Below you will find Prince’s research excerpts titled, “The Messenger.” You can view other topics here.
Search the content below for specific dates, names, and keywords using the keyboard shortcut Command + F on a Mac or Control + F on Windows.
‘THE MESSENGER”
“Passing the Sacrament
Highest Authority to Be Recognized First
Our observations indicate that one essential in passing the sacrament to the highest authority sitting on the stand is being overlooked in too many wards. Please observe the following:
No one is to receive the sacrament until after the highest authority has been served–no one!
Young men passing the sacrament should be instructed that, when going to their assigned positions, they should not offer the sacrament to anyone until they have observed that the highest authority on the stand has been served.
Passing the sacrament to the highest authority first is held to be a sound lesson in Church government. Following the above suggestion will insure the lesson’s being taught.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 1:1, January 1956)
“Removal or Exposure of Temple Garments
The following letter was sent to bishops August 23, 1955. It is reproduced here for the information of new bishops and for more convenient reference.
Dear Brethren:
The First Presidency have suggested that we communicate with you on the subject of this letter.
It is being observed that some Latter-day Saint men and women, some of whom are presiding officers and teachers in both stake and ward positions, are removing their temple garments to wear abbreviated clothing in varying degrees when working around their homes, when traveling by auto, or camping out-of-doors. In some instances, brethren who have been through the temple are removing their shirts while mowing the lawns and performing other out-door responsibilities, thus exposing the upper garment to full view.
Such removal of the temple garment, or exposure to more or less public view, is not in keeping with its significance or its sacred purpose.
It is suggested you use your influence in encouraging Latter-day Saints to avoid these practices. It may be advisable to read this letter before the various meetings of your ward officers and teachers. If our leaders set the proper example, it will be helpful in correcting such practices where they exist and in guarding against their development in the future.
Faithfully your brethren,
THE PRESIDING BISHOPRIC
(Signed) Bishop Joseph L. Wirthlin
Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson
Bishop Carl W. Buehner” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 1:2, January, 1956)
“Deacons to Gather Fast Offerings–No Other Funds
Two matters of policy should be taught to two sets of Church members, (1) Aaronic Priesthood bearers who gather fast offerings, (2) all members of the Church.
The policies are, (1)that Aaronic Priesthood bearers should gather only fast offering contributions, (2) that members of the Church should contribute only their fast offerings when visited by Aaronic Priesthood members sent for that purpose.
How and where shall these two policies be taught to these two groups?
Aaronic Priesthood bearers should be taught in their quorum meetings so they will be able to suggest to people not acquainted with the rule that they are authorized to gather fast offering funds only.
Members of the Church should be taught by the bishop that, when Aaronic Priesthood bearers are sent to their homes to gather fast offerings, no other funds should be contributed at that time.
It is suggested that bishops so teach their members occasionally during ward Priesthood and sacrament meetings.
Members of wards should also be taught where and how they may make all “other contributions” in addition to their fast offerings.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:2, February, 1956)
“Persons Performing Priesthood Ordinances in Other Wards
The following letter was sent to bishops August 23, 1955. It is reproduced here for the information of new bishops and for more convenient reference.
Dear Brethren:
We are directed by the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve to inform you of the following rules concerning bearers of the Priesthood desiring to perform certain ordinances in other wards:
1. Where a relative or friend, who is not a member of the ward, is invited to participate in confirmations, and blessings of children, he must bring a letter from his bishop, addressed to the bishop of the ward in which the ordinances are to be performed, showing that he is in full fellowship and indicating his office in the Melchizedek Priesthood.
2. A separate letter of authorization is to be obtained and required in each instance.
NOTE: Members of the stake presidency, stake high council, and stake missionaries are not required to obtain such authorization when performing these Priesthood ordinances in wards within their own stake. However, when invited to officiate in wards in other stakes, they are required to secure written authorization form their respective bishops, as outlined above.
We suggest this announcement be read occasionally in the ward Priesthood meeting until the bishop is satisfied that bearers of the Priesthood in his ward are familiar with the above rules.
Faithfully your brethren,
THE PRESIDING BISHOPRIC
(Signed) Bishop Joseph L. Wirthlin
(Signed) Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson
(Signed) Bishop Carl W. Buehner” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:2, February, 1956)
“More Care Urged in Temple Recommends
It has come to our attention that some bishops issue temple recommends to applicants not really qualified to go to the temple. In such instances they either fail to hold interviews that reveal the facts or they pass on to the stake president the distasteful responsibility of declining to sign the recommend.
The bishop’s signature on a temple recommend should indicate that he has personally interviewed the applicant, has asked the necessary questions to determine the individuals qualifications, and that he believes the person is worthy to go to the temple.
A bishop should never, knowingly, issue a temple recommend which he has any reason to believe will not be cleared and approved by the stake president.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 4:1, April, 1956)
“Bishopric Should Select Ward Teachers
Attention is called to the practice where bishops delegate to division supervisors the responsibility of selecting, interviewing, and assigning of all ward teachers. Ward teachers are the personal representatives of the bishop and his counselors. For this reason, the bishopric should personally select, interview, and become satisfied with those who are to represent them.
Division supervisors may recommend to the bishopric those whom they thing could qualify as ward teachers, but that is as far as they should go until the bishopric have given approval and authorized assignment to divisions, companions, and districts.
If this procedure is followed, the responsibility of ward teaching is dignified and ward teachers are properly instructed pertaining to their duties.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 5:1, May, 1956)
“PRAYERS IN SACRAMENT MEETING TO BE OFFERED BY PRIESTHOOD BEARERS ONLY
The following letter was sent to all Bishoprics and Branch Presidencies, June 5, 1956
To all Bishoprics and Branch Presidencies
Dear Brethren:
We have been directed by the First Presidency to recommend that only those who bear the Priesthood be called upon to offer opening and closing prayers in sacrament meetings, including fast meetings.
The following is a direct quotation from a communication signed by the First Presidency:
“Our sisters may participate in offering prayers in the meetings of the auxiliary organizations when desired, but we feel that the brethren holding the Priesthood should offer the prayers in sacrament meetings.”
We commend these instructions to all bishoprics and branch presidencies and suggest their careful observance.
Faithfully your brethren,
THE PRESIDING BISHOPRIC
[Signed Joseph L. Wirthlin,
Thorpe B. Isaacson
Carl W. Buehner]” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 6:1, June, 1956)
“Bishops Instruct Priests in Breaking Bread
Those who administer the sacrament should be instructed in the breaking of the bread so as to make its appearance more acceptable to those who partake of it.
It has come to our attention that the bread is often crumbled or broken into very small pieces and gives a stinted appearance in the tray. It frequently happens that the bread is not broken into distinct pieces and when a piece is picked up it pulls another attached pieced with it. It is also noted that the Priests in breaking the bread pinch it between their fingers making it soggy and less palatable.
We urge ward bishops to instruct those who officiate at the sacrament table as to proper procedures in the breaking of the bread. If necessary, it could be demonstrated how the bread can be broken into separate, uniform, fair sized pieces without being pinched or crushed. Such instruction should occasionally be given to the Priests.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 7:1, July, 1956)
“Preparation of Sacrament Table to Be Supervised
“It is increasingly urgent that ward bishoprics give more attention to the supervision of young men who prepare the sacrament table. Quite frequently these boys are left to themselves with no one to direct the preparation. As a result, there are occasions when these young men become playful and boisterous thus losing the dignity that should be exhibited. This is no time for levity.
Preparation includes placing of linen, filling of cups in water trays, and the placing of trays on the sacrament table. All of this should be done before the service gets underway. This responsibility necessitates three or four young men coming fifteen to twenty minutes early to make orderly preparation.
If ordained Teachers are given this assignment, the adviser to the Teachers’ Quorum together with the presidency of the quorum should work out this problem together. Although young and inexperienced, these young men can be trained to handle this problem. In order to satisfy himself, the general secretary might check up periodically to see that every thing is as it should be.
All members of the Aaronic Priesthood should be properly instructed pertaining to the sacred significance of the sacrament. The same reverential attitude should be displayed using the preparation of the sacrament as is demonstrated while it is being blessed and passed to the members. Instruction along this line should be repeated frequently.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 8:2, August, 1956)
“Ward Teaching Selling and Collecting Not Part of Teaching
Inquiries have been made regarding whether ward teachers should perform such services as selling books, welfare wheat, and tickets for various purposes while doing ward teaching. We have advised against this type of thing previously and repeat again for the benefit of those not informed, that ward teachers should not engage in selling or collecting while doing their teaching.
Ward teaching is a project of being “your brother’s keeper” and should be kept on that level. It should be confined to teaching the gospel, encouraging members to participate in Church activities, inviting them to attend their meetings regularly, and rendering service in cases of emergency and need.
Ward teachers may with the approval of the bishop endorse or encourage members to participate in fund raising projects, but they should refrain from selling or collecting.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 8:2, August, 1956)
“Bishop Interview to Precede Priesthood Advancement
Before a person is ordained to or advanced in the Aaronic Priesthood, and before he is recommended for advancement to the Melchizedek Priesthood, he should be personally interviewed by his bishop. This assures each man at least one and as many as four such contacts with a bishop before receiving the Melchizedek Priesthood.
These interviews should be held at a time and place where there will be no chance for interruptions or embarrassment. The bishop should, by leading questions, encourage the brother being interviewed to express himself freely and should assure him that what is said will be held in confidence.
The interview should be a heart to heart talk. It should reveal to the bishop the true feelings and aspirations of the one being interviewed. By observation, interrogation and with the hope of the Lord the bishop can determine whether it is advisable to give the brother added priesthood responsibilities and obligations.
These interviews are the bishops opportunity to impress upon each one advanced, the importance of the priesthood in his life. The covenant of the priesthood as recorded in the Doctrine and Covenants, 84:33-41, should be read and discussed carefully so that each might know the obligations that holding the priesthood places upon a person.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 8:2, August, 1956)
“Mentally Deficient Not to Be Baptized
It frequently happens that parents with mentally deficient children insist of their bishops that these children be baptized at the age of eight. Persons without sufficient mentality to make them accountable for their actions do not need to be baptized regardless of how old they may be. Like little children they are free of sin and have no need for either repentance nor baptism as long as such condition maintains.
It should be explained to parents or others concerned that the salvation of such persons is assured and that to insist that they be baptized is not pleasing to God. The eight chapter of Moroni should be read to them with special emphasis on verses 19 to 25. See, also, Helps and Suggestions for Ward Bishoprics, p. 26.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 9:1, September, 1956)
“Bishopric Should Not Assist in Sacrament
The question was recently asked, “should members of the bishopric assist in the administration of the sacrament when senior members are assigned to the sacrament service?”
Certainly members of the bishopric have authority to administer or pass the sacrament. However, it would detract form the impressiveness of the service to have the presiding officers leave their places on the stand. It should not be done unless expediency requires it and then it would be best if only the counselors left the stand. The bishop should remain on the stand as the presiding officer.
Where insufficient members of senior members are available for the assignment, group advisers or other Melchizedek Priesthood bearers may be called to aid them in the service. It may embarrass senior members if those under 21 are asked to assist at the same time.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 9:2, September, 195^)
“Avoid Embarrassment To Non-members in Passing Sacrament
Non-members of the Church are often in attendance at our sacrament meetings. They wonder what they should do when the sacrament is passed–whether to partake or to pass it on without partaking.
Wards using printed, typed, or mimeographed programs for sacrament meetings could well add the following words in the appropriate place:
“Sacrament Administered to Members of the Church.”
This procedure would relieve our non-member friends of anxiety and help them to feel at home among us.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 9:2, September, 1956)
“Aaronic Priesthood Not to Perform Ordinances in Other Wards Without Bishop’s Written Permission
No bearer of the Aaronic Priesthood should be called upon, or permitted, to perform Priesthood ordinances or assignments in other than his own ward of membership without the written permission of his bishop.
Some bishops are permitting Aaronic Priesthood bearers form other wards to perform Priesthood functions in their wards without authorization from the bishop having jurisdiction over such young men. This procedure should be discontinued wherever it is being followed.
Bishops should only give their written permission when there is a good reason therefor and when the person is a worthy bearer of the Priesthood. The authorization should specify the ordinance to be performed or the assignment to be filled and the date on which the service is toe rendered. Written authorizations are good only for the date specified.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 11:2, November, 1956)
“Teachers Not Authorized to Break Bread
It has been called to our attention that in a few case ordained teachers have been assigned to assist at the sacrament table in the breaking of the bread. This should not be done. The breaking of the bread before the congregation is an integral part of the administration and should be done only by priests or those who hold the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Teachers and deacons, if assigned, may prepare the sacrament table and may properly be called to pass the sacrament to the Church membership, but they do not have authority to pronounce the sacrament prayers on or to break the bread which is the visual part of the administration.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 1:2, January, 1957)
“Printed Sacrament Prayers to be Used When Needed
The printed prayers of blessing on the bread and the water should be in a position during the administration of the sacrament where they can be easily read, if needed. These prayers should be given verbatim as they have been revealed to us by our Heavenly Father.
It is recommended that priests or elders who are called to officiate at the sacrament table memorize the prayers and thoroughly know the significance of them. When this is done they are likely to put more feeling and meaning into them than even a good reader might do otherwise. It is important, however that the printed prayer be where it can be referred to if necessary.
To have the printed prayer where it can be read if needed instills confidence and minimizes emotional stress which oft times disturbs or interferes with memory.
Because these prayers should be accurately given in this sacred ordinance, we should use every precaution to insure accuracy. The printed prayer card should be properly placed on the sacrament table where even those who are familiar with and know the prayers from memory may use them if need arises.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:1, February, 1957)
“Priests Who Administer Sacrament Should be Worthy
It has been drawn to our attention that priests are sometimes assigned to administer the sacrament who are generally known to use tobacco or liquor. This should not be done.
There are those w offended when the sacred ordinance of the sacrament is performed by one whose personal conduct they know does not conform to the general standards of the Church. The sacrament is a time for meditation, communion and dedication and its sacredness should be emphasized by the humility, sincerity and dignity of those who are called to officiate at the sacrament table.
While we recognize that it is the Priesthood and not the individual that administers the ordinance and that its efficacy depends upon his authority rather than his personal worthiness we believe that only those whose lives are circumspect should be appointed to perform sacred ordinances and particularly those that effect the lives of others.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:2, February, 1957)
“Priesthood Bearers Only to Stand in Circle
“Only those who hold the Priesthood should assist in the blessing of children or in performing the ordinance of confirmation.
Fathers who hold the Aaronic Priesthood may be permitted to stand in the circle while these ordinances are being performed, but the blessing or prayer of confirmation should be pronounced by a Melchizedek Priesthood bearer. Those who don to hold the Priesthood should not be invited to join the circle of either of these ordinances.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:2, February, 1957)
“Young Women Should Not Prepare Sacrament Table
It is reported that bishops in some instances are permitting young women to prepare the sacrament table. This preparation it is said, consists of placing the linen and the trays and filling the sacrament cups. Such procedure is out of order. This responsibility should be performed by only those who hold the Priesthood. Ordained Teachers have received the specific assignment of preparing the sacrament table. Under no circumstances should young women of comparable age be assigned to make this preparation.
Young ladies may be assigned to launder the linen and to clean and polish the trays, but anything to do with preparing the sacrament table is reserved for members of the Priesthood alone. It will be appreciated if bishops will make this clear to those who are responsible for making these assignments.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 2:2, February, 1957)
“Only Melchizedek Priesthood to Assist in Blessing Babies and Performing Confirmations
In order to clarify the question as to who may stand in the circle when babies are blessed and when confirmations are performed, the Presiding Bishopric announce the following:
The blessing of babies and the confirming of members in the Church are ordinances pertaining to the Melchizedek Priesthood. Therefore, only those who bear the Melchizedek Priesthood should be invited to stand in the circle or to participate in any way in the performance of these ordinances.
The above ruling supersedes all previous instruction son this matter, including those appearing in The Messenger for February 1957 under the title “Priesthood Bearers Only to Stand in Circle.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 15:1, March, 1957)
“When Bishops May Share Information On Tithing
“The amount of tithing paid by an individual or by the total ward membership is confidential and should not be disclosed by the bishopric to anyone except to the stake president as requested and in confidential reports to the General Authorities.
Information as to whether bearers of the Aaronic Priesthood or young women of corresponding ages have paid a full tithing may be given to leaders concerned in qualifying young people for their awards but the amount paid should not be disclosed.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 16:2, April, 1957)
“Procedure Outlined In Excommunications
There is a specific procedure to be followed in dealing with those in transgression. Bishops not familiar with these instructions, and who have need to know of them, should request the pamphlet “Handling the Transgressor” form the Presiding Bishopric’s Office.
Members names are not removed from membership records at their request. Neither are names removed at the invitation or on the suggestion of bishops because of inactivity.
The procedure outlined in the above-named pamphlet should be followed closely in all cases involving transgression of Church laws and standards.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 17:2, May, 1957)
“Who Should Prepare and Clear The Sacrament Table
Preparation and clearing of the sacrament table includes (1) the placing of clean linens, filling of water trays with fresh water, placing all trays and finger bowls on the table, and seeing that the unbroken bread is on hand before the meeting begins, (2) to remove and store sacrament trays and linen following the close of the meeting. The foregoing constitutes on assignment.
It is recommended this assignment be made to members of the aaronic Priesthood and that performance be given to ordained teachers where available.
Custodians of buildings, women or Latter-day Saint girls should neither be invited nor required to perform any part of this service in connection with the sacrament table.
Laundering of sacrament linens or the polishing of sacrament trays may be assigned to Latter-day Saint girls at the bishop’s discretion.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 18:1, June, 1957)
“Dripping Water Trays Objectionable In Sacrament Service
Dripping water trays are very annoying and give every evidence of both thoughtlessness and carelessness in the preparation of the sacrament table.
Clothes have had to be sent to the cleaners after ta sacrament service because of dripping water. This is most unfortunate. Trays should be scrupulously clean of all surplus water before being placed on the sacrament table.
This objectionable matter can be overcome if water cups are filled individually with fresh water from a pitcher with a small spout instead of carelessly placing the entire tray under the spickett and, while filling the cups, splash water all over the vessels only to have it drip on clothing while the water is being passed.
Of course, it takes time to fill cups individually form a pitcher but is any time better spent than in properly preparing the sacrament?
We respectively urge bishoprics to watch this detail and overcome any carelessness in the preparation of water trays for the sacrament service.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 18:2, June, 1957)
“When Ward Teachers May Perform Baptisms
In some instances ward teachers have been successful in converting non-members. The question has been asked, “Are ward teachers authorized to baptize converts?”
Ward teachers are not authorized to administer the ordinance of baptism without permission form the bishop.
When an investigator applies for baptism, ward teachers should promptly refer the matter to the bishop who will interview the person and, when satisfied of the applicant’s sincerity and worthiness, will issue the recommend and approve arrangements for the baptism.
Ward teachers who are priests or who bear the Melchizedek Priesthood may perform the ordinance at the request of the applicant but only when duly authorized by the bishop.
Ward teachers who are ordained teachers in the Aaronic Priesthood do not have the authority to baptize.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 19:2, July, 1957)
“Young Men To Receive More Training In Passing Sacrament
Since the administration of the sacrament is largely taken care of by members of the Aaronic Priesthood, it follows that the presidency of the Aaronic Priesthood are responsible for the manner in which hit is performed. The bishop and his counselors should always be alert to everything that is done in connection with this holy ordinance.
Special attention and training should be given newly ordained Deacons to avoid the mistakes incident to inexperience.
While, details and arrangements should be taken care of by the general secretary and quorum advisers, the bishopric should always be on the watch for the slightest indication of irreverence and take appropriate action in effective correction.
What are some of the items to be given attention? (1) Neat and appropriate dress, (2) advance preparation and place assignments, (3) whispering or other poor behavior patters, (4) unnecessary walking back and forth, (5) walking quietly, no hurry, (6) remaining for the meeting following administration of the sacrament.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 19:2, July, 1957)
“Excommunication of Parents Does Not Include Children
When either one or both parents are disfellowshipped or excommunicated from the Church it does not affect, in any way, the standing of their children.
Children should never be disfellowshipped or excommunicated from the Church because such action has been taken against their parents for violation of Church standards.
Unbaptized children cannot be excommunicated.
Records of children of parents who have been excommunicated from the Church must be retained and included in the ward Record of Members as long as the family is resident in the ward. Every effort should be made to work patiently with such children to keep them interested and active in the Church.
Unbaptized children of parents excommunicated for practicing plural marriage are not to be baptized until of legal age and then only when they are willing to obey the teachings of the Church and live by its standards.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 21:2, September, 1957)
“Aaronic Priesthood under 21 Priesthood Meetings In Private Homes Not Recommended
Across the years, there have been instances where a quorum adviser has taken the quorum away from the ward priesthood meeting to the home of a quorum member to hold a quorum meeting. In some instances meetings have been held in hospital rooms where members have been under treatment and, consequently, unable to attend quorum meetings in the chapel. In still other instances, quorum meetings have been held at a member’s place of employment, out in the fields, where the employer would not give the quorum member time off to attend his meeting in the ward. Other such variations have been reported but will not be detailed here.
Guard Against Health Hazards
With the epidemic of flue and the presence of other contagious diseases, any continuation of such and related practices may constitute a serious hazard to the health of all concerned. Even the common cold, for instance, should not be spread by taking a group of young men to the sick bed of a member suffering from this affliction. Often, parents are embarrassed by the unannounced appearance of a group of young men who have come to their home to hold a meeting in the room where a quorum member is still in bed for one reason or another.
We realize that the desire to make and maintain independent and group records of attendance is a worthy and commendable ambition. However, we believe the time is right for a recommendation which we trust all leaders will carefully observe.
Priesthood Meetings Held in Meetinghouses
No priesthood or quorum meeting for bearers of the Aaronic Priesthood is to be held separate from the ward priesthood meeting conducted by the bishopric in the ward meetinghouse.
The only exception to the above rule is a priesthood or quorum meeting authorized and conducted by stake or ward Aaronic Priesthood leaders for groups of Aaronic Priesthood bearers temporarily away from home precluding their attendance at the ward priesthood meeting.
Study Periods Not Priesthood Meetings
Fathers are not authorized to conduct a priesthood meeting, as such, for the members of their families who bear the priesthood. This does not preclude a father from calling his sons together any time he desires to study the gospel, but such study periods are not to be designated as priesthood meetings in ward, quorum, or individual attendance records.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 22:1, October, 1957)
“Two Policies Affecting Missionary Farewells
The following letter was sent by the First Presidency to Presidents of Stakes and Bishops of Wards, May 31, 1956.
Dear Brethren:
We bring to your attention two policies affecting missionary farewells.
The farewell testimonial is given by the Ward to honor the missionary. It is appropriate, therefore, that the bishop arrange the program rather than leave this to the missionary. While the bishop may consult with the missionary and his family to determine any wishes they may have concerning those who are to participate, the bishop, as a general rule, should extend the invitation to the participants, bearing in mind that the testimonial is part of the sacrament meeting service. Music should be in harmony with the sacred character of this meeting, and the talks should be dignified and such as to set forth the opportunities and responsibilities of missionary service.
We have noted a growing tendency to hold so-called open houses following missionary farewells. Some of these have become rather elaborate and have put parents of outgoing missionaries to heavy expense when they could ill afford it. We feel that all such open houses should be discontinued. The missionary and his family may appropriately shake the hands of those who have come to do him honor in the foyer of the building without putting the family to the expense and inconvenience of a social gathering.
With appreciation for your devoted service, we are
Sincerely your brethren,
(Signed) David O. McKay
(Signed) Stephen L[.] Richards
(Signed) J. Reuben Clark, Jr.
THE FIRST PRESIDENCY” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 22:1, October, 1957)
“Avoid Offense When Requiring White Shirts and Ties In Sacrament Service
It is very important that bishoprics and Aaronic Priesthood leaders take every precaution to avoid offense when administering the sacrament. It may require several weeks, perhaps months, to educate our young men to this new requirement. Announcements should be made in quorum meetings, occasionally in priesthood meeting, and possibly in sacrament meeting, so that young men and their parents become aware of the recommendation.
Until such time as parents and their sons are familiar with this suggestion, no young man should be discriminated against to his embarrassment.
When Aaronic Priesthood bearers observe that their companions are coming to meetings with white shirts in full sleeve lengths and with appropriate and becoming neckties, they will fall in line by themselves.
If, after sufficient time for recommendation to this recommendation has elapsed, there are those who persist in wearing loud shirts, sleeves rolled high, no ties, a personal labor should be undertaken with them by a member of the bishopric and/or the quorum adviser, and quorum officers.
“Kindness” is the key word in effecting the desired change in this matter.
For the original announcement concerning white shirts and appropriate ties, see “The Messenger,” September, 1957.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 22:2, October 1957)
“Sacrament Trays Still Need More Careful Attention
In The Messenger for June 1957, we published an article entitled “Dripping Water Trays Objectionable in Sacrament Service.” Many bishops have carefully followed the recommendations with pleasing results. We are grateful.
However, there are still many wards where no improvement is noted. Cups in water trays are filled to the brim from a splashing spicket and the tray is used in the sacrament service with little, if any, thought to the surplus water left to drip on clothing during the passing of the water.
Some wards are careful enough to have provided vessels with small spouts form which water cups are filled, one at a time. They seem to feel the same time spent on having water trays spotlessly clean from dripping water is worth all the time and effort required to fill the trays properly.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 22:2, October, 1957)
“Telephone Calls Not Substitutes for Ward Teaching Visits
It has been called to our attention, that in some instances, where families are not at home at the time of the regular visit, ward teachers call these families on the telephone and take credit for a visit. There can be no objection to telephone calls by ward teachers but such calls are not “visits” and should never be reported as such.
The following is taken form the Handbook for Leaders in Ward Teaching, page 26:
“A ward teachers’ visit is completed when ward teachers are admitted into the home and when one or more members of the family receive instructions from the teachers.
“No credit for a visit should be taken when no one is at home regardless of the number of times ward teachers call. Where there is no contact, there can be no visit.”” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 23:2, November, 1957)
“Changes Announced in Program for Aaronic Priesthood Under 21
Stake and ward leaders of Aaronic Priesthood under 21 are alerted to some changes in the program to take effect January 1, 1958.
Stake committees should list the following items for discussion during the forthcoming stake priesthood leadership meeting to be sure of a thorough understanding by all leaders in this work, including new supplies needed for the new year.
New Handbooks Essential for 1958
All leaders, in this program, on both stake and ward levels, should have the revised handbook issued January 1958. The new handbook replaces all previous editions which should be destroyed immediately.
Full instructions, including a new order of business for stake committee council meetings and for conducting the modified stake-priesthood-leadership-meeting program, have been provided. Detailed instructions on the changes listed below are also included and [m]any other helpful suggestions have been added.
The new handbooks are being sent only to those who have ordered them on the special (yellow) order blank sent to stake chairmen and bishops during November.
Ward Aaronic Priesthood Leadership Meeting Discontinued
To insure a greater measure of effectiveness in dealing with the program of our young Aaronic Priesthood bearers, the Aaronic Priesthood Leadership Meeting is discontinued and, in its place, is to be held a Council Meeting of the Ward Committee for Aaronic Priesthood Under 21 and Quorum Officers.
Those expected to attend the newly designated meeting include the bishop and his counselors as the presidency of the Aaronic Priesthood, the general secretary(s), quorum advisers, quorum presidencies and secretaries. The meeting is to be conducted at all times under the personal direction of the bishopric–this responsibility should not be delegated to another.
It is recommended the meeting be held for at least thirty minutes immediately preceding the first weekly ward priesthood meeting each month. The time may be increased or shortened depending upon the number of young men bearing the Aaronic Priesthood in the wards.
Council Meeting Presents Unusual Opportunity
The objectives of the Council Meeting of Ward Committees and Quorum Officers are as follows:
1. To provide closer supervision of the program on the part of the bishopric.
2. To check on all preparations and needs for quorum work, including teaching of quorum lessons and making of assignments, for each of the weeks in the month ahead.
3. To review all quorum rolls with a view to giving personal attention to young men needing more assistance and understanding for any reason.
4. To more effectively train quorum presidencies in their responsibilities as quorum officers. There is an alarming apathy toward the work and responsibilities of quorum officers in the Aaronic Priesthood. For the most part, quorum officers know little or nothing about what is really required of them as leaders of their quorum members. This meeting provides the bishopric with an unusual opportunity to really teach and train quorum officers in the art of presiding over those in their charge. There is another truth we should not overlook, i.e., the potent influence a quorum presidency may be trained to exercise upon their quorum members. Often, a boy will have more influence with an inactive member than will an adviser or even a member of the bishopric. The meeting is designed to strengthen quorum presidencies, one of the most glaring weaknesses in our program–and it is not the fault of quorum officers: They have not been adequately trained!
Roll Books and Reports Have Been Simplified
New quorum rolls are needed in every quorum of Aaronic Priesthood under 21. The rolls have been somewhat simplified to make it easier for quorum secretaries, particularly.
While the ward and stake report forms contain requests for some new information, the number of questions has been reduced form 26 to 19.
Ward Aaronic Priesthood Meeting
A reminder: It is optional with bishops whether the ward Aaronic Priesthood meeting, to be held during the time of the second weekly priesthood meeting, will include all Aaronic Priesthood both under and over 21.
However, if Aaronic Priesthood under 21 meet in one group and senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood meet in another group at the same time, each meeting is to be provided with bishopric leadership.
Changes Affect Program For Senior Members of Aaronic Priesthood
The discontinuation of the Ward Aaronic Priesthood Leadership affects the program for senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood as well.
A council meeting of the bishopric and ward committee in this program should be conducted for at least thirty minutes before the time of the second weekly ward priesthood meeting each month.
Those to attend, in addition to the bishopric, include the general secretary, group advisers and group instructors.
All changes in the program for senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood will be detailed in The Messenger for January 1958.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 24:2, December 1957)
“Suggestions for Disposing of Empty Cups when Passing the Sacrament
In The Messenger for June 1957, and again in October, we stressed the desirability of more care in the preparation and passing of water trays in connection with the sacrament service. It is suggested that bishoprics review these recommendations and consider them as part of these instructions on the same subject.
Dripping water trays have too long been a problem receiving too little attention in too many wards. But we have other problems as well.
Handling Empty Water Cups
The problem of the empty water cup is now brought to the attention of bishoprics and Aaronic Priesthood leaders.
When the water is passed to members of the congregation, three undesirable practices tend to impose themselves upon good procedure as follows:
First: Quite frequently, persons taking a cup of water will drink only part of the contents and return the partially filled cup to the tray. Other persons often pick up such cup only to discover its previous use with some embarrassment and confusion and the necessity of looking for a full one.
Second: Replacing a completely empty cup in its own place in the tray still necessitates “hunting” for a full cup of water.
Third: The “stacking” of empty water cups results in an unpleasant sight which again detracts from this sacred service.
How To Solve These Problems
The solution of these problems may be accomplished in one of two ways as follows:
One: Provide a water-proof receptacle into which the empty cups are placed instead of returning them to the water tray. The empty-cup receptacles may be passed by ordained teachers or deacons in addition to those assigned to pass the sacrament trays.
Two: Where wards are in need of new sacrament trays, they may prefer to purchase those already provided with a place in which to place empty cups. Wards already supplied with sacrament trays should not feel obligated to purchase new ones but should adopt the suggestion that empty cup receptacles be provided.
The trays in the photograph illustrate a style which may be purchased where new ones are needed. The trays, as shown, may be ordered from The Church Purchasing Department, 47 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. They are priced at $11.00 per set, or $6.50 for the water tray and $4.50 for the bread tray, plus postage.
Let Us Solve The Problem
There is no reason why the empty-cup and dripping-water problems cannot be solved in every ward in the Church.
We respectfully urge the immediate adoption of the solution which may best be employed in your particular ward. Let us solve these problems and have this feature of our sacrament service a true reflection of the desired dignity which should always be in evidence.
Additional suggestions will be published in The Messenger for February which came too late to be included in this issue.
Another Suggestion
Members of the Church should occasionally be urged, by the bishop, to drink all of the water in the cup. Often, a large part of the water is left and this again increases the problem of handling empty cups.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 25:1, January, 1958)
“Changes Announced in Program for Senior Members of Aaronic Priesthood
[ ] stake and ward leaders for senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood should note and immediately put into effect the program changes announced below. A careful discussion of these changes should be had in stake committee council and leadership meetings. Stake committee members should assure themselves that they are understood and being effected in all wards.
New Handbook Not Yet Available
A new handbook for leaders will be issued in the near future, which will detail these changes. Please do not wait until the new handbook is issued, however, to put them into effect. A special order blank will be provided for ordering the new handbooks when they are ready for distribution.
Council Meeting of Ward Committee for Senior Members
As announced in the December Messenger, the ward Aaronic Priesthood leadership meeting is discontinued. It is replaced by a council meeting of ward committee for senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood.
It is recommended that this meeting be held for at least thirty minutes immediately preceding the second weekly ward priesthood meeting each month or at a time appointed by the ward bishopric. The meeting is to be under the personal direction of the ward bishopric, and should be attended by all members of the bishopric, the general secretary(s), group advisers, quorum or group officers, and quorum or group instructors. This meeting may be supplemented by additional training meetings and for ward committee members.
The council meeting should be a planning and training meeting. Program procedures should be formulated and discussed. Ways and means for perfecting the work, attendance at priesthood and sacrament meetings, more effective visits and cottage meetings, schools for senior members, and effective follow-up procedures, assignments and re-assignments of group advisers, individual case studies of group members, and effective techniques for re-activating each man are problems that should be given attention in these council meetings.
Ward Aaronic Priesthood Meeting
It is left optional with bishops whether the ward Aaronic Priesthood meeting on the second of each month be held jointly for Aaronic Priesthood over and under 21, or in separate meetings. If held separately, bishopric leadership should be provided for both meetings.
Roll and Report Books
There will be some changes in roll books and report books for senior members of 1958. Space is provided to indicate the number of senior members who are active each month. The definition of “active” is given on both roll and record books.
A Transmittal Report is included with the stake report for transmitting requested information to the stake Melchizedek Priesthood committee. Ward and stake roll and report books will be sent to bishops and stake clerks respectively without order.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 25:2, January, 1958)
“Instructions To Avoid Conflicts In Priesthood Meetings And Priesthood Duties
The following letter was sent by the First Presidency to presidents of stakes and bishops of wards October 1, 1952.
Dear Brethren:
We direct your attention to the following suggestions:
First: The bishop and his counselors, as the Presidency of the Aaronic Priesthood, are expected to spend their full time with Aaronic Priesthood quorums and groups during the ward Priesthood meeting time. They should not be required to attend the meetings of the Melchizedek Priesthood quorums or groups for any reason during the time the ward Priesthood meeting is in session.
Second: The monthly meeting of the High Priests quorum in the stake should not be held in conflict with any ward Priesthood meeting within the stake.
Third: Priests are not to be called to any position that would exempt them from doing their duty as ward teachers in company with companions from the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Faithfully yours,
(Signed) David O. McKay
(Signed) Stephen L Richards
(Signed) J. Reuben Clark, Jr.
The First Presidency” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 26:1, February, 1958)
“Refusal To Admit Ward Teachers Not Grounds For Excommunication
It is suggested that bishoprics exercise wisdom when visiting
families where ward teachers have been refused permission to call. It is reported that in some homes where opportunity has been sought to improve relationships and pressure has been exerted, the head of the family has become quite upset. In defending the Church, members of bishoprics have in some instances suggested to the member who was agitated, that perhaps it would be best if his name were removed form the rolls of the Church. Being angry and emotionally disturbed, he replied, “Go ahead and take it off.” Without giving thought, action was hastily taken and it was learned too late that other members of the family not in sympathy with the father were then made to suffer with restrictions imposed on them, forbidding their going to church gatherings or taking part in any of its activities.
There are some offenses against the Church for which members should be excommunicated, but refusing to admit ward teachers into the home is not one of them. When confronted with this problem, bishoprics should go to these people in the spirit of kindness and exert every effort to maintain their friendship and good will. We should not doubt the wisdom of Solomon when he said, “A soft answer turneth away wrath.” (Prov. 15:1.)” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 26:1, February, 1958)
“Information On Water Trays To Be Published In March
The additional information on water trays equipped to handle empty cups will be published in March instead of this month as announced.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 26:1, February, 1958)
“Bishops Not To Conduct “Interviews” In Groups
It is reported that, in some wards, the bishop, when all his priests or all bearers of the Aaronic Priesthood are together, proceeds to “interview” each young man by asking personal questions of each one before the group.
This has never been recommended and should never be done.
It is commendable in a bishop that he interviews each Aaronic Priesthood bearer (1) before being ordained to, or advanced in, the Aaronic Priesthood, (2) before being approved to receive the individual awards according to the requirements, (3) at any other time when it may be advisable, but this should be done in private and in the strictest confidence.
What good can come from asking personal questions of a young man before his fellow quorum members?> One thing will come, and it will not be good, i.e., the unnecessary embarrassment and understandable resentment of the young men subjected to such more or less public examination.
A friendly chat between the bishop and a young man may be the very thing to inspire confidence, create good will, and encourage loyalty and devotion to the Church. But a public interrogation concerning personal habits and behavior patterns is lethal to our objectives in winning our young men.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 26:2, February, 1958)
“Those Performing Ordinations Should Face The Audience
Bearers of the priesthood who are called upon to bless babies and to perform confirmations in fast meetings should always face the audience and be instructed by the bishop to speak loud enough to be heard by all present. Other participants may take positions in the circle as convenient.
Some wards provide the convenience of a loud speaker to insure that all members in the congregation will hear what is being said by those who speak.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 27:1, March, 1958)
“Information Concerning Sacrament Water Trays Further Delayed
Promised suggestions for handling empty water cups in connection with the sacrament must again be postponed. We are working on some ideas which require more time than anticipated. But we will have some very helpful information soon.
Please do not interpret our previous instructions to mean that new sacrament sets should be purchased. Such suggestions were neither made nor implied.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 27:2, March, 1958)
“More Care Urged In Preparation Of The Sacrament
We are increasingly apprehensive over reports of irreverence and lack of cleanliness in some wards in the preparation of the sacrament trays before they are placed on the sacrament table.
Not a few reports, including some personal inspections and observations, disclose the need for the training and education of our young men in the sacredness of this duty. Too often, there are evidences of boisterousness and indifference which suggest a lack of understanding and reverence in the preparation of trays and their contents for the sacrament service.
We are still not taking care of the dripping-water problem as we should in a majority of cases observed. When water trays are placed on the sacrament table there is no reason why even one drop of water, outside of the cups, should be in evidence. Again we respectfully ask bishoprics, general secretaries, and quorum advisers to correct this condition wherever it exists.
Often, neither the general secretary nor quorum adviser is present to see what is going on. At least one of these officers, and preferably both, should be present to supervise those preparing the trays and the sacrament table.
Quorum presidencies have a responsibility to set the proper example and to assist their quorum members in the becoming discharge of this responsibility.
Bishoprics are urged to take a greater personal interest in this matter wherever these allegations reflect the truth.
It is not the duty of custodians or women to prepare either the sacrament trays or the sacrament table. This is a responsibility to be accepted and performed, under supervision, by the Aaronic Priesthood.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 28:1, April, 1958)
“Clarification
Persons Performing Priesthood Ordinances In Other Wards
Only the person who participates “as mouth” in the performance of priesthood ordinances, outside his ward of residence, will need a letter of recommendation from his bishop as evidence of the priesthood he bears and his worthiness to perform such ordinances.
Those who are invited only to stand in the circle do not need such letters from their bishops.
For details of this recommendation, and for exceptions, please see “Persons Performing Priesthood Ordinances in Other Wards,” published in The Messenger for February 1956.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 28:1, April, 1958)
“Baptismal Prayer To Be Repeated If Candidate Is Not Completely Immersed
Those officiating in the ordinance of baptism should be instructed that the ordinance prayer must be spoken again whenever a repeated attempt is made to accomplish complete immersion of the candidate.
Bishops are urged to make these instructions a part of their training of priests in performing baptisms.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 29:1, May, 1958)
“Recommends Specified For Performance Of Priesthood Ordinances
Last month, under the title, “Persons Performing Priesthood Ordinances in Other Wards,” we overlooked informing bishops of the form “Recommend to Perform an Ordinance” which should be used instead of letters as was originally necessary. The new forms are available without charge.
Also, the revised form “Recommend for Baptism and Confirmation” is available which, in addition to recommending the candidate for baptism, recommends the person to perform the ordinance.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 29:2, May, 1958)
“Bishops Counselors Not Presidents of Quorums
It has been drawn to our attention that some wards are reporting bishop’s counselors as presidents or group leaders of deacons and teachers quorums or groups, both over and under 21. This is not in accordance with the revelations of the Lord nor the instructions from the Presiding Bishopric of the Church
Bishoprics preside over the Aaronic Priesthood members as a unit, but individual quorums or groups are presided over by their own quorum officers. The bishop, by his appointment becomes the president of priests quorums or groups, including senior priests. A deacons or teachers quorum is presided over by officers (a president, two counselors, and a secretary) chosen form its own membership. Bishop’s counselors act in an advisory or supervisory capacity and not a quorum or group officers.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 29:2, May, 1958)
“Avoid Breaking Sacrament Bread Too Small
Those officiating at the sacrament table should be instructed to break the bread into fair sized pieces. Too often, bread is broken almost into crumbs.
Bread should be broken lightly to avoid a crushed or “pinched” appearance.
Some of the difficulty may arise from trying to make a limited amount of bread serve a larger crowd than anticipated. This possibility should always be guarded against by providing sufficient bread at all times to take care of unexpected crowds. It is better to have unused bread on hand at the end of the service than to either run out of bread or try to make a limited supply go too far.
There is nearly as much room for improvement in the preparation and breaking of the bread as there is in avoiding the dripping water trays when administering the sacrament.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 29:1, May, 1958)
“Finger Bowls Should Be Used By Priests
In our efforts to improve the sacrament service, we direct attention to the recommended use of finger bowls by those who officiate at the sacrament table. It is somewhat disappointing that so little attention is given this matter in so many areas.
Finger bowls and a clean white hand towel should be placed on the sacrament table and used by the Priests immediately before breaking the bread.
If preferred, a hand towel may be soaked in water and placed on the sacrament table for use of the Priests in wiping their hands before breaking the sacrament bread.
In some wards, Priests are required by the bishopric to wash their hands before coming to the sacrament table at the beginning of the meeting. In this instance, the sacrament-preparation room is generally adjacent to the area where the sacrament table is located.
In any event, assembled saints should know that this desirable act of sanitation has been performed by the Priests before breaking the bread at the sacrament table.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 30, June-July, 1958)
“More Information Requested On Excommunications
Stake presidents and bishops will render a great service to the Church by being more specific in listing reasons for excommunications, especially those classified under “apostasy”. The lone word “apostasy” has many connotations which are not in evidence when the word is used by itself without further explanation.
For instance–each person excommunicated “at his own request”–the records should show whether “his own request” was in writing and signed. No person should be excommunicated on his verbal request only. A person is not excommunicated on the grounds of “apostasy” simply because he has joined another Church unless he requests, in writing, that his name be removed from Church records. Quite often, many such persons come back to the Church after tempers have cooled and attitudes have been seasoned, perspectives enlarged, with the passing of time.
Finally, we should be patient and long suffering with the wayward. Excommunication should only be done after untiring and prayerful efforts have been expended to bring about the desired reformation.
“Inactivity” alone is never a premise for excommunication. Inactive persons should not be considered as apostates deserving of Church action against their memberships. There must be something of a more serious nature than “inactivity” to justify excommunication.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 31:1, August, 1958)
“Information Concerning Sacrament Water Trays Coming Soon
Promised suggestions for handling empty water cups in connection with the sacrament will be forthcoming soon according to present plans.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 32:1, September, 1958)
“Programs of Local Origin To Be Approved Before Adoption
Occasionally, word comes back to Church headquarters that a ward or branch is launching into a new Aaronic Priesthood program or calling in some outside organization to assist in the ward Auxiliary work.
Usually, it is found that the Church already has a better program than the proposed new one. Before attempting any new program, please check with the Presiding Bishopric or the general board of the auxiliary involved.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 33:1, October, 1958)
“Worthiness Required [of] Ward Teachers
It is reported that some bishops, in an effort to give some senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood something to do, are assigning them to ward teaching before they are really prepared for this responsibility. This situation is made the more serious when there are some capable and worthy members of the Melchizedek Priesthood not yet assigned as ward teachers.
Worthiness to do ward teaching is infinitely more than keeping the word of wisdom. Too often, it is feared, that “worthiness” or “unworthiness” is determined by whether or not one refrains from the use of tobacco, alcoholic beverages, tea, and coffee. While violation of the word of wisdom is serious, morality, for instance, is more serious. Dishonesty and habitual lying disqualify one for ward teaching as much as smoking, for example.
Therefore, in appointing ward teachers either from among senior [teach]ers of the Aaronic Priesthood or from the Melchizedek Priesthood, “worthiness” should be determined on a much broader scale.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 33:2, October, 1958)
“New Sacrament Water Tray Filler Overcomes Dripping Water Problem
We introduce a new device for filling water trays which entirely overcomes the “dripping water” problem when trays are placed on the sacrament table.
Approved by action of the First Presidency and the Presiding Bishopric, the apparatus is of stainless steel construction with chromed copper tubing, instant shut-off valve, six feet of hose with an adapter connection to the water supply which will fit most threaded water outlets in use in our meetinghouses. When necessary, water outlets may be modified very easily and inexpensively by a plumber to accommodate the adapter fixture furnished with each filler.
The device will accommodate only the standard metal oblong water trays with an overall skirt measurement of 14 3/4″ x 8 1/2″ as shown in the photographs.
To use the filler, place empty cups in the tray and slide into place as shown in the upper photograph. When tray is in place, as in the lower photo, and with the hose connected to the water supply, operate the valve and fill all thirty-six cups in seconds with not one drop of surplus water anywhere on the tray.
It is anticipated that every bishop with this type of water tray will welcome this announcement. We respectfully urge the purchase of this filler without delay. (1) to save considerable time in the preparation of the trays for the sacrament table, (2) to get rid of the “dripping water” problem which is so objectionable in our sacrament service.
The approved filler is sold only through the Deseret Book Company, 44 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, and is priced at $35 each, postpaid. When ordering, be sure to specify water tray filler Number 0-10.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 34:1, November-December, 1958)
“Deacons Not To Leave Seats After Sacrament
Bears of the Aaronic Priesthood who administer or pass the sacrament should not leave their assigned seats when they have finished the sacrament service. There is an unnecessary disturbance, when, following the administration of the sacrament, young men immediately go to other areas of the meeting house to find seats.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 34:1, November-December, 1958)
“No Credit Given For “Assignments Filled” When Deacons Leave Before Meeting Is Ended
Bears of the Aaronic Priesthood who administer and pass the sacrament are required to remain during the entire meeting for the completion of their priesthood assignment.
No credit for an “Assignment Filled” shall be given any bearer of the Aaronic Priesthood who administers or passes the sacrament if he leaves the meeting before it is ended.
Aaronic Priesthood bearers should be immediately informed of this ruling: Leaders should be sure it is observed without exception.
It is recommended that only those young men who are willing to remain for the entire meeting be given this assignment.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 34:1, November-December, 1958)
“First Presidency Approve New Fixture For Empty Water Cups
With the approval of the First Presidency, the Presiding Bishopric recommend the immediate adoption of the new one-piece chromed-bronze fixture, shown in the upper photograph, for disposing of empty water cups during the sacrament service where standard rectangular metal water trays are in use. “Standard” trays are those with an overall measurement of 14 1/2 x 8 1/2″ x 1″, exclusive of handles, with exactly 5″, center to center, between openings in the trays where the handles are attached.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 35:1, January-February, 1959)
“Fathers May Hold Their Babies While Being Blessed By the Melchizedek Priesthood
The following instructions concerning the blessing and naming of children supersede all other instructions heretofore published for the performance of this ordinance:
Only those holding the Melchizedek Priesthood should be invited to participate in the ordinance of blessing and naming of children; but where a father, whether a member of the Church or not, requests the privilege to hold his child during the blessing, he may be permitted to do so.
The First Presidency and Council of the Twelve have suggested we emphasize that a father who does not hold the Melchizedek Priesthood should not be invited to hold his baby, but that in the event he requests the privilege of holding the child, his request may be granted.
These instructions follow the pattern given by revelation to the Prophet Joseph Smith: “Every member of the Church of Christ having children is to bring them unto the elders before the Church, who are to lay their hands upon them in the name of Jesus Christ, and bless them in his name.” (Doctrine and Covenants 20:70.)” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 35:1, January-February, 1958)
“Bishops Should Personally Interview Individual Award Candidates Beginning 1959
A new requirement has been added to the Individual Aaronic Priesthood Award program. The following is an excerpt from the new edition of the Handbook for Leaders of Aaronic Priesthood Under 21:
“It is recommended that the bishop personally interview each aaronic Priesthood bearer 12 to 21 who has met the minimum requirements of the Individual Aaronic Priesthood Award during the year to determine whether he is otherwise worthy to receive this recognition.
To be “otherwise worthy” requires a young man to be morally clean, honest, and of good report.
Those who may have been indiscreet during the year but who have seriously repented will be considered as “otherwise worthy.” The bishop will be the sole judge as to whether alleged or promised repentance is sufficiently honest and sincere to justify the young man’s being considered “otherwise worthy” to receive the award, he will not include his name on the application notwithstanding he may have met all the printed requirements.”
Bishops should inform Aaronic Priesthood bearers of this requirement periodically during the year in order that they may anticipate this interview. It should not come as a surprise. The interviews themselves should be conducted in utmost confidence and understanding.
This requirement applies to award earned during 1959 and not to awards earned during 1958. Bishops are referred to pages 56-57 of the 1959 Handbook for further details.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 36:1, March, 1959)
“Senior Members Should Be Proud Of Priesthood
Senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood should be taught to honor and respect the Priesthood they hold. This Priesthood should never be depreciated by workers; Senior members should never get the idea that they are not worthy or accepted of God because they do not hold the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Reception of the higher Priesthood and all that goes with it is a worthy goal; Senior members, however, should not be made to feel inferior because they do not hold it.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 36:1, March, 1959)
“Church Policy On Setting Apart Workers Explained
Many questions have arisen of late concerning the setting apart of officers and teachers in the Church auxiliaries. We hope the following information may be of service.
It is the policy of the Church that all auxiliary officers (Presidents, superintendents, counselors, secretaries: be set apart. The setting apart of teachers and other workers is not mandatory. If a person accepting such a call desires a special blessing to aid him in fulfilling his assignment, the bishop should feel free to give or cause to have given such a blessing. It is not necessary, however, that these brethren and sisters be formally set apart.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 36:1, March, 1959)
“New Designs In Sacrament Trays To Be Announced
In The Messenger for April 1959, with the approval of The First Presidency, we will introduce new sacrament trays for both the bread and the water and quite unlike any sets used heretofore. The water tray will be drip-proof and will include a provision for disposing of empty water cups.
It is emphasized that bishops will be under no obligation whatever to purchase these new trays to replace those already in use. Only those bishops who may be planning to replace old trays, or to purchase new ones for the first time, will have any interest in this notice.
Please do not order these new trays until our announcement next month informing you as to time and place of purchase, and prices.
This announcement does not affect, in any way, the introduction of empty-cup holders detailed in The Messenger for Jan.-Feb. 1959.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 36:1, March, 1959)
“Baptism Instructions For Children Modified
The instructions found on page 25 of the booklet “Helps and Suggestions for Ward Bishoprics” concerning the baptism of minor children of men and women who have been excommunicated from the Church are to be modified as follows:
These instructions, which state that such children are not to be baptized until they have sufficient understanding to apply intelligently for baptism, refer only to children of parents belonging to cults and splinter groups which have broken off from the Church and not to the children of parents who have been excommunicated for other reasons. The former case demands a great deal more caution than the latter.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 36:2, March, 1959)
“Procedure Outlined For Administration Of Sacrament To Absent Members
Many inquiries have come into our office concerning the possibility of passing the Sacrament to members of the ward who request it, but who through blindness, lameness or other infirmity are unable to attend meetings. These brethren and sisters should be allowed to have the Sacrament periodically if they so desire. This should not take place every week, but upon occasion it is to be permitted and even encouraged. The following instructions should be followed in this administration:
The Sacrament should be administered in the chapel, with the Sacrament that will be given to those in attendance. Two High Priests may then leave the building and take the Sacrament to those who have requested it. It should be carried covered and in as inconspicuous manner as possible. The Sacrament should not be blessed in each individual’s home.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 37:2, April, 1959)
“Sacrament Tray Announcement Delayed
Due to unforeseen manufacturing difficulties, the new Sacrament trays will not be ready until next month and the announcement concerning them, scheduled for this issue, will appear in a future Messenger. See the Messenger for March for further information.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 37:2, April, 1959)
“Baptism Approvals Should Be Written
A wife of a non-member of the Church seeking baptism should not be baptized into the Church without the written approval of hers husband. The same is true of minor children and unmarried women living at home, even though they might be of legal age. Exceptions to this rule should be allowed only under very special circumstances.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 37:2, April, 1959)
“Bishops to Contact Parents of All Boys Ordained to Priesthood
Bishoprics should take it upon themselves to contact the parents of every boy who receives the Aaronic Priesthood and discuss with them the program the young man has become a part of, and the experiences and growth he will experience therein.
This will serve several purposes: it will allow the bishop to get better acquainted with the parents, and vice versa; it will make for a better atmosphere between bishop and parents in connection with the young man’s activities; it is a gesture of respect to parental authority; it helps assure a high degree of activity on the part of the newly ordained Priesthood bearer himself; it stimulates interest in the young man’s work on the part of the parents, and sometimes leads them to greater activity in the Church.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 37:2, April, 1959)
“Bishops Should Teach Ward Members Importance of Morality
A bishop, said Paul, as the “steward of God,” should be “vigilant, sober…apt to teach.” A bishop is responsible for the temporal and spiritual welfare of all members of his ward. This is a tremendous responsibility and brings with it many obligations. A bishop, to fulfill his calling properly, must be many things: administrator, diplomat, judge, speaker and teacher. This bishop must be a teacher to young and old alike, but it is relation to the young especially that this obligation really comes into force.
Young people are very impressionable; they learn rapidly. It is therefore important that what they learn be to their ultimate good. The bishop can be a partner with the parent and the teacher in educating the youth of the Church, particularly as concerns the gospel. And among all the principles of the gospel that young people need to be taught, personal cleanliness and morality is certainly one of the most important.
Despite all that the prophets have said about unchastity and its temporal and spiritual results through all the ages of man, immorality is rampant in the world today. Impartial observers sadly note that the situation does not seem to be improving. Sex is in movies, books, magazines and advertising today to a degree probably unparalleled in the history of our nation. Our young people should be taught the importance and sacredness of this creative power so that these deceptive, destructive forces that are being loosed on all sides will not sway them with unfortunate results. They should be aware of the effects–here and hereafter–of unchastity and its kindred evils; they should know of the importance of premarital continence in the establishment of a happy marriage and home. “How glorious and near to the angels is youth that is clean” said the prophet. It is our responsibility to see that our young people remain that way.
Bishops should use all the facilities at their command to impress this upon their young people. The Priesthood quorums are an excellent vehicle, of course, but they reach only the young men. the auxiliaries should assist also–this message is of equally great importance to young ladies. Understanding individual counsel as well as group instruction can be of value. Only through awareness of these temptations and the results of transgression can our young people avoid making the same mistakes many others have made and lived to regret. This instruction is especially important to young people in their early teens, when they are first experiencing the emotions and drives of an adult.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 37:2, April, 1959)
“Sacrament Policy For Homebound Members Clarified
In the April Messenger we published a statement concerning the administration of the Sacrament to members of the Church who are unable to attend Sacramental services because of health reasons. Several questions have been raised concerning this procedure and, in the interest of clarity, the following questions are answered.
Q. 1) The article mentions that High Priests are to take the Sacrament to these home-bound members. Does this meany that only High Priests have this Authority? A–No. It may be carried by any two representatives of the bishopric. They should, however, hold the Melchizedek Priesthood. There should always be two.
Q. 2) How often should this administration be made? A–Determination of circumstance and frequency of this administration is left to the discretion of each bishop, but it should not occur too frequently.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 38:1, May, 1959)
“Bishops Not to Judge Worthiness of Missionary Candidates for Baptism
The following letter of instruction from the First Presidency, recently received by the Presiding Bishopric, is here reprinted for the benefit of the Church as a whole:
Dear Brethren:
In recent months we have had brought to our attention a number of times the fact that some bishops, particularly in wards found in areas where full-time missionaries operate, feel that it is their prerogative to interview prospective members of the Church to determine whether they are worthy to be baptized. As you will appreciate, this responsibility rests with the proper officers of the mission. In the full-time missions, it is the responsibility of the supervising elder; in the stake missions, it is the responsibility of the stake mission president. It is not the bishop’s prerogative to determine the worthiness of a candidate for baptism.
Our missionaries are encouraged to bring their investigators to meetings of the Church and introduce them to the bishop and other ward officers in advance of baptism. The bishop in each case should welcome the investigator and make him feel that if he joins the Church, he will be given opportunity for fellowship and development under the program of the Church. Such encouragement from the bishop may do much to incline the investigator toward the Church. However, the bishop shall not be the judge as to the candidate’s worthiness to join the Church.
When the candidate is baptized and confirmed, he becomes a member of the Church, and the bishop has a responsibility and an obligation to see that the new member is assimilated into the activities of the ward. He should put into effect in behalf of the new member of the prescribed program for fellowshipping new converts.
In view of the questions that have come to us from various parts of the Church, it may be well for you in one of your bulletins to bishops to bring this situation to their attention.
(Signed) David O. McKay
Stephen L Richards
J. Reuben Clark, Jr.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 38:1, May, 1959)
“More Details Needed On Excommunications
Reports of excommunication from various parts of the Church are still coming into our office with insufficient detail. Many do not even state the reason for excommunication. Many others have only a word or two such as “apostasy,” “wrongdoing” or “at his request.” These are inadequate. The reason for the excommunication should be given in sufficient detail so as to avoid any misunderstanding as to exactly what the circumstances were.
Parties concerned are referred to The Messenger, Number 31, August 1958.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 39:1, June, 1959)
“Teachers Responsible For All With Recommends in Ward
A question has arisen concerning families who live in one ward but who have their recommends in another. That is, who is responsible for visiting these families: the ward teachers from the ward in which they reside or the ward teachers from the ward where the recommend is?
The ward teachers of the ward holding the recommend have this responsibility. such families should be visited and should be counted when figuring the monthly totals and percentages. Deduction of such people form the total, merely because they reside outside the ward boundaries, is not authorized.
It is of course Church policy that all members should have their recommends in and attend the ward in whose geographical boundaries they reside. Those who are not complying with this instruction should be encouraged to do so.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 40:1, July, 1959)
“Ward Teachers To Be Instructed On Distress Situations
It is important that all ward teachers be instructed upon what is and what is not proper procedure when they come upon a family in deep financial straits, a family with serious medical problems, or any other type of distress situation.
In such situation, teachers should offer their sympathy and any immediate assistance possible. The situation should be reported in detail to the bishopric without delay.
Ward Teachers should not, however, commit the bishop or the Church to assistance of any nature, financial or otherwise. It is the bishop’s prerogative to decide which situations merit help and to what degree. It is absolutely imperative that all ward teachers realize this; a well-meant but ill-guided promise or act on the part of such teacher can lead to considerable embarrassment and difficulty.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 40:1, July, 1959)
“Recommendations Offered For Maximum Effectiveness In Ward Teaching
The ward teacher looms large in the organization of the Church. He represents the bishopric to his families and in many times the only link between bishop and family. Indeed, to some inactive or homebound member, he may be “the Church.”
The ward teachers of the Church have been doing a very commendable job. Here are a few hints which might perhaps increase this effectiveness.
It is more important that these teachers catch the vision of their work. It is more than giving lessons, more than attending report meetings, more than making monthly social calls. A ward teacher should feel a very personal interest in and responsibility for each member of every family to which he is assigned. He is assigned to visit each family once a month, but this figure represents a minimum rather than a maximum. Circumstances may exist which necessitate, for a limited period of time, visits weekly or even daily.
Bishops, division supervisors and teachers should approach this problem with wisdom, insight and discretion. We have often been asked, for example, the following question: What constitutes a visit for which a teacher should take credit? It would be unwise on our part, as well as extremely difficult, to attempt to exactly define such a visit. If a teacher has contacted his family, offered the necessary help, delivered the message and in every sense filled his obligation towards them, a visit has been made. Surely it cannot make a difference whether this be done in a house, on a lawn or on a porch or patio. Sometimes, it may be impossible for the teacher to even go to the home. Suppose, for example, that a member is boarding with a non-member family and this family is not kindly disposed towards the Church. The teachers can then meet this member by appointment, after Sunday School or Sacrament meeting, in a private room in the ward building and there deliver the message and complete the visit.
The question becomes, then, one of wisdom and a sense of responsibility. A telephone call is not a visit, nor is a casual greeting or exchange on the steps of the chapel. Teachers should visit members in their homes whenever feasible. They should there deliver the message to at least one responsible member of the family (parent or mature child); they should of course try to meet as many members of the family as possible. Sometimes families are often away from home and difficult to contact. In such cases the making of appointments in advance has been found effective and is recommended. Teachers should always visit in pairs and should report their work to their supervisors as soon as completed.
There can be no hard or fast rules here–the wisdom, common sense and collective consciences of teachers, supervisors and bishoprics must control. What is important is that each and every teacher get the proper spirit of his calling. the emphasis should not be on getting credit, but on doing the work in a manner that is acceptable to the Lord.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 40:2, July, 1959)
“New Sacrament Trays Approved By The First Presidency
We are happy to announce the addition of a new style of sacrament set which has been approved by The First Presidency and which is now available to bishops.
The new trays are distinctive, not only in shape, but the water tray has the added attraction of being completely drip-proof and, in addition, contains a provision for conveniently disposing of empty water cups, thus getting away form the necessity to “stack” cups in the tray or to hold them until they are gathered in baskets.
The new sets are an interesting innovation and present a very pleasing appearance. They have no handles but are easily passed from one to another as may be seen in the photographs. The tray is held securely and comfortably with the thumb gripping the deeply recessed outer rim while the fingers support the tray from underneath.
We present four pictures of the new water and bread trays and explain each photograph moving from the top down.
The upper picture shows the water tray. Where space is a problem, these trays may be stacked, as shown, after a sanitary doily has been placed over the filled cups. The water tray measures 12″ overall, is 2 1/8″ high, and holds 36 cups.
The second photograph from the top shows how the tray is easily passed from one person to another, and how the empty cup is immediately deposited in a large opening in the center of the tray.
The third photograph from the top shows how easily the tray is separated, the top from the bottom, to dispose of used cups and to keep the tray clean and sanitary on the inside.
The tray in the bottom photograph is the one-piece matching bread tray and is 9 1/2″ overall by 1 1/2″ high.
The new trays are beautifully finished in chromed light-weight steel and are available only at the Deseret Book Company, 44 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A. The water tray is priced at $10.00 and the bread tray at $7.00 or $17.00 per set. Prices include postage.
Bishops are reminded that the Church does not participate with them in the purchase of sacrament sets.
Only those bishops in need of new sacrament trays have any interest in this announcement. Bishop[s who have sacrament sets are under no obligation whatever to replace them with new ones unless they so desire.
According to present plans, we will announce a greatly improved rectangular sacrament set in the next issue of The Messenger. The water tray in this improved set will also be drip-proof and will provide for disposing of empty cups.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 41:1, August-September, 1959)
“Prescribed Ages For Ordinations Are To Be Carefully Observed
It has come to our attention that upon occasion our young men are being ordained to the Aaronic Priesthood or advanced in that Priesthood a few weeks or months before they reach the prescribed ages for such ordination. This practice is contrary to the order of the Church and should be avoided.
The ages for ordination as set up by the Church are as follows: deacon, 12 years; teacher, 14 years; priest, 16 years. Nineteen is the age when worthy young men become eligible for the Melchizedek Priesthood.
Boys ordained deacons before reaching twelve are placed in an awkward position as far as their primary and MIA work are concerned–they often lose interest in the former, sometimes failing to graduate, and are too young to attend the latter.
Occasionally a situation may arise in which a bishop may think an exception justified. Usually a careful look will show that the reasons against, far outweigh the reason for such an advance ordination. When such ordinations are performed, a very dangerous precedent is set. One exception to the rules leads to a demand for more. The ages have been set as they are for many and definite reasons, and should be adhered to. Any exceptions must be approved by the Presiding Bishopric.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 41:2, August-September, 1959)
“Second Set Of Sacrament Trays Approved By The First Presidency
In The Messenger for August-September 1959, we introduced a new style of sacrament tray and gave notice that an improved rectangular tray would be announced this month.
Photographs on the right show the details of the new rectangular water tray which has been approved by the First Presidency.
This modified tray is drip-proof, thus overcoming the objectionable “dripping-water” problem in connection with the sacrament service. The tray also contains ample space for the immediate deposit of empty water cups.
The top photo shows the tray as it appears when placed on the sacrament table.
The center photograph shows how the empty water cup is immediately deposited in the bottom of the tray through openings at either end and in the center.
In the photograph at the bottom we see the simple two-piece construction of the water tray. The top is lifted up over the handle when all cups may quickly be disposed of and the tray immediately dried to keep both sections clean and sanitary.
The top of the tray and the handle are of beautiful chromed bronze. The bottom of the tray is attractively designed and finished in anodized aluminum.
Rectangular in shape the new matching bread tray is of chromed bronze and similar to the bottom part of the water tray in design.
The new round sacrament set introduced in the last Messenger, and the new rectangular set introduced herein, makes available to bishops a choice of the style they prefer. Both are approved by The First Presidency.
Again, no bishop is under obligation to dispose of sacrament sets now in use. The new approved sets are available where replacements are desired and where new sets are needed. It is suggested that, where replacements are desired or new sets needed, one of these two styles be purchased since they are both approved by The First Presidency.
With the announcement of these two sacrament sets the round trays without handles and the rectangular trays with handles, our project on new sacrament trays is completed.
Both approved styles are available only at the Deseret Book Company, 44 East South Temple Street, Salt Lake City, Utah. The price of the round trays was announced in last month’s Messenger. The rectangular trays introduced herein are priced at $12.50 for the water tray set and $8.50 for the bread tray, or $21.00 per set, postage paid.
INSET: In The Messenger for January-February, 1959, a detailed photograph of an approved empty cup holder was shown with the recommendation that it be purchased and placed on each old style rectangular water tray. Many bishops have responded with delightful results in bettering the sacrament service. However we still find many bishops who have not yet installed the cup holder. The First Presidency have asked that, where the old style rectangular water trays are being used, steps be taken (1) to avoid the return of empty water cups to the tray, (2) to avoid the passing of baskets or other containers to gather empty cups held until all have partaken of the water.
The empty cup holder of chromed bronze referred to above is approved by The First Presidency and is the best solution to the problem. Bishops who can use the cup holder but have not yet complied with the recommendation, and who do not contemplate the purchase of the new dripless and self-contained sets, are again urged to purchase and place them on their present water trays as recommended.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 42:1, October, 1959)
“Seniors Should Have Own Class In Priesthood Meeting
Senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood should have their own class at Priesthood meeting. They should not be asked to meet with the elders or any group of Aaronic Priesthood bearers under 21.
These brethren have needs and interest quite different from any other group. They have a separate course of study, and should have a separate instructor and class. This is true no matter how few of them may attend.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 43:1, November, 1959)
“Stake Committees and Bishops More Reverence Urged In Administration And Passing Of Sacrament
…It has been reported that in some instances the priests who administer the sacrament come to fill this assignment not appropriately dressed. Surely when a young man is old enough to be a priest, he should appear at the sacrament table dressed in his best, with a white shirt and appropriate tie.
Deacons too often make little or no distinction in the selection of clothes to be worn when passing the sacrament and those to be worn in socials or school dress. It is not good when deacons pass the sacrament in clothes which distract form the attention of the congregation from the renewing of their covenants in partaking of the sacrament. Again, white shirts with appropriate ties are the recommended dress for those who pass the sacrament. Where coats are worn, they should also be appropriate for the sacrament service.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 44:1, December, 1959)
“Schools For Senior Members Of The Aaronic Priesthood Should Be Established On A Ward Level
Ever since they were first introduced into the program for Senior Members of the Aaronic Priesthood several years ago, schools have proven to be an extremely valuable tool for the reactivation and integration of Senior Members and their families who have for one reason or another become inactive.
A comparison of the results reached by different types of schools shows that the results obtained in schools held on a ward or two-ward basis have been especially gratifying. The different degrees of success obtained by the school seems to be determined by a number of variables, but ward schools possess definite advantages over schools held on other levels.
The Presiding Bishopric therefore recommends that, wherever the circumstances are practical and appropriate, and where numbers are sufficient, these schools be established on a ward basis. If a ward has two few senior members, two or more wards may combine. This will allow for more personal attention to each participant and admit more effective supervision by the bishopric.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 44:2, December, 1959)
“Young Men Not Holding Proper Priesthood Office Cause Concern
A problem of increasing magnitude in the Church today is the large number of young men 12 to 21 years of age who (1) have never received the Aaronic Priesthood or (2) do not hold that office in the Priesthood which is commensurate with their age (overage).
Bishop Thorpe B. Isaacson, of the Presiding Bishopric, analyzed this problem in detail during the Bishop’s meeting at the recent general conference. The Presiding Bishopric is deeply concerned, for as Bishop Isaacson pointed out: “If something is not done for these boys, it will not be very long until they will belong to the ranks of the Senior Members of the Aaronic Priesthood.”
The number of such youths is constantly increasing, and unless action is taken in their behalf, such a result as Bishop Isaacson describes is inevitable.
Bishops should make sure that young men under their jurisdiction are ordained to the Priesthood promptly upon reaching the age of twelve. The Bishopric should visit these young men and their parents and explain to them carefully the meaning of the Priesthood and the rights and duties connected therewith.
If worthy, young men should be promptly advanced in the Priesthood when they reach the prescribed age (for teachers 14, for priests 16). Delays for “convenience” often cause these young Priesthood bearers to lose interest and drift into inactivity. Bishoprics must recognize that these young men look forward, and rightly so, to being advanced in the Priesthood and postponements of such advancement should be avoided at all costs.
Bishops should devote continuous energy to this problem and keep close to every boy in their wards. It is infinitely easier to keep a boy active than to reactivate a man.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 44:2, December, 1959)
“Bishops Should Respect Members’ Right of Privacy
Privacy has been called “the right most valued by civilized man.” It has a place in the Church. While clearly nothing we do concerns ourselves alone, many things we do are not everybody’s business, and concerns only ourselves, the Lord and our bishop.
Bishops should take special care to assure that matters that are meant to be confidential are in reality confidential. For example, an interview for a temple recommend is a “private” interview. That means two people should be present, the bishop and the person he is interviewing. All others–counselors, clerks, people waiting for the bishop, friends and family members of the person being interviewed–should wait elsewhere until the interview has run its course. the same can be said for missionary interviews, tithing settlement interviews, or any interviews where matters of a private nature are discussed.
This caution of privacy relates not only to dealings with people, but also to the storage and use of papers reflecting these dealings. Forms which record the results of such interviews as those mentioned above are as personal as the interviews themselves and should not be left in a conspicuous place for all to see. How much tithing a man pays is his own business, his bishop’s and the Lord’s; the records of such payments should not be kept in a place where any and all have access to them. Even while being used, these should be so placed on the table that passers-by cannot merely by glancing over someone’s shoulder digest all that there is in them.
Any reprimand or other measure of discipline that a bishop might find himself forced to dispense should be given in private.
Privacy is precious, and the inalienable right of every member of this Church. If bishops respect this right, and encourage their co-workers to do likewise, much difficulty and embarrassment can be avoided.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 45:1, January, 1960)
“Membership Tags To Be Marked
Small red tags have been provided for bishops to place on the membership cards of individuals who, for various reasons, are not in good standing in the Church. When placed, these tags should be dated and/or signed by the bishop. this will enable future bishops under whose jurisdiction the party might come to check and learn the reason for the tag. Often bishops receive tagged membership records of individuals who have lived in several wards and are unable to learn where the marker originated. In such cases, they are of no value whatsoever.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 47:2, March, 1960)
“Use Of Water Tray Fixtures Again Recommended
When the First Presidency, in meeting with the Presiding Bishopric, approved the water tray fixtures here illustrated, they felt that the adoption of these cup holders would eliminate the undesirable practice of passing baskets or other containers after the water trays to gather empty cups. The use of these devices, it was felt, would also make unnecessary the passing of empty cups from person to person or the return of the cups directly to the water trays.
This fixture was first introduced in the Messenger for January-February, 1959 (Number 35). Once again we urge bishops to consider its advantages. It will fit most rectangular trays without difficulty; a small percentage will require an adjustment which will result in the loss of a few cups. See the Messenger No. 35 for specifications.
New dripless, self-contained Sacrament Sets were introduced in the Messenger for August-September 1959 (Number 41) and October 1959 (Number 42). These provide for cup gathering without the use of these cup holders. Bishops who have not ordered these sets and who do not contemplate doing so are urged to add the device pictured here, to the trays currently being used.
In Sacrament services, time is not of the essence. It is a mistake to try to get the Sacrament administration–the prime purpose for the meeting’s existence–over with as fast as possible. Emphasis should be placed on spirituality and tranquillity, rather than on haste. If it takes a little more time to pass the Sacrament properly, such investment in time is well made.
We feel that these new trays, and the device here pictured, are in keeping with this emphasis.
These cup holders are available at the Deseret Book Company, 44 East South Temple in Salt Lake City. Price for the one-piece attachment is $5.00 postpaid plus the old handle.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 48:1, April, 1960)
“Instructions, Cautions Concerning Marriage Offered to Bishops
Latter-day Saint bishops are often called upon to perform marriages. In a sense this is unfortunate, for as we know, there is but only one really proper place to enter this contract–in a temple of the Lord. Still, free will is part of the gospel plan and if a couple chooses not to avail themselves of the blessings that come through a temple marriage, they are within their rights. The bishop, if called upon, should make the event as pleasant and memorable as possible.
There are certain cautions that must be observed, however. First, these marriages should under no circumstances be performed on the Sabbath day.
Second, sectarian patterns and customs should be avoided. Occasionally a couple will request that candles, incense or other articles utilized in religious marriage ceremonies of other faiths be employed. These are out of place, as are kneeling during the ceremony and other practices foreign to our faith.
Bishops should do all within their means to create a warm, solemn and inspirational atmosphere. This can be done, however, without inclusion of such devices and practices as those above mentioned. The pattern of the service itself should conform largely to the civil marriage ceremony. Bishops should familiarize themselves with state and Church law as to where and when these marriages may be performed.
Marriage is a sacred and very important occurrence in the lives of those participating, and bishops should follow the wishes of the couple whenever possible. He should, however, refuse to allow practices he knows to be inconsistent with the standards and traditions of the Church to enter the ceremony.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 48:1, April, 1960)
“Susquehana Memorial Dedication Set For Saturday, June 18TH
…It was in the Harmony area that the Melchizedek Priesthood was also restored, soon after the Aaronic. Many revelations, including a large portion of the Book of Moses, date from the period in which the Prophet lived in Harmony. Much of the Book of Mormon was here translated.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 50:2, June, 1960)
“Wives Not To Act As Ward Teachers
It has been reported that wives are sometimes accompanying their husbands on their ward teaching visits.
This practice is clearly inconsistent with the order of the Church. Ward teaching is a function that has been specifically set aside for the Priesthood to fulfill.
Ward teachers are not to teach alone, but should seek other Priesthood bearers to accompany them. If a teacher finds his regular companion unable to go for any reason, he should either find a substitute himself or report to his division supervisor, who will do so.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 51:2, July, 1960)
“Twelve Years of Age Now Minimum Requirement For Baptisms For the Dead
(The following letter, sent during July from the Presiding Bishopric’s Office to all bishops, is herewith reprinted. Further instructions will follow in The Improvement Era and the Church News.)
Special to All Bishops
Re: Minimum Ages for Those to be
Baptized for the Dead
The First Presidency have directed the Presiding Bishopric to instruct bishops that worth members of the Church, desiring to be baptized for the dead, are to be twelve years of age or older. Worthy bearers of the Aaronic Priesthood 12 to 21 and young women of corresponding ages should especially be encouraged and invited to participate in this vicarious work.
We respectfully suggest that the Ward Genealogical Committee be immediately informed in order that their requests for persons to be baptized for the dead may conform to this recommendation.
Faithfully your brethren,
THE PRESIDING BISHOPRIC
[Signed Joseph A. Wirthlin
Thorpe B. Isaacson
Carl W. Buehner]” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 52:1, August, 1960)
“Sacrament Coverings Pastel Cream, Buff Shades Acceptable
We have received inquiry of late concerning the possibility of using pastel shades of cream or buff as Sacrament table cloths. We have discussed the matter with the First Presidency, who see no objection to these near-white shades if they are in good taste.
White is probably to be preferred, and vividly-colored cloths should not be used.
Lace and linen cloths are acceptable.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 53:1, September, 1960)
“Teachers Need Not Be Set Apart
Teachers in the auxiliary organizations of the Church do not need to be set apart.
“There is no reason to set apart teachers in classes or chairmen of groups. If we continue to do this, after awhile some may think these positions have become permanent offices in the Priesthood.” (Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, 1956, vol. 3, p. 107)
As was mentioned in The Messenger for March 1959 (Number 36), a person called to serve as a teacher may desire a special blessing. If so, there is no harm in giving such a blessing, but it is not a setting apart and the words “set apart,” or other words with the same meaning, should not be used.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 53:1, September, 1960)
“Ward Teachers May Administer To Sick
Ward teachers are sometimes called upon to administer to the sick as they make their rounds. This is in keeping with their calling; as Priesthood bearers they should answer this call whenever it comes.
A special problem is presented, however, if one of the teachers holds the Aaronic Priesthood and thus is unable to anoint or seal the anointing. This can be solved if there is another Melchizedek Priesthood bearer in the house; if so, he can join the ward teacher bearing the higher Priesthood in the administration. Otherwise, it might be necessary to call in a friend or neighbor bearing the Melchizedek Priesthood.
If desired, the young ward teacher bearing the Aaronic Priesthood can participate by offering a prayer before the actual administration takes place.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 53:2, September, 1960)
“Ward Teaching Members’ Confidence To Be Respected
Occasionally a pair of ward teachers may be taken into the confidence of assigned families and told personal matters. Such revelations should be treated by the teachers as confidential and not passed on further than intended. Often they are things that should be, and that the family expects to be, brought to the attention of the bishop. The bishop should be informed in this case, but the repetition should stop there.
The calling of a ward teacher, of course, is not to be a private investigator and he should not pry into the private lives of his families. But he should create a warm friendly relationship that will help the families feel that they can come to the teachers when they have problems.
Sometimes the senior companion will find it wise to instruct his junior companion concerning the nature of personal and confidential matters and his responsibility of such confidence be given. Both companions should so conduct their lives and teaching that they might be worthy of such confidence.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 53:2, September, 1960)
“Missionary Training for Aaronic Priesthood Announced by the Presiding Bishopric
It has been suggested by The First Presidency that all Aaronic Priesthood bearers 12 to 21 years of age be given special training for missionary work and that this assignment be set in motion as soon as possible.
In keeping with this suggestion, the Presiding Bishopric announce that, beginning January 1961, the time of the Ward Aaronic Priesthood Meeting, the second Sunday in each month, will be devoted to missionary training. Since bishops and their counselors are the only members of the Melchizedek Priesthood to attend this particular meeting, it will be their responsibility to provide leadership in this new training program.
The plan provides for the preparation of a missionary training lesson to be sent to each bishop well in advance of each monthly Aaronic Priesthood meeting. On assignment by the bishop, he or one of his counselors will carefully study the outline, make adequate preparation, and present the lesson as detailed.
It should be understood that any urgent matters which the bishop feels should be brought to the attention of all Aaronic Priesthood bearers in this combined meeting should be presented in addition to the presentation of the lesson on missionary training.
This is only the beginning of our project. Plans are already taking shape for the preparation of new courses of study for weekly quorum meetings and it is hoped these can be ready for 1962. In the meantime, our regular lesson outlines for 1961 have already been printed and these should be followed as closely as possible.
Quorum advisers should be encouraged and urged to slant the 1961 lessons to missionary training until the lessons for 1962 are introduced.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 55:1, December, 1960)
“Aaronic Priesthood Under 21
Change Noted in Age For Ordination to Melchizedek Priesthood
Heretofore, bishops have been authorized to recommend, to the stake presidency, worthy young men to be ordained to the Melchizedek Priesthood at nineteen years of age.
Instructions appearing in the 1961 revised Handbook for Leaders of Aaronic Priesthood Under 21, p. 58, are quoted below and supersede all previous directives on this matter:
A worthy bearer of the Aaronic Priesthood should be recommended by the bishop to the stake presidency for advancement to the Melchizedek Priesthood, (1) when called on a mission, [at age nineteen] or (2) when being married in the temple, or (3) when becoming twenty years of age.
Under this new rule, an overage priest will be one between the ages of twenty and twenty-one.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 57:1, February-March, 1961)
“PRIESTHOOD
“I say to you emphatically that Priesthood in this Church comes first. It is not superseded by any other activity or organization. It takes first place. The Priesthood of God was restored before the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was organized. The Priesthood of God was restored before we had work for the dead. The Priesthood of God was restored before we had missionary work. The Priesthood of God was restored before we had all of the great auxiliaries that are helps to the Priesthood. I hope with all my heart that you presidencies of the Aaronic Priesthood will give your first consideration to your Priesthood responsibilities.” (Presiding Bishop Joseph L. Wirthlin)” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 58:1, April, 1961)
“Advisers to Senior Members Require Careful Selection
We urge bishops to make a careful selection of advisers to senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood. Men should be called as advisers who by experience and temperament can accomplish the objective of motivating inactive men and to prepare them for ordination to the Melchizedek Priesthood. Our goal is not just a matter of filling committees. The value of a committee is determined in proportion to their accomplishments. We must, therefore, plan our work to accomplish our work.
Group advisers are to be active men who will make frequent visits with assigned senior members and invite them to various social activities, sacrament meeting, priesthood meeting, stake conferences, and teach them the gospel in their homes. These are just a few things he should do, the extent of which he must judge in relation to the particular man involved. This is in addition to the monthly visit the adviser will make with his ward teaching companion.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 58:2, April, 1961)
“Visits to Senior Members of the Aaronic Priesthood
Each visit made by members of the ward Aaronic Priesthood Committee for senior members which includes the bishopric, general secretary, and group advisers should be recorded on the monthly report. Visits made by members of stake committees to senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood should also be included.
This report is for visits made by the leadership in the program for senior members. Those who are officially appointed are to be set apart to stake and ward committees for senior members. Visits made by these men should be given credit on the monthly report. Visits made, whoever, by auxiliary organization members and those who are not officially called and set apart to the Aaronic Priesthood Committee for senior members (including wives) should not be given credit on the report.
It is the practice for bishops to set apart those who are called to work on the ward committee for senior members of the Aaronic Priesthood. On the other hand, ward teachers are not to be set apart, as ward teaching is a general priesthood function.
In the new integrating visit program, bishops should call a qualified man to be general secretary and capable men to serve as group advisers. These men should be set apart by the bishopric. Group advisers thus chosen should then be appointed as senior ward teaching companions to teach the senior member families of his assigned group. They should not be set apart for their ward teaching assignments.
Please refer to your handbook, page 32, for further instructions for reporting visits to senior members.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 59:1, May, 1961)
“SACRAMENT PREPARATION
The sacred nature of the Sacrament demands that its preparation be given a high priority of consideration by the bishopric. Special attention should be given to the filling of water trays to avoid “dripping water”; neither should there be a display of lightness or frivolity during its preparation and administration.
Presidents of the Aaronic Priesthood should not permit an irreverent or undesirable pattern to be set by not having the Sacrament preparation completed well in advance of the starting time of the meeting.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 59:2, May, 1961)
“Use of Right Hand in Partaking of Sacrament
The right hand should be used when partaking of the sacrament. The use of the right hand is a symbol of righteousness; and is not only a well-established custom in the performing of ordinances in the Church, but also has received divine sanction. Encouragement should be given where necessary to continue this practice.
For additional information on the subject of using the right hand, read Answers to Gospel Questions, Volume I, Page 151, by Joseph Fielding Smith.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 62:2, August, 1961)
“Bishoprics To Select, Interview and Assign Ward Teachers
Reports come to us that some bishoprics are still delegating to ward teaching division supervisors the responsibility of selecting, interviewing, and assigning ward teachers to companions and districts. This is not correct procedure. The division supervisor may recommend prospective ward teachers to the bishopric, but Priesthood members who serve in this capacity are personal representatives of the bishopric and should therefore be interviewed by a member of the bishopric.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 64:1, October, 1961)
“Interviewing Suggestions
A new booklet, giving suggestions for conducting interviews, has bene prepared for distribution to all bishops and stake presidents. This publication will be automatically mailed within a few weeks.
Interviews properly conducted provide an ideal opportunity to help the youth of the Church avoid making serious mistakes. An interview or confession to a bishop or stake president is called a “privilege communication” under the traditional English common law system and other modern law. Church leaders are therefore exempt in a court of law unless the permission of the confessing party is obtained. The calling to counsel and interview in the Church imposes trust and confidence upon bishops and stake presidents that should not be violated.
This new publication, treating suggestions for interviewing, should help leaders to become more effective in this work.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 66:2, December, 1961)
“Teachers to Prepare The Sacrament
The ordained teachers in the Aaronic Priesthood have the responsibility of preparing the sacrament in the ward. In the event there are no teachers over and under 21, the priests over and under 21 are given this responsibility. Under no circumstances are the young ladies or the women of the ward to prepare the sacrament. They may launder and provide clean linen used on the sacrament table, but they are not to participate further.
The bishop should make certain that adult supervision is provide during the preparation of the sacrament to insure that an atmosphere of reverence and respect is present. It is saddening to receive an occasional report of young men being permitted to display light mindedness and frivolity while attending to this sacred ordinance. It is also important that the sacrament table be prepared well in advance of the starting time of the meeting and properly cleaned after the service.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 68:2, February, 1962)
“MEMORANDUM TO BISHOPS AND STAKE PRESIDENTS
When Jethro observed Moses sitting from morning until evening judging and counseling the children of Israel, he questioned, “why sittest thou thyself alone, and all the people stand by thee from morning unto even?” (Exodus 18:14.) Jethro then counseled Moses, “Thou wilt surely wear away, both thou, and this people that is with thee: for this thing is too heavy for thee; thou art not able to perform it thyself alone.” (Ibid. 18:18.) From this point Moses was taught how to organize his work, “…so shall it be easier for thyself, and they (others) shall bear the burden with thee.” (Ibid. 18:22.)
In our present complex society the programming of the Church becomes more extensive than that among our progenitors. It is obvious that many bishops are carrying burdens that tend to dissipate and divert their energies from fundamental pastoral duties. The bishops should arrange their schedule so as not to be encumbered, neither neglect the essence of their ministry.
Bishops are presidents of the Aaronic Priesthood in their respective wards. They preside as bishops because of this presidency. scriptural descriptions of bishops’ invested authority include administration of five fundamental areas of responsibility, which are (a) president of the Aaronic Priesthood, (b) spiritual father of the ward, (c) care of the needy, (d) finances, and (e) common judge. Like Moses of old, it is essential that they surround themselves with adequate assistants to perform this work. It is therefore suggested:
1. The bishops delegate responsibility and power to counselors. Delegation is not a process of asking persons to do chores, run errands, or give orders. The gist of delegation is:
a. Responsibility shared with subordinate.
b. Authority given to perform that responsibility.
c. Decision-making shared with or left largely to one.
d. Freedom given to take action to reach objective.
2. That bishoprics need not attend all auxiliary functions and meetings. Frequently, the time required for such attendance can be used more profitably.
3. That bishops use the administrative machinery of the Church. auxiliary superintendencies and presidencies should act as the responsible officers of the auxiliaries. Let the duly called and constituted officers be responsible to operate their respective organizations.
Bishoprics should use their monthly leadership meetings more effectively. These meetings afford ample opportunity to acquaint the bishopric with the full operation of the ward. All activities can be here coordinated. It is not required that a bishopric know all the intricate workings of the auxiliary organizations. In this respect, they must rely upon the auxiliary presidents and superintendents. The monthly leadership meeting provides the bishopric with an ideal opportunity to teach and train ward personnel in leadership and administrative techniques.
Stake presidencies should plan their monthly meeting with ward bishoprics to provide adequate time to present instructions, leadership training, and other necessary information, thereby avoiding the necessity of calling ward bishoprics to several miscellaneous meetings throughout the month. In this meeting the stake presidencies may deem it advisable occasionally to invite the stake leaders of a particular auxiliary to present items for the bishopric’s information. Stake presidencies are urged to carefully analyze their practices and requirements affecting the time of ward bishoprics. They should protect their bishoprics form being encumbered or subject to the well-meaning demands and desires of others that tend to divert attention from their primary calling as a bishopric. Only in rare cases should stake presidencies require the attendance of a member of a bishopric to a stake auxiliary meeting, and in this exception the invitation should come form the president of the stake and not from the auxiliary. The Church is to be led and directed by the priesthood, not by the auxiliaries to the priesthood. Stake presidents should instruct high counselors and others assigned by them to arrange appointments to meet with the bishoprics during the week to discuss the promotion of various Church programs and not attempt to seek impromptu audiences with the bishopric on Sunday. The bishop and his counselors must be free on Sunday to circulate among the Saints and extend warm greetings and words of encouragement.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 74:1, August, 1962)
“Basic Meeting That One Or More Members of the Bishopric Are Require to Attend
1. Weekly Bishopric’s council meeting
2. Weekly ward welfare committee meeting
3. Weekly ward priesthood meeting
4. Weekly sacrament meeting
5. Monthly fast and testimony meeting
6. Monthly ward teachers report meeting
7. Monthly ward teachers committee meeting
8. Monthly stake priesthood meeting
9. Monthly ward boy leadership council meeting
10. Monthly council meeting for ward committee for Aaronic Priesthood over 21
11. Monthly ward leadership meeting (auxiliaries)
12. Monthly bishopric’s meeting with stake presidency
13. Monthly girl leadership meeting
14. Monthly building coordination meeting (where one or more wards occupy a building.)
15. Monthly high priests quorum meeting
16. Monthly district scout meeting
17. Bi-monthly stake welfare meeting
18. Special meetings connected with ward conference, stake conference, and general conference
19. Bishop’s court when required
20. Youth firesides” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 74:2, August, 1962)
“Bishop, Give All An Opportunity to Serve
…4. It is usually better if the bishopric’s wives are in the background sustaining their husbands and not serving as officers in ward organizations, thus denying some other family of having leadership influence in their home.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 76:1, October, 1962)
Supplement to booklet “Interviewing Boys”
When To Interview
We cannot over-emphasize the necessity of both the bishop and his counselors becoming well acquainted with every boy under their jurisdiction. This is especially true of the bishop. As president of the Aaronic Priesthood in the ward, he will want to know the environment, habits, hobbies, desires, and aspirations of all for whom he has an especial responsibility. A genuine interest by the bishop will enhance his own influence and deepen the boy’s love and respect in return.
As the bishop,you will conduct many interviews with your boys of the Aaronic Priesthood. Some of these interviews will be less formal than others. The most important element in this part of your work will be attunement with our Father in heaven. Pray and live worthy of divine guidance, and you will know which boy needs your most particular attention and the appropriate approach to use for him. Following is a suggested outline of occasions upon which an interview should be conducted with every boy.
1. The bishop is to interview and issue a recommend for baptism to a boy when he reaches the age of accountability. What a wonderful opportunity for the bishop and a boy to become better acquainted. This can be an occasion of great influence upon the boy’s life. Make it rewarding and inspirational.
2. When a boy is approaching twelve years of age, the bishop will interview him in private, preparatory to his receiving the priesthood. Afterward, it is recommended that a conference be held between the parents, the boy, and the bishop (or bishopric) to explain the programs, opportunities, and obligations of priesthood service. This priesthood orientation conference with the parents brings about greater parental encouragement to the boy.
3. Annually, it is required that the bishop personally interview each Aaronic Priesthood bearer, ages 12 to 21, to determine whether he is worthy to receive the individual Aaronic Priesthood award. Any boy who does not qualify for an individual award should be given special attention. obviously, the boy who has not qualified is in need of more encouragement and help.
4. Prior to every ordination in the priesthood, the boy is to be interviewed to determine his worthiness to be ordained to or advanced in the Aaronic Priesthood. He should be ordained or advanced only when such ordination s will bring blessings to him. Only the worthy boy is blessed in receiving greater priesthood responsibility. also, when a boy is called to serve in any office in the quorum, he is likewise to be interviewed.
5. Special interviews will also be conducted as appropriate. It is natural that some boys will require far more time and attention than others.
Each interview should be conducted in an atmosphere of friendship and good will without any feelings of criticism or fault finding. Interviews properly conducted provide an ideal opportunity to help the youth of the Church avoid making serious mistakes. An interview or confession to a bishop or stake president is called a “privilege communication” under the traditional English common law system and other modern law. The calling to counsel and interview in the Church imposes trust and confidence upon bishops and stake presidents that should not be violated. The Scottish novelist and poet, George MacDonald, clearly stated our responsibility when he said, “To be trusted is a greater compliment than to be loved.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 79:1, January, 1963) [What about girls?]
“The First Presidency has approved the following revision of the General Handbook of Instructions, page 46.
MONTHLY MEETING OF BISHOPRIC AND WARD OFFICERS
The bishop and his counselors should hold a monthly meeting with their ward officers (superintendencies, presidencies, secretaries, and other special individuals as the bishop may invite to attend). This meeting should provide opportunity for the bishopric to hear reports, discuss problems, and give instructions for improvement of ward work. Careful inquiry should be made, by the bishopric, of the progress of the work being accomplished, and an expression of appreciation for meritorious service should be made.
A significant part of the meeting should be devoted to training ward officers in the procedures of Church government and in leadership techniques. The following are examples of a few of the subjects bishops may choose to discuss: how to hold weekly council meetings; deportment and dignity of leaders; dependability; moral responsibility; encourage regular sacrament meeting attendance; fasting, fast offerings; and paying tithing in full.
It is preferable to have the auxiliaries conduct their monthly department meetings on another evening, subsequent to the meeting with the bishopric, when adequate time would be available for departmental sessions. It is of vital importance that the bishopric monthly meeting of ward officers be held at a time each month when all personnel can be in attendance without conflict of schedule. It is likewise advisable to hold the auxiliary organization leadership meetings with their teachers each month at a regular time or as scheduled in their specific program.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 79:1, January, 1963)
“AARONIC PRIESTHOOD BEARERS NOT TO SERVE AS STAKE MISSIONARIES
It has been observed that in some instances boys holding the Aaronic Priesthood have been called to serve as stake missionaries, thus removing them from the jurisdiction of their bishop and frustrating their participating in the Aaronic Priesthood program.
We specifically request that such boys not be called to serve as stake missionaries. the Lord has instructed that those holding the Aaronic Priesthood are to be presided over and directed in their activities by the bishop. nothing should be done to deter or prevent all boys from participation in the scheduled activities and duties of the Aaronic Priesthood. They should, however, cooperate in the missionary effort since every member is to be a missionary.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 79:2, January, 1963)
“JUST A REMINDER, BISHOP
You are to personally interview all young people who come to the temple to be baptized for the dead. This is not the responsibility of the stake and ward Genealogical Committee.
No person should receive a recommend to the temple for any purpose unless he is believed to be worthy in every respect. Unworthiness disqualifies him.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 84:1, June, 1963)
“BISHOPRIC’S RESPONSIBLE FOR GIRLS AND BOYS
As President McKay discusses the ward bishopric’s responsibilities toward boys of the Aaronic Priesthood, almost without exception, he adds the phrase, “and girls of corresponding ages.” Our concern for the girls in the Church must be just as real as that for the boys.
A truly effective bishop multiplies himself through his ward leaders. His Girls’ Program will be most effective as he successfully communicates his spirit and kindly direction through the leaders and teachers of the Y.W.M.I.A.
Every girl is entitled to a warm and friendly attitude toward her bishop so that the personal private interview with him can be a rich and rewarding experience in her life. The frequency of this interview will be influenced by information gleaned by the bishop through his monthly meeting with the teachers and leaders of girls. The importance of this meeting cannot be overemphasized.
May the Lord bless each bishop of the Church to be sensitive to the needs of the girls, that they may have ample opportunity for service and expression in connection with their achievement programs.
May we ever be mindful of the thought expressed by President McKay when he said, “The spirituality of a ward will be commensurate with the activity of the youth in that ward…for they will mold the moral atmosphere of the ward.”
The bishop is the key to the fulfillment of this prophetic statement.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 85:1, July, 1963)
“RETURNED MISSIONARIES TO BE INTERVIEWED
(The following letter was sent to all stake presidents, bishops and independent branch presidents)
Dear Brethren:
Bishops are requested to have a thorough interview with returning missionaries. As missionaries return home, they need guidance in making the necessary social adjustments. It should be emphasized to them that they are still missionaries, and their conduct should continue to set a noble example for the Church in the community.
It is noted that some young men are neglecting to discipline themselves properly and are succumbing to the evils of necking and petting. Young men need to be cautioned to make a better personal adjustment, particularly in their relationship to girls. They should avoid being too free and aggressive in their deportment with the opposite sex.
Such an interview can help individuals gain insight into their own responsibilities to be discreet and to continue to be missionaries in their new endeavors.
Sincerely,
THE PRESIDING BISHOPRIC
[Signed] [John H. Vandereberg
Robert L. Simpson
Victor L Brown]”(Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 86:1, August, 1963)
“JUST A REMINDER, BISHOP
Only those who bear the priesthood should be called upon to offer opening and closing prayers in Sacrament meeting, including Fast meeting.
The following is a quotation from an earlier statement issued by The First Presidency: “Our sisters may participate in offering prayers in the meetings of the auxiliary organizations when desired, but we feel that the brethren holding the Priesthood should offer the prayers in sacrament meetings.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 86:1, August, 1963)
“OUR DESIRE SHOULD BE TO SAVE TOOLS
It is suggested that bishops exercise wisdom when it is reported that a certain family has refused admittance to the ward teachers or home teachers. At no time should one suggest to a member who is irritated that it would be best if his name were removed from the rolls of the Church. When confronted with this problem, bishoprics should go to these people in the spirit of kindness and exert every effort to maintain their friendship and good will. As Solomon declared: “A soft answer turneth away wrath.” (Proverbs 15:1)
We should be patient and long suffering with the wayward.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 86:2, August, 1963)
“THE PRIESTHOOD HOME TEACHING CORRELATION PROGRAM
The Priesthood Home Teaching Correlation Program will officially commence operation throughout the wards and stakes in the Church on January 1, 1964. It is “one of our most urgent and rewarding opportunities,” said President McKay, “to nurture and inspire, to counsel and direct our father’s children in all that pertains to life.”
Throughout the Church there is great enthusiasm for commencing this program. We discourage, however, any stake or ward form prematurely introducing this program since no report books or record sheets will be available except for use after January 1. There is still much to be done in training and preparing all Home Teachers. Home Teachers’ training courses should be conducted under the direction of the ward Home Teaching committee.
Following the challenge to organize the program given by the stake Home Teaching committee, the ward Home Teaching committee should act in accordance with the letter of instructions from the First Presidency in setting up a sufficient number of orientation training sessions. They should be fitted into the priesthood schedule of meetings so as to lose no time in getting the program under way January 1, 1964.
We urge that special attention be given to the calling of Home Teachers as outlined on page F-26 of the Leader’s Handbook as follows:
Interview each Home Teacher and discuss his families with him. It would be desirable for the leaders to meet briefly with Home Teachers in pairs after the call has been made to them individually.
Explain what is expected of each Home Teacher in the way of performance, in showing love and interest in each of his families, and in being a worthy exemplar of the Cause he represent.
Discuss challenges given where appropriate for each member of every assigned family, and determine jointly with the senior companion Home Teacher (and his partner, if desirable) a date for achieving each challenge.
Urge the prospective Home Teacher to strive sincerely to fulfill his responsibilities, including attendance at priesthood meeting, sacrament meeting, and any training sessions or other activities in connection with the Home Teaching program.
Train all Home Teachers to become familiar with their handbook and to know the program, the same as you, as leaders, are expected to know all details of this divine work. Particular attention should be given to page A-2 of the Leader’s handbook which indicates the scope of the Home Teaching program in the correlation of activities of the priesthood and other church organization sin relationship to the home. Study carefully the pamphlet “Know Your Leader’s Handbook.”
All Melchizedek Priesthood quorum and group instructors should complete the study course for 1963(Jesus the Christ) on the first Sunday in December. The last three Sunday priesthood classes will be devoted to additional orientation and training of Home Teachers. Material for this purpose will be in the hands of all stake presidents for distribution to bishops in sufficient time.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 89:1, November, 1963)
“SCHEDULE OF BASIC MEETINGS
The following is a list of the basic meetings that one or more members of the bishopric are required to attend. With the introduction of the Priesthood Home Teaching Correlation Program, January 1, 1964, a revision of the basic meetings has been made to conform to the new program.
This list of meetings may be altered or combined as directed by subsequent instructions.
1. Weekly meeting of the ward bishop with his counselors
2. Weekly ward welfare committee meeting.
3. Weekly ward priesthood meeting
4. Weekly sacrament meeting
5. Monthly fast and testimony meeting
6. Monthly meeting of the ward home teachers committee
7. Monthly stake priesthood meeting
8. Monthly Ward Aaronic Priesthood Under 21 leadership meeting
9. Monthly ward leadership meeting for Aaronic Priesthood over 21
10. Monthly ward council–(New)–See Home Teaching handbook.
11. Monthly bishopric’s meeting with stake presidency
12. Monthly girl leadership meeting.
13. Monthly building coordination meeting (where one or more wards occupy a building)
14. Monthly high priests quorum meeting.
16. Monthly district scout meeting.
16. Bi-monthly stake welfare meeting
17. Priests’ cottage meetings
18. Aaronic Priesthood missionary committee
19. Special meetings connected with ward conference, stake conference, and general conference
20. Bishop’s court when required
21. Youth firesides.”(Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 90:2, December, 1963)
“TO ALL PRESIDENTS OF STAKES,
TO ALL PRESIDENTS OF MISSIONS,
TO ALL BISHOPS OF WARDS
Dear Brethren:
` Occasionally, inquiry is made as to the propriety of a person holding the Melchizedek Priesthood administering and passing the sacrament to members of his immediate family while on vacation or while living in areas far removed from any organized unit of the Church.
We are directed by the First Presidency to inform you that worthy members of the Melchizedek Priesthood who are removed from the church organization for an extended period of time (months) because of employment may upon written approval administer and pass the sacrament to their own family in a home meeting.
Persons desiring such approval should write to their bishop or branch president detailing the circumstances involved. He, in turn, will make his recommendation to the Presiding Bishopric for determination of approval. Vacations, tours, etc. are not to be considered as valid justification to seek this required approval for administering the sacrament.
Very truly yours,
[Signed] [John H. Vandereberg
Robert L. Simpson
Victor L Brown]” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 92:1, February, 1964)
“TEMPLE RECOMMENDS REQUIRE SIGNATURE OF STAKE OR MISSION PRESIDENT
A number of temple recommends which have not been signed by the stake or mission president have been presented by members at the temples. Since all individuals holding such incomplete recommends must be referred to the First Presidency for clearance and approval, it is necessary that we reiterate the following instructions:
“The recommend should be made in triplicate, and filled out properly and signed by the bishop or branch president which indicates that the applicant has been carefully interrogated and found worthy to go through the Temple of the Most High. The white and buff copies are to be delivered to the stake or mission president for his signature after he has also conducted a personal interview with the applicant.” (The General Handbook of Instructions, page 73)
As a matter of routine procedure, the bishop when issuing a recommend should instruct the applicant to deliver the necessary copies of the recommend to the stake or mission president for the required personal interview and signature.
When the signature of the stake or mission authority has been omitted, the applicant usually indicates that he did not know that this was necessary. To avoid such situations we suggest that bishops give complete instructions to each applicant.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 92:1, February, 1964)
“AARONIC PRIESTHOOD TO DO HOME TEACHING
There seems to be a peculiar philosophy in some stakes that Home Teaching is not a program for members of the Aaronic Priesthood. To dispel any such notion, we urge you to read the Doctrine and Covenants, Section 20 which contains a clear pronouncement from the Lord to the effect that it is the duty of teachers and priests to actively participate in such activities. Where there are more teachers and priests than needed the senior home teacher may have two boys assigned, with whom he can alternate in visiting the assigned homes.
There is also an immediate need to emphasize the Aaronic Priesthood’s role in the missionary program outlined in the Aaronic Priesthood Handbook, page. 48.
Every year the Presiding Bishopric receives a number of letters. The central theme is to seek exceptions for young men to receive their Certificate of Achievement because they were not provided the opportunity to meet the requirements. Such leadership failure cannot justify the issuance of an award to a boy for something he did not do. We especially urge bishops and stake presidents to give this matter their immediate attention.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 98:2, August, 1964)
“CHANGE OF TERMINOLOGY IN THE AARONIC PRIESTHOOD
In a letter dated June 4, 1964, from the First Presidency, the following terminology was authorized to be used in referring to the young men and adults who hold the Aaronic Priesthood:
Aaronic Priesthood–Youth
Aaronic Priesthood–Adult
This change will replace the previous designation of Aaronic Priesthood under 21 and Aaronic Priesthood over 21.
Please inform all personnel who are assigned to the Aaronic Priesthood program of this change.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 98:2, August, 1964)
“CONSECRATED OIL CONTAINER
It has come to our attention that the shell of a ball point pen has been manufactured and identified for use of “consecrated oil.”
We urge you to ignore any solicitation for this item. If you are acquainted with anyone who uses it, this should be discontinued immediately.” (Presiding Bishopric, The Messenger, 99:2, September, 1964)