter addressed to the First Presidency by Governor Lee asking certain questions in regard to the attitude of the Church with reference to taking over the Junior Colleges, how they would be operated, etc.
The other letter was a suggested answer to these questions by the First Presidency in a letter addressed to the Governor.
The Brethren felt that there should be some modifications in the letters. They decided to look over the copies that had been left with them.
At the invitation of the First Presidency President Wilkinson met with the First Presidency and made certain explanations regarding these letters. He explained that it was necessary to submit both letters to the Governor so that he would know what the questions and answers would be.”
Fri., 14 May, 1954:
“At 10:30 a.m. President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the B.Y.U. called and presented a redraft of a letter from the Governor containing questions regarding the Church’s attitude toward the State’s turning over to the Church certain junior colleges, also a redraft of letter answering the questions by the First Presidency. President Wilkinson was requested to go ahead with the matter.”
Fri., 21 May, 1954:
“At 9 a.m. Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson of the Brigham Young University reported to the First Presidency a conference he had had with the Governor yesterday. Said the Governor had approved the drafts of letters that were submitted to him except that he suggests that in the First Presidency’s answer they do not repeat the questions but just give the answers. The Governor inquired if we would have any objection to including a question regarding general vocational training, and President Wilkinson felt we could answer that in the affirmative. It was decided to make the final writing of the letters as indicated, and President Wilkinson was asked to go forward at once.
President Wilkinson also called attention to the athletic program of the B.Y.U. Dr. Wilkinson said that he is going to talk with the chairman of the Athletic Conference to see if it is not possible to maintain higher educational standards. He said he had already given instructions that unless the athletes occupy the full-time that other students devote to the work he would not give them jobs. The Brethren told Brother Wilkinson to go ahead and in the meantime try to get a reorganization in the Conference.
President Wilkinson said that he had been asked to recommend someone to go to Hawaii to take charge of the junior college to be established there. He mentioned for this position Reuben Law, Dean of the College of Education at the B.Y.U. He also mentioned Dr. Leon Winsor who at present is at Cornell.
Referring to the Ricks College situation, President Wilkinson said, in answer to a question as to how many of the students are graduating with the intention of teaching school, that 66% will obtain teaching jobs. He said that these teachers when they graduate, are qualified and have made a good record; that the B.Y.U. students are certified in exactly the same way.
Further in regard to the Ricks College, he said that the enrollment has been about constant over the years. They have about 25 more students now than they had five years ago. His own feeling is that if we continue the College in Rexburg we shall not have many more students and if we make it a two-year college the number will be reduced. In five years they have graduated 540 students from a four-year course.
Fri., 28 May, 1954
CHURCH STAND ON COLLEGES TOLD TO LEE
Letter by Governor Answered in Detail By First Presidency
Gov. J. Bracken Lee Friday released the texts of letters between him and the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in regard to the controversial junior college question.
The 1953 special session of the legislature voted to return Weber, Snow and Dixie Colleges to the Church. Petitions were filed which blocked the legislation and put the question on the ballot at the upcoming November election.
In answering a number of specific questions asked by Gov. Lee in his letter, the First Presidency said, ‘We trust the aforesaid answers will help to give the voters the facts they need for an intelligent decision at the polls.’
The First Presidency also pointed out, ‘The legislation to return Weber, Snow and Dixie Junior Colleges to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was not suggested directly or indirectly by the Church.’
Gov. Lee likewise said, ‘I take full responsibility for the proposal – one I have consistently and publically made for a period of four years.’
Gov. Lee’s questions, as stated in his letter, and the First Presidency’s answer, as stated in its letter, are as follows:
Gov. Lee’s question No. 1:
‘In view of the conflicting representations which have been made as to the desires of the Church, will you please advise me as to whether you do or do not want Weber, Snow and Dixie Colleges returned to the Church?’
The First Presidency’s answer to question No. 1:
‘We shall be pleased to have Weber, Snow and Dixie Colleges returned to the Church, which is in a position to operate them in a first-class manner scholastically and otherwise.’
Question No. 2:
‘Will the Church be willing to pay a fair and equitable price for the properties at these institutions which have been acquired or built by the State at the expense of the taxpayers of the State of Utah, during the time of State operation? It is understood, of course, in accordance with the deeds by which the properties of these institutions were originally conveyed to the State, that the Church will receive back the former Church properties without cost.’
Answer to Question No. 2:
‘As to lands which have been acquired and buildings built at the expense of the tax payers of Utah since the three colleges were conveyed to the State, the Church has been legally advised by competent counsel that the acceptance of the obligation to further operate the three colleges (which amounts to approximately one million dollars per year) is a sufficient and valid consideration and price for the transfer. Nevertheless, so as to remove any possibility of doubtful criticism, the Church is willing with respect to such property, to pay, taking into account all the circumstances, whatever price is fair and equitable. Under the pending legislation this amount would, of course, be determined by negotiation between the State Board of Examiners and the Church.’
Question No. 3:
‘In the event the voters approve the return of the institutions to the Church in November, would the Church be in a position to carry on the regular school program for the balance of the year? If so, will the Church, as respects the balance of the school year, continue the same faculty and other employees, pay the same salaries as have been agreed upon by the State, recognize Sabbatical leaves which have already been granted, continue the same curricula both as to day and evening schools, charge the same tuition, admit the same students and give credit to them for the work they have already done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if the three colleges continued to be operated by the State?’
Answer to Question No. 3:
‘The answer to all parts of this question is in the affirmative. The Church will be in a position to carry on the regular school program. Because of the fact that the school year will already have begun, the Church will consider itself bound by employment contracts which have already been entered into with all members of the teaching and custodial staff. Further, the same curricula, including the same courses, will be continued both for day and evening schools; Sabbatical leaves already granted will be recognized; the same tuition will be charged and the same students will be admitted and permitted to continue the courses for which they originally registered, without any interruption, just as though there had been no change of operation of the schools. It may be that in addition to the courses for which the students have already registered, additional courses may be offered so that there would be a better balanced and richer curricula, but there would be no diminution of the courses already offered.’
Question No. 4:
‘As long-term policy, would it be your intention to transform these institutions into what some have termed ‘religious seminaries,’ or would it be your intention to operate them as high-class, accredited junior colleges with a well-qualified faculty competent to meet educational needs of their respective communities?’
Answer to Question No. 4:
‘It would be our intention not to transform any of these colleges into what some have termed ‘religious seminaries.’ It would also be our intention to integrate all three of these institutions into our Church School System, and to operate them as high-class accredited junior colleges with a well-qualified faculty competent to meet educational needs of their respective communities. Our intentions as to competent faculties can best be measured by our past performance when these same schools were previously operated by the Church.’
Question No. 5:
‘Some of the teachers are concerned as to what their retirement rights will be in the event of return of the three colleges to the Church. Will you kindly inform me as to what retirement rights they will have?
Answer to Question No. 5:
‘We have not, of course, formulated any retirement policy for these three colleges in question nor can we be expected to do so until we know the outcome of the November election. We would expect, however, to pattern the retirement system for these three institutions along the line of the retirement system now in effect at the Brigham Young University which, we are informed, is the most favorable retirement system of any University in the State. The teachers at that institution in addition to having the benefits of the Federal Social Security, pay 5 per cent of their annual salary into a teachers’ retirement fund. This 5 per cent is mateched by the Church. The combination of the two provides a very good retirement system for faculty members.’
Question No. 6:
‘It was alleged during the campaign to obtain signatures to the referendum petition that if the three institutions were returned to the Church, veterans would not be able to obtain the same educational advantages and privileges as if the same institutions were maintained by the state. Will you kindly inform me whether this is a correct statement?’
Answer to question No. 6:
‘The statement you report is not correct. Veterans of World War II and of the Korean War have the same educational benefits in Church schools as in State schools. At the Brigham Young University, for instance, the tuition and fees of veterans of World War II were paid by the government in the same way as at state institutions. Veterans of the Korean War who desire to pursue higher education are paid certain educational benefits direct to them by the government, and may use these benefits as they see fit for tuition in either private or state schools.’
Question No. 7:
‘Would the Church include vocational education in its curriculum for these institutions?’
Answer to question No. 7:
“We answer this question in the affirmative.’
The purpose of the correspondence exchange was also cited by Gov. Lee.
‘In order that the voters of the state may be fully informed (with respect to the specified issues), I am taking the liberty of addressing this letter to you…,’ the governor wrote the First Presidency.
In its return letter the First Presidency concluded:
‘We trust the aforesaid answers will help to give the voters the facts they need for an intelligent decision at the polls, and that in particular they will resolve doubts as to the operation of these colleges, should the voters, who will exercise their right to vote as they choose, decide to sustain the action of the Legislature.’
Gov. Lee also took complete responsibility for asking for the return of the colleges to the Church. Referring to reports the Church had asked for return of the colleges, Gov. Lee said:
‘This I know to be unture and I take full responsibility for the proposal – one I have consistently and publically made for a period of four years.’
Deseret News – Friday, May 28, 1954″
20 July, 1954:
“July 20, 1954
Announcement by the First Presidency of the establishment of a Junior College by the Church in Hawaii
CHURCH TO ESTABLISH COLLEGE IN HAWAII
Decision to establish a Junior College of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the Hawaiian Islands, was announced Wednesday by the First Presidency.
The First Presidency’s statement told also of the appointment of Dr. Reuben D. Law, dean of the College of Education, Brigham Young University, as president of the new junior college.
The statement said further:
‘Dr. Law, Dr. Clarence Cottam, dean of the College of Biological and Agricultural Sciences at BYU, and Kenneth Bennion, director of the LDS Business College, will leave within the next few days for the Hawaiian Islands to make a preview study of buildings necessary and the establishment of the school. Upon their report steps will be taken to make the necessary preparation for the completion of the project.
‘It is hoped that the buildings will be built and that the new junior college will begin operations in the fall of 1955.
‘This new school is being created at the request of the Saints living in the Hawaiian Islands and will be a long step forward in giving them educational opportunities of the same nature as are provided for members of the Church living on the mainland.’
Deseret News, Wednesday, July 21, 1954
July 21, 1954
RE: PROPOSED STATEMENT OF FIRST PRESIDENCY ON
ESTABLISHMENT OF JUNIOR COLLEGE IN THE HAWAIIAN
ISLANDS.
The First Presidency announced today that a decision had been made to establish a Junior College in the Hawaiian islands.
Dr. Reuben D. Law, Dean of the College of Education at Brigham Young University has been appointed President of the new college. Dr. Law, Dr. Clarence Cottam, Dean of the College of Biological and Agricultural Sciences at BYU, and Kenneth Bennion, Director of the LDS Business College, will leave within the next few days for the Hawaiian Islands to make a preview study of buildings necessary and the establishment of the school. Upon their report steps will be taken to make the necessary preparation for the completion of the project.
It is hoped that the buildings will be built and that the new Junior College will begin operations in the Fall of 1955.
This new school is being created at the request of the Saints living in the Hawaiian Islands and will be a long step forward in giving them educational opportunities of the same nature as are provided for members of the Church living on the mainland.
Wed., 18 Aug., 1954:
“7:45 a.m. — Met by appointment Elder Adam S. Bennion of the Council of the Twelve. He reported that the Committee in charge of the Utah Educational Association, all but two of whom are members of the Church, have asked what their attitude should be in the coming convention toward the proposition of turning over Weber and other Junior Colleges to the Church. I told him that I thought they should use their own judgment; that the attitude of the Church is plainly stated in the First Presidency’s public statement, which is that we are receptive if and when the State ceases to conduct these schools as state institutions; that we will accept them in accordance with our agreement and, furthermore, that we will make good schools of them; that everyone should vote just as he wishes to vote. When I presented this later at the meeting of the First Presidency President Richards agreed wholeheartedly with me. It was felt that if we campaigned for the schools and succeeded in getting them we would have the antagonism of the non-members.
Mon., 30 Aug., 1954:
“Meeting of Group from Ogden on the Junior College situation
On August 30 by appointment at 8:45 in the morning met Frank M. Browning, W.M. Anderson, A.L. Glasman, Ernest H. Bulch, President of the Ogden Chamber of Commerce, Ira A. Huggins, and Brigham H. Robinson. They called in regard to the question of the proposed transfer of the Junior Colleges from the state to the Church. President McKay spent three hours with them, told them that the Church is not making an aggressive campaign to have these schools turned back; that the deed of transfer, when the Church gave the Schools to the state, states that if and when the state ceases to operate the Junior Colleges for educational purposes, the property reverts to the Church, and we stand ready to receive them, and when they do come back, we will maintain them as Junior Colleges. President McKay told them that further than that we were not saying anything, that it would not be wise for us to do so, because if the people do turn them back to us we do not want ‘you men’ (referring to the committee who were present) and others, to say that we used undue influence to get them back. We would rather say that you gave them back, and we want you to help us now in our Church school system.
Mr. Glasman asked President McKay: ‘Do you want them back?’
President McKay answered him: ‘Supposing I said that I do want them back, that I am in favor of this referendum, and you publish that in your paper, what would that do? That would be undue influence in your favor.
He then said that our people are saying that if members of the Church vote against turning these schools back to the Church, they are not good members of the Church and will be dealt with. President McKay answered that no member of the Church, General Authority or otherwise, will be dealt with if he votes his own convictions. That is what we want him to do.
President McKay said that Ira Huggins was the most virulent in his attack on the bill and when asked to give an example he said that only recently inone of the wards a young returned missionary got up and said that Pres. Ernest Wilkinson had put five dollars in his hand and told him to go up there and put in a good word for the BYU and the Junior College. President McKay answered that he would see Ernest Wilkinson and ask him about it. He said that fortunately when he got out of the meeting Ernest Wilkinson was in the office waiting, and he faced him with this matter, and he said that that is a mis-statement; that he had not given any missionary five dollars, nor asked him to do what was reported. President McKay said that he then dictated a letter to Ira Huggins, and asked him to please give him the name of the missionary and the ward in which he spoke.”
Thurs., 23 Sept., 1954:
2 p.m. Met at their request with Henry D. Moyle of the Council of the Twelve, and Ernest Wilkinson, President of the Brigham Young University. They wanted to know who should sign the statement given to the Secretary of State, and the paper setting forth the reasons why the State should discontinue Weber, Snow,and Dixie Junior Colleges, a question that must be answered in the coming election.
Dilworth Woolley will sign as Chairman of the Committee to present it to the State.
Mon., 27 Sept., 1954:
Telephone Calls
2. President Wilkinson called from the B.Y.U. in Provo. He stated that he had the pamphlet regarding the Junior College issue ready for print. He had found out that they could include the statement that was signed with the Secretary of State with reference to the transfer of the colleges without incurring any additional cost. President Wilkinson asked my permission to include this in the pamphlet. I told him that I would have to read it over before I could decide. President Wilkinson said he would send the material to me today in order that I may read it over and give my opinion.
I thanked President Wilkinson for the article regarding the seminaries in Los Angeles and stated that I thought I would use it in my talk. I asked President Wilkinson for some information on seventh grade enrollment in the seminaries. President Wilkinson stated that he would send this information to me.”
Tues., 28 Sept., 1954:
Telephone Calls
1. Henry D. Moyle of the Council of the Twelve called me by telephone regarding the meeting to be held by District Stake Presidents at which time a discussion will be held relative to the distribution of pamphlets concerning the Junior College situation and the Reapportionment. I told him that the Stake Presidents are not to make a campaign that Gen’l. Authorities are in favor of the Church’s taking over the Junior Colleges, nor that they are in favor of the Reapportionment plan – also that they are not to quote the General Authorities on either issue.”
Wed., 29 Sept., 1954:
Telephone Calls
“2. I called President Wilkinson at the B.Y.U. I told him that he had better go to Washington to fulfill his appointment with the Chamber of Commerce in that City. He asked if I had given Brother Moyle the material regarding the Junior College situation. I told him that I thought it had been given to Brother Moyle, and that we should have to arrange to pay for both of them some way.”
23 Oct., 1954:
“Re: Junior Colleges
October 23, 1954
Mr. Frank M. Browning
1547-26th Street
Ogden, Utah
My Dear Friend:
First, I owe you an apology for this delay in replying to your letters of recent date. Please excuse my seeming neglect. It was not intentional. That you might be assured of this, in acknowledgment of your second letter, I sent you the following telegram addressed to the Waldorf Hotel, New York. I hope you received it.
‘Salt Lake City, Utah,
October 15, 1954
‘Frank M. Browning
Waldorf Astoria Hotel,
New York City, N.Y.
‘Answering letter October eleventh. Attitude unchanged. Church not campaigning for colleges. Every voter free to cast his vote for State retention of colleges. Letter following. Kindest regards.
DAVID O. MCKAY’
This note this morning, just prior to my leaving for California, is to reassure you again that there has been no change of my attitude nor that of the First Presidency in regard to the proposed discontinuing of state support for four Junior Colleges.
Simply stated the question before the people of Utah is whether they want these schools to continue as state institutions. Every person entitled to vote should exprss at the polls his or her honest convictions regarding this important matter. A vote cast for the State to do so is not a vote against the Church. If the people decide that the State should discontinue its support of these colleges, then the Church has expressed its willingness to assume the responsibility of maintaining three of these institutions as Junior Colleges; but it is not conducting a campaign for the return of these schools to Church control.
The printed correspondence between Governor Lee and the First Presidency sets forth the issue clearly.
I was glad to receive both your letters and am happy to have you call on me or write to me at any time. I admire your ability and loyalty as a citizen and esteem you as a friend.
Cordially and sincerely,
President David O. McKay”
Thurs., 28 Oct., 1954:
“Received the following telegram from Jack M. Reed, Reporter for the Salt Lake Tribune:
‘Sa 38 RX PD Salt Lake City, Utah Oct. 28, 1954 709PMP
President David O. McKay, 168 Emerald Bay, Laguna Beach, California
Tribune has story from Ogden Porporting to quote your position of neutrality on Junior Colleges Question as stated by you in telegram to Frank Browning, Ogden; Chamber of Commerce would appreciate your calling me collect soon as possible at three-one-five-one-one. Can read this story to you. Best regards. signed – Jack M. Reed.’
I called Brother Reed and reiterated the stand that the First Presidency has taken regarding the transfer by the State of the Junior Colleges to the Church (see pamphlet attached). Other than the pamphlet containing a statement issued some months ago in answer to a series of questions posed by Gov. J. Bracken Lee, I have not approved of the distribution of campaign pamphlets through church channels.”
29 Oct., 1954:
“M’Kay Denies LDS Drive For Colleges
Tells Ogden C. of C. Pamphlets Issued Against Instructions
Special to the Tribune
OGDEN, Oct. 28 – David O. McKay, president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Thursday assured the Ogden Chamber of Commerce that the church is not campaigning for transfer of three junior colleges to the church.
President McKay, in reply to a message from the Ogden chamber, said that the church had made clear its position on transfer of the junior colleges in a statement issued some months ago in answer to a series of questions posed by Gov. J. Bracken Lee.
The questions and their answers, which have been circulated in pamphlet form, say that the position of the church is that it is not seeking return of the institutions, but will accept and operate them if state support is withdrawn.
Aside from this, any distribution of campaign pamphlets through church channels ‘was done directly contrary to my instructions,’ President McKay told the chamber.
‘Attitude Unchanged’
‘The Attitude (of the church) is unchanged,’ President McKay said in a telegram to Frank Browning, member of the Ogden Chamber of Commerce committee on Weber College Campaign.
‘The church is not campaigning for the colleges. Every voter is free to cast his vote for state retention of the colleges. This election is to determine whether the people of the state of Utah desire the state to continue to support the junior colleges. Only if they determine not to will the church be willing to take over and continue the colleges’ (Weber, Dixie and Snow).
Release Authorized
President McKay’s message was released by Bernie Diamond, manager-secretary of the Ogden Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Diamond said he was authorized by President McKay to release the telegram in a telephone conversation with the church president Thursday.
Mr. Diamond said President McKay’s reference to campaign, pamphlets was in response to the following message sent to him Wednesday night:
‘Pamphlets in support of transfer (of colleges) have been mailed to residents under postal permit of some stakes and delivered by ward teachers. Much mis-information and many erroneous rumors are circulating concerning the church position on junior colleges. May we quote your telegram to Frank Browning? We believe this is urgently needed to stave off controversy rapidly building up in this area.’
President McKay telephoned Thursday to authorize the requested release.
‘We are gratified,’ Mr. Diamond said on behalf of the Ogden Chamber of Commerce, ‘that President McKay has again clarified the church’s position. The Ogden chamber has attempted to conduct this campaign on a high level, keeping the church strictly out of the campaign because we have felt that the only question as President McKay put it, is to determine whether the people of the state of Utah desire to continue to support the Junior colleges.
‘We appreciate the generous offer of the church and its willingness to stand by to finance and operate these colleges if the state is unable to continue them. We hold firm to our position that this involves a broad question of public policy in education which merits the most serious study and this was not given to it.’
Contacted by The Tribune Thursday night in Laguna Beach, Calif., President David O. McKay of the Church of Jesus Christ reiterated the church’s official stand on the junior college transfer issue.
‘If and when the state ceases to support the junior colleges,’ President McKay said, ‘the church will resume jurisdiction and continue to operate them as junior colleges.’
The church leader said distribution of one pamphlet listing questions and answers on the issue between Gov. J. Bracken Lee and the LDS First Presidency had been authorized for distribution through church channels.
He stressed, however, that distribution of any other pamphlets ‘purporting to give church advice to vote any particular way concerning the junior college transfer issue is contrary to instructions.’
The Salt Lake Tribune – Friday, October 29, 1954″
29 Oct., 1954:
“October 29, 1954
Pamphlet Regarding Junior Colleges
LETTER OF
GOVERNOR J. BRACKEN LEE
AND
ANSWER OF THE FIRST PRESIDENCY
OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST
OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS
ON
PROPOSED TRANSFER OF
JUNIOR COLLEGES
LETTER OF GOVERNOR LEE
May 14, 1954
The First Presidency
The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Gentlemen:
As you know, the required number of voters of the State, by the filing of a petition, have placed on the ballot for the coming November election the question of whether the action of the last Legislature in authorizing the return of Weber, Snow and Dixie Junior Colleges to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, should or should not be sustained.
I am advised that during the campaign to obtain signatures to the referendum petition it was represented that the plan to return the Junior Colleges to your Church was requested by you. This I know to be untrue and I take full responsibility for the proposal-one I have consistently and publicly made for a period of four years.
I am also advised that in some parts of the State it was represented that The First Presidency wanted these colleges returned to the Church, whereas in other parts of the State it was represented that The First Presidency did not want these colleges returned. It was also represented that the return of these colleges would constitute a gift by the taxpayers of the State of Utah to the Church, of property having a substantial value. It was also asserted in some quarters that if the action of the Legislature should be sustained, many members of the faculties of said colleges would be immediately discharged, the salaries of others would be reduced, and that the curriculum of the various institutions would be sharply curtailed and modified. Finally it was asserted in some quarters that as a long-term policy the colleges if returned to the Church would be operated essentially as ‘religious seminaries.’
In order that the voters of the State may be fully informed with respect to these and other representations I am taking the liberty of addressing this letter to you and would be greatly obliged if you will be kind enough to answer the following questions:
Question:
1. In view of the conflicting representations which have been made as to the desires of the Church, will you please advise as to whether you do or do not want Weber, Snow,and Dixie Colleges returned to the Church?
Question:
2. Will the Church be willing to pay a fair and equitable price for the properties at these institutions which have been acquired or built by the State at the expense of the tax payers of the State of Utah, during the time of State operation? It is understood, of course, in accordance with the deeds by which the properties of these institutions were originally conveyed to the State, that the Church will receive back the former Church properties without cost.
Question:
3. In the event the voters approve the return of the institutions to the Church in November, would the Church be in a position to carry on the regular school program for the balance of the year? If so, will the Church, as respects the balance of the school year, continue the same faculty and other employees, pay the same salaries as have been agreed upon by the State, recognize Sabbatical leaves which have already been granted, continue the same curricula both as to day and evening schools, charge the same tuition, admit the same students and give credit to them for the work they have alread done, in the same manner and to the same extent as if the three colleges continued to be operated by the State?
Question:
4. As a long-term policy, would it be your intention to transform these institutions into what some have termed ‘religious seminaries,’ or would it be your intention to operate them as high-class, accredited junior colleges with a well-qualified faculty competent to meet educational needs of their respective communities?
Question:
5. Some of the teachers are concerned as to what their retirement rights will be in the event of return of the three colleges to the Church. Will you kindly inform me as to what retirement rights they will have?
Question:
6. It was alleged during the campaign to obtain signatures to the referendum petition, that if the three institutions were returned to the Church, veterans would not be able to obtain the same educational advantages and privileges as if the same institutions were maintained by the State. Will you kindly inform me whether this is a correct statement?
Question:
7. Would the Church include vocational education in its curriculum for these institutions?
Concluding Paragraph
I am confident that any information you can supply in answer to the foregoing questions will be helpful in quieting rumors and providing facts on which the people can base their vote in November.
Sincerely yours,
J. Bracken, Lee
GOVERNOR OF UTAH
JBL/efw
ANSWER OF THE FIRST PRESIDENCY
May 21, 1954
Hon. J. Bracken Lee, Governor
State of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear Governor Lee:
We acknowledge receipt of your letter of May 14, 1954. As you state, the legislation to return Weber, Snow and Dixie Junior Colleges to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was not suggested directly or indirectly by the Church. Over three years ago you addressed a letter to us asking what the Church would do in the event the State discontinued operation of these three institutions. We replied that under the deeds of conveyance by which these colleges in the 1930’s were ceded by the Church to the State, they would revert to and be operated by the Church if the State discontinued their operation. In response to a similar inquiry by you last year we gave the same answer.
In order to obviate any misunderstandings which you report are current, we answer specifically the questions set forth in your letter as follows:
Answer:
We shall be pleased to have Weber, Snow and Dixie Colleges returned to the Church, which is in a position to operate them in a first-class manner scholastically and otherwise.
Answer:
As to lands which have been acquired and buildings built at the expense of the tax payers of Utah since the three colleges were conveyed to the State, the Church has been legally advised by competent counsel that the acceptance of the obligation to further operate the three colleges (which amounts to approximately one million dollars per year) is a sufficient and valid consideration and price for the transfer. Nevertheless, so as to remove any possibility of even doubtful criticism, the Church is willing with respect to such property, to pay, taking into account all the circumstances, whatever price if fair and equitable. Under the pending legislation this amount would, of course, be determined by negotiation between the State Board of Examiners and the Church.
Answer:
The answer to all parts of this question is in the affirmative: The Church will be in a position to carry on the regular school program. Because of the fact that the school year will already have begun the Church will consider itself bound by employment contracts which have already been entered into with all members of the teaching and custodial staff. Further, the same curricula including the same courses, will be continued both for day and evening schools; Sabbatical leaves already granted will be recognized; the same tuition will be charged and the same students will be admitted and permitted to continue the courses for which they originally registered, without any interruption, just as though there had been no change of operation of the schools. It may be that in addition to the courses for which the students have already registered, additional courses may be offered so that there would be a better balanced and richer curricula, but there would be no diminution of the courses already offered.
Answer:
It would be our intention not to transform any of these colleges into what some have termed ‘religious seminaries.’ It would also be our intention to integrate all three of these institutions into our Church School System, and to operate them as high-class accredited Junior Colleges with a well qualified faculty competent to meet educational needs of their respective communities. Our intentions as to competent faculties can best be measured by our past performance when these same schools were previously operated by the Church.
Answer:
We have not, of course, formulated any retirement policy for the three colleges in question nor can we be expected to do so until we know the outcome of the November election. We would expect, however, to pattern the retirement system for these three institutions along the line of the retirement system now in effect at the Brigham Young University which, we are informed, is the most favorable retirement system of any University in the State. The teachers at that Institution in addition to having the benefits of the Federal Social Security, pay 5% of their annual salary into a teacher’s retirement fund. This 5% is matched by the Church. The combination of the two provides a very good retirement system for faculty members.
Answer:
The statement you report is not correct. Veterans of World War II and of the Korean War have the same educational benefits in Church schools as in State schools. At the Brigham Young University, for instance, the tuition and fees of veterans of World War II were paid by the Government in the same way as at State institutions. Veterans of the Korean War who desire to pursue higher education are paid certain educational benefits direct to them by the Government, and may use these benefits as they see fit for tuition in either private or State schools.
Answer:
We answer this question in the affirmative.
Concluding Paragraph
We trust the aforesaid answers will help to give the voters the facts they need for an intelligent decision at the polls, and that in particular they will resolve doubts as to the operation of these colleges, should the voters, who will exercise their right to vote as they choose, decide to sustain the action of the legislature.
Faithfully yours,
David O. McKay
Stephen L. Richards
J. Reuben Clark, Jr.
The First Presidency”
Mon., 1 Nov., 1954:
“At 5 p.m. returned to the office. Learned from my secretary that the telephone had been ringing almost continuously throughout the day — newspaper reporters, individuals, the associated press, etc. had called for information regarding the political issues of the day — the transfer by the State of Junior Colleges to the Church; the reapportionment, etc.”
November 2, 1954
DAWSON, DIXON WIN UTAH VOTE
UTAH VOTERS DEFEAT THREE BALLOT ISSUES
By WILL FEHR
News Staff Writer
A proposed Constitutional amendment and two junior college issues were overwhelmingly defeated by Utah voters Tuesday.
The three defeated issues called for (1) a Constitutional amendment to reapportion the Utah Legislature, (2) the transfer of three junior colleges from state control to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and (3) the discontinuance of state support of Carbon College.
Unofficial returns from 963 districts out of 1,008 show that 137,957 Utahns voted against reapportionment while 75,488 voted for it.
On the junior college transfer issue, 130,247 votes were cast against it and 85,212 for it.
Voters defeated the Carbon College issue by casting 166,747 votes against it. Only 46,816 votes were cast for the referendum issue.
Weber County residents lined up heavily against the three measures. Unofficial returns show that 23,525 votes were marked against the reapportionment measure and only 5,132 for it. The junior college transfer question drew 22,801 negative votes with only 5,908 for it. The Carbon College issue brought in 24,326 votes against and 3,823 votes for it.
Commenting on defeat at the polls of two proposals to take four colleges off the hands of the state, Gov. J. Bracken Lee said it was what he expected.
‘Any time you have great effort being made to put over one side of an argument without anyone taking the other side it is almost a cinch to go over,’ he declared.
‘I think if the junior college issue had been fought through from both sides the results might have been different,’ he said.
Refusal to drop Carbon College and return Weber, Dixie and Snow Colleges to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints ‘certainly will bring about higher taxes,’ he warned.
‘The Legislature can’t help but feel that the people would rather have these things and pay more taxes. I fought my heart out to cut down taxes, but if the people want to hurt themselves, why should I fight them,’ he asked.
He said he still is convinced that the best interest of the state would have been to go through with what the Legislature asked.
If the voters had decided for the three issues these changes would have been made:
(1) The Constitution would have been amended to provide for a State Senate of one senator from each of Utah’s 29 counties and a House of Representatives of 75 members. At present Utah has 23 senators and 60 representatives.
(2) Three junior colleges – Weber, Snow and Dixie – would have passed from state control to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
(3) Carbon College would have lost state support and would have ceased to exist as a college.
Deseret News – Wednesday, November 3, 1954
Voting Results for Utah in Capsule Form
Here are the unofficial at-a-glance totals in Tuesday’s general election:
U.S. Congress, First District
(487 of 523 Districts)
Henry Aldous Dixon (R)…54,821
Walter K. Granger (D)…47,367
U.S. Congress, Second District
(476 of 485 Districts)
William A. Dawson (R)…89,603
Reva Beck Bosone (D)…67,194
Reapportionment Amendment
(963 of 1,008 Districts)
For…………………………..75,488
Against…………………….137,957
Junior College Transfer
(963 of 1,008 Districts)
For………………………….85,212
Against……………………130,247
Carbon College
Abandonment
(963 of 1,008 Districts)
For………………………..46,816
Against…………………..166,747
Supreme Court
(963 of 1,008 Districts)
George W. Worthen….148,864
Delbert M. Draper Sr…82,403
District Courts
First Judicial District
(81 of 89 Districts)
Judge Lewis Jones……..11,809
M.C. Harris………………5,611
Second Judicial District
(171 of 172 Districts)
John Wahlquist…………23,003
John A. Hendricks……17,185
Third Judicial District
(364 of 366 Districts)
Judge Clarence E. Baker..64,651
Mark S. Miner…………….37,442
Fourth Judicial District
(114 of 163 Districts)
Judge R.L. Tuckett……….16,731
Ray P. Dillman………………9,361
Sixth Judicial District
Judge John L. Sevy Jr……..3,088
Ferdinand Erickson…………2,185
Deseret News – Wednesday, November 3, 1954
Thurs., 30 Dec., 1954:
‘8:45 a.m. Dr. Reuben D. Law met President Clark and me concerning the Church College in Hawaii. He made a report of his meetings in Hawaii recently with the Continuing Committee, consisting of President Edward L. Clissold, Chairman, President Ralph E. Woolley, member, Pres. D. Arthur Haycock, member, Reuben D. Law, as President of the Church College of Hawaii.
In answer to the Presidency’s request for these three to choose one other, they recommended that two be chosen. We approved of this, and George G. Cannon and Lawrence Haneberg, an Hawaiian, were named to act on the Committee, making a committee of five.
We considered for an hour and a half, first, a main assembly hall; (2) dormitory for men, and a dormitory for women; (3) securing of a house for the President, and (4) a faculty as may be necessary.
Dr. Law recommended a faculty of twenty-five, but I suggested that he cut this number down fifty per cent, making a faculty of twelve members to start out with.
Another matter which was considered is the advisability of starting the school in Honolulu, using the Tabernacle and Waikiki Ward as the center for the school for one year while the other buildings are being prepared.
It was decided that I should telephone to Brother Burton, the architect, to see if he would draw the plans, and have then ready by the first of June for the necessary buildings as named above.
Fri., 31 Dec., 1954:
I then had a conference with Brother Edward O. Anderson who took up the following matters with me:
(1) The Junior College in New Zealand. Eighty thousand square feet have been proposed for the building, and I told Brother Anderson (and he agreed) that that is altogether too large — that 35,000 square feet will give ample space. I shall investigae this matter while I am in New Zealand. Eighty thousand square feet will amount to $960,000, nearly a million dollars. Forty thousand square feet will be just one half that amount, or $480,000. I therefore feel that I can save the Church one half million dollars in this school project, and this is one reason why I am eager to make this 45,000-mile-journey to the South Pacific.
16 Mar., 1955:
Telephone conversation—President David O. McKay and President Edward L. Clissold
President Clissold: Now, one other point, President McKay. The matter of the staff for the college. Brother Law is quite worried. He has to get in touch with these people to make sure that we can get them.
President McKay: Well, now we have received that recommendation, twenty people there, and we have your signatures approving, showing it has been presented to the Board. But now, if I remember rightly there are eight or ten of those who are coming out of the B.Y.U., and Dr. Law hasn’t said a thing to the President of that Institution. And he is offering, so it is reported to me, more money for some of those teachers. It will become one part of the Church to outbid another part of the Church, and it’s a little discourteous, Brother Clissold, for Brother Law to speak to these people without first consulting the President of the Institution. And the same thing with U.S.A.C.
President Clissold: We didn’t know that. We supposed that everything had been cleared.
President McKay: I know you didn’t. But it hasn’t cleared. And, furthermore, I think he has already spoken to a woman in Ogden. She wants to come down now and see me to see whether or not we will have a job for her husband. Well, we haven’t any job for her husband going over there, have you?
President Clissold: Off hand, there will be quite a bit of work around the school, but I don’t know what he can do.
President McKay: Well, we can’t guarantee him any work. If this woman goes over there and takes a position in the school why she must run the risk of her husband’s getting a job. We can’t guarantee that. I haven’t spoken to her; but I gave her an appointment to come down tomorrow at 4:30 so I can give you something definite on that later. The point is, it seems to us that Brother Law has taken things in his own hand and written to these members of the staff without consulting the heads of the institutions in which these people are working.
President Clissold: I wanted to know what position our committee should take in regards to these appointments to the staff. Do you wish us to submit all these to you as we have done?
President McKay: Well, I think it would be necessary in this case. I think that all communications to us should come through you, the members of the Board. Let him make his recommendations to you and you write to us.
President Clissold: Brother Law was of the opinion that at our meeting at my home that you had told us to go ahead with the staff and give the final approval, but we didn’t feel that way. We felt that the names should be submitted to you.
President McKay: Well, you are right. And you remember we made pretty clear there that we would hold you Board members responsible?
President Clissold: We are trying to be very careful.
President McKay: I know you will be, and we will probably change that Continuing Committee as soon as we send down your Articles of Incorporation–change that to a Board of Trustees or Board of Directors.
President Clissold: We will wait until we hear from you on this staff matter.
President McKay: Yes, we will have a meeting tomorrow afternoon with the President of B.Y.U. and Executive Committee at which time we will bring this up. But I have already heard indirectly of this offering a higher salary if they will come down there, and they feel just a little piqued about it. So we will let you know about that within a few days. Kind regards to Sister Clissold and all your associates.
President Clissold: Had some very rainy weather. Brother Ehlers went through here last night on his way to New Zealand.
Mon., 13 June, 1955:
“8:30 to 9:30 a.m. Conference with Brother Joy Dunyon, Supervisor of Seminaries of the Church, just recently released.
Brother Joy Dunyon called at the office and asked my advice regarding his future relationship with the educational system of the Church. He said he has enjoyed his positions as seminary teacher and supervisor of the seminaries. He has looked upon these positions more as Calls than as jobs, and now he has reached the point where he must decide whether to accept the position offered him as an instructor in the School of Religion of the Brigham Young University, or whether to choose a business career. He explained that if he accepts this proffered position as an instructor at the B.Y.U., it means that he accepts teaching as his life’s profession, and must go on and win higher degrees.
There are reasons why he hesitates to accept this proffered position at the Brigham Young University.
He has promising prospects before him in the business world, which will enable him to work in the Church, to remain with his family in their lovely home which they own, and, to a satisfactory degree, succeed in the business world.
After a confidential interview, I said: ‘I deeply regret to see a man of your strength, ability, and leadership withdraw from the educational system of the Church; we need just such leadership as you possess, but under the circumstances, I believe that I would not accept the proffered position at the Brigham Young University, but would spend the next year or two in completing your business affairs with this understanding that during the Winter months you get your Master’s Degree whether you ever teach or not – you are so near that accomplishment that you cannot afford to not get your Master’s Degree, and you can get that either at the Brigham Young University or the University of Utah as you wish.'”
Thurs., 24 May, 1956:
“Dr. E. Allan Bateman, Superintendent of State Public Instructions (DA 2-4721) telephoned, and said there is a problem concerning the property at Weber College and Dixie College. There is a reversion clause in the deed that the Church made out to the State when they turned over to the State in the 30’s. The State is erecting buildings on the new campuses at both Dixie and Weber. They will probably be ready to move on the campus at Weber within the next two years, and at Dixie it will be a little longer. There is a problem associated with this that Dr. Bateman and the Committee would like to talk over with the First Presidency on Friday, June 1 so that they may have the final decision in this matter.”
Fri., 1 June, 1956:
“Weber College – Dixie College
9:30 a.m. On May 24, 1956 Dr. E. Allan Bateman, Superintendent of State Public Instruction telephoned and said that there is a problem concerning the property at Weber College and Dixie College which he and his Committee would like to discuss with the First Presidency on Friday, June 1, 1956 if possible.
Explained that there is a reversion clause in the deed that the Church made out to the State when they turned over to the State in the 30’s the Church school property. The State is now erecting buildings on the new campus of the Dixie College and of the Weber college. They probably will be ready to move on the campus at Weber within the next two years, and at Dixie a little longer. There is a problem associated with this that Dr. Bateman and the committee would like to talk over with the First Presidency.
Accordingly, at 9:30 a.m. this morning the First Presidency met the following:
Dr. R.V. Larson, Chairman, Utah State Board of Education
Dr. E. Allan Bateman, State Supt. of Public Schools, and Executive Officer of the
Utah State Board of Education
Rulon T. Hinckley, Member State Bd. of Education
Charles A. White, Monroe, Utah, Member of the State Board of Education
They presented a problem associated with the erecting of buildings on the new campuses of Dixie College and Weber College. They mentioned that a clause in the deed given by the Church to the State made it necessary that they return these buildings to the Church in the event they are not used for the purpose for which they were given, and that this clause will be effective in about a year — at longest, two years — so far as the Weber College is concerned. At one time they thought they would keep those buildings for night school and other purposes, thus retaining them in the possession of the State, but now they have decided to remove all educational activity to the new campus on Harrison Avenue, so that those buildings to the Church in about two years.
However, this is not the case with the Dixie buildings, as they would like to retain those buildings for junior college purposes, including two years of high school, and will wish to retain the buildings for educational purposes for the lower grades.
The First Presidency gave no answer, but asked that they submit the matter in writing. The buildings at Dixie College in St. George are on the same block as our Tabernacle.
(a letter signed by the Utah State Board of Education Special Committee and signed by Dr. R.V. Larson, Chairman – Rulon T. Hinckley – Charles A. White – E. Allen Bateman, Executive Officer, was sent to the First Presidency under date of June 20, 1956) (see June 21 and June 26, 1956 with further reference to this matter)
Thurs., 21 June, 1956:
“Junior Colleges
(See newspaper clipping regarding the return of the old Weber College campus and buildings, and also Dixie College to the Church)
Letter regarding this matter was received by the First Presidency under date of June 20 from Mr. E. Allen Bateman, Executive Officer, Utah State Board of Education, Department of Public Instruction, Salt Lake City 14, Utah. (See copy of letter sent in answer on other side of newspaper clipping) These letters are in files of the First Presidency.
Juen 21, 1956
STATE BOARD SLATES MOVE AT DIXIE, WEBER CAMPUS
The State Board of Education Wednesday estimated it could return the old Weber College campus to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints by mid-1959, but proposed that the church deed over the old Dixie College campus to Washington County School District.
Both campuses were turned over to the state by the Church as sites for junior colleges, with the proviso that when the land was no longer used for such educational purposes it would revert back to the Church.
In a letter to LDS Church President David O. McKay, the Board of Education pointed out that it is now in the process of transferring both Weber College and Dixie College to new sites.
If the 1957 legislature appropriates enough funds for an adequate physical education plant on the new campus at Weber, the letter stated, ‘it is probable the abandonment of the old campus will take place in the summer of 1959.’
At Dixie College, the letter stated, the complete transfer to the new campus probably cannot be completed before 1961.
However, the letter pointed out, the old campus here is currently used for both high school and college purposes. It is contemplated that when the buildings on the new site are adequate, only the college (and not the high school) will be moved there.
When this occurs, the letter continued, the high school program then will be under the sole responsibility of Washington County School District and the property no longer will be operated by the state.
The Salt Lake Tribune – Thursday, June 21, 1956
June 21, 1956
COPY
July 3, 1956
Mr. E. Allen Bateman, Executive Officer
Utah State Board of Education
Department of Public Instruction
Salt Lake City 14, Utah
Dear Mr. Bateman:
We have your letter of June 20th regarding the matter of the reversion to the Church of certain properties formerly connected with Weber College and the Dixie College.
We are desirous of consulting the local people in regard to this matter before making a decision, and will communicate with you after we have heard from them.
Faithfully yours,
The First Presidency
By DAVID O. MCKAY
J. Reuben Clark, Jr.”
Tues., 26 June, 1956:
“9 to 9:50 a.m. – Attended the regular meeting of the First Presidency.
Among other matters, the following were discussed:
2. Weber and Dixie Colleges: A letter was read, received from the Utah State Board of Education and signed by E. Allen Bateman, Executive Officer, dated June 20, 1956, prepared in response to the request of the Presidency that matters discussed at the interview of June 1, 1956, be thus submitted. In this letter the State Board of Education reviews the expected abandonment of the use of the land and buildings at Weber and Dixie Colleges by the State under the terms of the deeds of transfer of this property from the Church to the State, and the ultimate reversion of these properties to the Church.
The letter also presented the case of the need of the Washington County School District for the use of the property of Dixie College for a county high school and asked the Church’s favorable consideration of this need with a view to the transfer of the property to the Washington County School District, after the reversion of the property to the Church.
It was decided that a committee of the General Authorities of the Church (Elders Adam S. Bennion and Mark E. Petersen) be appointed to explore this matter fully, including learning the sentiment of the people in St. George and particularly with relation to their interest in having a Church School in St. George. It was agreed that the letter be acknowledged and the State Board of Education be informed that the matter will be given careful consideration; that the need for an early decision is realized, but that we desire to consult the local people before making a decision.
(See newspaper clipping June 21 and also June 1, 1956 for personal interview regarding this matter)
Wed., 18 July, 1956:
“8:30 a.m. – Met by appointment at his request President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the Brigham Young University.
1. I asked President Wilkinson to check on the report that I had received that one of the Professors at the Brigham Young University (Brother Bassett or Brother Berrett) had told the students all about the temple ceremonies in one of his classes. (President Clark mentioned that one of his nieces had told him this).
President Wilkinson will investigate and report.
President Wilkinson then took up the following matters with me:
1. Asked permission for the Brigham Young University and the Corporation of the President to join as parties plaintiff in a suit brought by P.L. Larsen and Company against Ray and Chester Davis for breach of warranty on insulating materials purchased in connection with Heritage Halls.
I asked Pres. Wilkinson to confer with the defendants to see if there is any possibility for settlement. Also that he confer with President Wendell Mendenhall of the Church Building Committee to see if his (Pres. Wilkinson) proposal meets with this favor.
2. It was agreed that we should not pursue further the matter of engaging Pete Couch of the University of Utah on the Physical Education Staff of the Brigham Young University. He is obtaining a salary of $7200 for 9 month’s work at the University of Utah which is a salary the B.Y.U. cannot meet.
3. The Music Department of the B.Y.U. would like the consent of the First Presidency to send the BYU Choir to England in the Fall of 1957 to sing at the dedication of the new temple there.
I told President Wilkinson that I felt impressed that we should not send this choir to Europe for the purpose stated above.
4. Discussed the matter of a new Library for the B.Y.U., to accommodate 3,000 students. At the present rates the building would probably cost about $4 million. We agreed that this is very high, and Pres. Wilkinson will meet further with the architects and try and get them to cut down on the costs as much as will be consistent for the building they must have. Pres. Wilkinson will report in the Fall to the full Board of Trustees on this matter.
5. I authorized President Wilkinson to proceed with the following institute and seminary matters: a) Instead of building a new building or an enlargement of the present institute building at Cedar City, which is authorized in the present budget, to proceed to remodel the present building which will cost approximately $7100 and will satisfy the needs for probably many, many years. b) I authorized a new appropriation for the purchase of land for a new seminary adjacent to a new high school in Mesa, Arizona, not to exceed $2,000. This will not require a new appropriation of church funds. c) I authorized the completion of the institute project at Weber College which will cost approximately another $12,000. This also can be taken out of funds authorized for other institutes and seminaries, the projects of which will not occur this year.
6. I asked President Wilkinson to present to the full Board of Trustees this Fall, the question of whether Ricks College should remain at Rexburg, Idaho.
7. President McClure of the Church Building Committee will examine certain land in Fullerton, California, which we may want to purchase for a Junior College.
8. I took President Wilkinson in to the meeting of the First Presidency and there we authorized him to proceed again next year with an extension of the program for recruiting Indian students, that had been agreed upon the previous year.
Thurs., 2 Aug., 1956:
11:30 a.m. Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall came into my private office and presented matters pertaining to the purchase of 663 acres of land at Fullerton, California. President Wilkinson of the B.Y.U. first contacted me relative to this matter, he having been approached by Brother LeRoy A. Thompson and A.R. Bishop, real estate brokers in Los Angeles regarding the purchase of this land, a portion of which could possibly be used as a future college building site.
I requested Brother Mendenhall to look into this matter who in a letter to the First Presidency reported that ‘in order to retain a portion of this property as a future college building site, it would be necessary to sell off at least 550 acres of the land which could readily be done. This proposition poses a large financial deal of better than four million dollars but there appears that there should be considerable interest taken in this property to make a thorough and extensive investigation.’
I told Brother Mendenhall that I had taken the matter up with my counselors, and that we have decided that the Church is not interested in the purchase of the property in question. It is undoubtedly good property, but if the Church acquired it, we would have to build dormitories. Brother Mendenhall said that he had stated to President Wilkinson that he could not visualize the site as being suitable for the building of dormitories, and that from that point of view, the property is not what we want — that it would not be a good thing for the Church to sub-divide that property for sale and get into a speculative proposition. I answered that he had better telephone the people in Fullerton and tell them that the Church is not interested in the purchase of this property.
Friday, May 17, 1957.
Telephone conversation with Brother D’Monte W. Coombs, former President of the Tongan Mission.
Re: Polynesian Educational Committee.
I called Brother D’Monte W. Coombs, former President of the Tongan Mission, at the Geneva Steel Mills, Geneva, Utah where he is employed, and informed him that we are organizing a Polynesian Education Committee to take charge of the schools in New Zealand, Tonga, Samoa, and Hawaii. This committee will serve particularly during the formation period of the schools before they are turned over to the general educational committee. The committee will also take charge of the staffing of the schools, securing of the principals and the members of the staff.
I then asked Brother Coombs if he would serve on this committee, and he stated that he would be very happy to serve in this capacity. I told him that there would probably be five members on the committee; Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall will be chairman of the committee as he knows the physical features in these areas. Brother Ermel J. Morton will be another member of this committee. I then said that we should like their judgment of two other men who could serve in this capacity. I said that one member probably will be from Hawaii.
I told Brother Coombs that we would pay expenses that he would encounter, in coming to Salt Lake to meet with the committee, etc., and that later it may mean a trip for him to Tonga.
I mentioned to Brother Coombs that it is my understanding that he is in favor with the Queen of Tonga, and he said that they had had a very fine relationship with her; that she had been very congenial with them. He mentioned, also, that they had gone out of their way to do things to please her.
I stated to Brother Coombs that we were worried about the location of the headquarters of the Mission in Tonga; that we are having difficulty in obtaining a site for the headquarters of the mission. I told him that we felt it would be better not to have the headquarters on the school grounds–that the schools will have to be largely independent of the mission, and that we shall pay the teachers. However, I said that these are matters which we will take up after we complete the committee.
I asked Brother Coombs for his telephone number. He stated that he had bought a home in American Fork and that his telephone number is 439J. I told him that he would hear further from us regarding this assignment.
May 20, 1957
Telephone conversation with Brother Ermel J. Morton, Ricks College, Rexburg, Idaho, Monday, May 20, 1957.
Re: Polynesian Educational Committee
I called Brother Ermel J. Morton at Ricks College by telephone and informed him that we are appointing a Polynesian Educational Committee and that we should like him to serve as a member of that committee. Brother Morton said that he would serve in this capacity. I explained further that this committee would choose principals, members of faculties, etc., and that our immediate concern is the problem of obtaining a president of the school in New Zealand. I told Brother Morton that Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall and Brother D’Monte W. Coombs were other members of the committee, and that we should like them to select two additional people to serve in this capacity.
The information was then conveyed to Brother Morton that he would be informed later about meetings and other appointments.
I asked Brother Morton if all was well with him. He stated that they have a new baby girl just a few weeks old. I then inquired as to the number of children he now has, and he said, ‘five.’ I asked him to give my best wishes to Sister Morton.
Brother Morton stated that he was keeping busy. He has completed the translation of the temple ceremony in the Tongan language, but he still has about half of it to copy on the typewriter. He expects to deliver this translation to us within a week or two. I asked him where he was taking care of this translation work, and he said in the Idaho Falls Temple.”
History of The Church College of Hawaii.
(Article obtained from the college general catalog, 1957-58).
(Catalog is in the general scrapbook, 1957.)
An assembly program held September 26, 1955, in the Laie Ward Chapel and attended by some four hundred students, board members, faculty members, parents, and friends, marked the official opening of The Church College of Hawaii. This joyous occasion was the culmination of an idea envisioned some thirty-four years earlier by President David O. McKay, who had seen in the establishment of a school at Laie the means of making this dedicated land a learning center, as well as a spiritual center, for the peoples of the Pacific areas.
President of the college, Dr. Reuben D. Law, conducted the assembly. His greeting revealed his great happiness to see brought to fruition the efforts that had officially commenced on July 21, 1954, when the First Presidency had announced his appointment and had assigned him to head a survey committee consisting of Dr. Clarence Cottam of the Brigham Young University and Director Kenneth Bennion of the L.D.S. Business College to survey the situation in relation to the bringing of higher education to the Saints of the islands.
Messages of congratulation from the First Presidency, from the members of the survey committee, from the U.S. Office of Education and others were read by President Law, undoubtedly bringing to his mind the awesome rsponsibility that was his charge. In his meeting with the First Presidency prior to his departure from the Mainland, President David O. McKay had given this charge: ‘Always bear in mind these two things as you proceed with this college: (1) The students must be imbued with the fact and be led to feel that the most important thing in the world is the Gospel and that the observance of its principles in their lives brings happiness and joy in this life and further progress and exaltation in the life hereafter; and, (2) The college must be fully creditable in all its instruction and activities.’
Also speaking to the assembly were some of the men who had kept the vision of President McKay alive in the islands through the intervening years. Former Stake President Ralph E. Woolley and member of the school’s Board of Trustees admonished the faculty to set the example of faith and devotion to the Church. He charged the students to learn well their lessons and to progress in understanding and to apply the principles of the Gospel in all of their activities. It had been at his initiative that the first definite steps had been taken toward the establishment of the school. Following the encouragement of President McKay and the late Apostle Matthew Cowley, he had in June of 1947, appointed four members of the Oahu Stake High Council to study the problem. This group, composed of Clinton Kanahele, J. Franklin Woolley, Lawrence Peterson and George Zabriskie, had recommended a high school be established at Laie where it might later expand into a junior college. Later, in November of 1950, he had considered the recommendation of Hawaiian Mission President Edward L. Clissold to use the old Waialee Training School as a temporary location for the school. A second group consisting of Fred E. Lunt, George Kekauoha, Elmer Jenkins and Ruby Enos had worked with the Mission Presidency to determine the suitability of the Waialee plant. In June of 1951, Frank McGhie was sent to make a study of educational possibilities in the islands.
Edward L. Clissold, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the college and President of Oahu Stake, expressed his great appreciation in seeing the school established in Laie. His remarks indicated that in part his happiness was based upon knowledge of the purposes of those who had come. His conviction was that they had come to obtain higher education, to gain a better understanding of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and to acquire thought and work habits to better serve their fellow men.
He could recall strenuous efforts in bringing this occasion to pass. Prior to and from his apointment as President of Oahu Stake in May 1952, there had been activities under his direction to bring to realization this cherished hope of our Prophet. A study of educational possibilities for the island area had been made by Dr. Wesley Lloyd of the B.Y.U. and his recommendations presented to the First Presidency. There had been the work of the survey committee and the presentation of their report to the First Presidency. There had been the appointment of Dr. Reuben D. Law of the Brigham Young University as president of the college who, with the Board of Trustees and the faculty, had carried the work forward to this point.
Vivid in the memories of many of those present was the momentous and historic day of February 12, 1955, when President David O. McKay had broken ground and had recounted his earlier visions of the school, noting the long trail of events leading to its ultimate establishment.
Deep in the hearts of all was the vision of the future when the school would be housed not in the temporary army surplus buildings presently provided, but in labor missionary constructed, modern, well-equipped buildings through whose portals would go thousands of students to take positions of leadership in the world.
KENNETH T. SLACK
JERRY K. LOVELAND
History Committee”
Tues., 18 June, 1957:
“8:15 a.m. Brother Edward L. Clissold, President of the Oahu Stake, called at the office.
I invited him to become a member of the newly created Committee to be known as the Pacific Board of Education. He consented to be a member and will do everything he can to promote the welfare and success of our schools throughout the Pacific Islands.
I told Brother Clissold that we had asked Stuart Meha to come to the Hawaiian Temple to do the translation of the temple ceremony into the Maori language. Brother Ariel S. Ballif, President of the New Zealand Mission, in a letter to the First Presidency under date of June 13, 1957, said: ‘Brother Stuart Meha is the most qualified of all of our Maoris to do this very important work, and he feels very highly honored in being selected.
Please let us know in time enough to make what arrangements are necessary here for his transportation.’
Fri., 21 June, 1957:
“MEMORANDUM
TO: THE FIRST PRESIDENCY
FROM: THE PACIFIC BOARD OF EDUCATION June 21, 1957
1. It is recommended that the First Presidency make a public announcement of the formation of the new Board as the Pacific Board of Education operating under the direction of the First Presidency, and naming the Board Members and making a brief statement of responsibility and function. (Given to Deseret News June 21, 1957, with authorization from President McKay.)
2. We recommend that a formal letter of appointment to the Board be sent to each member over the signature of the First Presidency. The names and addresses are as follows:
W.B. Mendenhall, Building
D’Monte W. Coombs, 261 West 6th North, American Fork, Utah
Ermel Morton, 35 West 2nd South, Rexburg, Idaho
Edward L. Clissold, 239 Merchant Street, Honolulu, Hawaii
Owen J. Cook, 1635 Garnett Lane, Concord, California
3. A letter to be sent to each Mission President and/or Stake President announcing the Board and its function.
4. A letter to be sent to each school principal making the same announcement.
Milford Cottrell, Apia, Upolu, Samoa
Ralph Olsen, Nukualofa, Tongatabu, Tonga
Reuben D. Law, Laie, Oahu, Hawaii
4-a. Will you please send copies of letters directed to Mission Presidents or Stake Presidents and copies of letters directed to school principals or presidents to this office.
5. We recommend an advisory committee for each Mission area and that the present board in Hawaii now become an advisory committee to the President only, with Edward L. Clissold acting as chairman of this advisory committee and all other members of the board as formally constituted to act on the advisory committee. It is also recommended that the President of each Mission act as chairman of the advisory committee in each school area.
6. With the appointment of Owen J. Cook as acting executive secretary of the Pacific Board of Education, and member of the Board, who will have full responsibility to screen and interview teachers and presenting to the Board matters of budget and budget control, and all other responsibilities incident to his position, he feels that he should be released as Counselor to President Creer of the Walnut Creek Stake and would appreciate President Creer to be so advised. He carries a very heavy responsibility with the Mt. Diablo School Board of Education and, with this new assignment, it will be necessary for him to devote considerable time to this important work.
These matters were presented to President McKay June 21, 1957, for general approval.
PACIFIC BOARD OF EDUCATION
By W.B. Mendenhall, Chairman”
Tues., 25 June, 1957:
“First Presidency’s meeting – Pacific Board of Education Committee
At the meeting of the First Presidency, Brother Wendell Mendenhall, Chairman, of the Pacific Board of Education, submitted a memorandum of matters considered at the first meeting and also a statement of duties of the Board. (see June 21). These matters were submitted for the consideration and approval of the First Presidency. The memorandum of statement of duties was read. After consideration, it was agreed that the Committee be asked to meet with the First Presidency Friday morning at 8:30 a.m. when the items of the report will be considered with the committee and the following points will be established, among others: (1) that the missionary service interest and credit for the teachers in the schools be preserved; (2) that the Board screen applicants and nominate teachers, recommending them to the First Presidency, and that the calls be issued by the First Presidency; (3) that the Board assignment be to set up the schools and prepare them ultimately to be under the jurisdiction of the Church Board of Education. (see newspaper clipping following giving announcement of the Pacific Board of Education Committee)
Tuesday, June 25, 1957
SUPERVISORY GROUP
BOARD OF EDUCATION CREATED FOR SOUTH PACIFIC
MISSIONS
The Church’s far-flung schools in the South Pacific this week were brought under a single board of education.
The new board, known as the Pacific Board of Education, will operate under the direct supervision of the First Presidency of the Church.
Appointed chairman of the board was W.B. Mendenhall, chairman of the Church Building Committee. Elder Mendenhall is also on special assignment to direct the building of the New Zealand Temple.
Other members will be:
Owen J. Cook, of Concord, Calif., executive secretary. Elder Cook has been assistant superintendent for business services of the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, Concord, Calif.
D’Monte W. Combs, of American Fork, Utah, former president of the Tongan Mission. He is an engineer at Columbia-Geneva Steel Division of United States Steel Corp.
Edward L. Clissold, president of the Oahu Stake in Honolulu, now chairman of the board of trustees of the Church College of Hawaii at Laie, Oahu, Hawaii, and former president of the Japanese, Central Pacific and Hawaiian Missions.
Ermel J. Morton, Rexburg, Idaho, professor of journalism and director of publicity at Ricks College. He was principal of the Liahona College, Tonga, for six years, returning to the U.S. early this year.
The board will have its headquarters in Salt Lake City. It will administer the educational program for the more than 4,000 students and 110 faculty members.
Under the new board will be Church schools in Hawaii, Samoa, Tonga, New Zealand and others as they develop. Colleges as well as high schools and elementary schools will be supervised by the board.
With new facilities being built in all areas of the Pacific the school enrollment is expected to increase in the near future, Elder Mendenhall said.
There will be several new school buildings ready within the next 18 months, he said.
Deseret News – Church Section, Saturday, June 29, 1957″
Tues., 30 July, 1957:
“12:20 p.m. to 1 p.m. – According to previous arrangement met in the office of the First Presidency Brigham Young University television technicians who took pictures of me presenting the following statement with regard to the Seminary and Institute Program of the Church Educational system. For 40 minutes I sat under the blazing lights of the television cameras until the statement and pictures were perfected. This statement and pictures will be incorporated with pictures that were taken some weeks ago of Board of Trustees of the B.Y.U. and Church Board of Education, which will become the documentary film on the Seminary and Institute program of the Church.
Statement:
The youth of today will constitute the leadership of tomorrow. Their well-being, their training and instruction have always been of vital interest to the leaders of the Church.
Great concern is shown for our youth, that they develop a testimony of the restored Gospel of Jesus Christ and have as benefits in their lives the guiding principles and protection such knowledge and conviction offer.
The seminary and institute program offers daily instruction in moral and spiritual values. It gives meaning and purpose to secular education, and assists the young man and the young woman to develop the attitudes of the noble Christian character.
In fostering the educational program of the Church, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve who constitute the General Board of Education look for the Seminaries and Institutes to have a significant place with the Priesthood and auxiliary organizations in the training of the youth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.”
Wednesday, July 31, 1957
8:30 a.m.
Items Taken Up With Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall, Chairman of the Building Committee, and of the Pacific Board of Education:
(8). The salary schedule as proposed by the Pacific Board of Education for the Pacific Island Schools was presented to President McKay, and was given general approval by him; however, this matter will be taken up by President McKay at a meeting of the First Presidency for final approval.
(9). President McKay was in agreement with the plan to pay the school teachers salaries as per the salary schedule, however, they will be called to act as ‘School Teacher missionaries’, and will be set apart by a member of the Pacific Board of Education. The School Principal will act in each case as the Mission President, and the school teachers will serve under his jurisdiction in a school teaching, mission-service capacity.
It was also agreed that the school teachers will be under the same retirement system as is now operating under the Church Board of Education System.
(10). The advisability of giving the living quarters in New Zealand, Samoa, and Tonga to the school teachers rent-free as an incentive program was discussed, and given general approval by President McKay; however, he will take the matter up this morning at the meeting of the First Presidency for final approval.”
Mon., 9 Sept., 1957:
“Monday, September 9, 1957.
Telephone conversation with Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall, Monday, September 9, 1957.
Brother Mendenhall: Happy Birthday!
President McKay: Thank you and Sister Mendenhall for your birthday greetings.
Brother Mendenhall: I am just back to my desk this morning. I understand that some of the New Zealand teachers are not approved.
President McKay: No, we want to have a talk with you. Please come down and meet the Presidency tomorrow morning at 9 o’clock. You said you had the minimum we have paid to teachers in the seminary and institutes.
Brother Mendenhall: I think that is right, isn’t it President McKay?
President McKay: I think you are way above on these teachers.
Brother Mendenhall: I cannot understand that because we got our information from them, and I don’t know where in the world we could have made a mistake. It starts at $3700.00, and I don’t think that we are wrong on that. If we are, I apologize because we got it direct from them.
President McKay: Well, if that is right I am surprised. I did not think we were paying salaries like that. If we offer this to the teachers and then pay their fare down there, we are going to spend a lot of money.
Brother Mendenhall: We are trying to handle these things the best way we can, but I was just in California and we are up against something. I have cut a clipping from the newspaper. The Board of Education is short thousands of teachers in California, and the demands on the State of Utah for teachers are tremendous. Now, we have gone to a great extent, and combed five of these western states on these teachers and everyone of the teachers are in a better position to stay here than to go and under any salary we would pay them. I think, President McKay, as you well know I have given consideration from every point of view with the purpose of holding these things as low as we can. We are up against it — the teachers are taking a great deal of sacrifice and showing loyalty to the Church by going.
President McKay: You come down a few minutes in the morning.
Brother Mendenhall: Your Hawaiian is above this. It is approved and the teachers are there.
President McKay: Hawaii is not a good example. It is our full intentions to bring that into line.
Brother Mendenhall: I have a salary schedule from New Zealand and also from Tonga and Samoa. As far as New Zealand and Samoa are concerned the minimum salary schedules are about the same as here. They grade them differently.
President McKay: Then the minimum comes just about in line with ours.
Brother Mendenhall: I am sure we can’t do anything else, and I only have about three weeks before I take the trip.
September 24, 1957
Items discussed with President McKay at 8:30 a.m. September 24, 1957
(Wendell B. Mendenhall)
3. The question was asked ‘Can any of the General Authorities interview school teachers for the Pacific Board of Education?’ If it is confined to the Quorum of the Twelve, it means considerable travel and inconvenience for prospective teachers to be interviewed. President McKay approved that these teachers can be interviewed by any of the General authorities in the area in which they live if it is any appreciable distance from Salt Lake. He approved Brother and Sister Carr to be interviewed by me in Hawaii and that Brother and Sister Hart be interviewed in New Orleans by Sterling W. Sill and he also approved Brother Wanlass’ interview made by Bishop Carl W. Buehner in Idaho Falls.
Sat., 4 Jan., 1958:
“This morning I had a conference with Dr. Ernest L. Wilkinson who reported his visit with Governor George Dewey Clyde about the building of Junior Colleges here in Salt Lake County.
He said that the Governor said that what is proposed by the State is the erection of a Trades Junior College, but that he, the Governor, sees no objection to the building of a Church Junior College if the Church thinks one is needed here.
After the above discussion, we took up the question of Dr. Wilkinson’s seeking an appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States. An important phase of such an appointment would be the favorable consideration by Senator Watkins, who, President Wilkinson thinks, is not in favor of such an appointment.
Brother Wilkinson also mentioned the request that had been made for him to seek the nomination for Senator in opposition to Senator Watkins. I said, ‘Well I shall tell you this much, and only this much: That if they do nominate you for Senatorship, we shall give you a leave of absence from your present position while you run, and let you have your freedom to do as you wish, and you will not lose your position as President of the Brigham Young University.'”
Mon., 31 Mar., 1958:
“Purchase of Property in San Fernando Valley for Junior College Site
At a conference with President Ernest L. Wilkinson this morning, I approved of the motion made at a meeting of the Board of Trustees of the B.Y.U. and Board of Education held Friday, March 28, 1958, authorizing ‘the purchase of property in the San Fernando Valley (137 acres) at an approximate cost of $1,250,000 for use as a future junior college site.’
This land is reasonably priced in comparison with other land in the same area. While the average cost will be $9,500 per acre (it could have been purchased for around $7000 two years ago) other property owners for land not as conveniently located, are asking $15,000.
All indications are that by the year 1975 there will be over 10,000 Mormon students of college age in this area. By the year 2000 this number will have increased to 30,500. It will of course be impossible to take care of these students at the BYU or in various institutes of the Church. (the above information was reported by President Wilkinson)”
Wed., 14 May, 1958:
Wednesday, May 14, 1958
MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT DAVID O. MCKAY ON MAY 14, 1958 at 7:50 A.M.
1. Stetson property in San Fernando Valley.
I informed President McKay that during his absence George Henry Stetson had agreed to sell to the Church School System two hundred eighty-five acres of land in the San Fernando Valley for $1,250,000; that our own appraisal of the land gave it the value of $2,100,000. I pointed out this was an average price of $4,386 per acre, whereas other land in that valley had been offered to us at prices ranging all the way from $9,000 to $15,000 per acre. I told him that his counselors had authorized us to consummate the deal, but that they had suggested that we may want to sell a part of the property forthwith. I told President McKay that in view of the State of California now insisting on nine hundred acres for a campus for a State college, I thought we ought to be very hesitant about selling any of this acreage, particularly in view of the bargain price at which we obtained it. He replied that he agreed with me and that we should hold all of the property for the purpose of ultimately founding there a junior college.
2. Appointment of Elder Hugh B. Brown to the Executive Committee.
I recalled to President McKay that before leaving for New Zealand he informed me he intended to appoint Elder Hugh B. Brown as a member of the Executive Committee of the BYU and of the Church Board of Education. I pointed out that I was now having difficulty in getting a quorum from time to time and asked him if he would immediately make an appointment. I had written President McKay about this on April 7. He agreed to do so.
3. Alleged improper methods of collecting monies for BYU Destiny Fund.
I recalled to president McKay that before he left for New Zealand he said he had had some complaints with respect to irregularities in the manner of collecting monies for the BYU Destiny Fund and that he had agreed to send me those complaints. I told him that I had not yet received those complaints and I could not investigate them without knowing what they were. I had written President McKay about this on March 5. He agreed he would forward the complaints to me.
Mon., 6 Oct., 1958:
‘Though members of the First Presidency are supposed to take a holiday on Mondays, I came to the office as usual.
I had a 40-minute consultation with Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall regarding:
1. The decision that the Pacific Board of Education is to close the primary schools in Tonga as now operating at the close of this year and that we shall not operate primary schools in the Tongan Islands, but let the government provide the primary education for their own children. I advised that we should take these steps to close the schools before the government takes steps to close them for us, that we shall capitalize on our school program at Liahona College.
I also stated that we shall continue to operate the primary schools now established in Samoa, but will not build the proposed school at McKay Village on Savaii, and gave instructions that the Pacific Board of Education should limit the primary schools to the now existing schools.
2. Discussion was held in regard to the teacher salary adjustment for New Zealand, Tonga, and Samoa. The schedule as now used plus a $400-dollar-increase was approved. The teachers’ schedule as submitted to the First Presidency for the increase in the Church College of Hawaii was also granted.
3. Brothers Howard Dunn and Dyke Walton were approved as members of the Building committee.
4. Church College of Hawaii to be dedicated around December 15. Preparations are now going forward to meet this dedication date.
5. The writing of the history of the labor missionary program in the South Pacific. A brother D.W. Cummings would like to write the story and publish it in a book.
6. Bro. Mendenhall’s proposed trip to New Zealand, Australia, Tonga, and Samoa in the months of January and February. To be considered.
7. Building Program in South America was discussed. Buildings have been approved for Uruguay, Argentine, and Brazil, and a labor missionary program is to go forward with not less than 25 buildings in these missions. Two labor missionary supervisors are to be located for each mission. Letter has been sent out over the signature of the First Presidency, dated August 29, 1958, initiating this program in South America.
Brother Mendenhall said that all of the preliminary plans are developed for the buildings and that three architects in South America are now in the process of developing the finished drawings, and that it would be four or five months before construction will actually start, at which time it would be necessary for him to visit the South American missions and establish the labor missionary program with the supervisors and the mission presidents. He said further that following his trip to the South Pacific it would be about time for him to spend thirty days in South America establishing the building program with the supervisors. I made no comment regarding this.
After a review of considerations to date of the building needs of the South American Missions with the First Presidency on October 7, it was agreed that the subject be considered in the meeting of the Building and Expenditures Committee October 7 with a view to having the survey made by someone other than Brother Mendenhall.
Left the office at 12 noon. Stayed at home the rest of the day and studied on Conference addresses to be given next week.”
Mon., 17 Nov., 1958:
“9 a.m. – Brother Wendell Mendenhall came in and presented the program, placques, etc. for the dedication of the Church College of Hawaii. He said that he would like to go to Hawaii a few days before the dedication in order to make the necessary preparations.
I approved having Brother Marion Romney as one of the speakers at the dedication.
The question of inviting Dr. Law who is on leave of absence as President of the Church College of Hawaii to attend the dedication was discussed. I stated that I would call Dr. Law and extend the invitation to him. Brother Mendenhall then brought up the question of Dr. Law’s resigning before he goes to Hawaii, and it was determined that that question would be taken up with the First Presidency for a decision.
The matter of continuing the two primary schools in Vava’u as recommended by Brothers Cook, Olson, and Stone, with the idea that we could make some modifications and renovations and build two teachers’ houses and make these schools serviceable and adequate for about $50,000. I shall take this matter up with the First Presidency.”
Tues., 18 Nov., 1958:
“8:30 to 10 a.m. – The First Presidency held a meeting with Dr. William F. Edwards. Two subjects reviewed were: 1) Utah State University, and 2) Program for the dedication of the Church College of Hawaii.
Utah State University
Early in 1957 the University propsoed to the Church that the Church acquire land from the University and construct two housing units for five hundred students at a cost of approximately two million dollars. Subsequently, the University proposed to the Church the sale of land adjacent to the quonset chapel on the campus that would provide additional land to permit replacing this inadequate building with a new chapel for four or more wards. However, as a condition of making this land available, the University again requested that the Church proceed with the construction of two buildings to house five hundred students.
We considered very carefully two memorandums prepared by Dr. Edwards – one dated February 24, 1958 and the other dated October 1, 1958, after which it was the decision of the First Presidency that it would be inadvisable for the Church to construct and operate housing units on the Utah State University Campus.
Accordingly, the following letter was sent to President Daryl Chase President of the Utah State University.
‘We have given most careful consideration to your proposal that the Church build and operate housing units for Church members attending the University. It is our decision that this would be inadvisable.
‘We are mindful of the large number of Church members who attend the Utah State University. We are most grateful for the favorable relationships that exist between the University and the Church organizations on your campus. We are particularly appreciative of the support being given by your administration.
‘The Church is anxious to strengthen the programs on the campus. As you probably know, approval has been given to enlarge the institute building. We are desirous of acquiring land that will permit constructing adequate facilities for the University Stake and wards. Through these normal activities we seek to develop and maintain on the campus programs that will permit the spiritual growth of the members.
‘We commend you for the progress being made by the University, and pray that the Lord will continue to bless you.
Sincerely your brethren,
The First Presidency.’
Church College of Hawaii
The First Presidency discussed the program for the dedication of the Church College of Hawaii December 17 with Dr. Edwards. It was decided that Acting President Wootton would conduct the services, with President McKay presiding and offering the dedicatory address and prayer. President Reuben D. Law will be invited to interrupt his leave of absence to attend the dedicatory services. Mrs. Law will be invited to go with him. Brother Law will be asked to participate as a speaker.”
Fri., 21 Nov., 1958:
Telephone Call
I called Dr. Reuben D. Law, formerly President of the Church College of Hawaii and now on sabbatical leave from the Brigham Young University at the University of Southern California, c/o Dean of the College of Education, University of Southern, University Park, Los Angeles, California, and invited him to attend the dedicatory services of the Church College in Laie.
I then asked Brother Law if he would like to take Sister Law with him, and he answered that he was sure that she would be delighted to go. I told him to make his own arrangements, and that the Church would reimburse him for the expense.
Brother Law said: ‘I thank you from the bottom of my heart; I love those people and it will be a thrill to attend the dedication.’
I then asked him if he could break into his sabbatical leave, and he said that he is quite sure that he can arrange with the Dean to take a few days’ leave.
I told him to take care of the arrangements and that we should look forward to seeing him in Hawaii.”
“Friday, December 12, 1958 to Friday, December 19, 1958.
(Trip to Hawaii to dedicate the Church College of Hawaii. Dedicatory services held Wednesday, December 17, 1958.)
Friday, December 12, 1958.
8 p.m. – In company with Sister McKay left via Union Pacific Railroad for Riverside, California. Elder Marion G. Romney of the Council of the Twelve accompanied us. The train was an hour and 15 minutes late because of snowstorms in Wyoming and the plains states.
Tuesday, December 16, 1958.
Following a good night’s rest, President Clissold drove us to their beach home (Sister Clissold accompanying us) at Laie — a beautiful spot! The front has a spacious lawn down to the ocean. The back yard is full of banana tress and beautiful shrubs.
A little later we drove over to the College site, and spent the morning inspecting the College buildings.
We learned that the wives of the labor missionaries, and other women members of the Church had laid all the tile in the building — 150,000 square feet. Their hands were blistered, but they kept on with their work regardless until they finished. The tile has grooves and had to be pushed into place, which was very hard on their hands.
The pillars in the library are set with colored mosaic stone — very beautiful!
Twenty new buildings of modern design comprise the campus, located on a 100-acre site near the Hawaiin Temple. It took three years to construct these buildings. The campus, one of the finest in Western America, and the Pacific Islands, overlooks the Pacific Ocean, with the Koolau Mountains in the background. An oval drive encloses the central unit of ten buildings, a cafeteria and library. Circling the drive are parking areas, athletic fields, gymnasium and outdoor swimming pool, tennis courts, men’s and women’s dormitories, housekeeping apartments and technology building.
More than 400 students have been enrolled in classwork, and present facilities can accommodate 1,200 students, with provision for future expansion.
Most labor for the project was provided by skilled supervisors and laborers from America and Hawaii, who have devoted their full-time to the project. Members of the Church in Hawaii contributed to the sustenance of the labor missionaries. A total of 530,038 hours of work with an estimated cash value of $944,360 has been contributed to the school. The Church College was constructed at a cost of $3,500,000. It is a credit not only to the Church but to the entire territory of Hawaii!
That evening we were guests at a turkey dinner given by the labor missionaries. The Clissolds, Mendenhalls, Brother Romney, and others were present. The Chef was one of the labor missionaries, and the dinner was cooked very well.
Following the dinner a short program was given by the labor missionaries. The former Hawaii Mission President, Elder D. Arthur Haycock, walked in and surprised us all. President Quealy had paid his way over.
Wednesday, December 17, 1958 (10 a.m.)
Dedicatory Services of the Church College of Hawaii.
Guests and members of the Church College of Hawaii Faculty assembled about a block and a half north of the College for the formal procession to the flag pole in front of the College buildings on which the Stars and Stripes, and the Hawaiian Flags were flying together in the breeze.
Between the group and the flag pole, stood two rows of little girls dressed in white, one at each end of a nine-foot chain of small orchids. As we reached them, the two middle girls separated and walked to the side still holding the chain of flowers. We passed through 50 such orchid gates. The chains were held by 200 Laie grade school children. The gates thus formed a solid corridor of orchids for an entire block and around the flag pole, providing a pathway to the foyer of the administration building. There was one long line of girls holding these streamers of orchids along two sides.
We have had flowers strewn in our way, and many flowers given to us, but this was the most beautiful presentation we have ever seen. The children had been trained so that there was not a slip-up anywhere. It was very moving and thrilling to see those children amongst so many flowers.
The Royal Hawaiian Band was present at the request of Mayor Neal S. Blaisdell, and strains of patriotic tunes filled the air. We stopped at the flag pole briefly, and the 1,000 persons present pledged allegiance to the flag. The Band played the ‘Star Spangled Banner’. We were then directed to march to the front of the building and there we beheld for the first time the 33-foot Italian colored mosaic on the front of the building, depicting the flag-raising ceremony witnessed by Elder Hugh J. Cannon and I when we visited the Laie School in 1921 – the flag-raising ceremony of that day preceded the opening of a primary school. (Following President McKay’s return home in 1921 he presented to the First Presidency the need of a school at Laie.) (see following copy of President McKay’s 1921 diary giving an account of this event.)
The painting from which the mosaic was made was painted by artist, Edward Grigware. It took 10 days and 20 hours to put it together.
We then marched inside the building and passed the two 33-foot murals, one depicting Princess Kapiolani’s defiance of the pagan goddess of the volcano, Pele, and the other showing the arrival of the first Mormon Missionaries in the Islands in December 1850. The paintings are magnificent. Mr. Grigware, the artist, is a Catholic who is converted to Mormonism, but is unable to join the Church because of his wife.
In the party accompanying us were: Elder Marion G. Romney, The Honorable William F. Quinn, Governor of the Territory of Hawaii and Mrs. Quinn; the Honorable Neal S. Blaisdell, Mayor of the city and county of Honolulu; Dr. Laurence Snyder, President of the University of Hawaii; Dr. Deal F. Crooker, deputy superintendent of the Territorial Department of Public Instruction; Wendell B. Mendenhall, Chairman of the Pacific Board of Education; Dr. Richard T. Wootton, acting administrator of the Church College of Hawaii; Edward L. Clissold, member of the Pacific Board of Education; Dr. Reuben D. Law, President of the Church College of Hawaii and members of the Board of Trustees and the President’s Advisory Board – George Q. Cannon, Jay A. Quealy, Lawrence Haneberg, and Ray E. Dillman.
The group then moved into the beautiful new auditorium where an audience of nearly 2,000 were crowded into the chapel, recreational hall, and in adjoining rooms where loud speakers were placed.
Excerpts from the diary of President David O. McKay — An Account of Visit to Laie School and Flag Raising Ceremony of Children
Sunday, February 6, 1921
After a most inspirational meeting at 1:30 p.m., we drove to Laie, the plantation home of the Latter-day Saints. Here we met many of the brethren and sisters of the branch and all the elders and sisters laboring in the temple, public school and mission.
The meeting at night, under the auspices of the Y.M. & Y.L. M.I.A., was very good, and each of us seemed free in speaking to the attentive congregation.
At the conclusion of the service, all those present, about 150, marched in order and shook hands with us, extending as only an Hawaiian can, their cordial ‘aloha’. Stayed all night in the President’s room at the girls’ dormitory of the Mission House.
Monday, February 7, 1921
After a delicious breakfast prepared in her home by Sister Waddoups, wife of William M. Waddoups, president of the Temple, Presidents Cannon, Smith and I went over to the school which is conducted under the direction of the Mission, and witnessed a most impressive and inspiring sight. One-hundred and twenty-seven little children, ranging from 7 or 8 years to 14 or 15, formed in order on the lawn, and then marched to the flag pole and participated in the flag raising ceremony. As the flag began to rise, little William Kaaa, a Hawaiian, stepped out of the circle and repeated the following:
Hats off!
Along the street there comes
A blare of bugles,
A ruffle of drums,
A flash of color beneath the sky,
Hats off!
The flag is passing by.
Then Master Thomas Marr Waddoups, a little American, stepped out and in the spirit of young America, said:
Now raise the starry banner up,
Emblem of our country’s glory,
And teach the children of this land
It’s grave and wondrous story;
Of how in early times it waved
High o’er the Continentals,
Who fought and made our country free,
The one true home of liberty.
A little Japanese boy by the name of Otockochi Matsumoto, then participated in the exercises destined to make them all Americans, by repeating with all the vigor of his Japanese nature:
Salute the flag, of children,
With grave and reverent hand,
For it means far more than the eye can see,
Your home and your native land.
And many have died for its crimson bars,
It’s field of blue with the spangled stars.
Then as he stepped back, the entire school – teachers, pupils, visitors – gave the salute and the pledge:
I pledge allegiance to my flag and to the
Republic for which it stands; one nation,
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Then young William Kaaa again stepped out and concluded with the following:
This flag that now waves o’er our school,
Protecting weak and strong,
Is the flag which vindicates the right,
And punishes the wrong.
As I looked at that motley group of youngsters, and realized how far apart their parents are in hopes, aspirations, and ideals, and then thought of these boys and girls, the first generation of their children, all thrown into what Israel Zangwell has aptly called the ‘Melting Pot’ and coming out Americans, my bosom swelled with emotion and tears came to my eyes, and I felt like bowing in prayer and thanksgiving for the glorious country which is doing so much for all these nationalities. But more than that, when I realize that these same boys and girls have the opportunity of participating in all the blessings of the Gospel which will transform the American into a real citizen of the Kingdom of God, I feel to praise His name for the glorious privileges vouch-safed to this generation. We held short services in the school room in which all – American, Hawaiian, Japanese, Chinese, Filipino – participated as though they had belonged to one nation, one country, one tongue.
America and the Church of Christ will truly make of all nations one blood. May God hasten the day when this is accomplished.
——-President David O. McKay
Upon returning home, President McKay recommended a Church School at Laie, saying that it is a paramount need.
Friday, December 12, 1958 to Friday, December 19, 1958.
RADIOGRAM
President David O. McKay Dec. 17, 1958
Laie, Oahu, Territory of Hawaii
Please give my greetings to all assembled at the dedication of the
Church College of Hawaii. This splendid new campus, built by
the faith and work of your Church members, adds much to the
resources of the Hawaiian community. I am sure that the young
people who study here will be forever inspired by the devoted
example of their many benefactors. Congratulations and best
wishes.
(Signed) Dwight D. Eisenhower
President
United States of America
December 23, 1958
Dear President Eisenhower:
Your telegram of December 16, 1958 conveying congratulations and good wishes on the completion of the Church College of Hawaii was the crowning feature of impressive Dedicatory Services at Laie, Hawaii, December 20th. The Governor of Hawaii, the mayor of Honolulu, the President of the University of Hawaii, other distinguished guests, and 2,000 others in attendance were thrilled when I read your message.
In behalf of the First Presidency, the Church Board of Education, and all others honored by your graciousness, I express grateful appreciation of your thoughtfulness.
Please accept our love, loyal support, and prayers for God’s guidance to continue with you in your great responsibilities as President of our Beloved Country.
Kindest regards and Season’s Greetings.
Affectionately,
David O. McKay
The Honorable Dwight D. Eisenhower
The White House
Washington, D.C.”
Wed., 21 Jan., 1959:
11:30 a.m. – According to appointment at his request, I met in my private office the Honorable George Dewey Clyde, Governor of the State of Utah.
I congratulated him on his message given before the State Legislature.
The Governor then talked to me about 1) Education. He believes that we should have courses of study that would terminate at Junior College level, or two years of University, and that the courses given should deal with the practical phases of life–engineering, technology, etc. Thus, having training in practical subjects, our young people would be equipped to take positions and earn their own livelihood instead of going on to the University and spending two or more years in study without any specific goal and then when graduated be unfit for any kind of job. The training, he repeated, should be of such a nature that it would terminate at the second year, and they should be so trained that they would feel that they were successful and could earn their own living.
In this line of thinking, the Governor said that the Weber College (a Junior College) would like to add two more years so that they will be a four-year college. If the bill were passed, there would be four universities in the State of Utah–University of Utah – Utah State University – Brigham Young University, and Weber College, the courses given in which all are more or less general in nature.
Weber College, now a Junior College, emphasizes the practical phase of education referred to, and Governor Clyde is in favor of keeping the school for the present, as a Junior College emphasizing the practical phases of education — courses in technology – so that a student may major in one of these practical lines, and after completing his Junior College may go into the fields of technology and feel that he is successful.
I asked the Governor: ‘Can you now authorize the addition of two years to Weber College to be effective probably five years hence so that some of the students who enter Weber may continue to their third and fourth years in College if they desire?’ The Governor answered, ‘Yes, I believe we can.’
2). Welfare Work of the State
The Governor believes in taking care of those who are in need. It now costs the State about $75 a month for each recipient. They are now contemplating introducing a bill which would bring this amount up to $100 a month. The Governor feels that this increase to $100 a month will probably be an inducement for many who do not need Welfare to make application for the State to take care of them.
The Governor is against this bill, because many who do not need welfare will sell their homes, putting the money in someone else’s name, and then ask the State to take care of them.
3). Coordination Committee for Higher Education
The Governor believes it will be helpful to him as Governor, in arriving at a more equitable distribution of funds to the schools now receiving appropriations, bienially, to have a Coordination Committee.
My only comment on this was: The value of such a committee and the danger of such a committee will depend wholly upon the powers granted to it. In no way should such a committee interfere with the present Regents of the University of Utah or the members of the Board of Trustees of the Utah State University. Rather it should be an advisory, and not a functional committee.
Other points were considered, but they were more or less of a general nature. One, for example, was the introducing of a bill in the legislature to repeal the present Right to Work Law. Another was the Sunday closing law.
Thurs., 22 Jan., 1959:
“At 4:25 p.m. Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall, Chairman of the Building Committee came in. He talked about the schools in the Pacific Islands and the matter of making the Church College of Hawaii a four-year school. I expressed the opinion that The Church is not ready to establish a four-year college at Hawaii, but that we might work toward that plan.
Tues., 10 Feb., 1959:
George Romney – Letter re: Church educational trends
I also brought to the meeting and had read a long letter addressed to me by President George Romney, President of the Detroit Stake, who expesses his concern about trends he notes in Church educational policies for the development of institutions for higher learning and post graduate study in Utah and Idaho in competition with already established institutions, and his concern lest this development may reduce the Church’s seminary and institute policy. It was decided to refer the letter to President Wilkinson who has been asked to see me about the matter before I answer the letter. (Later, it was decided that Pres. McKay would send an acknowledgement, stating that Dr. Wilkinson was sending facts). We then discussed various other church matters.
Fri., 27 Feb., 1959:
Friday, February 27, 1959.
February 18, 1959
To Members of Ward Education Committees:
The youth of today will constitute the leadership of tomorrow. Their well-being, their training and instruction have always been of vital interest to the leaders of the Church.
Great concern is shown for our youth, that they develop a testimony of the restored gospel of Jesus Christ and have as benefit in their lives the guiding principles and protection such knowledge and conviction offer.
The Seminary and Institute programs offer daily instruction in moral and spiritual values. They give meaning and purpose to secular education and assist the young man and the young woman to develop the attitudes of a noble Christian character.
In fostering the education program of the Church, the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, who constitute the Church Board of Education, look for the Seminaries and Institutes to have a significant place wtih the priesthood and auxiliary organizations in the training of the youth of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
You, as members of Ward Education Committees, have an important role to play in this vast program of religious education. It is within your power to touch the lives of thousands of our youth for their eternal spiritual welfare by seeing to it that they are encouraged to enroll in our Colleges, Institutes of Religion, Deseret Clubs, and Seminaries. From the ninth grade through college, our youth should have the special interest and encouragement of the members of Ward Education Committees. Each boy and girl should be followed through these years of academic training and ever be kept track of and in touch with by personal correspondence so that we do not lose them. Every soul is precious to our Father in Heaven, who desires the continuous activity of all his children in the Kingdom of God on earth and their adherence to the eternal principles of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. My fellow workers, yours is a great calling. Your work is vital to the Church, and you are charged to perform your duties faithfully and well.
May the choice blessings of our Father in Heaven ever attend you in the great service you are rendering.
Sincerely yours,
David O. McKay
President”
Fri., 12 June, 1959:
“At 7:30 a.m. – Met by appointment, at his request, Governor George Dewey Clyde. He was right on time, and said that he appreciated the opportunity to meet with me this morning.
Co-ordinating Council for Higher Education
Governor Clyde presented, first, the question of a Coordinator’s Council for Higher Education – a State appointment. He wanted to know if he could use Dr. William F. Edwards, Financial Secretary to the First Presidency, as Chairman of this Council. I remarked that I knew that he was instrumental in organizing that Council, and the Governor said, ‘Yes that is true.’ I called attention to the fact that we are putting a lot of work on Dr. Edwards, and asked Governor Clyde how much time this appointment would require. He said he didn’t know whether it would be the Governor’s prerogative to appoint the Chairman or whether the Committee will choose the Chairman. In either case, he said he thinks it is likely that Dr. Edwards will be made Chairman, and that they will probably meet once a month. I told the Governor that I would have a meeting with Dr. Edwards next Monday and let the Governor know. (Later, Dr. Edwards reported it would be to our advantage for him to serve on this important committee.)
Committee on Aging
The second matter he presented related to the State Committee on the Care of the old people of the State. The Governor said: ‘Here again I should like to come to the Church — we should like to have Sister S. Spafford to help on this Committee.’
I read to the Governor the telegram that had come from Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of the Deparment of Health Education and Welfare in Washington, D.C. appointing Sister Spafford a member of the National Advisory Committe for the White House Conference on Aging to be held in Washington, D.C., January, 1961.
I then remarked: ‘Governor Clyde when Sister Spafford told me of this appointment, I cautioned her not to be placed in a position where she would become overburdened because of her great responsibilities in the Relief Society.’
I gave the Governor permission to call Sister Spafford and talk the matter over with her. (Later, Elder Delbert Stapley was asked to confer with the Governor on this matter, and it was decided for the time being that Brother Stapley will act as Chairman of the Committee on the Care of the Aged so long as it is not too burdensome.)
Prison Conditions
The third item the Governor brought up to me was Conditions at the Prison. He has in mind the appointment of a chaplain. I told him that I am not informed as to just what our relation is at the prison. I am told that we have a Mormon Chaplain out there who is not satisfactory. The Governor said the State is paying this chaplain $100 a month. The Governor said he would make further inquiry as to what relation the Church has to the Chaplaincy at the Prison, and let me know, at which time we shall discuss this matter again.
Mon., 15 June, 1959:
“Monday, June 15, 1959.
June 15, 1959
In a meeting this morning with President McKay and the Pacific Board of Education held at 9 a.m. all members of the Board were present except Brother Ermal Morton. The following subjects were discussed:
1. The request for approval of a four year college at The Church College of Hawaii as a teacher training college to cover the areas of Hawaii, Samoa, Tonga, Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, Tahiti, Niue and the Cook Island group and the oriental areas. We reassured President McKay that accreditation would be forthcoming within a reasonable length of time.
(a) That it has been determined by the Board to invite applications for the office of President of this four year institution with a screening committee composed of the Pacific Board of Education and others as may be approved. Dr. Wootton will be considered as one of these applicants.
(b) We presented the scope and interest of the entire Pacific area as well as the need for this four year institution.
(c) We also presented the limited number of teachers and additional expenses necessary in the inauguration of the third and fourth year to this college.
(d) We explained the very healthy outlook of continued growth of this college to its full capacity and the response of all the other islands in sending students to the college and a program now being locally set up by the local Advisory Committee for student loan funds.
(e) We presented the given purpose for the establishment of the third and fourth year as to train teachers to return to the various church schools in the Pacific to become members of the teaching staff, to find employment in government school and in government training colleges and the many other broad advantages which each of these graduates would experience, from which the church would greatly benefit, as they found their place in life throughout the Pacific communities.
Action taken:
President McKay approved the third and fourth year addition to this college making it a four year teacher training institution and asked us to take immediate steps to locate and name the new President and get all of the necessary pre-requisites complied with to establish the third year at the opening of the 1959-60 school year. He asked that we present this to the First Presidency for their approval Tuesday at 8:30 a.m.
2. We presented the proposed purchase of the Otto Brehner property in Tongatabu as additional property to be operated in connection with the Liahona College program.
Action taken:
President McKay approved this purchase based on the provisions of purchase as listed on the proposed purchase sheet and authorized steps to be taken to consumate the purchase by the Chairman of the Board consumating the sale direct with government officials and the owner at a time convenient for such purposes and at a time necessitating consumation. He also requested that we present this proposed purchase to the First Presidency at 8:30 Tuesday, June 16th, for their approval.
3. We presented to President McKay the Church College of Hawaii’s Advisory Committee’s request to solicit funds from the foundations and from persons not of the Church as an organized procedure to raise scholarship money by employing the following methods:
1. The Eleemosynary foundations in Hawaii
2. The non-L.D.S. public spirit people of means in Hawaii.
3. Members of the Church in Hawaii, particularly the more financially able.
They propose an objective of $60,000.00 for the goal for this scholarship fund.
President McKay asked us to present this subject to the First Presidency for their approval.
These items approved by the First Presidency, all members present, on June 16, 1959 at 8:30 a.m.”
Fri., 19 June, 1959:
“Coordinating Council for Higher Education
It was decided that it would be desirable to have Dr. Edwards accept the appointment of Governor Clyde (which was discussed with me earlier by Governor Clyde) to be chairman of the State Coordinating Council for higher education. Dr. Edwards said that this assignment would take about three days a month, and that ‘in view of the Governor’s request and the extreme importance of the assignment’ he would willingly accept the assignment to be chairman if this would be in accordance with the First Presidency’s desire.”
Tuesday, March 15, 1960
Report of interview with President McKay on Church College of Hawaii labor missionary program, and the success that has attended their efforts in the Pacific Island Missions.
11:00 a.m. Held a conference with President McKay.
It was my pleasure to have a short visit with President McKay and describe to him the arrival of 31 Tongan labor missionaries and 24 Samoan labor missionaries for the Church College of Hawaii construction project.
They arrived well dressed, and came with limited baggage and properly prepared documents. I was invited by the Immigration Department to help direct them through the Customs office. Pan American captain and the crew were overwhelmed with the sincerity of these boys and learned to love them on the trip and cherish their ideals beyond description. The boys sang farewell songs and other native songs in flight and had the entire crew in tears as they departed from the plane in Honolulu.
The head official of the Immigration Department said to me that he had never experienced such a fine clean looking group of young men, nor had he experienced taking such a group through customs so easily and with such well prepared documents.
The Customs and Agricultural agents were equally charitable with their remarks in stating they had never seen such a fine group of young men with such a fine spirit and decorum.
Hundreds of people at the airport were interested and thrilled at the arrival of these boys.
I described to President McKay the activities of the school and of the great Polynesian night of entertainment which was put on at Kaiser Village in which some two thousand people witnessed the performance including Hawaiians, Tongans, Maoris and Samoan native cultural songs and dances.
The Dean of Hawaiian entertainment, who was the Master of Ceremonies in the Royal Hawaiian Hotel, said he had never seen such entertainment in all of his life. The writer for the Star Bulletin, the leading paper in Honolulu, was astounded at this performance and was so thrilled that he could hardly express himself. The people were all so satisfied and pleased with the performance on such a high plane that many of them made the remark, ‘It is a relief to see such a show on a high cultural Polynesian plane.’
I explained to President McKay that the Hawaiian Islands have accepted the labor missionary program and both the Hawaiian Mission and the Oahu Stake are going to request this program to build buildings in their respective areas. I described the activities at the Church College of Hawaii construction project, that it was a beehive of activity and all is going forward according to plan.
The Church College of Hawaii is becoming well known and well respected throughout the Islands. It was my privilege and sincere pleasure to pay honor and tribute to our Prophet and President, David O. McKay, for a great vision in adopting this labor missionary program to build the islands of the sea and of his vision concerning the development of schools and of a Board to operate these schools.
President McKay’s vision is truly causing prophecies of earlier prophets of this Church to be realized and a great spiritual movement among a most faithful people is moving forward with complete satisfaction.
President McKay asked me several questions concerning the proposal of organizing a New Zealand mission on the South Island of New Zealand and the advantages that there would be if such a mission were to be created. I expressed my sincere appreciation for the privilege of working under the direction of President McKay in going forward with this great work as Chairman of the Building Committee and as Chairman of the Pacific Board of Education. I told him I was certain that the people throughout the Stakes of Zion and the Missions of the Church were pleased with the direction of the Building Committee in assisting them in building the buildings of their needs throughout the world.
/s/ W.B. Mendenhall”
Wed., 16 Mar. 1960:
“10:15 to 12:15
The First Presidency met with Dr. Daryl Chase, President of the Utah State University, and his business manager, Mr. Dee Broadbent, Business Manager of the University. On March 10, 1960 I received a letter from Dr. Chase in which he asked me for an appointment, and said: ‘With most of our student body and faculty being Latter-day Saints the developments I wish to discuss with you are intermingled with the growth and development of the Church on our campus and in Logan, but more important, with the welfare of the hundreds of communities where our graduates will eventually make their homes. I need your counsel at this time. Several important decisions are pending which will influence the lives of thousands of Latter-day Saint students, and have bearing upon fundamental relationships of Church and State on our campus. A mistake on my part at this time would be a serious one. It is for this reason that I ask for a portion of your precious time.’
After receiving this plea from Dr. Chase I decided to make an appointment for him to meet the First Presidency. Dr. Chase made a very intelligent presentation of the need of buildings and developments at the College. Charts and maps were exhibited, and detailed explanations made. (See minutes of the First Presidency’s meeting for details)
One chart showed 1700 students enrolled at the LDS Institute in 1959-60. Of 40 Institute classes held in the winter quarter, 37 are held in the buildings of the University. President Chase explained that the courses given at the LDS Institute are accepted at the College for credit.
Another chart showed Church service being rendered in the East Cache Stake by members of the USU faculty. Four other stakes in Logan also have officers and workers who are members of the faculty. Members of the faculty are also active in stake and ward positions in Hyrum, Smithfield, and Benson Stakes.
The final chart presented the request of the Utah State University of the Church as follows:
That the Church construct the following facilities:
(1) One dormitory of the apartment type for 288 girls at an estimated cost of $1,094,000.
(2) One dormitory of the apartment type for 216 men at a cost of $820,800.
(3) One conventional dormitory not of the apartment type for 72 men (Delta Phi Fraternity) at a cost of $273,800.
And that arrangements be made for the investment of the Church in these buildings to be returned with interest on a self-liquidating plan. President Chase stated that the amortization plan for the return of the money to the Church was figured on a 40-year period. President Moyle stated that 48 years was set for the BYU.
Brother Broadbent estimated that the dormitories could be built in about one year which would make them available by the fall of 1961. President Chase explained that in the dormitory buildings erected by the Church the standards of the Church would be established and Brother Broadbent stated that it is expected that the influence of the standards of the LDS dormitories would be felt in all other dormitories on the campus.
I expressed myself as in favor of the proposal, and President Clark and President Moyle concurred.
As I had felt for two or three years that we should do something for our LDS students at the Utah State University, I was very happy over our decision this morning. (See letter of appreciation which follows from Dr. Chase)
Following Dr. Chase and Brother Broadbent’s departure from the meeting, we continued with the regular meeting of the First Presidency, considering and discussing other important Church matters.
Wednesday, March 16, 1960
Utah State University
March 28, 1960
The First Presidency
President David O. McKay
Elder J. Reuben Clark, First Counselor
Elder Henry D. Moyle, Second Counselor
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear Brethren:
I am grateful for the hearing which you gave me and my colleague last week. The decision to provide some housing facilities for L.D.S. students attending Utah State University will render assistance and encouragement to many young men and women to get a good education. Too many young Latter-Day Saints, for various reasons, are terminating their schooling at high school graduation.
These new housing facilities will also provide our returned missionaries with living quarters which will reflect their ideals and the standards of the Church. I personally will rejoice with these devout young men the day they move into their new home.
Moreover, the Church, the State, and the University will all benefit from the action taken. Your decision nurtures the very roots of this institution. In behalf of the thousands
of young men and women who eventually will be the recipients of your generous action, I say, ‘Thank you,’ and may the blessings of our Heavenly Father continue to sustain you in your daily labors.
Yours sincerely,
Your brother in the Gospel of Christ,
Daryl Chase
bb
Original Letter in Scrap Book of Letters
Wednesday, March 16, 1960
March 31, 1960
President David O. McKay
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear President McKay:
Last Sunday, Brother Burton, the Church Architect, met with several of us at Utah State to become better acquainted with the campus and the educational program of the University. I believe that he was delighted with the choice building sites which the Church now owns at this institution.
I feel confident that under the direction of this highly competent and intelligent brother, we shall soon have this important project on its way.
Your steadfast support of education and the general enlightenment of youth is appreciated far beyond my power of expression.
Saturday, Alice and I were delighted to hear the radio report that Sister McKay is now back home. Please extend our best wishes to her.
Yours sincerely,
Daryl Chase
bb”
Thurs., 14 Apr. 1960:
“Advisory Committee for Elementary Schools In Mexico
At 8:30 a.m. Elder Marion G. Romney and President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the B.Y.U. by appointment came into our meeting of the First Presidency. President Wilkinson explained that the Executive Committee had asked Brother Romney and him to present to the First Presidency the recommendation that an advisory committee be appointed to advise on matters of the elementary schools to be established in Mexico. The following were recommended to serve as the Advisory Committee: President Harvey H. Taylor, President of the Mexican Mission; Agricola Lozana, a lawyer, who now advises on legal matters; William Farnsworth, son of Wilford Farnsworth, one time member of the Juarez Stake Presidency; (Brother Wm. Farnsworth lives in Mexico City); Hector Travino and Bernabe Parra, each members of different missions. Recommendation was approved and the appointment of the committee was authorized.
Wed., 4 May 1960:
“8:30 a.m.
Mr. Jay Wright, manager of KSL Radio Station, came in to the First Presidency’s meeting by appointment. He read a report and a request for instructions regarding Logan Television Channel 12. The project was considered from the standpoint of helping the Utah State University at Logan to make a start in providing educational television. Manager Wright stated that the project to KSL would be without prospect of profit or commercial advantage, but might have the effect of discouraging competition from entering and establishing a television station in Cache Valley and should enable KSL to participate with USU cooperatively in relaying as a ‘satellite’ station, programs originating with the Utah State University. Decision was reached that Mr. Wright be encouraged to seek a conference with Mr. Rosel Hyde of the Federal Communications Commission with a view to discovering his attitude and position with relation to granting another six months extension of a permit to establish a television station at the USU, this extension being needed because of a necessity of receiving authorization of the state legislature and the USU having the necessary appropriation to support it before proceeding. Mr. Wright was asked to make a report back to us. The establishment of a television station in Logan would be in furtherance of cooperative educational purposes of the three Utah institutions of higher learning, the U of U, BYU, and USU, Mr. Wright explained. We told him that he can go on the assumption that if this thing can be carried with the approval of Mr. Rosel Hyde on the basis of expenditures not to exceed $10,000 (and that they be reimburseable) then we could afford to go ahead.
Wed., 28 Dec. 1960:
“Wednesday, December 28, 1960
MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT DAVID O. MCKAY AND GOVERNOR GEORGE D. CLYDE
DECEMBER 28, 1960
Pursuant to an invitation from President McKay, I met with him and Governor Clyde at President McKay’s office at 8:00 a.m.
President McKay opened the meeting by telling Governor Clyde that we would like to just confidentially and informally discuss certain mutual financial problems relating to the financing of the BYU on the part of the Church and the financing of USU, the U of U and other institutions of higher learning on the part of the state. He told Governor Clyde that if the Governor thought this was none of our business he should say so.
1. We discussed budgets which the institutions of higher learning in the state had requested. For operating budgets the University of Utah had requested an increase of 54.6%, Utah State University 40.8%, the junior colleges 47.3%, or an average of 48%. With respect to these requests, the Coordinating Council had recommended that the University of Utah receive an increase of only 16.7%, Utah State University an increase of 24.7%, the junior colleges 25.1%, or an average amount of 20.9%.
I informed the Governor that I had requested for the BYU an average increase of only 8.9% and that the Budget Committee had trimmed this to 7.4%. The Governor said that he thought we would be well pleased with what he would recommend for the budgets of the other institutions because he intended to cut under the amount recommended by the Coordinating Council.
The Governor also pointed out that one of the difficulties he was having was that over the last several bienniums the state institutions of higher learning had received an average increase each biennium of about 20% and that now they pretty much assumed that this increase was to be automatic each biennium. He knew that this could not continue.
2. With respect to teachers’ salaries, President McKay pointed out that teachers’ salaries he knew in the past had been altogether too low, but that he thought they were now about where they ought to be and he hoped some way could be found of stabilizing them. The Governor and I both agreed.
I pointed out, however, that a committee appointed by President Eisenhower had recommended that the salaries of school teachers be increased 100% by 1970. The Governor in turn pointed out that the National Education Association was proposing that they be increased that much by 1965. It was felt by all that this would be unreasonable, and in Utah would tax our resources altogether too much.
The Governor stated that with respect to both budget increases and salaries he was constantly urged that institutions in other states were raising budgets and salaries and that therefore we should get in line. The Governor said that he had urged that just because others were doing it was no reason why Utah should do it. We all felt that the line had to be held somewhere.
3. With respect to building programs for state institutions, the Governor commented that he thought that the time had come when before new buildings were authorized or constructed they would have to be justified on the question of whether present buildings were fully utilized. I told him in this connection John Fitzpatrick, former head of the Tribune, had informed me that he understood there were some periods during the afternoon when buildings at the University of Utah were utilized to the extent of only 15%. The Governor said he had seen one study showing that they were utilized to the extent of only 11%. The Governor commented that he was going to recommend to the legislature that the State Building Commission have authority to continuously conduct utilization studies of the different institutions; that it was apparent that the institutions themselves could not be relied upon for accurate utilization studies.
4. As respects enrollments, the Governor thought that the new Coordinating Council had done a good job in trying to get accurate enrollment figures and that if this Coordinating Council were given a little more time it would come up with some very constructive studies. I agreed with him and suggested that he ought to by all means give the Coordinating Council full support.
5. I informed the Governor I understood some were suggesting a junior college for Provo. he said he had not even heard such a suggestion and he did not think at the present time the state could justify any new junior college anywhere.
6. I informed the Governor I had been critical of academic monies used by other institutions of higher learning for athletic purposes. He said he was aware of that question and was trying to work it out but that they had not been using as much money for that purpose as he thought they had been using.
7. Finally, I recalled to Governor Clyde that he and I had talked with respect to the recommendation of the Chamber of Commrce in Provo that University Avenue be extended northward, in which event some land of the Vocational School as well as of the BYU would be needed for that purpose. I hoped that he would continue in his opposition to such a plan. Governor Clyde said he hoped we could work that out locally, that he did not think the people locally should be told from Salt Lake just what they should do. I told him I thought we had pretty much agreed on a compromise route, and he said he was happy about that.
Ernest L. Wilkinson
ELW:ra
P.S. After the above discussion, President McKay said he had some other matters to take up with the Governor, and I left the conference.
E.L.W.”
Thurs., 15 June 1961:
Letter to U.S. Representative Ralph R. Harding of Idaho re: Federal Aid to Education.
On May 31, 1961 received a letter from Ralph R. Harding U. S. Representative from Idaho asking whether or not the Church has taken an official stand against federal aid to education.
It was decided that I should write a letter to him telling him that this matter was discussed by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve sitting as members of the Board of Trustees of Brigham Young University and the Board of Education of the Church, and that we were unanimously of the opinion that the proposed legislation before the Congress is unnecessary and unwise. Certain facts and figures to be inserted in the letter were prepared by President Ernest L. Wilkinson, President of the B.Y.U.
Thursday, June 15, 1961
May 31, 1961
David O. McKay, President
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
L.D.S. Church Offices
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear President McKay:
I want to tell you how much I enjoyed my delightful visit with you the last of March. It was certainly a pleasure and I appreciate your giving me a few minutes of your valuable time.
I am writing to obtain information on something that I consider very vital to the welfare of the nation. Probably the hottest issue before the United States Congress is federal aid to education, and our LDS people by the thousands are involved in this question on both sides. I have received hundreds of letters from Bishops, Stake Presidents and other loyal members of the Church, who are primarily educators and teachers, supporting federal aid to education. By the same token I have received hundreds of letters from Bishops, Stake Presidents and other loyal members of the Church, who are primarily members of the National Farm Bureau and of the chambers of commerce, opposing federal aid to education.
Up until this last week it was never assumed that the Church had any official stand on this subject. However, a statement that President Wilkinson made on May 23 in opposition to federal aid reads as follows: ‘The Board of Education of the Unified Church School System and the Board of Trustees of Brigham Young University whom I represent, oppose, as a matter of principle, any plan of general federal aid to education, irrespective of whether that legislation permits or does not permit parochial schools to share in any grants thereunder.’
It is common knowledge that the Board of Education of the Church school system and the trustees of Brigham Young Univesity are the members of the Council of the Twelve, and opponents of this legislation are now using this argument that the Church has taken an official stand against federal aid to education. Should this be true I would like to know about it.
I can assure you that I have spent considerable time studying this matter and praying about it, and I feel that if we are to remain an educated nation which can stay free from the threats of international communism, we must immediately meet the problems of substandard teachers’ salaries and inadequate buildings that face a majority of our schools. Inasmuch as the federal government controls most of the revenue in this nation through the federal income tax, I feel that this can be done only through federal aid to education. This matter is non-partisan. Congressman H.A. Dixon last year voted for federal aid to education. He is a fine man and one whom I believe certainly understood the problems of education.
However, if my Church is opposed to federal aid to education I want to know about it and am sure that every other Church member interested in this vital problem should be made aware of it. I intend to share your reply with Congressmen David S. King and M. Blaine Peterson of Utah, both of whom hold and honor the Melchizedek Priesthood and serve with me in the House of Representatives.
I await your reply as to whether or not the Church does have a position on this all-important issue.
Best personal regards,
Ralph R. Harding
Member of Congress
RRH:cb
cc: The First Presidency
Council of the Twelve
Congressmen King and Peterson
Thursday, June 15, 1961
June 15, 1961
Honorable Ralph R. Harding
House of Representatives
Washington, D.C.
Dear Brother Harding:
Re: Federal Aid to Education
I appreciate your letter of May 31 and the spirit in which it was written.
I am advised by President Wilkinson of Brigham Young University that you are a graduate of that institution where you were a recognized student leader and that you are a faithful member of the Church. I congratulate you on this background and again on your election to the Congress of the United States at such an early age.
As to your inquiry as to whether the Church has taken an official stand against a general program of federal aid to education as embodied in the bill already passed by the Senate, please be advised that this matter was discussed by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve sitting as members of the Board of Trustees of Brigham Young University and the Board of Education of the Church. We were unanimously of the opinion that the proposed legislation before the Congress is unnecessary and unwise. In accordance therewith President Wilkinson was requested to prepare and forward to Washington the statement, which I understand was placed in the congressional Record by Senator Bennett.
I note your statement that you have received hundreds of letters from bishops, stake presidents, and other loyal members of the Church who are primarily educators and teachers supporting federal aid to education; that on the other hand you have received hundreds of letters from bishops, stake presidents, and other loyal members of the Church, primarily members of the National Farm Bureau and chambers of commerce, opposing federal aid.
It is apparent from this statement of yours that you detect in a number of these letters a certain bias because of personal interest involved. In our delibertaions, however, we approached the matter entirely from what we considered to be right from the standpoint of the nation, for we have no personal interest to serve. While our record shows our dedicated interest in education, we are not on educational payrolls.
In this respect I note your comment that you feel that if we are to remain an educated nation we must meet the problems of substandard teachers’ salaries and inadequate buildings that face a majority of our schools. We gave consideration to both of these matters before expressing our deep convictions and came to the conclusion as set forth by President Wilkinson in his statement that local communities and the states are doing a pretty good job in taking care of school teachers’ salaries. We have noted, for instance, that over the last 30 years (from 1929 to 1959) the increase in teachers’ salaries was 106% in constant dollars. During the same period other state and local employees had an increase of only 58% and federal civilian employees only 73%.
We noted further that the average annual salary of school teachers rose from $3,126 in 1950-51 to $5,389 in 1960-61 (or 72.4% in a decade). The number of teachers with salaries below $3,500 decreased from 62% in 1952-53 to 9.6% in 1960-61, and the number with salaries of $4,500 or more rose from 13% to 63% during the same period. The significant aspect of the matter is that the teachers’ salaries rose sharpest in the states where they have been lowest. Between 1938 and 1954 for instance, teachers’ salaries rose 101% in dollars of constant value in the 12 lowest income states as compared with 28% in the 12 top income states. The differences in salaries in different parts of the country are narrowing perceptibly each year.
With respect to the so-called building shortage, we have the following comments to make:
The present drive for general federal aid to education gained its momentum during the 1950’s — in part from the unusual demand for school construction during that period, which was occasioned in turn by the very large ‘crop’ of babies born during the war years, but in larger part from incorrect reports of government officials as to existing shortages of classrooms and even more incorrect estimates as to future classroom shortages. That these reports and estimates were flagrantly wrong has been demonstrated by Mr. Roger A. Freeman, who directed the research of the Education Committee of the U.S. Commission on Intergovernmental Relations in 1954-55, (of which Dr. Adam S. Bennion was chairman), in his testimony before the subcommittee on Education of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, United States Senate, on March 13, 1961. (For a local example, Circular No. 490 issued by the U.S. Office of Education, indicated that Utah was constructing only 124 new classrooms during the 1956-57 school year. But data published shortly thereafter by the Utah State Department of Public Instruction reported that 345 new classrooms, almost three times the federal estimate, were actually completed during the 1956-57 school year.)
Summarily stated, as shown by Mr. Freeman, the ‘incontestable fact is that over the past decade more than 600,000 classrooms were completed while the increased attendance required the addition of only 400,000. This means that over 200,000 new classrooms were made available to replace old ones and to reduce class sizes. This record is the result of thousands of communities voting bond issues and higher taxes year after year. It may be well to note that the new public schools, built in the postwar period, now house close to 20 million American children — compared with schools for 9 million children which — according to their own claims — the Russians built in the same span of time.’
With respect to the future, President Kennedy in his message to Congress on February 20, 1961, based on estimates of the Federal Office of Education, stated that ‘if every child is to have the oppotunity of a full day’s education in an adequate classroom, a total of 600,000 classrooms must be constructed in the next ten years,’ or 60,000 classrooms per year. The fact of the matter is, however, that states and local communities have been building about 70,000 classrooms each year for the last 5 years! If, therefore, the present rate of construction is continued, we will build more than the number of classrooms which, according to the President’s own estimate, are needed.
And the fact of the matter is that such a remarkable achievement is actually taking place. The Investment Bankers of America have reported that the amount of school bonds approved in school elections in 1960 reached a new high of $1,800,000,000. Futhermore, January of 1960 was again eclipsed by January of 1961. The Department of Commerce has estimated that public educational construction would increase 8% in 1961 over 1960.
This progress has been made possible by the fact that very few local school districts have exhausted their bonding capacity. A survey made by the Federal Department of Health, Education and Welfare about 1 1/2 years ago revealed that only 237 out of 40,000 school districts had exhausted their legal capacity to borrow — less than 1% of the total number of districts. Instead of proving that these 40,000 school districts cannot continue to assume their traditional responsibility, this survey shows that they can, and the rate at which building is going on, shows that they will.
Admittedly, out of 40,000 school districts, there will be some who are lagging, particularly those who have been waiting to pass their responsibilities to the federal government to do their job for them. But on the whole, the record has been excellent, and it demonstrates there is no justifiable basis for the present drive for general federal aid for school house construction. To the extent there was an emergency, that emergency is passed, for there will only be one-half the increase in school attendance over the next ten years there has been in the past ten years. If, therefore, we keep building as many classrooms as we have built over the last ten years (which is probable), we will build double the number we need for new students.
Consequently, we finally came to the conclusion that federal aid, unless of mammoth proportions, might slow down, rather than accelerate, the construction of needed buildings. Support for this claim can be obtained from the report of the study committee on ‘Federal Responsibility in the Field of Education’ made in 1955 to the Commission on Intergovernmental Relations appointed by President Eisenhower. (This is the committee of which Dr. Bennion was chairman) That report read, in part:
‘Research does not sustain the contention that Federal funds are essential to support the elementary and secondary school system — it is our opinion that the appropriation of relatively small sums of federal aid to school construction — amounting to 10 per cent or 20 per cent of the present state and local outlay of almost $2 billion a year* — may delay rather than advance school construction. Districts not eligible in one year may hold off their building plans on the chance of being able to buy their school houses at 50 cents on the dollar a year or two later.’
__________________
*A National Education Association Survey published in December of 1960 revealed that school construction during 1960-61 had reached a new high of $3,094,000,000 in capital outlay; which suggests that local communities, now they know the problem, are responding to the need.
This report, as to the amounts involved, is admittedly out of date, but its fundamental theory, is, we think, still sound.
We agree completely that this matter is non-partisan, which is the reason we believe it proper for us to take a position on the matter. We are frankly gravely concerned over the increasing tendency of the Federal Government to assume more responsibilities with an ever-increasing indebtedness. In this respect we note your statement that the Federal Government controls most of the revenue in this nation through the federal income tax, and that you therefore think that the Federal Government should take on this new burden. In our judgment, the tendency of the Federal Government to more and more control the revenue of the country should be reversed, not increased.
It goes without saying that we are not attempting to control your vote in this matter, which should be determined by you in the clear exercise of your own conscience. But we have given to you our best advice based on no little study on our part.
We conclude with the prayer that you will be continuously blessed in your work in the nation’s capitol. We are grateful for your inquiry as to our advice.
Sincerely yours,
/s/ David O. McKay
(President)
Tues., 27 June 1961:
IV. Federal Aid to Education – President Wilkinson inquired whether President McKay had had an opportunity to answer the letter sent to him by Congressman Ralph Harding of Idaho with respect to federal aid to education. President McKay in turn inquired of Miss Middlemiss, who informed him that the letter had been sent to Congressman Harding essentially as drafted by President Wilkinson.
Tuesday, June 27, 1961
August 12, 1961
President David O. McKay
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: General Program of Federal Aid to Education
Dear President McKay:
This morning’s newspaper carried the news that the administration has finally abandoned its plan to try and force through Congress a general program for federal aid to education at this session.
Of course, I expect them to renew it at the next session but at least those of us who think that such a program is bad have had a temporary victory. I appreciate very much the support you have given me in the position I have taken. When I started to speak out against this a year ago I was informed by nearly everyone that the federal aid bill was inevitable and I was wasting my time. My answer was that I was going to continue because I felt that I was right and I hope we can ultimately prevail.
Sincerely,
Ernest L. Wilkinson
ELW:ln
Thurs., 6 July 1961:
“11:45 a.m.
President Edward L. Clissold of Honolulu came in. He said that he is thrilled with the development that has taken place at the Hawaii College. He said, ‘We are beginning to see the first fruits — the graduates are now going back prepared to teach in the various schools in the Islands.'”
Tues., 25 July 1961:
“8:30 a.m.
Met with Presidents Henry D. Moyle and Hugh B. Brown, President Clark still confined to his home.
Pacific Board of Education
I also reported that in my interview with Brother Mendenhall this morning Brother Mendenhall is eager to have an extended time for the duration for the Pacific Board of Education. I stated that I felt that an additional year and a half from the present time would enable the Board to clear up whatever business was necessary before turning over the affairs of the Board to the Church Board of Education. Brother Mendenhall reported the following items which need attention by the Pacific Board — the Mapusaga building in American Samoa — some additions to be made at the Church schools at New Zealand and Tonga, and some other smaller items. I said that I thought the matter of handling the coconut groves at Tonga and Mapusaga, and the completion of the Polynesian village should be handled independently of the Pacific Board of Education.
Fri., 16 Feb., 1962:
“[First Presidency Meeting] Federal Aid to Education
Attention was called to a letter from a Mr. Loren Searcy suggesting that I issue a statement to all members of the Church against the government’s aid to the education program. It was decided to do nothing about this matter.
Wed., 7 Mar., 1962:
“MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT McKAY
ON MARCH 7, 1962, FROM 7:45 A. M. TO 8:45 A. M.
I met with President McKay at his office at the above time. The following decisions were made:
3. Congressional Record for President McKay’s reply to Congressman Harding on Federal Aid. President McKay authorized me to have Senator Goldwater put in the Congressional Record his reply to Congressman Harding’s inquiry on Federal aid to education.
4. Deseret News for President McKay’s reply to Congressman Harding on Federal aid. President McKay authorized me to have his reply to Congressman Harding printed in the Church Section of the Deseret News.
5. Roger Freeman. President McKay authorized me to engage Roger Freeman to bring our research on Federal aid to education up to date .
Friday, June 8, 1962
June 8, 1962
President David O. McKay
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear President McKay:
I think it would please you to know that every graduating senior and many members of our faculty were given a copy of the article, ‘True Education,’ which you wrote and which was published in the Instructor in August, 1961. Our young people were very much impressed with your definition of education.
We are always grateful to you for your gems of wisdom which inspire our lives to nobler action. The entire student body and faculty join me in extending to you again our great love and appreciation for all the things you mean to so many.
Sincerely yours,
Ernest L. Wilkinson
ELW:jb
Friday, June 8, 1962
TRUE EDUCATION
By President David O. McKay
The very purpose of the Church organization is to promulgate Truth among men. Members of the Church are admonished to acquire learning by study, by faith and prayer, and to seek after everything that is virtuous, lovely or of good report, or praiseworthy. In this seeking after Truth, they are not confined to narrow limits of dogma, or creed, but are free to launch into the realm of the infinite for they know that ‘truth is truth wherever it is found, whether on Christian or on heathen ground.’
Indeed, one of the fundamental teachings of the Church is that salvation itself depends upon knowledge, for it is impossible for a man to be saved in ignorance.
…If a person gains more knowledge and intelligence in this life through his diligence and obedience than another, he will have so much the advantage in the world to come. (Doctrine and Covenants 130:19.)
But gaining knowledge is one thing, and applying it is another. Wisdom is the right application of knowledge to the development of a noble and Godlike character. A man may possess a profound knowledge of history and of mathematics; he may be an authority in physiology, biology, or astronomy. He may know all about whatever has been discovered pertaining to general and natural science, but if he has not, with this knowledge, that nobility of soul which prompts him to deal justly with his fellow men, to practice virtue and honesty in personal life, he is not a truly educated man.
Character is the aim of true education; and science, history, and literature are but means used to accomplish this desired end. Character is not the result of chance, but of continuous right thinking and right acting. True education seeks to make men and women not only good mathematicians, proficient linguists, profound scientists, or brilliant literary lights, but also, honest men, with virtue, temperance, and brotherly love. It seeks to make men and women who prize truth, justice, wisdom, benevolence, and self-control as the choicest acquisitions of a successful life.
It is regrettable that modern education so little emphasizes these fundamental elements of true character. The principal aim of many of our schools and colleges seems to be to give the students purely intellectual attainment and means of gaining a livelihood, and to give but passing attention to the nobler and more necessary development along moral lines. This is particularly noticeable along the lines of self-control. Notwithstanding the study of hygiene in our public schools and the hundreds of books written in condemnation, for example, of the use of tobacco and alcoholic beverages, too many of our school children are ignorantly sapping their intellectual strength and blunting their moral sensibilities by the promiscuous use of the cigaret and other forms of tobacco. The small percentage of those who reach college add to the tobacco and drinking habit sexual indulgence, which leave them stranded as moral wrecks when they are scarcely launched on their life’s journey.
Boys and girls of the present generation, unfortunately, begin early to date steadily. They become too free with one another. Being young, they lack perspective and the ability to distinguish between momentary thrills and long-range happiness; and thus, because they are lacking in the virtue of self-control, the happiness of a lifetime is sometimes sacrificed for pleasure which, ‘like poppies spread, you seize the flower, its bloom is shed.’ The man who wrote that line knew how momentary those pleasures are.
What, then, is true education? It is awakening a love for truth, a just sense of duty, opening the eyes of the soul to the great purpose and end of life. It is not teaching the individual to love the good for personal sake; it is to teach him to love the good for the sake of the good itself; to be virtuous in action because he is so in heart; to love and serve God supremely, not from fear, but from delight in His perfect character.
Upon the teacher rests much of the responsibility of lifting society to this high level. Ralph Waldo Emerson, reputedly the wisest American, said, ‘Character is higher than intellect. A great soul will be fit to live as well as to think.’
Students choose the paramount purpose of true education, and let it be yours as you seek your education! Teachers, yours is the responsibility to teach not only by precept, but by example!
Wed., 27 June 1962:
“7:45 – 8:15 a.m.
Met by appointment at their request the following educators: Paul Rose, President of the Murray Stake, and President of the State School Board Association; Dr. Lynn Bennion, Superintendent of City Schools; Dr. Dean Belnap, President Elect of the State School Board, former Bishopric member; Darold Long, Executive Secretary of the State School Board, and High Councilman of the East Jordan Stake; and Dan Peterson of Lehi, President of the Alpine School District, and President of Society of Superintendents.
We discussed the school and economic situation which has greatly changed in Utah. It has come to the point where teachers must have higher salaries. They are going into government and economic phases, some leaving the state, where their remuneration is so much higher.
I advised that they should choose men of both parties before the election who will favor education — that that is the first step. Then when we get men in the legislature, laws which will encourage more efficient teachers and better pay should be passed.
It seems to be a serious situation, and we shall have to get men who will give the matter the best intelligent judgment that they have.
Wednesday, June 27, 1962
UTAH SCHOOL BOARDS ASSOCIATION
June 29, 1962
David O. McKay, President
Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear President McKay:
We certainly wish to express our appreciation for your graciousness in receiving us last Wednesday morning. We are very grateful to have had an opportunity to discuss with you our concerns about education in Utah.
We feel a mounting anxiety as we observe the shortage of teachers to fill already existing positions. We are concerned about the inadequacy of teacher compensation, the decline in educational attainment of late, the radical viewpoints of some teachers leading even to threats of strikes to gain the things they are demanding. We feel, as you know, that these problems are becoming increasingly pressing and serious. In great detail they might be described as follows:
Teacher Shortage: Many districts in our state are finding it virtually impossible to find teachers to fill classrooms.
Teacher Salaries: The paramount reason given by teachers for not entering the profession in Utah is that salaries are way too low in comparison with other states and private industry. The reason given by students for not entering the field of education is the inadequacy of the financial compensation. This is a very serious problem.
Educational Attainment: Utah can well be proud of her accomplishments of the past. However, we are rapidly losing our position of leadership in many areas.
Viewpoint of Some Teachers: There are at the present time about six local districts that have not come to an agreement on salaries for the coming year. Talk this past spring, undoubtedly spurred by the New York City Teacher’s Strike, has been more radical and belligerent than ever before. There is growing sentiment among teachers to adopt the strike methods of enforcing their demands. The Unions are waiting to move into the ranks of our teachers.
Your counsel has already proved to be extremely helpful. We are grateful for your suggestions as to ways in which the Church might help us.
a) to encourage both parties to nominate candidates as representatives to the legislature who are favorable toward education.
b) to encourage the people to elect representatives to the legislature, regardless of political affiliations, that are favorable toward education.
c) to inform the public that teachers do need to be adequately compensated to live under our present economic conditions.
d) to encourage legislators and Governor to find necessary funds for education.
Your philosophy of education and the role of the teacher is most refreshing. The dedication of teachers to service of which you spoke is certainly present in the large majority of our teachers. We were thrilled with your suggestion that the Church can encourage especially young men to enter the field of education as a real service. We would concur that there is no higher calling than that of teacher. If in the minds of students in college we could couple the ideal of service with the assurance of a more adequately compensated future, we would be able to attract more and better people into teaching. We can then keep them here at home where they really want to be.
One of the most important factors in holding teachers in the past has been their desire to remain in Utah where the Church is. Many of our educators are very active in the Church, as you know. They find now, however, that they can go most anywhere and enjoy higher salaries while at the same time living in organized wards and stakes.
The importance of an education cannot, as you have said, be over estimated. That ‘education is an investment … not an expense,’ is certainly a concept everyone should espouse.
We hope this review of some of the things we discussed the other morning is accurate. As we strive to maintain local control of our schools and to solve education’s serious problems, we are most happy to know that you feel as we do.
Thank you once again for the time you took to listen to us. We are extremely grateful to you for your kindness.
If we can be of any assistance to you in any fashion, we would certainly feel thankful for the opportunity. Please call upon us.
Our Love and Respect Always,
Paul S. Rose Darld J. Long
President Executive Secretary”
Fri., 3 Aug., 1962:
“Telephone Calls:
I considered carefully the following message left for me by my secretary Clare Middlemiss:
“President McKay: Brother Lynn Richards called today (August 1, 1962) and said that he and Dr. Moroni Brown, Chairman of the State Board of Education, would liked to have an appointment with you to present a matter of extreme importance involving a choice for the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. He said that they are having some very serious problems. They would like to take Dr. Harvey Taylor, Vice President of the Brigham Young University. President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the BYU has given his consent to this, but Brother Taylor loves his work at the BYU, and has a new home in Provo, and wishes to stay where he is. They want you to put pressure upon him to accept the position of State Superintendent of Public Instruction.”
I then called my son, Lawrence, and asked his opinion of this matter, and asked him if he had been consulted by Brother Richards.
After discussing this situation with Lawrence, I called Brother Richards
and told him that I did not feel it wise to influence Dr. Taylor to accept
the above mentioned position, but that this decision should be left entirely to Brother Taylor.
(See copies of telephone conversations following)”
Telephone conversation between President David O. McKay and David Lawrence McKay, August 3, 1962, at 8:20 a. m.
DLM: Hello
DOM: Lawrence, did Lynn Richards speak to you about this appointment of Dr. Harvey Taylor ?
DLM: Yes, he asked me what your reaction was. I told him that you had not answered. He did not say anything. He wanted to know whether the present Chairman of the Board wanted an appointment with you, and if he could have one. I said that was up to you and Clare.
DOM: There is a note on my desk this morning that he has called and wants an appointment. They want me to pressure Brother Taylor. Well, I do not feel like doing it.
DLM: It seems to me that that is a matter of his personal life, rather than the Church, isn’t it?
DOM: I do not see why I should get into it at all. Do you ?
DLM: No, I do not.
DOM: I believe I will just leave word that that is up to Brother Taylor.
DLM: That would be my reaction.
DOM: They want me to pressure him. Well, I will not do it. I do not see why I should.
DLM: They want you to do it for the good of the State.
DOM: I am not so sure that he would be very good at it either. Are you? Do you know him?
DLM: I do not know him well enough.
DOM: Well, I do know him.
DLM: I have never been impressed that he could turn the world around with his influence .
DOM: No. Well, I believe I will tell them that I would rather leave that with him, and not use any pressure.
DLM: It seems to me that would be wise.
DOM: All right, thank you.
DLM: Fine.
DOM: Good-bye.”
“Telephone conversation between President David O. McKay and Lynn Richards, August 3, 1962, at 8:40 a. m.
McKay: Hello .
Richards: President McKay?
McKay: Good morning.
Richards: This is Lynn. How are you this morning?
McKay: Very well, thank you. I am glad to hear your voice.
Richards: I am always sorry to impose on your time.
McKay: I just came back from Huntsville, and there is a note on my desk from you.
Richards: Yes. Now, President McKay, the Chairman of the School Board–the State Board of Education–wanted to wait on you to see if you would care to use your influence to prevail upon Dr. Harvey Taylor to become the State Superintendent of Public Instruction. President Wikinson favored it very much, knowing the necessity of having a strong man in that office and the threat to release time in our Seminary System if anything went wrong up there, but we have discussed this matter with Brother Taylor and attempted to prevail on him, and he told me yesterday he was disposed not to take it. Now, we would not take your time to discuss this further if you felt that you would not like to urge him against his will to take this office.
McKay: Well, I am very strongly in that opinion. I would rather not use my influence in urging him to take it.
Richards: At all ?
McKay: 0h, no! I will leave that entirely with him and you folks. I think I had better not. I think it would be unwise .
Richards: All right. And he has decided that he would rather not take it. So, I appreciate your time in calling back, and thank you very much. We will let it stand at that.
McKay: Well, thank you, Lynn. I will appreciate it if you will .
Richards: Mother is always asking about you.
McKay: Give her our love, will you please?
Richards: I will. She is fine, and we hope you are.
McKay: Sister McKay is much better. She cannot write or she would have answered personally the sweet letter your mother sent. She is a darling mother, and we appreciate her friendship.
Richards: We just hope you are both well.
McKay: Yes, thank you!
Richards: Fine. Good-bye.
McKay: Good-bye.”
Tues., 8 Jan. 1963:
“Tuesday, January 8, 1963
MEMORANDUM OF CONFERENCE WITH PRESIDENT MCKAY AT HUNTSVILLE ON TUESDAY, JANUARY 8, 1963, AT 3:30 P.M.
UNIFIED CHURCH SCHOOL MATTERS
At a meeting held with President McKay at his home in Huntsville on January 7 where he graciously received me, the following decisions were made:
5. Letter from Jefferson Eastmond
I reminded President McKay that Jefferson Eastmond, who is Assistant Secretary of the Utah Educational Association had written him a long and critical letter about the President’s statement on Federal Aid to Education, which letter the President had sent to me. I suggested to the President that he merely make a short response to Brother Eastmond’s letter and that he give me the burden of answering that letter in detail.
6. Letter from Glenn E. Snow of National Education Association
I reminded the President that Glenn Snow of the N.E.A. had written asking the position of the Church as to Federal Aid for Parochial Schools. I suggested that I draft a letter for President McKay to send to Snow on this subject and he agreed.
Wed., 13 Feb. 1963:
8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
President Daryl Chase of the Utah State University, Logan, Utah, came in by appointment at his request. He reported his visit to the missions on his recent trip to South America. He commended the leadership of our missions, and said that prospects for missionary work in the South American Countries were never brighter in the history of the Church. From his observations, he thinks the Church ought to build our chapels in order that we may establish elementary schools and teach the children how to read and write.
Wed., 13 Mar. 1963:
“8:00 a.m.
At their request, met by appointment, Dr. Moroni L. Jensen, President of the Utah Education Association, and Mr. John C. Evans, Jr., Executive Secretary. I invited them in to meet my counselors who joined in the consultation.
For the next hour we discussed the present school situation. Mr. Jensen explained the organization of Cooperative Agencies for Public Schools in its efforts to raise the professional level of school teachers, and to provide for elementary and secondary schools in the State of Utah. He said this organization has been working for 18 months to prepare a suitable bill to present to the Legislature to accomplish the purpose, to attract qualified people into the teaching profession, and to provide many necessary facilities for better education in the State. He referred to the meeting of the members of the Utah Education Association to be held in the coliseum at the Fair Grounds on Saturday which the members have requested to give them opportunity to evaluate the results of the present Legislative session.
Mr. Jensen said his purpose in coming to the First Presidency with Executive Secretary Mr. Evans is to say that the teachers are not interested alone in better salaries, but also in a better educational program for the children of the State. He said that the Saturday meeting may turn out to be one where the teachers will feel that enough has not been done for education through the Legislature, and will suggest that services be withheld with the beginning of the next school year.
I said that that would be a fatal thing to do, and Mr. Jensen said many of the membership feel that this is the only way to bring the problems of education and the needs of education in Utah to the attention of the public.
I asked him what their visit this morning has to do with the teachers and the AFL-CIO. Mr. Evans said that this is one of the greatest concerns of the organization. He said if teachers do not get some sort of satisfaction, they may feel that they are not able to carry on as professional people. At the present time, the American Federation of Teachers would not have more than a handful of members. There are significant numbers in Salt Lake City who, he estimated, would be about 500 and 600, are waiting to see what will be done for education this year before giving the AFL-CIO encouragement to come in.
Mr. Evans said the history of Utah schools prepared by Dr. Moffatt is intimately associated with the Church. He said they are proud of the professional manner of the teachers in facing their responsibilities, but there comes a time when the significant number of people are beginning to question whether it is more professional to continue to take part in the program which is entirely inadequate, and which prevents their doing a professional job because of lack of material and working conditions, and because of the great load which makes it almost impossible to do the job they are prepared to do.
A long discussion then ensued regarding ways and means of meeting the problems that are facing them.
I asked Mr. Jensen what could be done, and he said that they would not come here with any egotistical opinion that they could counsel us as far as this is concerned, but that they have felt so often that just a favorable editorial in the Deseret News or actually refraining from downright criticism would help. The CAPS program has not been given any kind of support by either newspaper, despite the fact that there has been grass roots meetings in 35 of the 40 school districts.
In answer to my inquiry, Mr. Evans said the bill is in shifting committees in the House of Representatives. He said education should not be political, and that they feel that regardless of political party the leaders of the State should be in sympathy with providing the best kind of education, but the legislators vote almost wholly on party lines. He reviewed the action taken in the committees of the Senate, and the House on the Governor’s bill indicating the political element in consideration thereof. He said that it is a one-man rule, the governor is running the Legislature as well as his own office.
I asked if there is a possibility that the organization will attempt to force the Governor’s hand, and Mr. Evans said there is, and that the school people have tried to maintain a professional attitude towards this problem.
He said that Saturday the membership at the UEA is going to decide whether it is more professional to take just what the Governor is willing to give and come back into the classroom next Fall knowing that there is no possibility of doing the kind of professional job of teaching that really needs to be done, or whether it will be more professional to say there comes a time and a place beyond which we do not think it is professional to continue to teach under these conditions.
Mr. Evans expressed thanks to us for receiving them and giving so much time to them, and I said that we are deeply interested in education, and that we do not want to see our teachers go on strike. Mr. Evans said education will be irreparably damaged; that they do not want that either, but time is so short now, and that they feel they are closer to the pulse of our people than anyone else, and thanked us for giving them an opportunity to communicate this matter to us as to what would be best to do. They said they have sat on the lid of this power keg as long as they can unless something is done with the Governor.
I asked them if they had spoken to the Deseret News, and Mr. Evans said he had had a conference with Preston Robinson, and his whole staff of editorial writers, and that they had sent down their research documents and bulletins but that they get meagre notice. I asked them what their immediate question is, and Mr. Evans said that if there is anything that could be done to that end that it would be the saving factor. Raising the state level to 15 million, and give opportunity to the local districts to do more, he said, would be helpful.
I think we had a very profitable meeting, and that it will have the effect of modifying the action of the meeting to be held next Saturday by members of the teachers’ association. I am sure the CIO Labor Organization would like the teachers to join the union of the Utah Education Association, and it is hoped that they will not do that. I think that these representatives of the Utah Education Association left with a good spirit and will do the right thing. I wish that we could help them to get more money, but this is a matter that is in the hands of the Legislature.
The next day at the meeting of the First Presidency, we considered with favor the advisability of publishing a suitable editorial in the Deseret News emphasizing the giving of the local communities authority to act in the interest of the schools, and to take steps to keep the schools out of the control of labor organizations.
At this time these men withdrew from the meeting.
Tues., 9 Apr. 1963:
“UEA Officers Claim of Approval of the First Presidency
President Moyle mentioned a claim reported to have been by Mr. Jensen, President of the Utah Education Association, that the First Presidency of the Church approve their course urging teachers to refuse to sign contracts. President Moyle said the UEA is reported to be attempting to have graduates of the schools of education of the University of Utah and Utah State University sign powers of attorney giving the UEA the right to represent them in teaching contract negotiations. The advice given and expressly noted to the effect that encouraging the teachers to strike would be disastrous was reviewed from the meeting with the First Presidency attended by Mr. Jensen and Mr. Evans.”
Fri., 12 Apr. 1963:
“11:00 a.m.
BYU Meeting – Regarding Utah Education Association
Held a special meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Brigham Young University to consider the request of the Utah Education Association that the Brigham Young University encourage its students who are going into education to refrain from entering into individual contracts with school boards in this State, and to give powers of attorney to local teachers’ associations so that if the present ‘controversy over school finance has not been satisfactorily resolved ‘from the standpoint of the UEA, teachers may refuse en masse to enter ‘into the actual performance of duties until negotiations between the local education association and schools districts have come to a satisfactory conclusion.’
At 3:30 p.m. that same day we held a meeting with the following:
President Ernest L. Wilkinson of the BYU; Royden Derrick, Executive Committee, University of Utah; Wilford M. Burton, Executive Committee, University of Utah; Leland B. Flint, Board of Trustees University of Utah; Henry Hurren, Executive Committee, Utah State University; and Alma Sonne, Chairman of the Board, Utah State University.
Public statements were issued by these schools in criticism of the UEA action, particularly of the letter they had written to Utah teacher-training institutions asking them to support the UEA by informing teacher trainees of the situation and advising them to sign only conditional contracts, and to turn their bargaining rights over to local UEA units.
It was decided that a public statement be issued protesting such actions by the UEA. (see newspaper clippings following, also letter from Clyde Sandgren of the BYU).
Friday, April 12, 1963
April 10, 1963
President David O. McKay
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Dear President McKay:
Pursuant to your authorization, I am today sending notices to all members of the BYU Board of Trustees that we will hold a special meeting of said Board at 10:00 a.m. on Friday of this week, April 12.
At the suggestion of President Wilkinson, I am informing the Brethren that the meeting will last approximately one-half hour and will deal with the request by Utah Education Association that BYU encourage its students who are going into education to refrain from entering into individual contracts with school boards in this state and to give powers of attorney to local teachers’ associations so that if the present ‘controversy over school finance has not been satisfactorily resolved’ from the standpoint of UEA, teachers may refuse en masse to enter ‘into the actual performance of duties until negotiations between the local education association and school districts have come to a satisfactory conclusion.’
Kindest personal regards.
Sincerely your brother,
Clyde D. Sandgren
Vice-President and General Counsel
CDS:er”
Sat., 4 May 1963:
“7:00 a.m.
Stopped at the office to attend to accumulated matters on my desk. Soon after I arrived, Elder Thorpe B. Isaacson came in. He said that he has been invited by the U.S. Office of Education to be a special consultant to Francis Keppel, U.S. Commissioner of Education to serve without compensation. He has been asked to be an advisor on policy problems for the Commission.
Elder Isaacson asked me what he should do, and I told him to accept the position.
Saturday, May 4, 1963
MEMORANDUM
TO: Clare Middlemiss DATE: May 6, 1963
FROM: Elder Thorpe B. Isaacson
RE: U.S. Department of Education
Dear Sister Middlemiss:
On Friday, May 3, at 2:05 p.m., a long distance telephone call came to my office in the Church Office Building from Commissioner Keppel of the U.S. Office of Education – United States Cabinet. I was not in the office at the time the call came in, but came in five minutes after and returned the call and had a long conversation with Commissioner Keppel.
Commissioner Keppel asked me whether I would serve as a consultant to the commission on problems of the U.S. Department of Education. I thanked him for his cordial invitation. We talked about a number of things. I have never met the man, but I told him I would like to clear this with the President of the Church.
Friday afternoon I tried to see President McKay, but he had gone and I didn’t wish to disturb him at the Hotel. I, therefore, met him in the Church Office Building Saturday morning, May 4 about 7:00 a.m. I told him of the telephone call and showed him the telegram that I received Friday afternoon following my telephone conversation with Commissioner Keppel. President McKay quickly and strongly urged me to accept it. He assured me of his complete approval and cooperation and support in this calling. As a result of his approval and encouragement, I accepted the invitation of Commissioner Keppel. He told me I would be called to Washington periodically to discuss problems of education.
I deeply appreciated the visit with President McKay on May 4 at such an early hour. He gave me every encouragement and he made me feel as though I could be of some service in this connection. The appointment, of course, is to serve without compensation. I so notified President McKay that there would be no compensation whatsoever. If I can render some possible service, I shall be grateful. He felt I could render some service because of my experience in higher education, serving on Boards of Trustees and Boards of Regents, etc., and he felt this appointment was an honor to me and to the Church. He told me to accept it with his approval. President McKay’s kindness, thoughtfulness, graciousness, and encouragement make one wish to rise higher and to do better. His greatness is exceeded only by his sweetness of soul and spirit. Had he have discouraged me, I would have turned down the invitation, but he strongly advised me to accept it.
Affectionately your brother,
Thorpe B. Isaacson, Assistant to the Council of the Twelve
TBI:eso”
Wed., 5 June 1963:
Chile – Establishment by Church of Schools in
President Brown reported upon the assignment to him to write to President A. Theodore Tuttle of the South American Mission, and President A. Delbert Palmer of the Chilean Mission about schools in Chile, and to receive their recommendation.
Letters from President Palmer and President Tuttle on the subject were read, in which letters they propose a school at Cisterna near Santiago, and one at Venna Del Mar. The letters give estimates of the number of children (150) of grades one to five, which can be taught in these schools, and submitted a budget of $30,000 for the first year to operate the schools. President Tuttle and Palmer join in recommending securing the services of Brother Dale Harding of the Brigham Young University, now in Chile as a Fulbright scholar in education, to direct the establishment and to supervise these schools on the basis of a trial for the first year.
Facts about Brother Harding were read with the appraisal of his ability as a scholar and a school administrator given by Dr. Reed of the Brigham Young University.
The letters also included estimate of the school building facilities available in the chapel at Cisterna, and another at Venna Del Mar.
President Brown commented upon the importance of such schools to liberate members of the Church from the domination of the Catholic school system in Chile.
I commented upon the establishing and supporting of these schools as relieving the government of its obligation. President Moyle and President Brown referred to conferences with government officials who cordially encourage the Church to undertake this service.
After consideration, it was decided that these projects be undertaken as recommended by Presidents Tuttle and Palmer; that the schools be under the direction of Brother Palmer, and that he be under President Tuttle’s supervision, and that these brethren account to the First Presidency; that in this initial stage and a trial period, it would not be advisable to place the schools in the Unified Church School System.
President Moyle raised the question as to the advisability of bringing this project to the Board of Education until some experience has been acquired under President Tuttle and President Palmer, and I said that during this trial period, we shall keep it in our own hands.
It was agreed that immediate jurisdiction over the schools will be assigned to President Palmer, working under the direction of President Tuttle, and that the two counsel together.
I asked President Brown to prepare a letter for the signatures of the First Presidency to President Palmer, and a copy to President Tuttle, telling him we acknowledge receipt of these letters, and directing them to take initial steps and to keep the Presidency informed, and that they start with the buildings we now have. (See Diary of June 18, 1963, for additional discussion.)
Tues., 11 June 1963:
“8:15 a.m.
Education – State Board of – Meeting Regarding UEA Situation
By appointment at their request, I met Brother Moroni Brown, Chairman of the State Board of Education, and Lynn Richards, member of the Board.
They came in about the teacher situation in the schools in Utah. They said that the situation is quite serious; that the Utah Educational Association officers have been insisting that the teachers give the UEA the right to vote for the teachers on the controversy that has arisen between the Governor and the UEA — the officers of the UEA saying that the schools will not open at the usual time next Fall unless certain conditions are met, and those conditions will be specified by the UEA.
I said: ‘The Governor’s stand is right in upholding the law as passed by the Legislators — that the Legislature is composed of able men, duly elected by the citizens. In the Legislature they unanimously passed certain resolutions effecting the educational welfare of the State, and the Governor’s stand by the decision of that Legislature is right, and he should be upheld in that. The UEA should wait until the Legislature meets again at which time they can present their proposition.’ I said further, ‘I commend you, Brother Brown, as Chairman of the State Board of Education and you, Brother Richards, in your stand that you have a right to put a plea before the people and let them vote on the question, and do not have any thought of having the teachers fail to meet their obligations as teachers in our schools.’
I said further, ‘You need not have any concern about Dr. Moroni L. Jensen, President of the UEA, and Mr. John C. Evans, Executive Secretary of the UEA ‘saving face’ — they haven’t any face to save.’ If these teachers who have sold their right to be represented will not come back and teach school, we shall get enough old teachers to take charge of the schools to insure the people that the schools will be open. These brethren went away feeling pretty well.
Tues., 18 June 1963:
Chilean Schools – Announcement of
Among a number of items considered was the opening of schools in Chile. President Brown said that President A. Delbert Palmer of the Chilean Mission, and President A. Theodore Tuttle of the South American Mission propose that they interview the American Ambassador to Chile, and the Chilean government officials about their starting the establishment of the schools in Chile but not before the public announcement is made by the First Presidency. In reply to inquiry President Brown said the schools would be at Santiago and Vina del Mar, and would include about 150 students. I asked about the cost, and explanation was made that the estimates of President Tuttle and President Palmer were that the budget would be $30,000 a year, and this will include the salary for Brother Harding as supervisor, who is now a Fulbright scholar from the BYU in Chile, and that he is employed at the BYU. President Moyle asked if it would be better to issue public announcement after the approval of the Chilean government has been received, and President Brown said that the approval of the government has been received. The Brethren do not want to go any further, however, until they have a news release of this action.
I said I think we should go on with it and make the announcement. President Moyle said that will mean other applications in Peru, Uruguay, and other countries. President Brown said this will open the door if we meet with success in these two schools. President Brown said President Palmer and President Tuttle also want to know if a call should be issued to Brother Harding so he can be released from the BYU. Direction was given for the preparation of a letter to Brother Harding asking him to take charge of the schools. President Brown said that Brother Jarvis had asked how this should be set up and whether or not it should be under a separate board of schools in South America or under the Church Board of Education. President Moyle reviewed the decision that was made that while these schools are in this experimental stage they will be under the direction of the First Presidency. It was decided that the funds will come from the general funds of the Church and Brother Jarvis should be informed of this decision. Direction was given for the preparation of a letter and of an announcement about the establishment of the schools in Chile. (see Diary of June 5, 1963, for discussion regarding this matter. See also letters to President A. Delbert Palmer and Dale Harding and newspaper clippings following.)
Tues., 16 July 1963:
“Utah Education Association
Was pleased to note in this morning’s paper that the crisis in the teacher situation in Utah is being satisfactorily resolved, and that the Utah Education Association leaders said they would recommend that teachers ‘proceed with negotiation of contracts for the 1963-64 school year.'”
Tues., 17 Sept. 1963:
“8:30 a.m.
Meeting of First Presidency. Among items discussed was the matter of Church Sponsorship of an Educational Program in Europe. We read President Theodore M. Burton’s letter written in response to inquiry about opportunities for youth of the Church to obtain higher education in Europe, by reviewing in summary educational systems of the countries on continental Europe through elementary high school and university levels and the degree to which opportunities are open to members of the Church. He expressed disfavor with the suggestion that the Church undertake to sponsor elementary high school or university education in European countries, but suggested that the Church could render a much-needed service to the Youth of the Church by establishing the institute program of the Church in favorable situations and locations, one in Great Britain and one on the continent of Europe, with dormitory facilities where the youth of the Church seeking education would find a rallying point under Church sponsorship and influence while they may be enrolled in any of the many schools or universities or educational centers already open to them. He explained that grade school and high school education in most countries is paid for by the state. President Hanks’ letter relating to the limited opportunities for youth in Great Britain to obtain higher education was also read. President Burton stated that one of the serious handicaps at the European universities is finding suitable living quarters. He estimated from the inquiries made of the missions in Europe that 312 students at present would be interested in attending an institute as suggested. A letter signed by district presidents in the Austrian Mission supporting the proposal was also included in the correspondence.
I said this plan could work; that it is in keeping with our system at home, and that we could start in England and spread it from there. I said I think we ought to do it, and that we should look favorably upon it. President Brown concurred. I stated that the time has come for us to take action, and that we shall talk with Brother Petersen and others. I said that we should look today with favor upon the suggestion of an institute. The building of dormitories is a very important part. We shall have to come to it. We are now a world-wide Church. There is no reason why we should not do it in England where the membership justifies it, and then do it here.”
Fri., 6 Mar. 1964:
“8:00 a.m.
Met by appointment at his request City School Superintendent Lynn S. Bennion. He reported that the schools have to have more money and that he favors taking contributions from the Government. I said that I oppose taking anything from the Government; that they only send back to us what we have sent to them.
I told Brother Bennion to be careful about letting the Government get control of our schools. He said that he will keep under control the management of the financial affairs, as well as the scholastic affairs of the schools. I said that that will be hard to do after they send the money to them.
Wed., 13 May 1964:
“Hawaii – Church College of
Consideration was given to the recent action of Brother Mendenhall and the Pacific Board of Education in releasing Brother Richard T. Wootton as President of the College and appointing Owen J. Cook as his successor. President Brown said that in talking with Brother Mendenhall about this matter, he had indicated to him that the matter should have been referred to the First Presidency before this change was effected. President Brown said that Brother Cook has been spoken to and his remuneration arranged. Brother Wootton had telephoned President Brown this morning from Hawaii asking if any action had been taken on his resignation and stating that he was willing to do whatever we wanted him to do. He did object to the way the change had been made and asked if the action taken represented the wishes of the First Presidency. President Brown said that it was the sentiment of some of the Brethren of the General Authorities that now would be a good time to place the schools in the Pacific under the chancellor of the Unified Church School System. I expressed the thought that it seemed to me that a change of such magnitude should be postponed until such time as we know whether President Wilkinson is going to return to the BYU and resume charge of the Church School System. The Brethren agreed that it would be preferable to wait until that time.
President Tanner read a letter addressed to the First Presidency by Brother Mendenhall in regard to Brother Wootton’s release, enclosing a copy of Brother Wootton’s resignation. In Brother Mendenhall’s letter he reports the action taken by the Pacific Board of Education in releasing Brother Wootton and appointing Brother Cook as his successor subject to the approval of the First Presidency, he to be paid a salary of $18,000 a year. Brother Mendenhall also presents the recommendation of the Pacific Board of Education that Dr. Keith Oakes, a member of the faculty of the Brigham Young University, be approved for membership on the Pacific Board, this also subject to the approval of the First Presidency. I said that I had learned that Brother Wootton is on the verge of a breakdown. It is understood that Brother Wootton will received a year’s salary in compensation for sabbatical leave. It was decided to give consideration to this matter at the meeting of the Presidency and the Twelve tomorrow.
Fri., 15 May 1964:
“10:30 a.m.
Hawaii, Church College of – Resignation of Richard T. Wootton, etc.
Met with Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall and David Lawrence McKay regarding: 1) Resignation of Richard T. Wootton as President of the Church College of Hawaii and the appointment of Dr. Owen J. Cook as the new President; 2) Decision made that the Pacific Board of Education is to remain the operating board of the Pacific schools under the direction of the First Presidency until December 31, 1964, and that on January 1, 1965 the Pacific School System is to be turned over to the Unified Church School System.
12:00 Noon
Hawaii, Church College of – Circumstances Surrounding Resignation of Richard T. Wootton Discussed
At noon I asked President Hugh B. Brown to come over to the apartment where for the next hour and one-half, in the presence of Brother Wendell B. Mendenhall, we aired out the situation concerning the resignation of Richard T. Wootton as President of the Church College of Hawaii.
Thurs., 21 May 1964:
8:30 a.m.
Was engaged in the regular meeting of the First Presidency. Among matters discussed were the following:
10:00 to 1:00 p.m.
Attended Council meeting.
Pacific Board of Education – Change Over to Unified Church School System to be Made December 31, 1964
I reported that I had had a conversation with Wendell B. Mendenhall regarding the release of Dr. Richard T. Wootton as President of the Church College of Hawaii and the appointment of Dr. Own J. Cook as his successor, also in regard to turning over the Church schools in the Pacific Board of Education to the Unified Church School System. I said that I should like to tell Brother Mendenhall that the Pacific Board of Education should take steps to change over to the Unified Church School System by December 31, 1964.
Elder Stapley said that thinking in terms of the budget for next year, he wondered if we could notify the Acting Chancellor of the Church School System of this proposal so that they could take it into consideration when making up their budget for 1965.
Elder Stapley moved approval of the proposition. Motion seconded and unanimously approved.
I then stated that the Pacific Board of Education has done a good work, and they will have the rest of the year to get in shape so everything will be satisfactory and ready to turn over to the Church Board of Education.
Elder Gordon B. Hinckley said he would like to add to the record that he thought they had done a good job, that the schools in the Pacific have had problems and difficulties, but he thought the Church College of Hawaii is a good school with a tremendous potential, and that the other schools in the Pacific have done inestimable good.
Referring again to the release of Dr. Richard T. Wootton, I presented the recommendation of the First Presidency that the action of the Pacific Board in extending a release to Dr. Wootton be approved, and that he receive a year’s salary. I said that Dr. Wootton feels all right about accepting a release.
President Tanner mentioned that last Thursday consideration was given to the recommendation of the Pacific Board of Education that Brother Cook, in addition to being President of the College, continue as executive secretary of the Pacific Board of Education, the position that he now holds.
I said that I should like to carry this matter over, as I do not have all the facts before me; that I had them in my papers at home.
Discussions were held on many other items of general Church importance.
Thurs., 1 Oct. 1964:
Pacific Board of Education – To be Transferred to the Unified Church School System
Signed a letter today recommending to President Joseph Fielding Smith that he call a meeting of the Executive Committee of the Church Board of Education for the purpose of considering methods to be adopted in order to accomplish the transfer of the Pacific Board of Education to the Unified Church School System.
Thursday, October 1, 1964
(Original in First Presidency’s Office Files)
September 16, 1964
President David O. McKay
and Counselors
47 East South Temple
Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Pacific Board of Education
Dear Brethren:
On Wednesday, February 15, 1961, I discussed with you the progress being made by the Pacific Board of Education and approximately the length of time it would take to complete certain construction areas and to have the schools organized and operating in a satisfactory manner. The question was asked, ‘How long do you feel it would be necessary to continue the Pacific Board of Education in order to complete this work?’ I said it would take approximately two years from January 1, 1961 which would mean we should be in good shape to turn over the schools to the Unified School System on January 1, 1963. President McKay said to get under way with all areas of the building program so that we could finish the work up and to get the schools operating in a satisfactory manner so that they could be turned over to the Unified School System when directed and that we could consider that we would have approximately these two years in which to accomplish the work.
On July 20, 1961, we wrote a letter to the First Presidency stating that we were compiling a report of operations of the Pacific Board of Education from the date of organization, July 12, 1957, to July 1961. This report would also outline to the First Presidency specific responsibilities of the Pacific Board which we felt should be carried out to completion and a time table indicating completion dates for work both in construction, instruction, curriculum and unification of all South Pacific Schools, with the recommendation that at the completion of this schedule, the Pacific Board of Education could make specific recommendations to the First Presidency that this school system be turned over the Unified School System of the church, approximately January 1, 1963, if such should be the wishes of the First Presidency. Or, we could continue to operate as the First Presidency might direct.
On May 18, 1964, a memorandum was prepared for President David O. McKay, at his request, indicating that President McKay had decided that the Pacific Board of Education would remain as an operating board under the direction of the First Presidency until December 31, 1964, and that on January 1, 1965, the Pacific School System would be turned over to the Unified School System of the church.
Please be advised that the Pacific Board of Education is making full preparation to turn its responsibilities over to the Unified Church School System as of January 1, 1965. We would be pleased to have your direction on this subject as to how you wish us to proceed in making an orderly transfer of subject responsibilities.
The Board appreciates the opportunity of being able to serve and the confidence the First Presidency has had in the Board.
We are well pleased with the progress which has been made over the years and for the opportunity we have had to develop this school system in the Pacific. We trust that it has been satisfactory to the First Presidency.
Again, thanking you for the privilege of serving, we are
Sincerely your brethren,
Pacific Board of Education
By /s/W.B. Mendenhall, Chairman
WBM:dt
Thursday, October 1, 1964
October 1, 1964
Elder Wendell B. Mendenhall, Chairman
Pacific Board of Education
Dear Brother Mendenhall:
We thank you for your letter of September 16th regarding the Pacific Board of Education and are pleased to note that arrangements are being made to turn over the responsibilities of the Pacific Board to the Unified Church School System as of January 1, 1965. We have been pleased to communicate with the Executive Committee of the Unified Church School System, notifying them of your willingness to turn over to the Unified Church School System the responsibilities of the Pacific Board of Education, and suggesting that they take such measures as may be necessary in order to effect this proposed change on the date specified, namely, January 1, 1965. The committee will no doubt communicate with you at an early date in regard to this matter.
Sincerely yours,
David O. McKay
Hugh B. Brown
N. Eldon Tanner
The First Presidency
Thursday, October 1, 1964
October 1, 1964
President Joseph Fielding Smith
Executive Committee
Church Board of Education
Dear President Smith:
We have received a letter from W.B. Mendenhall, chairman of the Pacific Board of Education dated September 16, 1964, in which he tells us that the Pacific Board of Education is making preparation to transfer its interests to the Unified Church School System as of January 1, 1965. Chairman Mendenhall asks for direction as to how we would wish them to proceed in making the proper transfer of their responsibilities.
We recommend that you call a meeting of the Executive Committee of the board for the purpose of considering methods to be adopted in order to accomplish this proposed change. The committee may wish to call to meet with them the members of the Pacific Board of Education in order to obtain a general over-all picture of the Pacific Board and its operations to assist you in effecting the proposed transfer at the time indicated.
Sincerely yours,
David O. McKay
Hugh B. Brown
N. Eldon Tanner
The First Presidency”
Tues., 31 Aug. 1965:
Junior Colleges – Marion D. Hanks to be Appointed to Governor’s Committee
We considered Governor Calvin L. Rampton’s request that the Church nominate someone who can represent the Church’s viewpoint on Junior Colleges in the State and whom Governor Rampton can appoint to a committee he will organize to study the Junior College subject for the State.
After consideration, we decided that Elder Marion D. Hanks, now a member of the Executive Committee of the Department of Education, be nominated to the Governor for this appointment.”
Thurs., 5 Jan. 1967:
11:00 – 12:10 p.m.
Clare came over. She presented for my consideration ten cases of petitions for cancellation of Temple sealings. After listening to the reports on these cases, I decided to grant the cancellations.
Clare also read several letters that had come to me at the Church Administration Building. One was from a student of Weber Academy days, who quoted in his letter ‘gems’ of literature which I had assigned the class to commit to memory. He said that the training he had received at the Academy had been of value and help to him all his life, and that he is now taking the time to thank me for the training he had received. (See Weber College scrapbook for letter.)
Tuesday, February 28, 1967
(Article by President David O. McKay to be included in the Brigham Young University yearbook, The Banyan, for 1967)
It is my belief, and I have often so stated, that education is a free people’s best investment. How great is that investment when it becomes a part of the lives of eager youths, nurtured in the rich environment of the Church, and harvested in the field of potential achievement!
Character is the aim of true education; and science, history, and literature are but means used to accomplish this desired end. Character is not the result of chance, but of continuous right thinking and right acting. True education seeks to make men and women not only good mathematicians, proficient linguists, profound scientists, or brilliant literary lights, but also honest men with virtue, temperance, and brotherly love. It seeks to make men and women who prize truth, justice, wisdom, benevolence, and self-control as the choicest acquisitions of a successful life.
How honestly and well you face the world of business or politics, professions or technical skills is a great challenge, and will prove the metal of which you students are made.
To the members of the graduating class, I extend sincere congratulations upon your having completed the prescribed courses of study in your respective chosen professions, but, more than that, I congratulate you upon your increased ability to preserve the liberties of our country, and your opportunity to be of greater service to your fellow men – for whatever your future successes or seeming failures, I still look upon all recipients of true education as individuals and groups radiating an influence that makes less dense and ineffective the darkness of ignorance, of suspicion, of hatred, or bigotry, avarice, and greed that continue to envelop in darkness the lives of men.
A university is more that a storehouse of knowledge and more than a community of scholars. University life is essentially an exercise in thinking, preparing, and living. Your experience here should have developed resources in you which will contribute to your well-being as long as life endures. This University’s aim is to help you develop power of self-mastery that you may never be a slave to indulgence or other weaknesses; to develop virile manhood, beautiful womanhood, so that in everyone of you may be found at least the promise of a friend, a companion, one who later may be fit for husband or wife, an exemplary father or a loving, intelligent mother, one who can face life with courage, meet disaster with fortitude, and face the future and even death without fear.
Apply your education, for true education, that for which the Church stands, is the application of knowledge to the development of a noble and Godlike character.
David O. McKay
President, The Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints”
Mon., 15 Jan., 1968:
“8:30 a.m.
Held a meeting with Presidents Brown and Tanner and Elder Dyer.
April Conference – Viewing of “After School, What?” Film
By appointment, we met with the following persons, who presented to us a film and tape of a proposed program which they recommend be presented in the General Priesthood Meeting of the Church to be held April 6, 1968:
Alma P. Burton of the BYU and President of the Sharon Stake,
William R. Siddoway, President of the BYU Fourth State,
Neal Willed, representing the LDS Business College,
Daniel S. Hess of the Ricks College, and
Scott Whitaker of the BYU Motion Picture Department.
The film strip and the tape recording, with President Brown speaking, were directed to the youth of the Church regarding educational opportunities which the Church affords, with emphasis on the fact that in obtaining secular education they should also arrange to have religious education after leaving high school, whether of a scholastic nature or, if considered desirable, training in the trades.
These Brethren proposed that a copy of the film strip, together with the tape recording, be shown in each of the Churches and buildings where the General Priesthood Meeting proceedings will be broadcast by closed circuit. It was explained that 141 Stakes and 320 Branches of the Church would hear the message and see the presentation. It will require approximately 20 to 25 minutes to give the program.
Suggestions were given for the improvement of the program as the presentation is now only in the rough. Elder Dyer made several good suggestions. (See his minutes following.)
I authorized the Brethren to go ahead with the program for the Priesthood Meeting at the April Conference.
The visiting brethren were then excused from the meeting.
“(Minutes of Meeting with The First Presidency Held in Hotel Apartment)
JOURNAL RECORD OF ALVIN R. DYER
MONDAY, January 15, 1968
(Meeting of The First Presidency)
I attended a meeting of The First Presidency at 8:30 A. M. which, by pre-arrangement, included Alma Burton, Brother Siddoway, Scott Whitaker and one other brother from the BYU. Also in attendance, representing a student guidance committee, was a brother from Ricks College, an Assistant to John L. Clarke.
Their presentation consisted of a colored filmstrip titled “After High School What?” and is narrated by President Hugh B. Brown. It has been prepared and proposed for showing in the General Priesthood Meeting of the April 1968 Annual Conference. It will require approximately 22 minutes.
The filmstrip and narration have not been finalized, so suggestions for its improvement were discussed. Among others, I suggested the following:
(A) The opening remarks of President Brown be more indicative of what the filmstrip was all about.
(B) That more of the professions be referred to. The present strip narrates many fields for attainment, but there is only minor references on filmstrip. I suggested that successful men in a number of fields showing them at their work, such as Business Administration, Engineer, Scientist, Doctor, Lawyer, Sales Executive, might well enhance the image of continuing education after high school.
(C) The present strip has President McKay in colored picture with certain remarks he has made, narrated, concerning the need of pursuing educational training, about two-thirds into the film. I suggested that he be moved to the very
last part of the filmstrip so as to conclude it.
The committee for preparing the filmstrip was given approval to proceed with the final phase and then check with President Brown who will represent The First Presidency.
Approval was given for the presentation of the filmstrip at the April Conference, as they had requested it.
President Brown asked the President if he wanted to consider any other matters before we left; his answer was no.
(Approval To Publish The Revised Version Of “The Refiners Fire” Given)
As we were about to leave the President, I whispered to President Brown that now might be a good time to ask the President for permission to go ahead with the publishing of “The Refiners Fire” Revised version; his answer was “Yes, it would be.” I asked if he would like to remain while I took the matter up with the President. He said, “Yes, if you would like me to, or why don’t you present the matter before all of us.” (This meant President McKay, President Brown, President Tanner and myself.) So we sat down again; I next to President McKay. I told him that I had been given the letter which Elder Harold B. Lee, Chairman of the Reading Committee, had submitted when the manuscript was returned to the Presidency. The letter contained the suggested changes and deletions. I have now conformed to the suggestions with the exception of the statement that it was God the Father who spoke to the Prophet Joseph in Liberty Prison, which I firmly believe. But the Reading Committee felt that it was Christ the Lord. I have five reasons why I believe as I do. These are as follows — although I did not bring them up at the time simply because of the controversial nature of the subject. (President Brown suggested that I change the wording just enough so that the reader could interpret it the way he liked.)
1. The Deity answering Joseph Smith called him “My Son”. (121: 7 )
2. The prayer which Joseph uttered was directed to, “O Lord God Almighty”. (121:4)
3. And in another verse “The Eternal God of all other Gods”. (121: 32)
4. The term “our Heavenly Father” is also used. (123: )
5. The Deity answering Joseph Smith refers to the Son of Man in the second person. “My Son all these things shall give thee experience and shall be for thy good. The Son of Man hath descended below them all. Art thou greater than He ?” (122: 7-8)”
Fri., 29 Mar., 1968:
“8:00 a. m.
At my desk. I feel fairly well this morning, after a good night’s rest.
9:00 a.m.
Held a meeting of the First Presidency. Presidents Brown, Tanner, and Smith, and Elder Alvin R. Dyer were present.
Some of the Matters Discussed:
LDS Student Association – Paul Dunn’s Release – Appointment of Marion D. Hanks
President Tanner presented a letter addressed to the First Presidency and directed to his attention. In the letter Elder Dunn said that he had been informed that he would be called in the near future to replace Boyd K. Packer as President of the New England Mission, and that consideration should be given to his successor in the direction of the LDS Student Association.
He stated that Henry D. Taylor, Managing Director of the Welfare, had been suggested to succeed him, stating a number of reasons for the suggestion.
President Brown said that such a move would necessitate Brother Taylor’s release from Welfare work, and he felt this should not be done, and recommended that Elder Marion D. Hanks be given the assignment. We felt that Brother Taylor is doing a good service in the Welfare work and questioned the advisability of releasing him from that position.
Elder Alvin R. Dyer spoke at length of his approval of this recommendation, giving as substantial reasons the following:
1. His accepted image among the youth.
2. His national prestige as a youth leader.
3. His better understanding of the MIA problem, which has not been fully correlated with the LDSSA program.
4. His acceptance in educational circles.
I approved of the appointment of Elder Hanks as also did President Brown.